Honor 9
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix LED-Blitz, Videos @1080p
Price comparison
Average of 68 scores (from 126 reviews)
Reviews for the Honor 9
Flashy. As with its predecessor, the Honor 9 compels at first sight with its flashy design of dancing light reflections on the back. But is this all just smoke and mirrors, or can Honor's new flagship also convince with its dual camera and fast performance? We find out in the test. Update: firmware B150 adds support for VoLTE and VoWifi.
Source: Phone World
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionHonor 9 is an excellent device in all aspects although the price is a little expensive. Its great camera, brilliant performance, and stylish design make it the best buy. Those users who are looking for a flagship device rather than the famous brand’s smartphones must go for Honor 9.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 50% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 is an interesting case. It takes over from the Honor 8, a phone released in 2016 that sold at the same price and didn’t seem like an amazing buy at the time.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Toptenreviews
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIts modular design divides opinion and few will bother with its extra components, but it’s a stylish phone with long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Reg Hardware
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWe're not alone in being puzzled by exactly what Huawei wants to do with the Honor range in the Western markets. Elsewhere, it sells buckets and promotes it heavily. Here, I suspect even Huawei doesn't know – hence the lack of promotion. Nonetheless, the Honor 9 is some of Huawei's best ideas, without the Leica branding (and royalty fees).
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2017
Source: Gadgetspeak
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionDesigned for the young at heart (at whatever age), the Honor 9 is the latest smartphone in the range to join the Huawei family of products. With this particular model, Huawei has attempted to combine aspects of quality, appearance and a price point that should appeal to its designated market sector.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Zdnet.com
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 delivers good performance and battery life, a decent 5.15-inch screen and an impressive dual camera setup. But how does it shape up versus its high-end Huawei P10 stablemate and the OnePlus 5, which is ploughing a similar 'affordable flagship' furrow?
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 89%
Source: Phone Arena
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIn the end, the Honor 9 is an attractive option for international smartphone users who want a phone that's compact, a reasonably strong performer, enjoys solid battery life, and offers a decently nice camera – and all for quite a bit less than your typical flagship. There's no one stand-out area where the Honor 9 shines, but it does enough right to be worth recommending.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 offers a lot of what the high-end flagship phones do right now, but for a much lower price. There’s no exciting, headline-grabbing feature here, but a great design, fantastic performance and lots of nice touches make this an all-round impressive and affordable phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Techradar
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 offers a lot of what the high-end flagship phones do right now, but for a much lower price. There’s no exciting, headline-grabbing feature here, but a great design, fantastic performance and lots of nice touches make this an all-round impressive and affordable phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: What Hi-Fi
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionStill, it’s tough to find better for less. Unless you’re prepared to make a significant investment in a 2017 flagship, this is as much phone as you’ll get for your £400 right now.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone Arena
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionMais malgré toutes ses qualités, on a du mal à comprendre le placement du Honor 9 dans la gamme Honor. Il est une sorte de version Edge du Honor 8 avec quelques améliorations mais il est moins performant sur plusieurs points que le Honor 8 Pro. Les petits budgets s'orienteront donc plus facilement vers le Honor 8 qui va voir son prix baisser, ceux en recherche de performances vers le Honor 8 Pro ou le OnePlus 5. Quelle place va donc occuper ce Honor 9 ?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Talk Android
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWhile the Honor 9 could be dismissed as simply a lesser-specced Huawei P10, in reality, having used both handsets as daily drivers, the Honor 9 simply has more heart, which is an admittedly weird thing to say about an inanimate object. The Honor 9 delivers in just about every area you would want, and despite the camera’s less-than-perfect performance in low-light conditions, the Honor 9 is another winner for the budget brand.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/28/2017
Source: Tech Advisor
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 is an undeniably impressive phone for an unmatched price right now. In performance terms, it's nipping at the heels of the year's top flagships, and only lacking flashy features like waterproofing or a bezel-less screen. It looks great, it runs fast, and it costs less than £400. We're sold.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: T3
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 is 100% solid in every key respect, although, it may lack that little bit of innovation which makes a phone a true Android flagship. Still, we really can't fault it at the price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Authority
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 officially starts at €449 in Europe, but there are lots of offers out there and for £379 or €429 where you can get the 64 GB Honor 9 and a Honor Band 3 fitness tracker together. However, no matter what you pay you will be getting a phone packing pretty high-end specs – essentially the same as those found in Huawei’s other 2017 flagship devices but for a lot less money!
