Notebookcheck

联想 IdeaPad 110-15ACL (A8-7410, 高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

体力不足。 联想的这台15.6寸笔记本电脑售价约350欧元(约2558人民币)。它的亮点在1TB硬盘和8GB内存。不过,选购的用户需要接受一颗较慢的处理器和较短的电池续航。
Sascha Mölck, Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AMD Carrizo Laptop / Notebook Windows
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE (IdeaPad 110 Series)
Processor
AMD A8-7410 4 x 2.2 - 2.5 GHz, Carrizo-L
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), Core: 847 MHz, 单通道, Crimson 17.2.1
Memory
8192 MB 
, DDR3-1600, 单通道, 一个内存槽(已占用)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 100 PPI, BOE NT156WHM-N32, TN LED, glossy: yes
Mainboard
AMD KernCZ
Storage
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, 1024 GB 
, 850 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC235 @ AMD Avalon FCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD读卡器, TPM 2.0
Networking
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8101/2/3 Family Fast Ethernet NIC (10/100MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.0
Optical drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE0N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 378 x 265
Battery
24 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 标清
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, Cyberlink Power2Go 8, Cyberlink PowerDVD 14, MS Office 365 (试用), McAfee LiveSafe (试用), 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.2 kg, Power Supply: 168 g
Price
349 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Connectivity

Right: DVD burner, cable-lock slot
Right: DVD burner, cable-lock slot
Left: power-in, One Key Recovery button, HDMI, Fast-Ethernet, USB 2.0 (Type-A), USB 3.1 Gen. 1 (Type-A), combo audio
Left: power-in, One Key Recovery button, HDMI, Fast-Ethernet, USB 2.0 (Type-A), USB 3.1 Gen. 1 (Type-A), combo audio
Front: SD-card reader
Front: SD-card reader
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus F540SA-XX087T
 
