Notebookcheck

小米10青春版5G智能手机评测：2000元价位的性价比

给每个人带来5G! 给每个人带来5G! 小米Mi 10 Lite允许以不到300欧元（〜355美元）的价格进入5G世界。 此外，价格实惠的小米智能手机还提供了一些功能非常强大的设备以及AMOLED面板。 在我们对小米智能手机的评论中了解Mi 10 Lite是否也存在一些弱点。
Marcus Herbrich, ✓ T. Hinum (translated by Zewei Shen), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Mi 10 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 620
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
6.57 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 392 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米音频端口, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 接近传感器，加速度传感器，电子罗盘，陀螺仪, OTG, Miracast, IR Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM：2/3/5/8; WCDMA: 1/2/4/5/8; LTE FDD：1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28, LTE TDD：38/40/41; 5G：n1/n3/n7/n28/n77/n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 163.7 x 74.8
Battery
4160 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 1/2英寸传感器，0.8μm，f / 1.79孔径，6P镜头）+ 8 MP（120°超广角，f / 2.2孔径）+ 2 MP（1.75μm，ƒ/ 2.4） + 2 MP（1.75μm，ƒ/ 2.4）
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5, 1/3.06", 1.0µm)
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道, Keyboard: 屏幕, 充电器，保护套，USB Type-C电缆，SIM卡工具，用户手册，保修卡, MiUI, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1，SAR：0.79 W / kg（头），1.18 W / kg（身体），无风扇, fanless
Weight
192 g, Power Supply: 78 g
Price
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84 %
10/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620		192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
82 %
02/2020
Samsung Galaxy A71
SD 730, Adreno 618		179 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.70"2400x1080
83 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618		209 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80 %
06/2020
realme 6 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618		195 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
83 %
10/2020
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
SD 730G, Adreno 618		204 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
82 %
07/2020
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6		189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
83 %
08/2020
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620		184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite in Dream White
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite in Dream White
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

Size Comparison

❌
165.75 mm 76.68 mm 8.8 mm 209 g163.8 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 195 g163.7 mm 74.8 mm 7.9 mm 192 g163.6 mm 76 mm 7.7 mm 179 g162.31 mm 75 mm 8.58 mm 189 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.67 mm 204 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (563min - 668max) MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (283min - 670max) MBit/s ∼95% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=295, last 2 years)
388 MBit/s ∼60% -38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
341 (334min - 349max) MBit/s ∼52% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
338 (295min - 356max) MBit/s ∼52% -46%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
333 (319min - 345max) MBit/s ∼51% -47%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 (145min - 352max) MBit/s ∼45% -54%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (275min - 666max) MBit/s ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=295, last 2 years)
375 MBit/s ∼56% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
324 (310min - 330max) MBit/s ∼49% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
317 (151min - 367max) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
realme 6 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 (137min - 336max) MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
255 (234min - 277max) MBit/s ∼38% -62%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665581631647623652629620640628626612622627623627644629635631545621662642627643635631639606640581631647623652629620640628626612622627623627644629635631545621662642627643635631639606640618667666672667673668667666673667674666673671658676665677665670673672673668656672670673670Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø627 (545-662)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø668 (618-677)
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite
Ultra wide-angle
Ultra wide-angle
Main camera
Main camera
2x zoom
2x zoom
10x zoom (max)
10x zoom (max)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraLow lightUltra wide-angleMain camera
ColorChecker
27 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
38 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
25 ∆E
51 ∆E
53.4 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
55.9 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
54.7 ∆E
56.1 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
35.1 ∆E
23 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G: 37.64 ∆E min: 12.99 - max: 56.06 ∆E
ColorChecker
5.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G: 5.37 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 10.11 ∆E
574
cd/m²		574
cd/m²		579
cd/m²
579
cd/m²		584
cd/m²		585
cd/m²
591
cd/m²		588
cd/m²		594
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 594 cd/m² Average: 583.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 584 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.17 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.231
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57		Samsung Galaxy A71
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70		Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67		realme 6 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60		Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47		Huawei P40 Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50		OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44
Screen
-49%
-18%
-159%
16%
-42%
-32%
Brightness middle
584
629
8%
610
4%
442
-24%
605
4%
466
-20%
529
-9%
Brightness
583
646
11%
579
-1%
419
-28%
608
4%
457
-22%
531
-9%
Brightness Distribution
97
95
-2%
92
-5%
90
-7%
95
-2%
91
-6%
94
-3%
Black Level *
0.37
0.37
0.61
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.17
2.7
-131%
1.8
-54%
6.1
-421%
0.84
28%
2.2
-88%
2.53
-116%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.95
6
-103%
3
-2%
9.7
-229%
1.8
39%
4.6
-56%
4.52
-53%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
3
-76%
2.5
-47%
5.9
-247%
1.3
24%
2.7
-59%
1.7
-0%
Gamma
2.231 99%
2.1 105%
2.31 95%
2.35 94%
2.211 100%
2.24 98%
2.249 98%
CCT
6341 103%
6340 103%
6864 95%
7631 85%
6310 103%
6633 98%
6462 101%
Contrast
1649
1195
764

