小米10青春版5G智能手机评测:2000元价位的性价比
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5, 1/3.06", 1.0µm)
Comparison Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84 % | 10/2020 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 192 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.57" | 2340x1080 | |
82 % | 02/2020 | Samsung Galaxy A71 SD 730, Adreno 618 | 179 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
83 % | 08/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 209 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
80 % | 06/2020 | realme 6 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 | |
83 % | 10/2020 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 204 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 | |
82 % | 07/2020 | Huawei P40 Lite 5G Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6 | 189 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
83 % | 08/2020 | OnePlus Nord SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 184 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.44" | 2440x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.5 - 1414, n=295, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
realme 6 Pro | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.59 - 1599, n=295, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraLow lightUltra wide-angleMain camera

|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 584 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.17 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.231
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57 | Samsung Galaxy A71 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67 | realme 6 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47 | Huawei P40 Lite 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50 | OnePlus Nord AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -49% | -18% | -159% | 16% | -42% | -32% | |
Brightness middle | 584 | 629 8% | 610 4% | 442 -24% | 605 4% | 466 -20% | 529 -9% |
Brightness | 583 | 646 11% | 579 -1% | 419 -28% | 608 4% | 457 -22% | 531 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 95 -2% | 92 -5% | 90 -7% | 95 -2% | 91 -6% | 94 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.61 | ||||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 1.17 | 2.7 -131% | 1.8 -54% | 6.1 -421% | 0.84 28% | 2.2 -88% | 2.53 -116% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 2.95 | 6 -103% | 3 -2% | 9.7 -229% | 1.8 39% | 4.6 -56% | 4.52 -53% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 1.7 | 3 -76% | 2.5 -47% | 5.9 -247% | 1.3 24% | 2.7 -59% | 1.7 -0% |
Gamma | 2.231 99% | 2.1 105% | 2.31 95% | 2.35 94% | 2.211 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.249 98% |
CCT | 6341 103% | 6340 103% | 6864 95% | 7631 85% | 6310 103% | 6633 98% | 6462 101% |
Contrast | 1649 | 1195 | 764 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 241.5 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 241.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 241.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9728 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms). |
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8591 - 9965, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1297 - 12228, n=94, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (6213 - 7765, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1163 - 14895, n=106, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2689 - 2882, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (412 - 5099, n=106, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7245 - 9989, n=17) | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=274, last 2 years) | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8687 - 11041, n=16) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2689 - 19989, n=253, last 2 years) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (48 - 97, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4.3 - 322, n=228, last 2 years) | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (43 - 86, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.2 - 143, n=228, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (31 - 56, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 180, n=227, last 2 years) | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (30 - 55, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4.5 - 120, n=226, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (22 - 38, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 117, n=224, last 2 years) | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (21 - 37, n=15) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 106, n=224, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | |
realme 6 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (285731 - 332305, n=14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 727247, n=166, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=212, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=224, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) | |
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | Samsung Galaxy A71 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | realme 6 Pro | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | Huawei P40 Lite 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -40% | -38% | -23% | -32% | 1% | -23% | -30% | |
Random Write 4KB | 138.47 | 109.57 -21% | 112.93 -18% | 154 11% | 125.75 -9% | 249.66 80% | 117 (18.2 - 290, n=76) -16% | 103 (4.31 - 319, n=281, last 2 years) -26% |
Random Read 4KB | 156.45 | 112.25 -28% | 122.58 -22% | 158.66 1% | 134.57 -14% | 146.07 -7% | 145 (92.6 - 239, n=76) -7% | 122 (13.5 - 325, n=281, last 2 years) -22% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 476.87 | 192.38 -60% | 171.09 -64% | 203.28 -57% | 213.22 -55% | 188.01 -61% | 255 (182 - 511, n=76) -47% | 288 (11.9 - 1321, n=281, last 2 years) -40% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 979.54 | 493.04 -50% | 498.15 -49% | 512.61 -48% | 501.29 -49% | 905.47 -8% | 784 (427 - 999, n=76) -20% | 686 (41.9 - 2037, n=281, last 2 years) -30% |
PUBG mobile
Asphalt 9 Legends
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Samsung Galaxy A71 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A71 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh | realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh | Huawei P40 Lite 5G 4000 mAh | OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 27% | 20% | 13% | 33% | 20% | 11% | 21% | 17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.5 | 0.63 58% | 0.75 50% | 0.92 39% | 0.8 47% | 0.65 57% | 1.8 -20% | 0.965 (0.66 - 1.8, n=15) 36% | 0.917 (0.37 - 2.3, n=240, last 2 years) 39% |
Idle Average * | 2.2 | 1.49 32% | 2.19 -0% | 1.79 19% | 1.1 50% | 2.25 -2% | 2.1 5% | 1.899 (0.82 - 2.55, n=15) 14% | 1.83 (0.82 - 3.94, n=240, last 2 years) 17% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.9 | 1.51 48% | 2.24 23% | 1.88 35% | 1.8 38% | 2.29 21% | 2.3 21% | 2.07 (0.85 - 2.9, n=15) 29% | 2.13 (0.85 - 4.2, n=240, last 2 years) 27% |
Load Average * | 4.4 | 4.62 -5% | 3.88 12% | 5.41 -23% | 3.7 16% | 3.7 16% | 3.4 23% | 3.98 (2.73 - 6.8, n=15) 10% | 4.42 (2.1 - 8.4, n=240, last 2 years) -0% |
Load Maximum * | 7.2 | 7.11 1% | 5.97 17% | 7.59 -5% | 6.1 15% | 6.46 10% | 5.2 28% | 6.19 (4.4 - 10.3, n=15) 14% | 7.14 (3.16 - 12.3, n=240, last 2 years) 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A71 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh | realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh | Huawei P40 Lite 5G 4000 mAh | OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -11% | 5% | 17% | 8% | 18% | -12% | |
Reader / Idle | 1683 | 2164 29% | 2336 39% | 2249 34% | 2003 19% | ||
H.264 | 1403 | 1164 -17% | 1096 -22% | 1370 -2% | 1064 -24% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 884 | 815 -8% | 1175 33% | 1031 17% | 1095 24% | 1047 18% | 869 -2% |
Load | 448 | 242 -46% | 303 -32% | 337 -25% | 261 -42% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict: 总结——小米提供了个不错的综合体验:
考虑到中国制造商今年已经向市场推出了多种型号,因此很难一个个评测它们。幸运的是,小米似乎并没有遵循“机海战术”来生产智能手机,因为小米10 Lite确实是一款非常好的中端智能手机。
考虑到其价格范围,Mi-10系列的Lite型号几乎没有任何缺点值得一提。续航时间极佳,MiUI 12表现出色,工艺和材料选择均处于良好水平,并且WLAN快速。此外,中端智能手机还提供非常好的硬件,例如5G支持和功能强大的765G SoC,以及有吸引力的OLED面板。不管这是由于OmniVision传感器本身还是优质的摄像头软件引起的,我们对测试中的主摄像头也感到非常惊讶-尽管小米到目前为止的摄像头算法还不是很成功。 48 MP摄像机的结果具有良好的质量。quality.
那些对60 Hz感到够用的人将获得一台出色的中档智能手机。
但是,Mi 10 Lite仍然是中端设备。弱光条件充其量只能满足要求,您已经不得不在日光下使用超广角摄像头降低视线,并且不具备无线充电或Wi-Fi 6等高级功能。Mi 10 Lite还不提供IP认证或SD卡支持。我们还希望下一代Mi-Lite的原始帧率超过60 Hz,因为竞争对手不会姑息。
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - 08/04/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich