Notebookcheck

小米Note 10青春版智能手机评测:性价比的一击

无需多言。 由于小米Mi Note 10 Lite几乎具有与高端同级Mi Note 10一样强大的性能,并且配备了几乎相同的功能,因此“ Lite”(青春版)这个绰号比其实用性更令人困惑。 小米只改变了摄像头模块,该模块是64 MP的(而不是108 MP),不过仍然提供可观的分辨率。 但是,Mi Note 10 Lite的价格也明显便宜-就此而言,“ Lite”版的称呼非常合适。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Zewei Shen),
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Mi Note Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.47 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, FHD+, 3D curved, HDR10, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB 
, 108.6 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机插孔, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 指纹传感器,振动电机,红外发射器,环境光传感器,加速计,陀螺仪,电子罗盘, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, USB OTB, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi display, DRM Widevine L1
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (band 2, 3, 5, 8), UMTS (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41), head SAR 1,011 W/kg, body SAR 1,385 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.67 x 157.8 x 74.2
Battery
5260 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix 64 MP主摄像头(Sony IMX686,f / 1.89,1 / 1.73“,0.8 µm)+ 8-MP超宽摄像头(f / 2.2,1 / 4”,1.12 µm )+ 5-MP深度传感器(f / 2.4,1 / 1.5“,1.12 µm)+ 2-MP宏摄像头(f / 2.4,1 / 1.4”,1.75 µm)?
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f / 2.48,1 / 3.06“ 1.0 µm,视频分辨率高达1080p @ 30FPS
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道, Keyboard: 屏幕, 充电器,保护套,USB Type-C电缆,SIM卡工具,用户手册,保修卡, MIUI 11, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
204 g, Power Supply: 85 g
Price
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83 %
10/2020
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
SD 730G, Adreno 618
204 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
82 %
07/2020
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
81 %
10/2019
Oppo Reno2
SD 730G, Adreno 618
189 g256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80 %
01/2020
Samsung Galaxy A51
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.50"2400x1080
83 %
11/2019
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080

Size Comparison

162.31 mm 75 mm 8.58 mm 189 g160 mm 74.3 mm 9 mm 189 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.67 mm 204 g158.5 mm 73.6 mm 7.9 mm 172 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Oppo Reno2
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
618 (532min - 671max) MBit/s ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
341 (334min - 349max) MBit/s ∼55%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
333 (319min - 345max) MBit/s ∼54% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (317min - 341max) MBit/s ∼54% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
298 (185min - 350max) MBit/s ∼48% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=620)
286 MBit/s ∼46% -16%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Oppo Reno2
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
355 (187min - 387max) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (321min - 333max) MBit/s ∼92% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
324 (310min - 330max) MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (189min - 335max) MBit/s ∼84% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=620)
273 MBit/s ∼77% -16%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
255 (234min - 277max) MBit/s ∼72% -21%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (334-349)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø324 (310-330)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Overview
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Overview
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Bridge
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Bridge
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Turn
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Turn
Garmin Edge 520: Overview
Garmin Edge 520: Overview
Garmin Edge 520: Bridge
Garmin Edge 520: Bridge
Garmin Edge 520: Turn
Garmin Edge 520: Turn

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 2WeitwinkelLowlight
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
55.6 ∆E
48.2 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
56.5 ∆E
58.7 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: 41.52 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 64.74 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
16 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: 7.38 ∆E min: 1.19 - max: 16.03 ∆E
598
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
623
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
612
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 626 cd/m² Average: 608.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.81 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 605 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.84 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.211
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Oppo Reno2
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A51
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Screen
-80%
-132%
-105%
-153%
Brightness middle
605
466
-23%
679
12%
589
-3%
625
3%
Brightness
608
457
-25%
683
12%
589
-3%
607
0%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
98
3%
94
-1%
89
-6%
Black Level *
0.61
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.84
2.2
-162%
3.5
-317%
2.22
-164%
4.38
-421%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
1.8
4.6
-156%
6.8
-278%
8.24
-358%
6.83
-279%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.3
2.7
-108%
4.2
-223%
2.6
-100%
4.1
-215%
Gamma
2.211 100%
2.24 98%
2.27 97%
2.111 104%
2.251 98%
CCT
6310 103%
6633 98%
6532 100%
6508 100%
7251 90%
Contrast
764