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 241.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 241.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 241.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9728 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms).
Geekbench 5.3 | Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1293 Points ∼64%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1242 Points ∼61% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1231 - 1302, n=10)
1265 Points ∼62% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=89, last 2 years)
2030 Points ∼100% +57%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1183 Points ∼64%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1169 Points ∼63% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (168 - 1278, n=12)
1060 Points ∼57% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=89, last 2 years)
1862 Points ∼100% +57%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
982 Points ∼46%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1063 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
903 Points ∼42%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
2137 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1004 - 1192, n=5)
1082 Points ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=60, last 2 years)
1576 Points ∼74%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
861 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1163 Points ∼69%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1201 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points ∼65%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
Points ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1178 - 1266, n=5)
1223 Points ∼73%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=56, last 2 years)
1677 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1647 Points ∼68% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1771 Points ∼73% -7%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1759 Points ∼72% -8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼69% -11%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
2434 Points ∼100% +28%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼81% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=17)
1781 Points ∼73% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=192, last 2 years)
1901 Points ∼78% 0%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
542 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
569 Points ∼85% -15%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
567 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
547 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
642 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=17)
603 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=192, last 2 years)
549 Points ∼82% -18%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8968 Points ∼96%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
9324 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8591 - 9965, n=3)
9175 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1297 - 12228, n=94, last 2 years)
5878 Points ∼63% -34%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7765 Points ∼79%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
9860 Points ∼100% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (6213 - 7765, n=3)
7214 Points ∼73% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1163 - 14895, n=106, last 2 years)
6917 Points ∼70% -11%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2863 Points ∼92%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
3113 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2689 - 2882, n=3)
2811 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (412 - 5099, n=106, last 2 years)
2246 Points ∼72% -22%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7773 Points ∼77% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7829 Points ∼77% +1%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
10106 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7628 Points ∼75% -2%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
9527 Points ∼94% +22%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼93% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7245 - 9989, n=17)
8308 Points ∼82% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=274, last 2 years)
7530 Points ∼75% -3%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8730 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
8885 Points ∼64% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
9091 Points ∼66% +4%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
13777 Points ∼100% +58%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8941 Points ∼65% +2%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
13099 Points ∼95% +50%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼79% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8687 - 11041, n=16)
9734 Points ∼71% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=253, last 2 years)
9600 Points ∼70% +10%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2445 Points ∼73% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2721 Points ∼82% -6%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2562 Points ∼77% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2686 Points ∼81% -7%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
3331 Points ∼100% +15%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼86% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2979, n=17)
2742 Points ∼82% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=215, last 2 years)
2629 Points ∼79% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1731 Points ∼38% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2250 Points ∼50% -30%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2255 Points ∼50% -29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2143 Points ∼47% -33%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4544 Points ∼100% +42%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼70% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 3198, n=17)
3053 Points ∼67% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=215, last 2 years)
2945 Points ∼65% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1851 Points ∼44% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2340 Points ∼56% -25%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2317 Points ∼55% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2244 Points ∼53% -28%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4204 Points ∼100% +34%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼74% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2287 - 3130, n=17)
2966 Points ∼71% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=215, last 2 years)
2601 Points ∼62% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2827 Points ∼61% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3236 Points ∼70% -7%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3067 Points ∼66% -12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3058 Points ∼66% -13%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4642 Points ∼100% +33%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼76% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3765, n=17)
3288 Points ∼71% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=275, last 2 years)
2809 Points ∼61% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2085 Points ∼42% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2539 Points ∼52% -29%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2558 Points ∼52% -29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2466 Points ∼50% -31%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4906 Points ∼100% +37%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼72% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2814 - 3592, n=17)
3467 Points ∼71% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12616, n=275, last 2 years)
3220 Points ∼66% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2214 Points ∼46% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2667 Points ∼55% -26%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2656 Points ∼55% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2577 Points ∼53% -29%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4845 Points ∼100% +34%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼73% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=17)
3413 Points ∼70% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9643, n=275, last 2 years)
