Notebookcheck Logo

联想 E31-80 (6200U, 高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

轻便伴侣。 联想的这台13.3寸笔记本电脑具备优秀的电池续航，一块固态硬盘和较低的运行噪音。它预装了Windows 10专业版操作系统。不过它搭配的屏幕无法让人满意。
Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE (E31 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 520, Core: 950 MHz, 单通道, 21.20.16.4550
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR3-1600, 单通道, 一个内存槽（已占用）
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 118 PPI, AU Optronics B133XTN01.6, TN LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, 256 GB 
Soundcard
Realtek ALC236 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audiocontroller
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21.5 x 320 x 230
Battery
35 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, MS Office 365 (试用版), McAfee LiveSafe (试用版), 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.59 kg, Power Supply: 292 g
Price
599 Euro
Links
Lenovo homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
328 mm 234 mm 25.6 mm 1.6 kg330 mm 233.5 mm 19.8 mm 1.6 kg327 mm 228 mm 20.7 mm 1.5 kg327 mm 220.6 mm 16.8 mm 1.5 kg320 mm 230 mm 21.5 mm 1.6 kg320 mm 230 mm 21.5 mm 1.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Connectivity

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
 
76.5 MB/s +194%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
 
27.9 MB/s +7%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
 
26 MB/s
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
 
19.1 MB/s -27%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
 
16.5 MB/s -37%
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
 
10.3 MB/s -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
 
87.4 MB/s +247%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
 
37.1 MB/s +47%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
 
37 MB/s +47%
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
 
29.93 MB/s +19%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
 
25.2 MB/s
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
 
17.7 MB/s -30%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
321 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
291 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)
438 MBit/s
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)
314 MBit/s
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
277 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)
385 MBit/s
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
325 MBit/s
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)
216 MBit/s
225
cd/m²		227
cd/m²		227
cd/m²
229
cd/m²		234
cd/m²		225
cd/m²
220
cd/m²		211
cd/m²		204
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B133XTN01.6 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 234 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 222.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 234 cd/m²
Contrast: 433:1 (Black: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 13 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.35% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.78
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
TN LED, 1366x768, 13.30		Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
TN, 1366x768, 13.30		Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
TN LED, 1366x768, 13.30		Asus X302UV-FN016T
TN LED, 1366x768, 13.30		Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
IPS, 3200x1800, 13.30		HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Display
32%
20%
30%
64%
3%
Display P3 Coverage
37.35
49.25
32%
44.72
20%
48.37
30%
64.6
73%
38.55
3%
sRGB Coverage
56.2
73.5
31%
67.3
20%
72.6
29%
87.3
55%
57.8
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
38.58
50.9
32%
46.2
20%
49.98
30%
63.8
65%
39.85
3%
Response Times
11%
-2%
9%
14%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 ?(25, 19)
44.4 ?(22.8, 21.6)
-1%
39 ?(20, 19)
11%
42 ?(20, 22)
5%
34 ?(15, 19)
23%
42.4 ?(15.6, 26.8)
4%
Response Time Black / White *
26 ?(20, 6)
20.4 ?(14, 6.4)
22%
30 ?(12, 18)
-15%
23 ?(6, 17)
12%
25 ?(8, 17)
4%
26.4 ?(6.4, 20)
-2%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(90)
1000 ?(90)
50 ?(90)
Screen
7%
3%
25%
35%
32%
Brightness middle
234
206
-12%
255
9%
218
-7%
295
26%
253
8%
Brightness
222
200
-10%
232
5%
210
-5%
283
27%
249
12%
Brightness Distribution
87
84
-3%
82
-6%
88
1%
88
1%
92
6%
Black Level *
0.54
0.6
-11%
0.52
4%
0.5
7%
0.65
-20%
0.32
41%
Contrast
433
343
-21%
490
13%
436
1%
454
5%
791
83%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
12.09
9.2
24%
13.12
-9%
3.89
68%
4
67%
5.28
56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
20.25
14.8
27%
22.98
-13%
7.11
65%
7.26
64%
13.66
33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
13
10.94
16%
15.01
-15%
4.9
62%
3.38
74%
3.8
71%
Gamma
2.78 79%
2.76 80%
2.41 91%
2.41 91%
2.38 92%
2.3 96%
CCT
15562 42%
13282 49%
24382 27%
7860 83%
6520 100%
6646 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36
46.92
30%
43
19%
46
28%
57
58%
36.7
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
56
73.36
31%
68
21%
73
30%
85
52%
57.6
3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
17% / 12%
7% / 6%
21% / 24%
38% / 38%
12% / 22%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4363
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
9795
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6961
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
116 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
287 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