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 176.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 176.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 176.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9596 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
903 Points ∼42%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
2137 Points ∼100% +137%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
812 Points ∼38% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
920 Points ∼43% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (812 - 920, n=3)
878 Points ∼41% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=67)
1648 Points ∼77% +83%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points ∼61%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1080 Points ∼61% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1127 Points ∼63% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1080 - 1127, n=3)
1099 Points ∼62% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=62)
1778 Points ∼100% +63%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼69%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
2434 Points ∼100% +44%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
1762 Points ∼72% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1727 Points ∼71% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1646 - 1786, n=5)
1722 Points ∼71% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 4160, n=146)
1958 Points ∼80% +16%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
547 Points ∼85%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
642 Points ∼100% +17%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
547 Points ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points ∼85% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (543 - 551, n=5)
547 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1604, n=146)
565 Points ∼88% +3%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7628 Points ∼80%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
9527 Points ∼100% +25%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
7134 Points ∼75% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5649 Points ∼59% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points ∼79% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (7134 - 8683, n=6)
7715 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=546)
6044 Points ∼63% -21%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8941 Points ∼68%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
13099 Points ∼100% +47%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
9145 Points ∼70% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6416 Points ∼49% -28%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points ∼69% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (8941 - 10200, n=6)
9422 Points ∼72% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=702)
6649 Points ∼51% -26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2686 Points ∼81%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
3331 Points ∼100% +24%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2621 Points ∼79% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2161 Points ∼65% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points ∼83% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2621 - 2775, n=6)
2720 Points ∼82% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=198)
2663 Points ∼80% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2143 Points ∼47%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4544 Points ∼100% +112%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2155 Points ∼47% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1438 Points ∼32% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points ∼47% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2143 - 2199, n=6)
2158 Points ∼47% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=198)
3065 Points ∼67% +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2244 Points ∼53%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4204 Points ∼100% +87%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2244 Points ∼53% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1554 Points ∼37% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points ∼54% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2244 - 2310, n=6)
2262 Points ∼54% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=198)
2718 Points ∼65% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3058 Points ∼66%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4642 Points ∼100% +52%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3162 Points ∼68% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2311 Points ∼50% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points ∼69% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3058 - 3391, n=6)
3218 Points ∼69% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=552)
2265 Points ∼49% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2466 Points ∼50%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4906 Points ∼100% +99%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2434 Points ∼50% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1530 Points ∼31% -38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points ∼49% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2425 - 2492, n=6)
2459 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=552)
2242 Points ∼46% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2577 Points ∼53%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4845 Points ∼100% +88%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2565 Points ∼53% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1654 Points ∼34% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points ∼53% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2561 - 2701, n=6)
2598 Points ∼54% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=553)
2078 Points ∼43% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3134 Points ∼68%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4637 Points ∼100% +48%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3112 Points ∼67% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2336 Points ∼50% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points ∼69% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3112 - 3352, n=6)
3213 Points ∼69% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=584)
2180 Points ∼47% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3751 Points ∼59%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6327 Points ∼100% +69%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3647 Points ∼58% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1993 Points ∼31% -47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points ∼58% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3646 - 3773, n=6)
3703 Points ∼59% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 21465, n=584)
3047 Points ∼48% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼61%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5853 Points ∼100% +63%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3513 Points ∼60% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2060 Points ∼35% -43%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points ∼60% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3513 - 3704, n=6)
3586 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=584)
2524 Points ∼43% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3257 Points ∼81%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +24%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3088 Points ∼77% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2217 Points ∼55% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points ∼79% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3088 - 3328, n=6)
3216 Points ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5262, n=633)