2920 Points ∼60% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2702 Points ∼58% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3226 Points ∼70% -8%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3125 Points ∼67% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3134 Points ∼68% -10%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4637 Points ∼100% +33%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼77% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3651, n=17)
3275 Points ∼71% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=273, last 2 years)
2763 Points ∼60% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3101 Points ∼49% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3785 Points ∼60% -29%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3835 Points ∼61% -28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3751 Points ∼59% -30%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6327 Points ∼100% +19%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼85% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4036 - 5437, n=17)
5181 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=275, last 2 years)
4483 Points ∼71% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3002 Points ∼51% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3645 Points ∼62% -26%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3651 Points ∼62% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼61% -27%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5853 Points ∼100% +20%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼82% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=17)
4562 Points ∼78% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=275, last 2 years)
3599 Points ∼61% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3210 Points ∼80% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3170 Points ∼79% -7%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3083 Points ∼76% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3257 Points ∼81% -5%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼87% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2964 - 3556, n=17)
3331 Points ∼83% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=269, last 2 years)
2717 Points ∼67% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2296 Points ∼48% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2356 Points ∼49% -29%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼50% -28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2298 Points ∼48% -31%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4804 Points ∼100% +45%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼68% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2048 - 3342, n=17)
3137 Points ∼65% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=269, last 2 years)
2727 Points ∼57% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2451 Points ∼53% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2499 Points ∼54% -25%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2514 Points ∼55% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2459 Points ∼53% -27%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4608 Points ∼100% +38%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼72% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2261 - 3346, n=17)
3162 Points ∼69% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=269, last 2 years)
2553 Points ∼55% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2792 Points ∼69% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3263 Points ∼81% -5%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3076 Points ∼76% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3294 Points ∼81% -5%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4042 Points ∼100% +17%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼86% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3529, n=17)
3237 Points ∼80% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=269, last 2 years)
2679 Points ∼66% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2999 Points ∼49% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3620 Points ∼59% -38%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3683 Points ∼60% -37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3610 Points ∼59% -38%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6158 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼84% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2844 - 5832, n=17)
4882 Points ∼79% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=269, last 2 years)
3827 Points ∼62% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2950 Points ∼53% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3534 Points ∼64% -25%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3528 Points ∼64% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼65% -23%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5516 Points ∼100% +18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼85% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2972 - 4693, n=17)
4318 Points ∼78% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=269, last 2 years)
3246 Points ∼59% -31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20429 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
21898 Points ∼53% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
20054 Points ∼48% -2%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
14849 Points ∼36% -27%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
20767 Points ∼50% +2%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
41610 Points ∼100% +104%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼51% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (14891 - 28331, n=17)
20632 Points ∼50% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 59268, n=243, last 2 years)
22335 Points ∼54% +9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
69506 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
52600 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
51789 Points ∼75% -25%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
53600 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53194 Points ∼77% -23%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
57067 Points ∼82% -18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (56690 - 70216, n=17)
67538 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=242, last 2 years)
53317 Points ∼77% -23%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
45304 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
40105 Points ∼76% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
38315 Points ∼73% -15%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
33926 Points ∼64% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39491 Points ∼75% -13%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
52715 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼87% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (38137 - 48201, n=17)
44398 Points ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=242, last 2 years)
37406 Points ∼71% -17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼75% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
85 fps ∼76% -11%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼76% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
83 fps ∼74% -13%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
112 fps ∼100% +18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼87% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (48 - 97, n=15)
88.7 fps ∼79% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=228, last 2 years)
93.4 fps ∼83% -2%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps ∼94% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼96% 0%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
60 fps ∼96% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (43 - 86, n=15)
62.5 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=228, last 2 years)
51.8 fps ∼83% -14%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼59% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼59% -16%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
41 fps ∼59% -16%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼59% -16%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +41%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼80% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (31 - 56, n=15)
51.1 fps ∼74% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=227, last 2 years)
54.5 fps ∼79% +11%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
37 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼71% -29%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
