Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarAcer Aspire V3-371笔记本电脑简短评测
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics AUO112D B133HTN01.1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 249 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 235.6 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 246 cd/m²
Contrast: 535:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 9.13 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.07% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
| Acer Aspire V3-371-58DJ HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Kingston RBU-SC100S37240GE | Acer Aspire V3-371-55GS HD Graphics 4400, 4210U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD | Acer Aspire V3-371-38ZG Iris Graphics 5100, 4158U, Kingston RBU-SC100S37240GE | Asus UX32LA-R3025H HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, SanDisk SD6SB1M128G1002 | HP Probook 430 G2 HD Graphics 4400, 4210U, Samsung SSD 840 PRO MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCMark 8 | -19% | -23% | -14% | -17% | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2939 | 2419 -18% | 2172 -26% | 2583 -12% | 2391 -19% |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3761 | 3283 -13% | 3065 -19% | 3618 -4% | 3599 -4% |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3430 | 2571 -25% | 2653 -23% | 2522 -26% | 2495 -27% |
| PCMark 7 | |||||
| Score | 4879 | 4722 -3% | 4037 -17% | 4654 -5% | 4556 -7% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-15% | -20% /
-21% | -10% /
-12% | -12% /
-14% |
| PCMark 7 Score | 4879 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2939 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3430 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3761 points | |
Help | ||
| Acer Aspire V3-371-58DJ HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Kingston RBU-SC100S37240GE | Asus UX32LA-R3025H HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, SanDisk SD6SB1M128G1002 | HP Probook 430 G2 HD Graphics 4400, 4210U, Samsung SSD 840 PRO MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 33% | 51% | |
| Seq Read | 491.3 | 476.7 -3% | 517 5% |
| Seq Write | 285 | 283.8 0% | 323.5 14% |
| 4K Read | 22.47 | 28.79 28% | 33.3 48% |
| 4K Write | 47.94 | 75.4 57% | 85.4 78% |
| 4K-64 Read | 151.9 | 324 113% | 370.2 144% |
| 4K-64 Write | 157.8 | 174.9 11% | 215.3 36% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.124 | 0.096 23% | 0.083 33% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.075 | 0.048 36% | 0.04 47% |
* ... smaller is better
Kingston RBU-SC100S37240GE
Sequential Read:
491.3MB/s
Sequential Write:
285MB/s
4K Read:
22.47MB/s
4K Write:
47.94MB/s
4K-64 Read:
151.9MB/s
4K-64 Write:
157.8MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.124ms
Access Time Write:
0.075ms
Score Read:
223Points
Score Write:
234Points
Score Total:
570Points
| Acer Aspire V3-371-58DJ HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Kingston RBU-SC100S37240GE | Asus UX32LA-R3025H HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, SanDisk SD6SB1M128G1002 | HP Probook 430 G2 HD Graphics 4400, 4210U, Samsung SSD 840 PRO MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 | Asus X550LD-XX023H GeForce 820M, 4200U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | Acer Aspire V3-371-38ZG Iris Graphics 5100, 4158U, Kingston RBU-SC100S37240GE | Acer Aspire V3-371-55GS HD Graphics 4400, 4210U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 | ||||||
| 1280x720 Performance | 1162 | 952 -18% | 781 -33% | 1302 12% | 929 -20% | 963 -17% |
| 3DMark | -20% | -29% | -14% | -34% | -16% | |
| 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score | 54754 | 42413 -23% | 36498 -33% | 50055 -9% | 33266 -39% | 44071 -20% |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5146 | 4346 -16% | 3928 -24% | 4225 -18% | 3722 -28% | 4512 -12% |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | 622 | 484 | 763 | 572 | 584 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -19% /