2140 Points ∼53% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2298 Points ∼48%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4804 Points ∼100% +109%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2243 Points ∼47% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1473 Points ∼31% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points ∼47% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2237 - 2310, n=6)
2271 Points ∼47% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=633)
1883 Points ∼39% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2459 Points ∼53%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4608 Points ∼100% +87%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2388 Points ∼52% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1592 Points ∼35% -35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points ∼52% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2388 - 2489, n=6)
2434 Points ∼53% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=634)
1785 Points ∼39% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3294 Points ∼81%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
4042 Points ∼100% +23%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3075 Points ∼76% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2225 Points ∼55% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points ∼79% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3075 - 3349, n=6)
3235 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=675)
2011 Points ∼50% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3610 Points ∼59%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
6158 Points ∼100% +71%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3504 Points ∼57% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2027 Points ∼33% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points ∼57% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3485 - 3678, n=6)
3567 Points ∼58% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=674)
2496 Points ∼41% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼65%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
5516 Points ∼100% +53%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3399 Points ∼62% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2068 Points ∼37% -42%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼62% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3399 - 3594, n=6)
3490 Points ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=677)
2133 Points ∼39% -41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
20767 Points ∼50%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
41610 Points ∼100% +100%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
14820 Points ∼36% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20393 Points ∼49% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
22054 Points ∼53% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (14820 - 22054, n=5)
18710 Points ∼45% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=818)
15785 Points ∼38% -24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53194 Points ∼93%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
57067 Points ∼100% +7%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
50829 Points ∼89% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25086 Points ∼44% -53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51267 Points ∼90% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (50829 - 53548, n=5)
52404 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 221179, n=816)
28207 Points ∼49% -47%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39491 Points ∼75%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
52715 Points ∼100% +33%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
33007 Points ∼63% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23866 Points ∼45% -40%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39608 Points ∼75% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (33007 - 39608, n=5)
37271 Points ∼71% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=816)
21758 Points ∼41% -45%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
83 fps ∼74%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
112 fps ∼100% +35%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
85 fps ∼76% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
46 fps ∼41% -45%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼75% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (83 - 86, n=5)
84.4 fps ∼75% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=815)
47.3 fps ∼42% -43%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (57 - 60, n=5)
59.2 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=824)
31.9 fps ∼53% -47%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼59%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +68%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
42 fps ∼61% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼35% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼59% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (41 - 42, n=5)
41.4 fps ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=720)
28.1 fps ∼41% -31%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼71%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
55 fps ∼100% +41%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
36 fps ∼65% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼42% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼69% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (36 - 39, n=5)
37.8 fps ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=728)
23.2 fps ∼42% -41%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼64%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +57%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
30 fps ∼64% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15 fps ∼32% -50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (30 - 30, n=5)
30 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=583)
22.5 fps ∼48% -25%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼73%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
40 fps ∼100% +38%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
26 fps ∼65% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼35% -52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼68% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (26 - 29, n=5)
27.4 fps ∼69% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=585)
20.1 fps ∼50% -31%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼65%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +55%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼59% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.5 fps ∼32% -50%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼59% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (10 - 11, n=6)
10.3 fps ∼61% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=344)
11.6 fps ∼68% +5%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼56%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
12 fps ∼100% +79%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.7 fps ∼56% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼29% -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼83% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6.3 - 10, n=6)
7.17 fps ∼60% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=342)
8.18 fps ∼68% +22%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼65%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
26 fps ∼100% +53%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼62% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.1 fps ∼35% -46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼62% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (16 - 17, n=6)
16.3 fps ∼63% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=348)
17.3 fps ∼67% +2%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼58%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +72%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼58% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼32% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼58% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (18 - 18, n=6)
18 fps ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=347)