38 fps ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼71% -29%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
55 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (30 - 55, n=15)
46.5 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=226, last 2 years)
40.3 fps ∼73% -27%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼64% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼64% -21%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼64% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼64% -21%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +24%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼81% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (22 - 38, n=15)
35.3 fps ∼75% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 117, n=224, last 2 years)
37.2 fps ∼79% -2%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼68% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼73% -12%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
27 fps ∼68% -18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼73% -12%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
40 fps ∼100% +21%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼85% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 37, n=15)
31.5 fps ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=224, last 2 years)
31.3 fps ∼78% -5%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼59% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼65% -15%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼65% -15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼65% -15%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +31%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼76% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.8 - 15, n=17)
12.3 fps ∼72% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=274, last 2 years)
13.3 fps ∼78% +2%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼56% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.9 fps ∼58% -19%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7 fps ∼58% -18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼56% -21%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
12 fps ∼100% +41%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼71% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5.3 - 13, n=17)
8.38 fps ∼70% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 101, n=273, last 2 years)
9.15 fps ∼76% +8%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼62% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼65% -19%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼65% -19%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼65% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
26 fps ∼100% +24%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼81% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 23, n=17)
20.2 fps ∼78% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 66, n=274, last 2 years)
20 fps ∼77% -5%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼58% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼58% -25%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼61% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼58% -25%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +29%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼77% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 24, n=17)
21.6 fps ∼70% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 257, n=274, last 2 years)
22.9 fps ∼74% -5%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼63% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼67% -14%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼67% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼63% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
27 fps ∼100% +29%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼78% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 21, n=15)
19.7 fps ∼73% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 75, n=223, last 2 years)
22.4 fps ∼83% +7%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼65% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼74% -6%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼70% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼74% -6%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
23 fps ∼100% +28%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼83% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (11 - 21, n=15)
17.7 fps ∼77% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 60, n=223, last 2 years)
19.6 fps ∼85% +9%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
247507 Points ∼67% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
271934 Points ∼74% -15%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
275464 Points ∼75% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
273255 Points ∼74% -14%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
369207 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼90% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (285731 - 332305, n=14)
312767 Points ∼85% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=166, last 2 years)
328950 Points ∼89% +3%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1103 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1226 Points ∼84% -16%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1233 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1365 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
1361 Points ∼93% -7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1139 - 1462, n=14)
1372 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=213, last 2 years)
1197 Points ∼82% -18%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3175 Points ∼47% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3757 Points ∼56% -28%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3768 Points ∼56% -28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3864 Points ∼57% -26%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6754 Points ∼100% +30%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼77% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2525 - 5247, n=14)
4732 Points ∼70% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 16996, n=213, last 2 years)
4943 Points ∼73% -5%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3466 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4452 Points ∼78% -22%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4573 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3752 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4609 Points ∼81% -19%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=14)
5099 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 9044, n=213, last 2 years)
3829 Points ∼67% -33%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6426 Points ∼75% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6856 Points ∼80% +13%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
6908 Points ∼80% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6305 Points ∼73% +4%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
8619 Points ∼100% +42%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼79% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5411 - 6936, n=14)
6506 Points ∼75% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=213, last 2 years)
6129 Points ∼71% +1%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2972 Points ∼68% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3444 Points ∼79% -16%
realme 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3481 Points ∼80% -15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3342 Points ∼76% -18%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4371 Points ∼100% +7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼93% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3237 - 4094, n=14)
3813 Points ∼87% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (179 - 6959, n=213, last 2 years)
3287 Points ∼75% -20%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
54.792 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.232 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
47.901 Points ∼87% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12)
47.7 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=191, last 2 years)
46.6 Points ∼85% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
46.148 Points ∼84% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
36.578 Points ∼67% -27%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
96.293 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.643 Points ∼97%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
89.577 Points ∼93% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