33 MB/s ∼100% +24%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
 
26.6 MB/s ∼81%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
 
22.7 MB/s ∼69% -15%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
 
17.8 MB/s ∼54% -33%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
 
39.4 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
 
36.7 MB/s ∼93% -7%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
 
26.6 MB/s ∼68% -32%
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
312 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
272 MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
315 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
186 MBit/s ∼59% -41%
265
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
235
cd/m²
235
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
228
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NT156WHM-N32
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 265 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 245.7 cd/m² Minimum: 8.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 253 cd/m²
Contrast: 575:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.2 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 11.05 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.23% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.39% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.55
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60
Asus F540SA-XX087T
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60
Display
-6%
2%
-5%
7%
Display P3 Coverage
37.39
35.28
-6%
38.04
2%
35.43
-5%
40.17
7%
sRGB Coverage
56.23
53.15
-5%
57.18
2%
53.34
-5%
60.03
7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
38.63
36.45
-6%
39.3
2%
36.6
-5%
41.54
8%
Response Times
2%
13%
1%
26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
58
48 ?(26, 22)
17%
43 ?(21, 22, Plateau)
26%
42.4 ?(14.8, 27.6)
27%
20 ?(10, 10)
66%
Response Time Black / White *
23
26 ?(9, 17)
-13%
23 ?(7, 16, Plateau)
-0%
28.8 ?(10.8, 18)
-25%
20 ?(12, 8)
13%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(90)
200 ?(90)
0%
Screen
-16%
-15%
-25%
9%
Brightness middle
253
225
-11%
201
-21%
199.8
-21%
215
-15%
Brightness
246
246
0%
202
-18%
199
-19%
200
-19%
Brightness Distribution
86
86
0%
92
7%
85
-1%
87
1%
Black Level *
0.44
0.46
-5%
0.67
-52%
0.712
-62%
0.26
41%
Contrast
575
489
-15%
300
-48%
281
-51%
827
44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
9.2
13.57
-48%
10.36
-13%
13.24
-44%
13.07
-42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
17.68
22.91
-30%
18.88
-7%
21.52
-22%
16.06
9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
11.05
15.07
-36%
11.06
-0%
13.33
-21%
4.34
61%
Gamma
2.55 86%
2.27 97%
2.56 86%
1.69 130%
2.48 89%
CCT
11451 57%
22046 29%
11368 57%
15879 41%
7212 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36
34
-6%
36
0%
33.8
-6%
38
6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
56
53
-5%
57
2%
53.4
-5%
60
7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-7% / -11%
0% / -8%
-10% / -18%
14% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20848 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
1917
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
6169
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
2819
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
50 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
166 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
17.25 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
82 Points ∼29% +64%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
53 Points ∼19% +6%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD A8-7410
52 Points ∼18% +4%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
52 Points ∼18% +4%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
50 Points ∼17%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
37 Points ∼13% -26%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
33 Points ∼12% -34%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
210 Points ∼2% +27%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD A8-7410
174 Points ∼2% +5%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
174 Points ∼2% +5%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
166 Points ∼2%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
165 Points ∼2% -1%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
68 Points ∼1% -59%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
61 Points ∼1% -63%
Cinebench R10
Shading 32Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
5601 Points ∼24% +99%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
3223 Points ∼14% +14%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
2819 Points ∼12%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
2681 Points ∼11% -5%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
2510 Points ∼11% -11%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
2265 Points ∼10% -20%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD A8-7410
1746 Points ∼7% -38%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
6953 Points ∼9% +13%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
6169 Points ∼8%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
5149 Points ∼7% -17%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD A8-7410
4665 Points ∼6% -24%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
4428 Points ∼6% -28%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
2256 Points ∼3% -63%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
1978 Points ∼3% -68%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
1907 Points ∼39% +46%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
1395 Points ∼29% +7%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
1307 Points ∼27%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD A8-7410
1205 Points ∼25% -8%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
865 Points ∼18% -34%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
4563 Points ∼6% +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
4093 Points ∼5% +4%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
3918 Points ∼5%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD A8-7410
3456 Points ∼4% -12%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
1583 Points ∼2% -60%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
1581 Points ∼24% +17%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
1356 Points ∼21%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
4364 Points ∼11% +26%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
3460 Points ∼8%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel Pentium N4200
90.06 Points ∼22% +19%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD A8-7410
75.5 Points ∼18%
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel Core i3-5005U
75.091 Points ∼18% -1%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
71.187 Points ∼17% -6%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
58.54 Points ∼14% -22%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
51.115 Points ∼12% -32%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1956 points
Help
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
HD Graphics 5500, 5005U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
2720 Points ∼43% +39%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
1993 Points ∼32% +2%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
1960 Points ∼31% 0%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
1958 Points ∼31% 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
1956 Points ∼31%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1661 Points ∼26% -15%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1598 Points ∼25% -18%
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
Transfer Rate Minimum: 1.3 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 130.7 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 96.1 MB/s
Access Time: 19.8 ms
Burst Rate: 104 MB/s
CPU Usage: 3.5 %
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
38%
50%
4252%
17%
Read Seq
92.05
111.3
21%
107.6
17%
484.4
426%
98.34
7%
Write Seq
88.49
107.2
21%
96.57
9%
139.2
57%
89.77
1%
Read 512
32.94
35.11
7%
22.5
-32%
338.1
926%
20.79
-37%
Write 512
26.71
41.3
55%
24.23
-9%
134.7
404%
34.84
30%
Read 4k
0.372
0.398
7%
0.474
27%
17.21
4526%
0.335
-10%
Write 4k
0.283
0.764
170%
1.089
285%
31.52
11038%
0.619
119%
Read 4k QD32
0.921
0.761
-17%
0.861
-7%
94.55
10166%
0.789
-14%
Write 4k QD32
0.473
0.991
110%
31.08
6471%
0.641
36%
3DMark 11 Performance
970 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i3-5005U
957 Points ∼2% +6%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
899 Points ∼1%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
782 Points ∼1% -13%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
744 Points ∼1% -17%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
624 Points ∼1% -31%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050
384 Points ∼1% -57%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060
382 Points ∼1% -58%
low med. high ultra
World of Warcraft (2005) 75.8 52.4 fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 34.6 18.5 15.9 fps
GTA V (2015) 24.6 20.7 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 26.2 21 fps
XCOM 2 (2016) 9.9 2.5 fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 10 5 fps
The Division (2016) 12.3 7 fps
Hitman 2016 (2016) 7.2 4.1 fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 7.7 5.6 fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 13.2 9.3 fps
Civilization VI (2016) 18.3 7 fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 41.5 28.3 fps
Titanfall 2 (2016) 17.6 14.7 fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 7.1 5.1 fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 19.8 11.9 fps
For Honor (2017) 14.5 4.9 fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 8.8 2.9 fps
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
34.6 fps ∼7%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
33.7 fps ∼6% -3%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
23.7 fps ∼4% -32%
Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-L
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
23 fps ∼4% -34%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060
18.1 fps ∼3% -48%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050
17.5 fps ∼3% -49%