19.9 fps ∼64% +11%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼63%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
27 fps ∼100% +59%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼63% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼37% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼63% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (17 - 17, n=5)
17 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=508)
15 fps ∼56% -12%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼74%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
23 fps ∼100% +35%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼65% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.6 fps ∼37% -49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼65% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (15 - 17, n=5)
15.8 fps ∼69% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=512)
13.3 fps ∼58% -22%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
273255 Points ∼74%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6, 6144
369207 Points ∼100% +35%
Oppo Reno2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
260154 Points ∼70% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
181295 Points ∼49% -34%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points ∼72% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (251673 - 273255, n=5)
264147 Points ∼72% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=136)
325471 Points ∼88% +19%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
54.792 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 50.6, n=5)
47.3 Points ∼86% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
46.148 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.038 Points ∼84% 0%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
45.819 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=210)
42.2 Points ∼77% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
27.681 Points ∼51% -40%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
96.293 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=5)
84 Points ∼87% +2%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
83.953 Points ∼87% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
82.347 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.228 Points ∼82% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
51.257 Points ∼53% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 343, n=644)
49.1 Points ∼51% -40%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
49.5 runs/min ∼100% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=191)
44.4 runs/min ∼90% +10%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
43.6 runs/min ∼88% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min ∼87% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=5)
43 runs/min ∼87% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
40.4 runs/min ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
29.1 runs/min ∼59% -28%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
115 Points ∼100% +64%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points ∼67% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=281)
70.8 Points ∼62% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=5)
70.4 Points ∼61% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
70 Points ∼61%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
66 Points ∼57% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
57 Points ∼50% -19%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
19727 Points ∼100% +22%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
17345 Points ∼88% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=5)
16856 Points ∼85% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points ∼82% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
16197 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
10194 Points ∼52% -37%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58488, n=813)
8213 Points ∼42% -49%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=839)
9584 ms * ∼100% -226%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
4375.1 ms * ∼46% -49%
Oppo Reno2 (Chrome 80)
3054.3 ms * ∼32% -4%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
2940.5 ms * ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=5)
2900 ms * ∼30% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2769.8 ms * ∼29% +6%
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331)
2254.1 ms * ∼24% +23%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteHuawei P40 Lite 5GOppo Reno2Samsung Galaxy A51Xiaomi Mi Note 10Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
44%
-22%
-12%
-4%
-18%
-47%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.67 (NM Card)
53.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.4 (33.3 - 65.3, n=10)
51.4 (1.7 - 87.1, n=549)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.35 (NM Card)
74.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.4 (36.8 - 85.4, n=10)
69.4 (8.1 - 96.5, n=549)
Random Write 4KB
125.75
249.66
99%
22
-83%
104.4
-17%
118.9
-5%
78.1 (13.6 - 196, n=15)
-38%
38.6 (0.14 - 319, n=913)
-69%
Random Read 4KB
134.57
146.07
9%
144.24
7%
110.8
-18%
106.2
-21%
115 (60.6 - 157, n=15)
-15%
61.7 (1.59 - 325, n=913)
-54%
Sequential Write 256KB
213.22
188.01
-12%
201.78
-5%
184.9
-13%
243.6
14%
182 (135 - 222, n=15)
-15%
135 (2.99 - 1321, n=913)
-37%
Sequential Read 256KB
501.29
905.47
81%
469.31
-6%
496.1
-1%
480.5
-4%
491 (272 - 687, n=15)
-2%
355 (12.1 - 2037, n=913)
-29%
010203040Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.19.0: Ø29.6 (10-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.3.4a: Ø29.8 (24-31)
Max. Load
 37.3 °C40.1 °C39.4 °C 
 37.6 °C39.3 °C39.8 °C 
 37.6 °C38.5 °C39.1 °C 
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 38.7 °C
35.1 °C36.8 °C36.6 °C
35.3 °C36 °C35.6 °C
36.6 °C36.9 °C35.1 °C
Maximum: 36.9 °C
Average: 36 °C
Power Supply (max.)  37.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.839.42539.941.63131.935.44038.937.25043.737.96329.829.98025.924.910026.325.912524.927.816021.636.3200194325018.949.131518.154.940016.658.950016.261.463014.963.38001564.2100015.672.6125014.974.5160014.973.3200015.675.7250014.671.7315014.269.5400014.164.2500014.465.8630014.669.9800014.970.31000015.269.21250015.463.61600015.750SPL6666.36470.627.583N18.319.715.825.3152.5median 15.4median 64.2Delta2.11042.946.342.343.934.834.63939.140.842.634.43528.127.125.125.123.627.822.137.120.244.919.650.218.456.418.960.520.163.62065.217.566.316.17515.576.217.874.3167315.971.416.172.316.363.416.564.816.572.116.970.916.663.91764.516.55567.866.429.383.620.818.51.255.5median 17median 64.51.710.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteXiaomi Mi Note 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.1 / 1.8 Watt
Load midlight 3.7 / 6.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh
Oppo Reno2
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-24%
-7%
-23%
-28%
-7%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.65
19%
0.7
12%
0.9
-13%
0.7
12%
0.698 (0.49 - 0.8, n=5)
13%
0.892 (0.2 - 3.4, n=910)
-12%
Idle Average *
1.1
2.25
-105%
1.25
-14%
1.7
-55%
1.8
-64%
1.362 (0.96 - 1.8, n=5)
-24%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=909)
-60%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
2.29
-27%
1.36
24%
1.8
-0%
2.2
-22%
1.712 (1 - 2.2, n=5)
5%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=910)
-13%
Load Average *
3.7
3.7
-0%
5.38
-45%
5.2
-41%
5.2
-41%
4.54 (3.11 - 5.38, n=5)
-23%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=904)
-11%
Load Maximum *
6.1
6.46
-6%
6.71
-10%
6.6
-8%
7.5
-23%
6.59 (5.23 - 7.5, n=5)
-8%
6.12 (1.2 - 14.2, n=904)
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
37h 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22h 50min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 37min
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh
Huawei P40 Lite 5G
4000 mAh
Oppo Reno2
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
-24%
-28%
4%
Reader / Idle
2249
2533
13%
1689
-25%
2134
-5%
H.264
1370
1125
-18%
846
-38%
1423
4%
WiFi v1.3
1095
1047
-4%
616
-44%
698
-36%
1127
3%
Load
337
185
-45%
289
-14%
387
15%

