Notebookcheck

摩托罗拉Defy智能手机评测--实惠的户外手机,有趣的设计

摩托罗拉公司(Moto Stabilo)。 想用很少的钱买到真正稳定的智能手机?那么摩托罗拉Defy可能正好合适:它以刚刚超过300欧元(约348美元)的价格提供了体面的性能率,但在其他方面似乎有点过时了。它还足以让人推荐吗?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Smartphone
摩托罗拉Defy

摩托罗拉Defy并不是它的第一款产品:制造商已经在2010年发布了一款名为Defy的防水防尘智能手机,当时仍然采用方便的3.7英寸格式,并配有Android 2.2。

然而,摩托罗拉的Defy 2021当然是一个完全不同的口径,不仅因为它的屏幕直径几乎正好是6.5英寸的两倍,而且还因为它自然拥有当代的性能和现代的操作系统。

这家联想子公司为其新的户外手机寻求与来自Bullitt集团的加固专家合作,该集团负责CAT手机等业务。因此,摩托罗拉有一个经验丰富的合作伙伴在身边。

我们的详细评论将显示摩托罗拉Defy 2021是否真的是一款好的户外智能手机。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Motorola Defy
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Kryo 260
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 47 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack and USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 512 GB, shared, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 10.9 x 169.8 x 78.2
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 20 Watt Motorola TurboPower
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​60fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.2, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, strap, 24 Months Warranty, FM radio, IP68-certified, MIL-STD-810H-certified, SAR: 0.993 W/kg (head), 1.494 W/kg (body), fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
232 g
Price
329 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78 %
10/2021
Motorola Defy
SD 662, Adreno 610
232 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
74.3 %
05/2021
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2
172 g64 GB eMMC Flash5.30"1480x720
81.1 %
09/2021
Nokia XR20
SD 480, Adreno 619
248 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
73 %
08/2020
CAT S42
Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300
220 g32 GB eMMC Flash5.50"1440x720
81.6 %
03/2021
Blackview BL6000 Pro
Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4
273 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.36"2300x1080

在外壳方面,摩托罗拉和布利特找到了一个很好的折衷办法。一方面,外观没有像其他户外手机那样炫耀金属应用或可见的螺丝,但另一方面,摩托罗拉Defy也有一些特别之处。左下角是这里的主要焦点,因为它没有机身其他部分那么圆,因此实际上是一个角。

因此,这款手机让人联想到一个说话的泡泡,因而令人难忘。同时,这个角也有一个实用的背景。附带的环形带可以穿在那里,这样你就可以把智能手机牢牢地固定在手腕上。

如果你不选择经典的黑色,而是选择 "锻造绿 "颜色的变体,你也会在背面得到这个角落的颜色。说到背面。在这里发现了一种橡胶质地,这也为此事增加了一些设计,有不同的笔触方向。

屏幕由大猩猩玻璃Victus保护,这是最新版本的保护玻璃。同时,边框明显突出,在跌落的情况下为显示玻璃提供进一步的安全保障。有IP-68认证,意味着对灰尘和永久浸泡在淡水中的完全保护。这款智能手机也经过了MIL-STD-810H的测试,以证明其稳定性。

摩托罗拉Defy的重量为232克(约8.2盎司),对于一款坚固耐用的智能手机来说并不过分。坚固的三星的Galaxy XCover 5可能仍然是那些寻找更轻、更紧凑的户外手机的选择。

对于所有喜欢清洁表面的朋友来说,这是一个重要的细节。摩托罗拉Defy可以用酒精、漂白剂、肥皂或消毒剂擦拭,不会造成任何损害。

摩托罗拉Defy
摩托罗拉Defy
摩托罗拉Defy
摩托罗拉Defy
摩托罗拉Defy
摩托罗拉Defy
摩托罗拉Defy

Size comparison

171.6 mm 81.5 mm 10.6 mm 248 g169.8 mm 78.2 mm 10.9 mm 232 g166.7 mm 81.3 mm 12.8 mm 273 g161.3 mm 77.2 mm 12.7 mm 220 g147.1 mm 71.6 mm 9.2 mm 172 g

特点 - 只有64GB内存

今天,64GB的大容量存储在消费领域已经不能真正诱惑到任何人。然而,由于保护措施,你必须削减户外智能手机的功能,因此,存储大小是可以接受的。然而,它只是缓慢的eMMC闪存,此外还有4GB的RAM。另一个存储变量不能被选择。

由于有一个3.5毫米的插孔,你也可以在没有适配器的情况下连接老式耳机。蓝牙5.0和NFC也在船上。

左边:SIM卡插槽
左边:SIM卡插槽
右边。待机按钮,音量摇杆,可自由分配的按钮
右边。待机按钮,音量摇杆,可自由分配的按钮
顶部:3.5毫米接口,麦克风
顶部:3.5毫米接口,麦克风
底部。腕带、麦克风、USB-C接口、扬声器
底部。腕带、麦克风、USB-C接口、扬声器