Noise Level

Idle
30.9 / 30.9 / 31 dB(A)
HDD
32.3 dB(A)
DVD
37.3 / dB(A)
Load
31.8 / 31.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.4 dB(A)
Max. Load
 32 °C25.7 °C23.3 °C 
 32.9 °C26.6 °C23.6 °C 
 31.1 °C29.8 °C30.2 °C 
Maximum: 32.9 °C
Average: 28.4 °C
23.1 °C23.6 °C27.9 °C
23.5 °C25 °C34.5 °C
25.8 °C26.8 °C33.5 °C
Maximum: 34.5 °C
Average: 27.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  35.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.134.834.12531.231.231.23131.936.131.94030.829.930.85030.529.330.56327.728.327.78027.12727.11002625.72612525.624.325.61602523.42520023.923.523.925023.921.523.931525.421.125.440037.620.437.650038.719.438.763041194180044.218.144.2100046.918.246.9125050.817.750.8160059.717.459.7200061.917.761.9250060.517.860.5315056.818.256.8400055.118.155.150005418.254630047.918.447.980004718.4471000047.518.647.51250049.218.449.21600043.718.343.7SPL68.130.568.1N18.11.418.1median 46.9median 18.4median 46.9Delta111.81135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.22 / 0.42 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.4 / 6.8 / 7.3 Watt
Load midlight 21.1 / 25.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)
3h 21min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 41 Wh
376 min ∼14% +87%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 33 Wh
329 min ∼12% +64%
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
Pentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, 36 Wh
321 min ∼12% +60%
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD
5005U, HD Graphics 5500, 32 Wh
255 min ∼10% +27%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
A8-7410, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), 24 Wh
201 min ∼8%

Pros

+ 运行安静
+ 几乎不会变热
+ 高硬盘容量
+ 8GB工作内存
+ 无线网络AC标准

Cons

- 镜面TN屏幕
- 很短的电池续航
- 仅一年质保
- 仅高速以太网接口
- 不支持USB-C
- 接口布局不够合理
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

联想IdeaPad 110-15ACL是一台15.6寸基础办公笔记本电脑。它所采用的APU处理器可以满足简单办公应用和上网浏览的需要。这台设备在使用中几乎不会变热,可以保持安静运行。由于采用1TB机械硬盘,它的存储空间十分充裕。用户也可以自行更换升级固态硬盘,不过这需要打开机身底盖。它搭配的键盘可以满足家庭使用的需要。镜面、可视角度范围较窄的屏幕无法得到任何赞扬,不过考虑到价位它的表现也不是无法接受。

这是一台家用办公笔记本电脑,但在低售价设备中并不能脱颖而出,目前售价350欧元(约2558人民币)。

在这样的低价位上有所舍弃也无可厚非。这台笔记本电脑仅提供了高速以太网接口。而目前的标准配置是千兆网口。另外,它仅提供一年的质保,许多生产商为低价设备也提供了两年质保。必须提到的还有它低容量电池带来的极差续航表现。

这台IdeaPad在这个价位上可能很难吸引消费者的目光。例如联想另有一款相似的IdeaPad设备,搭配了更强的酷睿i3-6100U处理器和128GB固态硬盘,售价同样为350欧元(约2558人民币)。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE - 03/26/2017 v6(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
72 / 98 → 74%
Keyboard
73%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
36 / 80 → 46%
Weight
62 / 20-67 → 89%
Battery
71%
Display
72%
Games Performance
50 / 68 → 74%
Application Performance
50 / 92 → 55%
Temperature
94%
Noise
93%
Audio
30%
Camera
35 / 85 → 42%
Average
63%
74%
Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 IdeaPad 110-15ACL (A8-7410, 高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2017-04- 8 (Update: 2017-04- 8)