Pros

+ 优质的做工
+ 曲面屏
+ 明亮的AMOLED屏幕
+ 良好的白天相机效果
+ 没有降频
+ 良好的游戏性能
+ 续航时间长
+ 快速充电

Cons

- 光滑的玻璃机身
- 一般般的低光图片
- 没有microSD插槽
- 没有IP认证

总结——高于价位的体验

In review: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Test devices courtesy of
In review: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Test devices courtesy of

“很棒的相机,很小的妥协”,这总结了我们对小米Mi Note 10的评价。当以此为参考时,Mi Note 10 Lite的标准必须是:仍然有一台好相机,与Note 10相机相比,没有其他妥协。

精简版提供了高端替代产品出色的一切:出色的制造质量,明亮的AMOLED屏幕,超长的续航时间,快速充电,高速的八核SoC,以及非常好的性价比比

对于中档智能手机来说,小米Mi Note 10 Lite高于平均水平,只有其相机无法完全与高端Mi Note 10匹配。

Mi Note 10 Lite或Mi Note 10?尽管毫无疑问Mi Note 10的108-MP相机可以拍摄出更好的照片,但Mi Note 10的照片质量至少在光线充足的情况下几乎一样好。但是,精简版的价格要便宜得多,我们认为这对于价格敏感的买家来说是一个更好的选择。

Mi Note 10 Lite没有很多缺点。但是,由于内部存储无法使用microSD卡扩展,因此,潜在的购买者应仔细考虑是否选择64 GB或128 GB型号。此外,小米智能手机不防水,没有无线充电,并且手机表面摸起来感觉很滑。

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite - 08/06/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
87%
Games Performance
28 / 64 → 44%
Application Performance
68 / 86 → 79%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
68%
Average
77%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Note 10青春版智能手机评测:性价比的一击
Manuel Masiero, 2020-10-17 (Update: 2020-10-17)