微型SD卡读卡器

在复制测试中为27.5MB/s,我们参考的微型SD Angelbird V60的最大速度在这里只是适度使用。在同一时间, 诺基亚XR20甚至更慢一些。在CPDT中的读写速度对于中档智能手机来说是在一个体面的水平上。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Motorola Defy
Adreno 610, SD 662, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
27.5 MB/s ∼100%
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
22 MB/s ∼80% -20%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758036.439.139.439.340.838.633.725.731.326.823.121.925.621.222.319.729.619.121.521.520.823.21727.320.824.119.729.32023.931.633.831.428.134.331.824.320.820.723.72419.92719.834.320.326.91627.132.635.123.419.629.220.829.321.323.122.330.82723.124.320.52230.722.425.821.524.621.128.418.42318.838.921.22721.422.835.117.437.521.126.521.725.230.519.832.719.723.921.123.326.919.725.92320.817.627.323.32722.527.235.224.222.831.424.126.136.121.125.827.82238.236.134.936.434.518.826.221.722.128.734.430.33825.83323.337.322.829.520.625.420.418.619.517.519.124.928.435.52919.519.618.318.320.332.72023.120.219.521.628.520.424.722.618.220.718.218.720.517.418.919.123.424.733.320.219.521.625.224.621.226.329.72529.423.933.523.323.2262036.231.619.121.128.319.620.818.417.918.722.728.123.123.129.219.520.118.720.932.622.123.128.719.119.71920.924.826.518.72020.221.725.218.120.427.425.218.519.719.526.827.320.618.420.118.919.837.131.223.821.525.120.619.617.918.920.319.419.918.718.817.819.117.519.324.824.236.439.139.439.340.838.633.725.731.326.823.121.925.621.222.319.729.619.121.521.520.823.21727.320.824.119.729.32023.931.633.831.428.134.331.824.320.820.723.72419.92719.834.320.326.91627.132.635.123.419.629.220.829.321.323.122.330.82723.124.320.52230.722.425.821.524.621.128.418.42318.838.921.22721.422.835.117.437.521.126.521.725.230.519.832.719.723.921.123.326.919.725.92320.817.627.323.32722.527.235.224.222.831.424.126.136.121.125.827.82238.236.134.936.434.518.826.221.722.128.734.430.33825.83323.337.322.829.520.625.420.418.619.517.519.124.928.435.52919.519.618.318.320.332.72023.120.219.521.628.520.424.722.618.220.718.218.720.517.418.919.123.424.733.320.219.521.625.224.621.226.329.72529.423.933.523.323.2262036.231.619.121.128.319.620.818.417.918.722.728.123.123.129.219.520.118.720.932.622.123.128.719.119.71920.924.826.518.72020.221.725.218.120.427.425.218.519.719.526.827.320.618.420.118.919.837.131.223.821.525.120.619.617.918.920.319.419.918.718.817.819.117.519.324.824.231.781.580.379.581.477.880.281.979.780.780.280.680.281.480.281.180.680.580.379.878.380.281.579.48180.582.281.579.581.278.683.480.7788082.180.480.57881.581.580.279.382.180.481.579.980.780.580.679.780.280.380.180.6808180.280.681.28080.981.580.580.680.479.78181.280.280.675.77881.579.778.281.878.480.58079.480.680.179.878.579.180.378.480.580.281.18180.380.680.478.580.780.180.480.180.879.380.480.580.180.279.980.979.179.780.180.279.980.180.378.280.48079.278.343.27971.872.768.770.471.873.132.779.679.57880.3788178.779.679.279.577.579.979.378.680.478.978.678.87879.978.680.278.279.378.580.179.677.779.678.280.179.178.878.97881.177.478.980.179.879.178.780.178.979.478.380.678.178.573.277.981.379.9797878.379.579.679.475.274.677.777.979.179.67681.180.975.681.178.280.279.378.678.179.178.380.67880.48077.379.278.679.677.476.983.379.977.47974.780.876.179.376.977.478.777.380.177.978.476.280.17978.579.278.378.852.151.250.350.150.34750.150.450.150.650.650.633.959.749.550.551.749.4Tooltip
Motorola Defy Adreno 610, SD 662, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write: Ø26.1 (16-40.8)
Nokia XR20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write: Ø23 (17.4-38)
Motorola Defy Adreno 610, SD 662, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read: Ø79.1 (31.7-83.4)
Nokia XR20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read: Ø74.4 (32.7-83.3)

软件--有点老旧的安全

为什么摩托罗拉Defy只配备了Android 10,而目前的智能手机已经有了Android 12,这是一个合理的问题。然而,在商业环境中,时不时地使用旧的操作系统版本是有意义的。例如,当公司使用专门编程的应用程序时,可能首先要适应新的操作系统版本。然而,对于私人用户来说,这是相当烦人的。

安全补丁是在测试时从2021年6月开始的,这也有点老。摩托罗拉承诺2年的安全升级,但没有给出任何关于新操作系统版本的信息。

与摩托罗拉的惯例一样,你得到的是一个相当纯粹的Android ,只是通过Moto应用程序和其他一些实用程序来加强。

软件 Motorola Defy
软件 Motorola Defy
软件 Motorola Defy

通信和GNSS - 慢速WiFi 5

虽然摩托罗拉Defy实际上支持WiFi 5,但在我们用参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12进行的WLAN测试中,智能手机无法提供相应的传输速度:仅仅是每秒50 - 60 MBit左右,更多是在WiFi 4的水平上。一个明显的缺点,因为你甚至不能使用100MBit/s的家庭网络的全部力量。

这款户外手机不具备5G功能,但它的4G频率种类还不错,所以你也可以在国外旅行。然而,摩托罗拉的Defy并不是一款真实的手机。

在我们的审查样本中,室内的接收效果也相当好。我们测量了3/5的接收强度,甚至是完全接收;其他智能手机在同一地点也显示了类似的接收率。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Blackview BL6000 Pro
Mali-G57 MP4, Dimensity 800, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
697 (668min - 704max) MBit/s ∼100% +1223%
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
630 (561min - 645max) MBit/s ∼90% +1095%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=286, last 2 years)
451 MBit/s ∼65% +756%
CAT S42
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A20 MT6761D, 32 GB eMMC Flash
329 (326min - 335max) MBit/s ∼47% +524%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
327 (291min - 337max) MBit/s ∼47% +520%
Motorola Defy
Adreno 610, SD 662, 64 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (21min - 70max) MBit/s ∼8%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
649 (589min - 673max) MBit/s ∼100% +989%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
Mali-G57 MP4, Dimensity 800, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (434min - 660max) MBit/s ∼98% +962%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=286, last 2 years)
447 MBit/s ∼69% +650%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
327 (269min - 339max) MBit/s ∼50% +449%
CAT S42
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A20 MT6761D, 32 GB eMMC Flash
324 (318min - 336max) MBit/s ∼50% +444%
Motorola Defy
Adreno 610, SD 662, 64 GB eMMC Flash
59.6 (34min - 74max) MBit/s ∼9%
0510152025303540455055606570735938534548344143605753707358487073654873726550737365477374735938534548344143605753707358487073654873726550737365477374606040412142443034696655376570633563696556486866454470703351Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø59.1 (34-74)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø52.7 (21-70)
GPSTest在户外
GPSTest在户外
可用的卫星
可用的卫星