86.75 Points ∼90% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
82.347 Points ∼86% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=199, last 2 years)
82.2 Points ∼85% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11)
81.1 Points ∼84% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
65.293 Points ∼68% -30%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.7 runs/min ∼100%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
49.5 runs/min ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=170, last 2 years)
47.9 runs/min ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9)
46.1 runs/min ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
45.2 runs/min ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
40.4 runs/min ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
32.8 runs/min ∼65% -35%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
115 Points ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points ∼66%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=212, last 2 years)
74.4 Points ∼65% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13)
71.5 Points ∼62% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
71 Points ∼62% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
70 Points ∼61% -8%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
67 Points ∼58% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
60 Points ∼52% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
19727 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
17265 Points ∼88% -7%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
17157 Points ∼87% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14)
16671 Points ∼85% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
16197 Points ∼82% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=223, last 2 years)
15688 Points ∼80% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
12771 Points ∼65% -31%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=224, last 2 years)
4664 ms * ∼100% -79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14)
3721 ms * ∼80% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
3435.5 ms * ∼74% -32%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)
3033.1 ms * ∼65% -17%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
2940.5 ms * ∼63% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)
2850.1 ms * ∼61% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602.2 ms * ∼56%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
2254.1 ms * ∼48% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy A71Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Prorealme 6 ProXiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteHuawei P40 Lite 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-40%
-38%
-23%
-32%
1%
-23%
-30%
Random Write 4KB
138.47
109.57
-21%
112.93
-18%
154
11%
125.75
-9%
249.66
80%
117 (18.2 - 290, n=76)
-16%
103 (4.31 - 319, n=281, last 2 years)
-26%
Random Read 4KB
156.45
112.25
-28%
122.58
-22%
158.66
1%
134.57
-14%
146.07
-7%
145 (92.6 - 239, n=76)
-7%
122 (13.5 - 325, n=281, last 2 years)
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB
476.87
192.38
-60%
171.09
-64%
203.28
-57%
213.22
-55%
188.01
-61%
255 (182 - 511, n=76)
-47%
288 (11.9 - 1321, n=281, last 2 years)
-40%
Sequential Read 256KB
979.54
493.04
-50%
498.15
-49%
512.61
-48%
501.29
-49%
905.47
-8%
784 (427 - 999, n=76)
-20%
686 (41.9 - 2037, n=281, last 2 years)
-30%
PUBG mobile
051015202530354040404040403934394140403940404040404139404040404140394040404041403940404040404039414039404140394040404041403940404040404040404040404040404040404039404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404039404039403939404040404039394040404040403934394140403940404040404139404040404140394040404041403940404040404039414039404140394040404041403940404040404040404040404040404040404039404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404039404039403939404040404039394040404040404040394140404040404040404039404139404040404040404040404040404040403940404039404040404040404040404040403940404041403940404041404039404040404040404039343941404039404040404041394040404041403940404040414039404040404040394140394041403940404040414039404040404040404040404040404040404040394040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040394040394039394040404040393940404040404040403941404040404040404040394041394040404040404040404040404040404039404040394040404040404040404040404039404040414039404040414040394040402930303030312930303030303030302930303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302930312930303030303129293030303030253030293030312930303030303030302931302929303030283030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303029313030303030293130303030293031302931302930303130303029303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø39.9 (34-41)
; Balanced: Ø39.9 (39-41)
; HD: Ø29.9 (25-31)
Asphalt 9 Legends
0510152025303030302830303030283129302931303129303030303031302930302925143029303030233030303030303130293030303031302930292930293229303030292931302930303030303031293030293030313028313030303129303030293030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302830303030283129302931303129303030303031302930302925143029303030233030303030303130293030303031302930292930293229303030292931302930303030303031293030293030313028313030303129303030293030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303029303130303030293130302830302931303030303030303030303030303030303030293030302931302931303030302931303030302931303030303029303031303030293030313030303029313030303030303030303030302931303030302931303030303030293130293030Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.7 (14-32)
; Standard / low: Ø30 (28-31)
Max. Load
 39.7 °C38.6 °C35.2 °C 
 40.5 °C39.1 °C35.5 °C 
 40.7 °C38.5 °C35.6 °C 
Maximum: 40.7 °C
Average: 38.2 °C
33.5 °C37.3 °C37.5 °C
33.2 °C37.9 °C38.8 °C
33.9 °C37.6 °C38.2 °C
Maximum: 38.8 °C
Average: 36.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.845.82539.944.33131.935.54038.936.65043.740.96329.830.38025.926.510026.333.312524.938.516021.642.22001942.725018.94631518.15440016.66150016.265.863014.969.78001568.7100015.671.9125014.972.6160014.970.1200015.673.4250014.671.3315014.268.1400014.165500014.461630014.665.6800014.968.61000015.268.41250015.457.11600015.756.6SPL66.36470.627.581.5N19.715.825.3150.4median 15.4median 65.6Delta2.18.737.232.224.426.327.329.722.729.53330.526.725.623.420.82122.417.621.518.233.814.740.91550.21656.715.759.514.465.514.365.914.269.414.270.513.869.914.970.814.573.514.67414.376.714.475.614.973.414.47314.675.31574.915.168.815.561.626.785.20.862median 14.7median 69.40.611.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy A71
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A71 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.5 / 2.2 / 2.9 Watt
Load midlight 4.4 / 7.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A71
4500 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh		realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh		Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh		Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh		OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
27%
20%
13%
33%
20%
11%
21%
17%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
0.63
58%
0.75
50%
0.92
39%
0.8
47%
0.65
57%
1.8
-20%
0.965 (0.66 - 1.8, n=15)
36%
0.917 (0.37 - 2.3, n=240, last 2 years)
39%
Idle Average *
2.2
1.49
32%
2.19
-0%
1.79
19%
1.1
50%
2.25
-2%
2.1
5%
1.899 (0.82 - 2.55, n=15)
14%
1.83 (0.82 - 3.94, n=240, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
1.51
48%
2.24
23%
1.88
35%
1.8
38%
2.29
21%
2.3
21%
2.07 (0.85 - 2.9, n=15)
29%
2.13 (0.85 - 4.2, n=240, last 2 years)
27%
Load Average *
4.4
4.62
-5%
3.88
12%
5.41
-23%
3.7
16%
3.7
16%
3.4
23%
3.98 (2.73 - 6.8, n=15)
10%
4.42 (2.1 - 8.4, n=240, last 2 years)
-0%
Load Maximum *
7.2
7.11
1%
5.97
17%
7.59
-5%
6.1
15%
6.46
10%
5.2
28%
6.19 (4.4 - 10.3, n=15)
14%
7.14 (3.16 - 12.3, n=240, last 2 years)
1%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
28h 03min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)
7h 28min
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A71
4500 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
5020 mAh		realme 6 Pro
4300 mAh		Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh		Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh		OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
Battery Runtime
-11%
5%
17%
8%
18%
-12%
Reader / Idle
1683
2164
29%
2336
39%
2249
34%
2003
19%
H.264
1403
1164
-17%
1096
-22%
1370
-2%
1064
-24%
WiFi v1.3
884
815
-8%
1175
33%
1031
17%
1095
24%
1047
18%
869
-2%
Load
448
242
-46%
303
-32%
337
-25%
261
-42%