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 90% display: 85% mobility: 87% workmanship: 88%
Source: Trusted Reviews
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 is an interesting case. It takes over from the Honor 8, a phone released in 2016 that sold at the same price and didn’t seem like an amazing buy at the time.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Techradar
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 offers a lot of what the high-end flagship phones do right now, but for a much lower price. There’s no exciting, headline-grabbing feature here, but a great design, fantastic performance and lots of nice touches make this an all-round impressive and affordable phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Pocket Lint
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 is a siren in the mid-range phone market. Its eye-catching design is paired with highly capable performance for a price point that, in the context of 2017, undercuts the OnePlus 5 by a sizeable enough margin to leave the Honor in a field of its own.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/13/2017
Source: GSM Arena
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 is a well-executed project, which in spite of the lack of a massive PR campaign, has everything needed to succeed and prevail on the market. We can't really figure out Huawei's strategy for the Honor brand yet again, but we don't mind having such a thoughtful allrounder once in a while.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/07/2017
Source: Stuff TV
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 is a phone with some serious high-end chops that sells for a mid-range price. It costs the same amount as a Samsung Galaxy A5 but has a much more powerful processor, a slightly more versatile camera, more storage and a more eye-catching design. It’s a step up, basically.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Lowyat.net
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe honor 9 is really a refinement of its predecessor’s winning qualities. It’s an eye-catching phone, it’s well-equipped, and most importantly, it offers plenty value for money. For context, the honor 9 retails from 2,299 yuan in China – that comes up to only RM1,450.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/05/2017
Source: Recombu
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 is a great-value handset that offers a similar flagship experience to most other premium phones, yet with a greatly reduced asking price. Sure, you don’t get any jazzy HDR visuals or a ridiculously sharp Quad HD screen - and most users won’t even notice. They’ll be too content with the slick software, lovable design, smooth performance and dependable battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Authority
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionAs I mentioned at the outset, the Honor 9 is a no frills smartphone, delivering a solid baseline across the board at a price point that most can manage. It doesn’t add anything brand new to the mix, just improves on a winning formula from years past, and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2017
Source: Tech Advisor
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 is an undeniably impressive phone for an unmatched price right now. In performance terms, it's nipping at the heels of the year's top flagships, and only lacking flashy features like waterproofing or a bezel-less screen. It looks great, it runs fast, and it costs less than £400. We're sold.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Techradar
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Honor 9 seems like an accomplished device based on our early look – we're looking to forward to putting it through its paces to see if it can outperform its attractive price tag.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/27/2017
Source: Stuff TV
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWe’ll have to wait until a full review to see how they stack up together, and whether it really can beat the OnePlus 5 in more areas than sheer value, but right now, things are looking very good indeed.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2017
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18

Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 85% display: 86% mobility: 64% workmanship: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: MobiFlip
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/25/2017
Source: WinFuture
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/24/2017
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/15/2017
Source: Android Mag
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 96% price: 89%
Source: Honor News Blog
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 90% performance: 95% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: PocketPC
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/30/2017
Source: Netzwelt
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% features: 100% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tom's Hardware
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/21/2017
Source: Teltarif
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 93% price: 95% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Chip.de
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 99% features: 91% display: 93% mobility: 86%
Source: Curved
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: Allround-PC.com
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/06/2017
Source: Inside Handy
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: n-tv
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/03/2017
Source: RP-Online
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2017
Source: Tech Stage
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2017
Source: PocketPC
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: Android Pit
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Blick
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/28/2017
Source: Golem
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/28/2017
Source: WinFuture
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/28/2017
Source: Curved
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2017
Source: Movil Zona
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Newesc
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 90% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tuexperto
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/18/2017
Source: Computerhoy
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% features: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: El Androide Libre
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/12/2017
Source: Xataka
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 85% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: El Confidencial
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/12/2017
Source: 4G News
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/09/2017
Source: PC Guia
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Mais Tecnologia
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/16/2017
Source: Pplware
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: Android Geek
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/06/2017
Source: Pplware
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/28/2017
Source: Key for web
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: AndroidPit.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Notebook Italia
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/28/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Wiz Blog
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/21/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/04/2017
Rating: performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Optima
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/26/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/25/2017
Source: Ridble
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Style HD
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/16/2017
Source: Tech Different
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/16/2017
Source: Chimera Revo
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 85% features: 90% display: 86% mobility: 82% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Geek 4 You
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: InstaNews
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/09/2017
Source: Techzilla.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 90% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Panorama
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/03/2017
Source: Tecno Cino
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/03/2017
Source: Panorama
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: Tutto Android
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 94% features: 90% display: 85% mobility: 82% ergonomy: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 80% features: 90% display: 85% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Best Tech
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/28/2017
Source: HDblog.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: AndroidPit.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Panorama
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/12/2017
Source: Mobi France
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/04/2018
Source: Golden Geek
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2017
Source: Clubic
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Komorkomania
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Galaktyczny
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 85%
Source: 90 Sekund
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/20/2017
Source: Tabletowo
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 100%
Source: Android.com.pl
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 70% display: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Galaktyczny
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/30/2017
Source: Android.com.pl
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/27/2017
Source: Helpix
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Helpix
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Product Test
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 92% mobility: 66%
Source: DGL.ru
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/24/2017
Source: Zoom
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/10/2017
Source: Ferra.ru
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/27/2017
Source: Product Test
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/22/2017
Source: Geeks.hu
 HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 HU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/07/2017
Source: HWSW
 HU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 HU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/31/2017
Source: CNews.cz
 CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
 CZ→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/03/2017
Source: Svet Androida
 CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
 CZ→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/17/2017
Source: CZC
 CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
 CZ→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Gioididong
 VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/04/2017
Source: The Gioididong
 VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/28/2017
Source: Dinside
 NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/16/2017
Source: Tek.no
 NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Tweak.dk
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Lyd og Billede
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil DK
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Ljud och Bild
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: Puhelinvertailu
 →zh-CN Archive.org version
 →zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Comment
ARM Mali-G71 MP8:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 960: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