在户外,我们需要几秒钟才能定位到3米(约10英尺)以内。在我们的测试中没有发现中国的北斗网络,尽管根据制造商的说法是支持的,但除此之外还有大量的定位卫星。

在我们的自行车之旅中,摩托罗拉Defy不得不证明自己与Garmin Edge 520推荐的导航设备相比。在将近15公里(约9.3英里)的距离上相差100米(约109码),在测量距离上是相当小的偏差。

详细来说,摩托罗拉Defy在空地上几乎没有显示出任何弱点,但我们在过桥时位于汽车道而不是自行车道上。总的来说,当不需要绝对的准确性时,这款智能手机可以很好地用于日常生活中的追踪。

位置 Garmin Edge 520 - 概述
位置 Garmin Edge 520 - 概述
定位Garmin Edge 520 - 转
定位Garmin Edge 520 - 转
定位Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
定位Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
追踪摩托罗拉Defy - 概述
追踪摩托罗拉Defy - 概述
追踪摩托罗拉Defy - 转
追踪摩托罗拉Defy - 转
追踪摩托罗拉Defy - 桥梁
追踪摩托罗拉Defy - 桥梁

电话功能和语音质量 - 良好的可理解性

谷歌的标准应用程序被用作手机应用程序。它安排得很清楚,其他Android 智能手机的用户会很快找到他们的方式。可以使用VoLTE和VoWiFi,但智能手机并不显示目前正在使用的网络。

在语音质量方面,我们喜欢这样的事实,即通过听筒可以听到对方相当响亮的声音,因此即使在环境噪音中也可以很好地理解。说到环境噪音。麦克风并不能很好地过滤掉这些噪音,但我们的对话伙伴总是能听懂我们的话。我们还可以使用扬声器和免提麦克风,以体面的质量进行通话。我们也可以说得更小声一点,我们的声音仍然可以听得见。

照相机 - 没有广角,有良好的清晰度

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

对于户外手机来说,摄像头的质量往往不那么重要,摩托罗拉的Defy在这方面也略显瘦弱。用户没有广角镜头,这显然限制了相机系统的灵活性。

然而,主摄像头有一个4800万像素的传感器,通过像素分选将四个像素组合成一个更加感光的像素,从而形成1200万像素的图像。然而,如果需要,也可以使用全分辨率。

用主摄像头拍摄的照片出乎意料地清晰,有时它们甚至看起来略微过度锐化了。我们喜欢整体上的细节表现相当好。在光线很暗、对比度很高的情况下,动态范围可以更高,但图像清晰度在这里也不差。然而,在低光下,颜色看起来相当酷。

还有一个微距镜头和一个支持景深效果的镜头,每个镜头的分辨率为200万像素。在微距模式下,自动对焦有点吃力,低像素使照片更可作为快照使用。

视频可以以全高清和最多60帧的速度录制。自动对焦在这里的反应有点慢,而且还得时不时地稍微抽一下。亮度转换感觉不是很流畅。然而,在良好的照明条件下,该相机可以录制体面的视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera FlowerMain camera EnvironmentMain camerra Low Light
click to load images

我们还看了一下相机在实验室条件下的成像性能。同样,在光线良好的情况下,即使在边缘也有不错的图像清晰度,令人印象深刻。细节方面的对比度可以再高一点,但总体而言,相机的表现不错。在只有1勒克斯的照明下,几乎没有任何细节仍然可见。

ColorChecker
14 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Defy: 7.22 ∆E min: 2.1 - max: 15.7 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.7 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
53.4 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
39.7 ∆E
25 ∆E
66.6 ∆E
65.4 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
74.7 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
76.5 ∆E
68.6 ∆E
51 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Defy: 45.54 ∆E min: 14.19 - max: 76.5 ∆E

附件和保修 - 腕带在包装内

包装中包括一个充电器,一条USB-C电缆,以及一个可以安全携带智能手机的腕带。目前,制造商没有在其网站上提供任何特殊的配件。

摩托罗拉在中欧为其设备提供24个月的保修

输入设备和操作 - 背部的指纹传感器

摩托罗拉Defy的屏幕只提供60赫兹的刷新率,所以使用起来并不像目前的高端手机那样流畅。然而,它是精确的,反应灵敏的,你还可以提高触摸屏的灵敏度,这样你就可以在戴手套或湿手指的情况下使用它。

在背面,摩托罗拉的标志也作为一个指纹传感器。在我们的测试中,它被证明是相当可靠的,但当智能手机处于完全待机状态时,它也有点慢:然后需要一秒钟,直到主屏幕出现。然而,如果你事先举起智能手机,并能为即将到来的系统启动做好准备,那么解锁就会更加直接。

如果你喜欢,你也可以使用面部识别来解锁,或者将其与指纹传感器结合起来。

摩托罗拉的Defy配备了一个可自由分配的按钮,可用作按压式通话按钮,因此你可以像收音机一样使用智能手机。或者你可以为该按钮分配一个功能或一个首选的应用程序。

键盘画像
键盘画像
键盘景观
键盘景观

显示器 - 亮度太低

子像素图像
子像素图像

摩托罗拉的Defy在某种程度上扩大了720p的分辨率,在廉价的耐用型手机中处于有利地位,但考虑到它的尺寸,我们希望屏幕分辨率能稍微高一点。因此,很明显的是,它的显示效果并不像高端手机那样清晰。

IPS面板的屏幕亮度也可以更高,特别是考虑到该智能手机声称是一款户外手机。仅仅385.7cd/m²的亮度显然低于其他坚固耐用的手机所达到的亮度,而且实际上也不再是最新的了。

0.45cd/m²的黑色值在限制范围内,但由于亮度相当低,对比度仍然相当平庸。

379
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 403 cd/m² Average: 385.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.09 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 402 cd/m²
Contrast: 893:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.83 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
96.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.378
Motorola Defy
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
PLS, 1480x720, 5.30
Nokia XR20
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
CAT S42
IPS, 1440x720, 5.50
Blackview BL6000 Pro
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.36
Screen
3%
38%
6%
9%
Brightness middle
402
525
31%
599
49%
541
35%
583
45%
Brightness
386
491
27%
598
55%
532
38%
518
34%
Brightness Distribution
90
87
-3%
99
10%
95
6%
83
-8%
Black Level *
0.45
0.53
-18%
0.33
27%
0.52
-16%
0.6
-33%
Contrast
893
991
11%
1815
103%
1040
16%
972
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.83
5.54
-15%
4.52
6%
5.89
-22%
4.78
1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.53
10.23
-7%
7.6
20%
11.35
-19%
8.7
9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.4
6.7
-5%
4.2
34%
5.6
12%
5.5
14%
Gamma
2.378 93%
2.318 95%
2.279 97%
2.272 97%
2.22 99%
CCT
8348 78%
8555 76%
7309 89%
7884 82%
6830 95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17025 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

我们用CalMAN软件和分光光度计进行的测试表明,色彩设置 "饱和 "或 "自然 "在色彩再现方面没有大的区别。在这两种模式下,都可以看到明显的蓝色偏移,一般来说,某些色调的偏差使专业色彩评估变得困难。

CalMAN灰度 - "饱和 "颜色模式
CalMAN灰度 - "饱和 "颜色模式
CalMAN色彩精度--"饱和 "色彩模式
CalMAN色彩精度--"饱和 "色彩模式
CalMAN灰度 - "自然 "色彩模式
CalMAN灰度 - "自然 "色彩模式
卡尔曼色彩精确度--"自然 "色彩模式
卡尔曼色彩精确度--"自然 "色彩模式
卡尔曼色彩空间--sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间--sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 - AdobeRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 - AdobeRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 - DCI P3
卡尔曼色彩空间 - DCI P3
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 30 ms rise
↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

在户外,当你在阳光下时,低亮度会被注意到,这对你是不利的。屏幕的反射率很高,内容几乎无法辨认。在阴凉处,情况会好一些。

从侧面看屏幕时,在观看角度上可以看到轻微的暗淡。这在日常使用中是很明显的,但还是可以忍受的。

观点
观点
户外使用
户外使用

性能 - 摩托罗拉Defy可以跟上

随着 骁龙662来自高通公司,摩托罗拉Defy配备的SoC已经有两年半的历史。尽管如此,它在性能方面仍然相当合适,特别是当你将处理器的性能与其他廉价的户外手机进行比较时。我们的基准测试显示,即使在系统基准测试中,摩托罗拉的耐用型智能手机也有不错的结果。

在图形性能方面,一个 Adreno 610也不太合时宜。它的性能也可以超过在的图形解决方案。 三星Galaxy XCover 5CAT S42但它可以超越它们。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
315 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
183 Points ∼31% -42%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
504 Points ∼85% +60%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
134 Points ∼23% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (305 - 316, n=9)
312 Points ∼53% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=246, last 2 years)
594 Points ∼100% +89%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1426 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
926 Points ∼46% -35%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1662 Points ∼82% +17%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
421 Points ∼21% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1234 - 1453, n=9)
1363 Points ∼67% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4829, n=246, last 2 years)
2022 Points ∼100% +42%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
467 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
636 Points ∼29% +36%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
976 Points ∼45% +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (442 - 498, n=5)
466 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=144, last 2 years)
2185 Points ∼100% +368%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
368 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
543 Points ∼24% +48%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1092 Points ∼48% +197%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (345 - 376, n=7)
366 Points ∼16% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=146, last 2 years)
2270 Points ∼100% +517%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
6425 Points ∼65%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7090 Points ∼72% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (6425 - 7554, n=2)
6990 Points ∼71% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=65, last 2 years)
9914 Points ∼100% +54%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1865 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1263 Points ∼28% -32%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3527 Points ∼77% +89%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
437 Points ∼10% -77%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4591 Points ∼100% +146%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1797 - 1889, n=8)
1848 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=236, last 2 years)
3469 Points ∼76% +86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1743 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1139 Points ∼24% -35%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3692 Points ∼77% +112%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
384 Points ∼8% -78%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4806 Points ∼100% +176%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1681 - 1765, n=8)
1733 Points ∼36% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=236, last 2 years)
4051 Points ∼84% +132%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2470 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2039 Points ∼51% -17%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3051 Points ∼77% +24%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
838 Points ∼21% -66%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3969 Points ∼100% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2161 - 2543, n=8)
2419 Points ∼61% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=236, last 2 years)
2806 Points ∼71% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1896 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1277 Points ∼27% -33%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3656 Points ∼78% +93%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
462 Points ∼10% -76%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4659 Points ∼100% +146%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1819 - 1914, n=8)
1881 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=258, last 2 years)
4209 Points ∼90% +122%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1781 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1145 Points ∼21% -36%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3845 Points ∼71% +116%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
408 Points ∼8% -77%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4721 Points ∼87% +165%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1737 - 1794, n=8)
1778 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=258, last 2 years)
5405 Points ∼100% +203%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2452 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2140 Points ∼48% -13%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3118 Points ∼70% +27%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
865 Points ∼19% -65%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4455 Points ∼100% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2146 - 2502, n=8)
2349 Points ∼53% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=256, last 2 years)
3008 Points ∼68% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1164 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
861 Points ∼25% -26%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2438 Points ∼72% +109%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
242 Points ∼7% -79%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3380 Points ∼100% +190%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1151 - 1905, n=8)
1262 Points ∼37% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=233, last 2 years)
2668 Points ∼79% +129%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1011 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
739 Points ∼23% -27%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2302 Points ∼71% +128%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
201 Points ∼6% -80%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3241 Points ∼100% +221%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (998 - 1074, n=8)
1025 Points ∼32% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=233, last 2 years)
2826 Points ∼87% +180%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2477 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2034 Points ∼51% -18%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3076 Points ∼77% +24%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
850 Points ∼21% -66%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3979 Points ∼100% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2351 - 2513, n=8)
2459 Points ∼62% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=233, last 2 years)
2825 Points ∼71% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1176 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
872 Points ∼25% -26%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2566 Points ∼72% +118%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
263 Points ∼7% -78%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3557 Points ∼100% +202%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1124 - 1197, n=8)
1173 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=259, last 2 years)
3439 Points ∼97% +192%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1027 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
745 Points ∼19% -27%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2448 Points ∼62% +138%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
219 Points ∼6% -79%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3368 Points ∼85% +228%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (980 - 1081, n=8)
1031 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=259, last 2 years)
3967 Points ∼100% +286%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2383 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2152 Points ∼49% -10%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3090 Points ∼70% +30%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
874 Points ∼20% -63%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4427 Points ∼100% +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2164 - 2534, n=8)
2345 Points ∼53% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=259, last 2 years)
3044 Points ∼69% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1113 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
944 Points ∼31% -15%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2322 Points ∼75% +109%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3095 Points ∼100% +178%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1096 - 1167, n=8)
1119 Points ∼36% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=197, last 2 years)
2620 Points ∼85% +135%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
968 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
819 Points ∼26% -15%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2250 Points ∼71% +132%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3187 Points ∼100% +229%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (963 - 1005, n=8)
977 Points ∼31% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=197, last 2 years)
2943 Points ∼92% +204%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2340 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2020 Points ∼72% -14%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2613 Points ∼93% +12%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
2812 Points ∼100% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2124 - 2499, n=8)
2305 Points ∼82% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=197, last 2 years)
2641 Points ∼94% +13%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
370 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
430 Points ∼15% +16%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
980 Points ∼33% +165%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
1679 Points ∼57% +354%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (369 - 385, n=7)
375 Points ∼13% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9386, n=110, last 2 years)
2961 Points ∼100% +700%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
366 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
429 Points ∼14% +17%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
977 Points ∼32% +167%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
1641 Points ∼53% +348%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (366 - 369, n=4)
367 Points ∼12% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=106, last 2 years)
3097 Points ∼100% +746%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
102 Points ∼11%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
294 Points ∼31% +188%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (102 - 108, n=2)
105 Points ∼11% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83 - 3059, n=58, last 2 years)
953 Points ∼100% +834%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
101 Points ∼11%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
287 Points ∼31% +184%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
 