Pros

+ 漂亮的OLED面板
+ 续航时间长
+ 做工好
+ 快速WLAN
+ 良好的性能（考虑价格）
+ 不错的单声道扬声器
+ 不错的主相机（日光下）...

Cons

- ...但是晚上不那么好
- 没有IP认证
- 少数LTE频率支持
- 不支持SD卡
- 没有远摄镜头
- 仅60 Hz

Verdict: 总结——小米提供了个不错的综合体验：

小米10青春版5G智能手机评测. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de.
小米10青春版5G智能手机评测. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de.

考虑到中国制造商今年已经向市场推出了多种型号，因此很难一个个评测它们。幸运的是，小米似乎并没有遵循“机海战术”来生产智能手机，因为小米10 Lite确实是一款非常好的中端智能手机。     

考虑到其价格范围，Mi-10系列的Lite型号几乎没有任何缺点值得一提。续航时间极佳，MiUI 12表现出色，工艺和材料选择均处于良好水平，并且WLAN快速。此外，中端智能手机还提供非常好的硬件，例如5G支持和功能强大的765G SoC，以及有吸引力的OLED面板。不管这是由于OmniVision传感器本身还是优质的摄像头软件引起的，我们对测试中的主摄像头也感到非常惊讶-尽管小米到目前为止的摄像头算法还不是很成功。 48 MP摄像机的结果具有良好的质量。quality.

那些对60 Hz感到够用的人将获得一台出色的中档智能手机。       

但是，Mi 10 Lite仍然是中端设备。弱光条件充其量只能满足要求，您已经不得不在日光下使用超广角摄像头降低视线，并且不具备无线充电或Wi-Fi 6等高级功能。Mi 10 Lite还不提供IP认证或SD卡支持。我们还希望下一代Mi-Lite的原始帧率超过60 Hz，因为竞争对手不会姑息。

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - 08/04/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 71%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
90%
Games Performance
37 / 64 → 57%
Application Performance
73 / 86 → 85%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
72%
Average
78%