-19% | -31% /
-30% | -1% /
-5% | -27% /
-29% | -17% /
-16% |
| 3DMark 06 1280x800 Score | 7725 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 4798 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1162 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 54754 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5146 points | |
Help | ||
| Acer Aspire V3-371-58DJ HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Kingston RBU-SC100S37240GE | Asus UX32LA-R3025H HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, SanDisk SD6SB1M128G1002 | HP Probook 430 G2 HD Graphics 4400, 4210U, Samsung SSD 840 PRO MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 | Asus X550LD-XX023H GeForce 820M, 4200U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite | -22% | -42% | 19% | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | 43.13 | 35.8 -17% | 25.8 -40% | 51.2 19% |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | 24.2 | 17.9 -26% | 13.6 -44% | 28.6 18% |
| Tomb Raider | -18% | -42% | 15% | |
| 1024x768 Low Preset | 60.6 | 53.6 -12% | 34.5 -43% | 70.4 16% |
| 1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x | 30.4 | 23.3 -23% | 18.1 -40% | 34.7 14% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -20% /
-20% | -42% /
-42% | 17% /
17% |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| Anno 2070 (2011) | 71.2 | 41.6 | 22.82 | 9.96 |
| Crysis 3 (2013) | 19.6 | 12 | 8.5 | |
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 60.6 | 30.4 | 19.1 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 43.13 | 24.2 | 19.53 | 5.9 |
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 22.5 | 6.1 | 6 | 5 |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 22 | 17.1 | ||
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 31 | 21 | 12.8 | 4.3 |
| Need for Speed: Rivals (2013) | 16.8 | 10.7 | ||
| Thief (2014) | 20.6 | 12.6 | 10.1 | |
| Wolfenstein: The New Order (2014) | 31.3 | 28.1 | 13.3 | |
| Watch Dogs (2014) | 20.2 | 13.9 | 4.4 | |
| GRID: Autosport (2014) | 91.3 | 37 | 19.2 | |
| Sims 4 (2014) | 173.3 | 41.4 | 19.4 | |
| Fifa 15 (2014) | 36.6 | 17.4 | ||
| Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 21.92 | 15.75 | 8.33 | |
| Alien: Isolation (2014) | 35.6 | 23.1 | 12.3 | 8.8 |
| Ryse: Son of Rome (2014) | 13.9 | 9.3 | ||
| The Evil Within (2014) | 17.7 | 13 | ||
| F1 2014 (2014) | 56 | 37 | 23 | 13 |
| Civilization: Beyond Earth (2014) | 45.3 | 18.4 | 11.6 | |
| Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare (2014) | 32.5 | 16.5 | ||
| Far Cry 4 (2014) | 18.3 | 13.9 | 7 | |
| The Crew (2014) | 21.3 | 16.5 | 7.9 |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 29.6 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 39.8 / 39.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm distance) | ||
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.4 °C / 77.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.4 °C / 77.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle | 2.7 / 5 / 7.3 Watt |
| Load |
28.7 / 31.5 Watt |
   
| |
| Battery Runtime - WiFi (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-371-58DJ | |
| HP Probook 430 G2 | |
| Asus UX32LA-R3025H | |
Acer这款定价700欧元的笔记本配备了全高清屏幕，固态硬盘，8GB内存，和一颗全新的英特尔 Core i5-5200U处理器。我们一开始测试就发现了它的售价控制的如此低的奥秘所在。尽管它的屏幕上盖采用了铝合金涂层，但机身只有外观比较好而已。Acer Aspire V3轻盈、纤薄而简洁。不过，锐利的边角和不太坚固的屏幕转轴让它给人的整体印象受到了负面影响。它的输入设备设计十分优秀，可以适合长时间的使用，但我们测试机的点击触控板的质量存在些问题。它在点击时的嘎嘎声十分影响正常工作。在这些小问题之后，这台测试机又重新展现出了它的优势。例如，它的全高清屏幕采用了磨砂表面，因此十分适合偶尔的户外使用。遗憾的是，它的TN屏幕面板无法提供足够的可视角度稳定性，不过在这个价位上也无法尽善尽美。Aspire V3在系统和应用性能上十分出色。相对采用Haswell处理器的竞争者它更是占据了先机。对于一台13.3寸笔记本来说，电池续航十分重要。这款Aspire在这方面表现优秀。它可以轻松的坚持一整个工作日。
整体上，Acer V3-371在这个价位可以算是个优秀的便携设备。不过，它的工艺缺陷有些破坏它给人的印象。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