101 Points ∼11% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=55, last 2 years)
931 Points ∼100% +822%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
49 fps ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
35 fps ∼57% -29%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
59 fps ∼97% +20%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
18 fps ∼29% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (29 - 51, n=9)
40 fps ∼65% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=200, last 2 years)
61.1 fps ∼100% +25%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
35 fps ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
24 fps ∼21% -31%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
81 fps ∼70% +131%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
13 fps ∼11% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (34 - 36, n=9)
35.1 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 417, n=200, last 2 years)
115 fps ∼100% +229%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
33 fps ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
29 fps ∼60% -12%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
37 fps ∼76% +12%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
11 fps ∼23% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (17 - 34, n=9)
26.4 fps ∼54% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=198, last 2 years)
48.6 fps ∼100% +47%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼24% -16%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
41 fps ∼61% +116%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
5.9 fps ∼9% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (19 - 21, n=9)
19.3 fps ∼29% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 229, n=199, last 2 years)
66.8 fps ∼100% +252%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
25 fps ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
20 fps ∼53% -20%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
26 fps ∼68% +4%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
8.1 fps ∼21% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (12 - 26, n=9)
19.7 fps ∼52% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=197, last 2 years)
38 fps ∼100% +52%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.4 fps ∼20% -28%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
29 fps ∼63% +123%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
4 fps ∼9% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (13 - 14, n=9)
13.1 fps ∼28% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 151, n=197, last 2 years)
46 fps ∼100% +254%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼50% -8%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
14 fps ∼59% +8%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
3.3 fps ∼14% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (6.4 - 14, n=9)
10.3 fps ∼43% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=196, last 2 years)
23.8 fps ∼100% +83%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6 fps ∼22% -15%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼58% +125%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1.8 fps ∼6% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7 - 7.3, n=9)
7.17 fps ∼26% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=196, last 2 years)
27.7 fps ∼100% +290%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps ∼51% -20%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼68% +7%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
4 fps ∼17% -73%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
21 fps ∼89% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7.5 - 15, n=9)
11.6 fps ∼49% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=264, last 2 years)
23.7 fps ∼100% +58%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8.4 fps ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6.2 fps ∼22% -26%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps ∼65% +114%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
2 fps ∼7% -76%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
22 fps ∼79% +162%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (8.2 - 8.6, n=9)
8.4 fps ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=264, last 2 years)
27.9 fps ∼100% +232%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
8.9 fps ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.4 fps ∼47% -17%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10 fps ∼63% +12%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
2.5 fps ∼16% -72%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
13 fps ∼82% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4.4 - 9.6, n=9)
7.13 fps ∼45% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=265, last 2 years)
15.9 fps ∼100% +79%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2.2 fps ∼20% -21%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6.5 fps ∼60% +132%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
0.73 fps ∼7% -74%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
8.2 fps ∼76% +193%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2.6 - 2.9, n=9)
2.79 fps ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=265, last 2 years)
10.8 fps ∼100% +286%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
194505 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
131776 Points ∼26% -32%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
322933 Points ∼64% +66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (194505 - 198290, n=3)
196949 Points ∼39% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (121238 - 815441, n=55, last 2 years)
501153 Points ∼100% +158%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
176579 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
127096 Points ∼37% -28%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
264533 Points ∼77% +50%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
77514 Points ∼22% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (167471 - 185542, n=9)
177411 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=177, last 2 years)
344947 Points ∼100% +95%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
2343 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1533 Points ∼41% -35%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3265 Points ∼86% +39%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
895 Points ∼24% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2243 - 2432, n=10)
2345 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 7123, n=187, last 2 years)
3776 Points ∼100% +61%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
4848 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3314 Points ∼48% -32%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6296 Points ∼92% +30%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1542 Points ∼23% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4275 - 5001, n=10)
4853 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 11774, n=187, last 2 years)
6845 Points ∼100% +41%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
3046 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1533 Points ∼34% -50%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3847 Points ∼86% +26%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1018 Points ∼23% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2618 - 3454, n=10)
3061 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=187, last 2 years)
4484 Points ∼100% +47%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1791 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1219 Points ∼21% -32%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3765 Points ∼64% +110%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
478 Points ∼8% -73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1773 - 1887, n=10)
1839 Points ∼31% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 15739, n=187, last 2 years)
5890 Points ∼100% +229%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Defy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 4096
1139 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
893 Points ∼69% -22%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1247 Points ∼96% +9%
CAT S42
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
854 Points ∼66% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1034 - 1228, n=10)
1126 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=187, last 2 years)
1296 Points ∼100% +14%

