Honor Magic7 Lite
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.45, Videos @1080p/30fps)
Price comparison
Average of 27 scores (from 44 reviews)
Reviews for the Honor Magic7 Lite
Honor Magic7 Lite 电池容量大,但却坚固轻巧。它还配备了 108 MP 摄像头,据称屏幕亮度超过 4000 尼特。然而,当谈到这款手机的主要亮点时,人们很快就会感到失望。
Source: OI Spice Tech News
EN→zh-CNThose days were gone when Honor used to release flawless phones back to back. And after 2020, most honor phones were going downhill. But the Honor Magic 7 Lite comes out as a refreshing breeze. It comes as a budget-centric phone and delivers according to the price point. Moreover, it features liquid screen protection, higher storage capacity, a curved display, etc. For example, performance is sluggish if you are an extreme user. Lowlight pictures would have been better. The software interface gives a mixed-bag response. Some core Android settings and the latest AI perks are missing.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/05/2025
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CNThe Honor Magic 7 Lite excels in areas like battery life, durability, and main camera performance, making it a reliable choice for users who value longevity and practicality. However, its dated design, average performance, and limited software support leave it trailing behind competitors in the fiercely competitive mid-range market. If battery life is your top priority, the Magic 7 Lite is a clear winner. But for those seeking a more well-rounded device, there are better options available.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/29/2025
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews
EN→zh-CNDespite being a generally competent mid-range phone, the Honor Magic 7 Lite is ultimately tricky to recommend. Battery life is excellent and improvements like OIS for the main camera, faster charging speed and upgraded device durability just about account for the extra £50 premium. Even with these improvements, however, the Magic 7 Lite struggles to compete with the now-discounted Google Pixel 8a. It may not have as much storage or last as long, but the Pixel’s general performance, camera quality, display accuracy and software support are all far superior. The Magic 7 Lite puts up a valiant fight but it would have been better off avoiding the price hike and giving the Pixel a wider berth.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/14/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: DxOMark
EN→zh-CNThe Honor Magic7 Lite’s battery achieved a top score ex aequo in our database thanks to a powerful performance in autonomy. Equipped with a serious 6600 mAh battery, the Honor Magic7 Lite, which is marketed as Honor X9c in some regions of the world, exhibited an impressive battery life of just over three and a half days under moderate usage. The device gained 12 hours of autonomy over the previous model, the Honor Magic6 Lite (5800 mAh), lasting 89 hours without needing to recharge. Across most test cases, particularly in video streaming and gaming, the Honor Magic7 Lite demonstrated exceptional autonomy, also achieving the No. 1 spot in our autonomy sub-score.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/07/2025
Source: Irish Mirror
EN→zh-CNOverall, you get a well-made everyday device built to withstand knocks, drops and falls and yet it looks more premium than you might expect at its price point. If you are on a budget, this Honor handset will give you enough bang for your buck.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/02/2025
Source: Stuff TV
EN→zh-CNIn a few ways, the Honor Magic 7 Lite doesn’t make any meaningful progress over its predecessor. The entry-grade chipset is unchanged, the firm’s software upgrade commitments still lag behind rival brands, and now the styling feels that much more out of step with the rest of the phone world. It’s not all bad though. Some might argue the rear cameras have gone backwards by dropping the third snapper, but the Magic 6 Lite’s macro lens was a token inclusion at best, and adding optical image stabilisation has upped the Magic 7 Lite’s night-time performance among affordable rivals. This is also a much tougher handset, which will be great news for accident-prone shoppers. Ultimately you’ll buy the Magic 7 Lite for its colossal battery; there’s simply no other affordable option out there with such a high capacity. If you’re after a long-lasting handset that doesn’t look like an actual brick, you’ll be able to forgive the limited generational upgrades everywhere else.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/02/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phandroid
EN→zh-CNAt a price that rests between 200-300 USD (when converted), the Honor Magic 7 Lite’s impressive design and build quality, good-looking display, capable battery and generally smooth performance make for a solid everyday smartphone. Folks looking to save a bit of cash will find a lot to love about the Magic 7 Lite, as long as they keep their expectations in check. On the other hand the low-end chipset, pre-installed apps and overall camera performance might leave you wanting a little more, and people who prioritize these areas will have to spend a bit more to get the device they want. At the end of the day though it’s a solid phone that plays it safe without attempting to punch higher than its weight class.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/02/2025
Source: Tech Spurt

This near 6.8-inch blower boasts a 6600mAh battery, one of the biggest of any mid-range mobile, with 66W wired charging. I've tested out the dual lens camera and here's some photo and video samples from my 24 hours of play time. And I've also wielded the Honor Magic 7 Lite during some Call of Duty action, to see if it will satisfy gamers. Spoiler: you've got the same Snapdragon here as the previous 6 Lite. Sadly it's old Android 14 and Magic OS 8 stashed on the Honor Magic 7 Lite straight out of the box. Here's hoping it's updated to the latest software soon. Still, at least you don't get many annoying apps pre-installed and that design is pleasingly skinny and light.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/02/2025
Source: PC Welt
DE→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/18/2025
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Smartzone
DE→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/13/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 75% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Xataka
ES→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/15/2025
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 65% display: 80% mobility: 93% workmanship: 83%
Source: Hipertextual
ES→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/15/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Canaltech
PT→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2025
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: Pplware
PT→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/20/2025
Source: 4G News
PT→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2025
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Smart World
IT→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/18/2025
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 60% features: 70% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/23/2025
Rating: Total score: 75% features: 79%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/20/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 75% display: 85% mobility: 95% workmanship: 73%
Source: DDay IT
IT→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/17/2025
Source: Igizmo
IT→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2025
Source: Mister Gadget
IT→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/15/2025
Source: Evo smart
IT→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/09/2025
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 90%
Source: Techprincess IT
IT→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/07/2025
Source: Tutto Android
IT→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/07/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/02/2025
Rating: Total score: 100% performance: 100% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2025
Source: Presse Citron
FR→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2025
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 75% display: 95% mobility: 95% workmanship: 95%
Source: Les Mobiles
FR→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Journal du Geek
FR→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Les Numeriques
FR→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/08/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: 01Net
FR→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% mobility: 70%
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/08/2025
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Co Nowego
PL→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/09/2025
Source: Techno Senior
PL→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2025
Source: Komputerswiat
PL→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2025
Source: Telepolis
PL→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/05/2025
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Maniak
PL→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/02/2025
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% display: 79% mobility: 95%
Source: GSM Online PL
PL→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/02/2025
Source: MobilArena HU
HU→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/02/2025
Rating: price: 60% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mobilmania.cz
CZ→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/23/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Smartmania.cz
CZ→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/11/2025
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 85% features: 75% mobility: 98% workmanship: 81%
Source: Mobility.bg
BU→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/28/2025
Source: Tek.no
NO→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2025
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Computerblog.ro
→zh-CNSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/19/2025
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 710:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 6 Gen 1: 中端 SoC,配备 8 个 Kryo 内核(4 x ARM Cortex A78 2.2 GHz 性能集群、4 x ARM Cortex A55 1.8 效率集群)和一个 X62 5G 调制解调器(下载速率高达 2900 Mbps)。该芯片采用现代 4 纳米工艺制造。» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.