23.59 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Help
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | Geekbench 4.4 | JetStream 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
144 Points +24%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
Intel Core i7-7500U
144 Points +24%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U
115 Points -1%
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
83 Points -28%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
53 Points -54%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
344 Points +20%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
Intel Core i7-7500U
341 Points +19%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U
290 Points +1%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
287 Points
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
209 Points -27%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
165 Points -43%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
12658 Points +29%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U
9940 Points +1%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
9795 Points
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
7048 Points -28%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
5284 Points -46%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
5668 Points +30%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U
4400 Points +1%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
4363 Points
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
3144 Points -28%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
1677 Points -62%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
3429 Points +33%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U
2877 Points +12%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
2571 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
1362 Points -47%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
7051 Points +27%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U
6067 Points +9%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
5553 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
4425 Points -20%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
4108 Points +27%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
3225 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
1555 Points -52%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
7798 Points +32%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
5896 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
4162 Points -29%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
3285 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
6126 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel Core i7-7500U
244.6 Points +29%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
Intel Core i7-7500U
235 Points +24%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
Intel Core i5-6200U
197.5 Points +4%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel Core i5-6200U
189.6 Points
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
106.9 Points -44%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel Pentium N4200
89.1 Points -53%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3393 points
Help
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3554 Points +5%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
GeForce 920MX, 6200U, Hynix HFS128G3MND
3466 Points +2%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3393 Points
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Phison S10C-512G
3085 Points -9%
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
HD Graphics 5500, 5005U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive
2782 Points -18%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
2073 Points -39%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Sequential Read: 522 MB/s
Sequential Write: 457.4 MB/s
512K Read: 398.1 MB/s
512K Write: 303.6 MB/s
4K Read: 35.05 MB/s
4K Write: 88 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 299.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 229.8 MB/s
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP		Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive		Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0		Asus X302UV-FN016T
Hynix HFS128G3MND		Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Phison S10C-512G		HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-89%
-91%
-36%
8%
-18%
Read Seq
522
116.4
-78%
105.1
-80%
428.2
-18%
522
0%
505
-3%
Write Seq
457.4
120.7
-74%
103.1
-77%
178.6
-61%
384.4
-16%
328.9
-28%
Read 512
398.1
37.01
-91%
33.89
-91%
282.6
-29%
412
3%
313.6
-21%
Write 512
303.6
73.1
-76%
49.7
-84%
179.1
-41%
395.5
30%
301
-1%
Read 4k
35.05
0.507
-99%
0.386
-99%
6.559
-81%
34.07
-3%
21.69
-38%
Write 4k
88
4.156
-95%
1.095
-99%
71.2
-19%
100.9
15%
80.4
-9%
Read 4k QD32
299.7
0.967
-100%
0.91
-100%
253
-16%
316.3
6%
132.2
-56%
Write 4k QD32
229.8
0.652
-100%
1.149
-99%
174
-24%
286.4
25%
258.8
13%
3DMark 11 Performance
1348 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1747 Points +39%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1543 Points +23%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1463 Points +16%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1258 Points
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i3-5005U
887 Points -29%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
583 Points -54%
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 35.4 21.1 17.2