摩托罗拉的Defy在浏览互联网时有一个不错的速度。它离高端还很远,但至少你在滚动时不必等待太长时间直到图片被重新加载。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182, n=174, last 2 years)
52.5 Points ∼100% +67%
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)
46.435 Points ∼88% +47%
Motorola Defy (Chrome 93)
31.517 Points ∼60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (30.4 - 32.4, n=10)
31.5 Points ∼60% 0%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 (Chrome 89)
18.469 Points ∼35% -41%
CAT S42 (Chrome 80)
14.282 Points ∼27% -55%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=184, last 2 years)
95.2 Points ∼100% +85%
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)
83.5 Points ∼88% +63%
Motorola Defy (Chrome 93)
51.344 Points ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (47.8 - 51.3, n=8)
49.4 Points ∼52% -4%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 (Chrome 89)
27.09 Points ∼28% -47%
CAT S42 (Chrome 80)
22.543 Points ∼24% -56%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=160, last 2 years)
52.2 runs/min ∼100% +81%
Nokia XR20 (Chome 92)
37.62 runs/min ∼72% +30%
Motorola Defy (Chome 93)
28.91 runs/min ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (26.5 - 29.3, n=9)
28.4 runs/min ∼54% -2%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 (Chome 89)
15.3 runs/min ∼29% -47%
CAT S42 (Chome 80)
12.8 runs/min ∼25% -56%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=190, last 2 years)
80.8 Points ∼100% +44%
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)
69 Points ∼85% +23%
Motorola Defy (Chrome 93)
56 Points ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (51 - 59, n=10)
53 Points ∼66% -5%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 (Chrome 89)
35 Points ∼43% -37%
CAT S42 (Chrome 80)
26 Points ∼32% -54%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=198, last 2 years)
18562 Points ∼100% +94%
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)
17816 Points ∼96% +86%
Motorola Defy (Chrome 93)
9575 Points ∼52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (8893 - 9879, n=10)
9332 Points ∼50% -3%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 (Chrome 89)
4875 Points ∼26% -49%
CAT S42 (Chrome 80)
3971 Points ∼21% -59%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
CAT S42 (Chrome 80)
11842.1 ms * ∼100% -211%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 (Chrome 89)
9396.9 ms * ∼79% -147%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (3811 - 4650, n=10)
4438 ms * ∼37% -16%
Motorola Defy (Chrome 93)
3810.5 ms * ∼32%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=200, last 2 years)
3795 ms * ∼32% -0%
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)
2382.7 ms * ∼20% +37%

* ... smaller is better

如果你看一下存储,你会发现互联网上的信息,它应该是UFS 2.1存储,但在基准测试中的表现反而说明了eMMC闪存,它的速度明显较慢。制造商实际上应要求证实了这一点。这款智能手机的传输率至少比其他采用eMMC存储的设备在随机访问中更稳定一些,但同时整体速度相当差。

Motorola DefySamsung Galaxy XCover 5Nokia XR20CAT S42Blackview BL6000 ProAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-6%
85%
-43%
96%
-31%
85%
Sequential Read 256KB
306.5
268.5
-12%
485
58%
287.9
-6%
872.5
185%
274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=174)
-11%
797 ?(41.9 - 2037, n=271, last 2 years)
160%
Sequential Write 256KB
187.7
273.6
46%
452
141%
121.1
-35%
198.5
6%
178 ?(40 - 274, n=174)
-5%
360 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=271, last 2 years)
92%
Random Read 4KB
96.4
121
26%
174.8
81%
51.6
-46%
190.2
97%
58.7 ?(11.4 - 149, n=174)
-39%
141 ?(13.5 - 325, n=271, last 2 years)
46%
Random Write 4KB
92.6
14.7
-84%
146.2
58%
14.8
-84%
181.9
96%
29.1 ?(3.4 - 147, n=174)
-69%
131 ?(5.5 - 330, n=271, last 2 years)
41%

游戏--削减的3D游戏

摩托罗拉Defy不是也可能永远不会成为真正的游戏智能手机。系统组件,尤其是图形解决方案,根本不够强大。

简单的休闲游戏可以顺利进行,2D射击游戏Armajet 至少可以达到相对稳定的60帧。然而,如果你想在没有卡顿的情况下玩3D游戏,你必须大大减少细节,如PUBG Mobile。此外,根本没有提供更高的图形选项。我们用GameBench的软件测量了帧率。.

