Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 8 scores (from 15 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54
轻盈,却便携不足。 智能手机大亨华为推出了一台Windows变形本——它主要面向高端商务用户。这台小巧的二合一设备能否对Surface Pro 4或惠普Spectre x2 12造成威胁呢?
Source: Tab Times
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWhen it comes to using the MateBook as a laptop, with the attached keyboard, the desktop experience suffers only in offering fewer angles at which you can prop up the display. We’re hoping to do a full Surface Pro 4 comparison and to explore the accompanying docks as well, particularly, we are eager to see if the benefits of USB Type-C and the slim form-factor of the MateDock are an advantage over the big pair of bricks that make up the Surface Dock.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Source: Mirror
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionI'll caveat that by saying you shouldn't be expecting to load up Skyrim or edit 4K video streams on it. But on the other hand it's very portable, capable of handling the majorioty of a user's demands and it looks good too.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/29/2016
Source: Unlocked Newegg
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThis product would be good for those who want something fast and reliable in the workplace or for the ultimate true mobile tablet experience. If you were already thinking of upgrading your machinery, then it’s a device that can handle business needs in the air and on the ground. The iPad Pro caveats apply -- for typists and content creators, this isn't a real laptop replacement. But for everyone else, the Huawei is a strong competitor for best in class, especially if you've been itching for a Win 10 tablet with iPad build and style (and minimalist USB-C connectivity). Really, the Huawei MateBook is a near perfect Windows 10 tablet. If this is the kind of product we can expect from Huawei, then I can't wait to see what else they bring to market.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/11/2016
Source: Marijan bloggt
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 93% performance: 95% display: 96% mobility: 96% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Marijan bloggt
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/29/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 11/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: c't - Heft 20/2016

Single Review, online available, Length Unknown, Date: 09/15/2016
Source: HardwareLuxx
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/08/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 10/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Technik Surfer
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% performance: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Tablet Blog
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/26/2016
Source: Areamobile
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 69% mobility: 76% workmanship: 97% ergonomy: 74%
Source: Notebookinfo
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 90% display: 95% mobility: 70% workmanship: 95% ergonomy: 90% emissions: 90%
Source: Ubergismo Deutsch
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Curved
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 68% display: 95% mobility: 68%
Comment
Intel HD Graphics 515:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
6Y54: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