Noise Level

Idle
31.8 / 31.8 / 31.8 dB(A)
Load
35.7 / 34.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.139.640.736.736.12536.337.937.133.736.33133.23333.131.133.24032.732.533.931.132.75032.933.132.829.932.96333.434.534.632.133.48029.432.132.629.829.410028.730.633.129.428.712526.625.928.125.226.616025.827.627.825.225.820025.527.227.324.925.525024.326.125.523.224.331523.325.425.822.523.340022.224.124.221.222.250021.823.323.620.721.863021.223.22319.621.280020.625.424.119.220.6100020.827.124.918.420.8125019.524.222.117.919.5160019.224.622.617.619.2200019.124.422.616.919.1250018.825.322.116.918.8315018.723.520.717.118.7400018.821.119.616.918.8500018.719.61916.718.7630018.71918.916.818.7800018.618.91916.618.61000018.518.718.816.618.51250018.418.518.516.418.41600018.518.718.616.418.5SPL31.935.734.230.231.9N1.72.42.21.41.7median 19.5median 24.2median 22.6median 17.9median 19.5Delta2.33.13.42.32.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
Max. Load
 37 °C40.2 °C32 °C 
 29 °C37.6 °C31.4 °C 
 21.4 °C22.5 °C26 °C 
Maximum: 40.2 °C
Average: 30.8 °C
31.3 °C45 °C38.2 °C
29.3 °C44.5 °C27.3 °C
26.2 °C23.5 °C22 °C
Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 31.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+2.3 °C / 4.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.536.741.52542.433.742.43141.431.141.44041.531.141.55044.529.944.56344.132.144.18045.929.845.910045.429.445.412546.425.246.416049.825.249.82005324.95325055.923.255.931564.622.564.640065.721.265.750065.320.765.363066.219.666.28006719.267100071.118.471.1125068.117.968.1160070.417.670.4200068.316.968.3250063.416.963.4315064.417.164.4400068.616.968.6500067.216.767.2630065.316.865.3800061.716.661.71000061.516.661.51250060.716.460.71600056.816.456.8SPL79.230.279.2N46.81.446.8median 64.6median 17.9median 64.6Delta5.22.35.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo E31-80 80MX0107GEApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.47 / 0.48 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.6 / 6.8 / 7.5 Watt
Load midlight 26.9 / 26.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 40)
7h 02min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh
430 min +2%
Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 35 Wh
422 min
Asus X302UV-FN016T
6200U, GeForce 920MX, 38 Wh
392 min -7%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H
Pentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, 36 Wh
365 min -14%
Medion Akoya S3409-MD60234
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
278 min -34%
Lenovo E31-70 80KX015RGE
5005U, HD Graphics 5500, 35 Wh
254 min -40%

Pros

+ 雾面屏幕
+ 高速固态硬盘
+ 运行安静
+ 电池续航优秀

Cons

- 昏暗、对比度低、视角窄的屏幕
- 仅一年质保
- 不支持USB-C
In review: the Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE. Test model provided by notebooksbilliger.de
In review: the Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE. Test model provided by notebooksbilliger.de

联想为E31-80搭配了一颗Skylake架构酷睿i5处理器。它为办公和上网浏览提供了绰绰有余的性能。相比Broadwell架构的E31-70系列机型，Skylake机型的性能仅仅略高。它的处理器对电池续航的影响反而更大。

Skylake架构处理器明显改进了这台设备的电池续航时间。

这台笔记本电脑在运行中可以保持安静，且不会过热。一块固态硬盘保证了迅捷的系统响应。用户也可以打开机身自行升级更换固态硬盘。它搭配的键盘质量优秀，可以适合长时间文字输入用途。

和很多笔记本电脑一样，E31-80的最大弱点在于屏幕品质。联想为它搭配的是一块低亮度、低对比度、可视角度很窄的屏幕。它的屏幕明显无法得到任何称赞。同时这台设备仅仅一年的质保期也让我们略感不满。对于一款今年的新机型我们期待至少有两年的质保。同时，它也没有提供USB-C接口。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。 

Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE - 04/19/2017 v6(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
78 /  98 → 80%
Keyboard
74%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
42 / 80 → 53%
Weight
68 / 35-78 → 77%
Battery
89%
Display
75%
Games Performance
53 / 68 → 78%
Application Performance
81 / 87 → 93%
Temperature
92 / 91 → 100%
Noise
91%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
43 / 85 → 51%
Average
71%
80%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Lenovo E31-80 80MX0107GE (E31 Series)

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 E31-80 (6200U, 高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2017-04-29 (Update: 2017-04-29)