通过触摸屏和位置传感器进行控制没有问题。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
05101520253035404550556059596056605960605959596060606060605953595858595759586060606059606060606060596059606060556060606060605956606058606059596060606059606059596059596056605960605959596060606060605953595858595759586060606059606060606060596059606060556060606060605956606058606059596060606059606059596030302930303029312930302930303030303028313029302928302930293030303030302930303028303030303029313028303029303030293030293030595960566059606059595960606060606059535958585957595860606060596060606060605960596060605560606060606059566060586060595960606060596060595960303029303030293129303029303030303030283130293029283029302930303030303029303030283030303030293130283030293030302930302930302524222525252525242425242524252525242623252425252525242526252524252525242625252424262425252425252424242525242625252525252425252420242192024242225232523252524252422232424252523262020242525Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.3 (53-60)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.6.0: Ø29.7 (28-31)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 1.6.0: Ø24.1 (9-26)

排放 - 几乎没有变暖

温度

3DMark狂野生活压力测试
3DMark狂野生活压力测试
3DMark狂野生活极端压力测试
3DMark狂野生活极端压力测试

摩托罗拉Defy的外壳发热相当适中,即使在较长时间的满负荷工作后也是如此。我们在正面测得的最高温度为40℃(104°F)。因此,智能手机总是可以毫无问题地被触摸到。

长期性能也得到了保证,正如3D Mark Wild Life的压力测试所显示的那样。在这里,即使在运行了20次基准测试后,仍有远超过90%的性能可用。

Max. Load
 40 °C37.1 °C35.1 °C 
 39.2 °C36.6 °C35.5 °C 
 38.3 °C36.3 °C34.7 °C 
Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 37 °C
33.3 °C35.9 °C39.5 °C
32.9 °C35.9 °C37.8 °C
32.7 °C35.6 °C36.6 °C
Maximum: 39.5 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 (5.86min - 5.89max) % ∼100% 0%
Motorola Defy
Adreno 610, SD 662, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.4 (2.24min - 2.25max) % ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
Mali-G52 MP2, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 % ∼100% 0%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
Mali-G57 MP4, Dimensity 800, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.5 % ∼99% -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.1 (1.747min - 1.763max) % ∼100% +2%
Motorola Defy
Adreno 610, SD 662, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.7 (0.594min - 0.614max) % ∼98%
00.10.20.30.50.60.70.80.911.11.21.41.51.61.71.81.922.10.6120.610.5940.6120.6130.5990.6110.6130.6130.6110.6120.6120.5970.6140.6120.5950.610.6130.6130.5980.6120.610.5940.6120.6130.5990.6110.6130.6130.6110.6120.6120.5970.6140.6120.5950.610.6130.6130.5982.252.242.242.242.252.252.242.242.252.242.252.252.242.252.252.242.252.252.252.25Tooltip
; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø0.608 (0.594-0.614)
; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.25 (2.24-2.25)
热图背面
热图背面
热力图前线
热力图前线

演讲者

尽管屏幕上方的听筒以宽大的扬声器格栅呈现。只有下边缘的扬声器被用于声音输出。它的工作做得相当好。它不能将低频混入声音中,但它确实有一些低中音和合理平衡的高音,即使在最大音量下也不会在耳朵里砰砰作响。

方便。顶部的3.5毫米音频端口和USB-C端口都可用于音频输出。因此,你可以选择使用模拟或数字输出,不需要现有耳机的适配器。

声音可以通过蓝牙无线传输,许多高质量音频的编解码器都有aptX HD、aptX Adaptive和LDAC,所以你不必太担心与无线耳机的兼容性问题。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2050.743.52541.342.7313129.54035.634.9503838.16330.134.18030.835.610023.522.412520.321.916020.334.320016.244.425015.950.931513.956.740013.661.150013.565.263019.368.480016.573.1100013.974.512501473.5160013.267.6200013.267.7250014.269.231501672.2400017.269.9500017.971.7630018.570.6800019.174.91000019.877.31250019.374.41600020.160.6SPL28.883.9N1.159.4median 16.5median 68.4Delta2.910.24342.536.837.536.829.530.632.53433.12928.425.519.329.320.323.91614.224.511.333.411.741.19.747.39.352.111.857.413.756.417.362.416.268.311.167.810.369.810.468.611.666.612.667.213.965.615.266.415.669.316.372.216.567.316.458.217.147.465.971.426.479.619.226.50.843.9median 13.9median 62.42.412.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola DefySamsung Galaxy XCover 5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Defy audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命--即使在没有电源插座的情况下也能使用数天

能源消耗

摩托罗拉的Defy被证明是相当节能的。特别是在负载情况下,测量的速率在合理范围内,但智能手机在空闲模式下也不会太饿。

Power Consumption
Idledarkmidlight 1.3 / 1.9 / 2.2 Watt
Load midlight 3 / 5.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Defy
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
3000 mAh
Nokia XR20
4630 mAh
CAT S42
4200 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-17%
26%
-14%
-26%
-10%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
1.3
-0%
0.7
46%
1.5
-15%
0.863 ?(0.49 - 1.38, n=9)
34%
0.953 ?(0.37 - 2.5, n=217, last 2 years)
27%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.9
-0%
1.1
42%
2
-5%
2.5 ?(1.5 - 4.92, n=9)
-32%
1.806 ?(0.65 - 3.94, n=217, last 2 years)
5%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
2.7
-23%
1.6
27%
3
-36%
2.72 ?(1.63 - 4.95, n=9)
-24%
2.04 ?(0.69 - 4.2, n=217, last 2 years)
7%
Load Average *
3
4.3
-43%
2.7
10%
3.6
-20%
5.07 ?(3 - 7.21, n=9)
-69%
4.48 ?(2.1 - 8.4, n=217, last 2 years)
-49%
Load Maximum *
5.2
6.2
-19%
4.9
6%
4.9
6%
7.26 ?(5.2 - 9.32, n=9)
-40%
7.32 ?(3.56 - 12.3, n=217, last 2 years)
-41%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345673.512.823.012.722.532.512.582.822.642.52.662.722.482.62.512.831.9622.382.432.692.581.5612.62.72.692.52.492.472.692.682.953.023.152.792.792.751.7872.582.091.7532.131.6712.522.842.521.6712.531.7361.7472.512.512.681.93522.772.921.8052.482.492.462.712.512.482.52.662.612.462.472.452.672.492.482.692.672.552.492.672.831.9712.82.912.781.7462.843.043.313.113.133.193.333.243.123.13.433.433.133.193.143.333.243.153.123.331.932.222.631.5262.752.512.582.482.372.331.8442.572.642.551.7652.72.482.952.653.142.562.672.952.381.5412.562.541.7282.472.812.762.652.772.562.792.583.052.512.572.512.852.892.592.732.711.6832.482.862.572.532.692.722.62.592.92.951.923.261.9025.071.7264.774.644.674.84.534.9854.914.634.64.695.14.724.694.6454.464.824.694.794.754.624.914.974.784.711.6811.7215.525.8365.955.582.951.9442.722.554.574.574.524.284.74.44.964.584.474.834.334.374.254.854.524.73.651.8525.966.111.5255.366.095.912.15.886.435.495.755.861.7615.721.5445.575.295.085.515.555.33.561.9225.396.586.676.073.364.84.854.894.081.9035.964.575.315.752.052.986.977.443.493.513.553.121.7685.25.235.041.7553.044.946.114.7365.454.995.865.151.6073.695.055.185.115.295.213.122.56.115.76.237.085.36.376.026.346.066.55.831.6174.166.141.825.755.657.3967.267.166.097.27.445.937.466.766.347.047.115.917.384.855.77.257.55.727.456.716.4977.296.117.526.611.6272.782.892.632.623.112.964.955.125.125.414.314.564.925.024.354.524.854.284.334.544.615.294.594.764.664.271.7163.125.85.891.7831.5771.5832.062.7Tooltip
: Ø3.83 (1.525-7.52)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.60.91.11.31.51.71.92.22.42.62.833.23.43.73.94.13.353.323.53.363.253.383.613.213.473.353.563.433.313.313.323.533.483.283.443.633.353.593.373.83.373.43.513.693.44.314.313.783.773.823.893.363.413.423.483.643.43.363.583.563.333.353.423.693.543.393.433.613.523.423.543.383.473.393.393.53.643.343.353.323.53.363.253.383.613.213.473.353.563.433.313.313.323.533.483.283.443.633.353.593.373.83.373.43.513.693.44.314.313.783.773.823.893.363.413.423.483.643.43.363.583.563.333.353.423.693.543.393.433.613.523.423.543.383.473.393.393.53.643.341.8672.12.82.532.592.691.9231.8651.8121.9522.281.8331.8961.8722.162.232.242.372.192.381.7981.8041.8271.9971.8751.8241.8191.8721.8081.7641.9722.021.8971.791.7831.9691.7831.9171.7691.8711.8281.7691.841.9811.8131.781.7671.7761.7871.9021.771.8061.9611.7521.7491.9591.7641.731.7691.9991.879Tooltip
; Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.5 (3.21-4.31)
; Idle 1min: Ø1.953 (1.73-2.8)

电池寿命

由于有5000毫安时的电池,摩托罗拉Defy有足够的电池容量。因此,它实际上可以持续很长时间:在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,15:48小时的速度并不差,表明至少可以在远离电源插座的情况下正常使用两天。

智能手机不能进行无线充电,但可以使用高达20瓦的有线快速充电。使用附带的充电器充满电大约需要1:20小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
30h 46min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 36min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 28min
Motorola Defy
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5
3000 mAh
Nokia XR20
4630 mAh
CAT S42
4200 mAh
Blackview BL6000 Pro
5280 mAh
Battery Runtime
-31%
-4%
-18%
-11%
Reader / Idle
1846
1246
-33%
1786
-3%
1243
-33%
H.264
936
689
-26%
895
-4%
902
-4%
WiFi v1.3
948
657
-31%
927
-2%
836
-12%
846
-11%
Load
328
213
-35%
301
-8%
253
-23%

Pros

+ 别致而稳定的外壳
+ IP68和MIL-STD-810H
+ 锐利的相机图像
+ 3.5毫米和USB-C接口可用于音频
+ 不错的系统性能
+ 良好的接收效果

Cons

- 蹩脚的WLAN
- 稀缺且缓慢的内存
- 没有广角镜头
- 阴暗的显示屏
- 较旧的操作系统和安全补丁

结论 - 不是完美无缺,但非常强大

审查中。摩托罗拉Defy。测试设备由Bullitt集团提供。
审查中。摩托罗拉Defy。测试设备由Bullitt集团提供。

当涉及到户外智能手机时,有必要降低一点期望值。如果你将这些设备与相同价格范围内的普通智能手机进行比较,你会立即注意到在性能和功能方面的显著差异。

然而,像摩托罗拉Defy这样的智能手机也具有300欧元(约348美元)左右的普通手机所没有的功能。例如,非常稳定的大猩猩玻璃Victus,橡胶外壳,或甚至可以用湿手指使用的触摸屏。

作为交换,你必须接受一些东西。Wi-Fi性能相当低,内存很少而且很慢,屏幕很暗,这对一个户外手机来说特别令人讨厌。

亮点是良好的运行时间、体面的性能和别致的外壳,在我们的测试中证明它是非常稳定和制作精良的。该设备在负载下不会过度发热,可以保持其性能,有一个可以拍摄清晰照片的摄像头,并有一个相当纯净的Android 。

摩托罗拉和Bullitt集团之间的合作产生了一个坚实的户外手机,拥有别致的外壳和体面的摄像头。

您可以通过以下方式获得更多的性能 诺基亚XR20.还有一个额外的广角摄像头。如果你正在寻找一个更小的坚固耐用的手机,你应该看看 三星Galaxy XCover 5CAT S42.

价格和可用性

摩托罗拉Defy可以直接从制造商处购买,价格为https://motorolarugged.com/de-de/329欧元(约合人民币382元)。在Amazon.com(DE)进行测试时,但在互联网上也可以找到更便宜的报价。

Motorola Defy - 09/29/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%