Notebookcheck

联想ThinkPad A285 (Ryzen 5 Pro, Vega 8, FHD)笔记本电脑评测

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Zewei Shen), 02/08/2019
AMD Business Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen)

AMD硬件商务机! 新设计采用了AMD硬件,在ThinkPad A系列中被称为A285。我们将告诉您这台12英寸的AMD硬件设备如何与基于英特尔的竞品竞争。

Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
Processor
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 - 1024 MB, Core: 1100 MHz, Memory: 1200 MHz, 共享显存, 23.20.826.9216
Memory
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2400,双通道,板载
Display
12.5 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 176 PPI, N125HCE-GN1, IPS LED
Mainboard
AMD CZ FCH
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 GB 
, M.2 SSD (NVMe)
Soundcard
Realtek Audio
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机接口, Card Reader: MicroSD, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.4 x 307.7 x 209.8
Battery
48 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 时六芯锂电池
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p带ThinkShutter
Additional features
Speakers: 2W立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 六排巧克力背光键盘,带小红点, ThinkPad Ethernet Extension Adapter Gen 2 , 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.145 kg, Power Supply: 341 g
Price
5999元 ~ 1439 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Lenovo ThinkPad A285
Lenovo ThinkPad A285
Lenovo ThinkPad A285
Lenovo ThinkPad A285
Lenovo ThinkPad A285
Lenovo ThinkPad A285
Lenovo ThinkPad A285
Lenovo ThinkPad A285
Lenovo ThinkPad A285
Lenovo ThinkPad A285
Lenovo ThinkPad A285
Lenovo ThinkPad A285
Lenovo ThinkPad A285
Lenovo ThinkPad A285

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 7390
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
166 MB/s ∼100% +120%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
137.4 MB/s ∼83% +82%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
78.3 MB/s ∼47% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
  (Toshiba Excerie Pro M501)
76.8 MB/s ∼46% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
75.4 MB/s ∼45%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8 - 186, n=102)
62.5 MB/s ∼38% -17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 7390
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
201.1 MB/s ∼100% +130%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
165.3 MB/s ∼82% +89%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
87.5 MB/s ∼44%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
  (Toshiba Excerie Pro M501)
86.1 MB/s ∼43% -2%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
86 MB/s ∼43% -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (17.7 - 251, n=103)
81.3 MB/s ∼40% -7%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
634 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
611 MBit/s ∼96% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
610 (min: 579, max: 627) MBit/s ∼96%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (71 - 950, n=97)
534 MBit/s ∼84% -12%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
525 MBit/s ∼83% -14%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
510 MBit/s ∼80% -16%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
667 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
611 MBit/s ∼92% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
599 (min: 579, max: 613) MBit/s ∼90%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
525 MBit/s ∼79% -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (72 - 949, n=97)
523 MBit/s ∼78% -13%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
507 MBit/s ∼76% -15%
309
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 347 cd/m² Average: 321 cd/m² Minimum: 3.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 349 cd/m²
Contrast: 938:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.7 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 6
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
64.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 42.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
N125HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
B125HAN02.2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5
Dell Latitude 7390
AU Optronics AUO462D / B133HAN [DELL P/N:F7VDJ], IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Sharp LQ133M1JW28, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
M133NVF3 R0, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
4%
-17%
-33%
-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41 (22, 19)
40 (22, 18)
2%
48.8 (24.8, 24)
-19%
43 (21, 22)
-5%
31 (15, 16)
24%
Response Time Black / White *
31 (16, 15)
29.6 (16.4, 13.2)
5%
35.2 (21.2, 14)
-14%
29 (16, 13)
6%
24 (14, 10)
23%
PWM Frequency
25510 (50)
217 (20)
-99%
1000 (90)
-96%
Screen
21%
35%
32%
39%
Brightness middle
347
344
-1%
329
-5%
344
-1%
289
-17%
Brightness
321
313
-2%
316
-2%
320
0%
310
-3%
Brightness Distribution
88
82
-7%
92
5%
77
-12%
85
-3%
Black Level *
0.37
0.25
32%
0.25
32%
0.31
16%
0.23
38%
Contrast
938
1376
47%
1316
40%
1110
18%
1257
34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.7
4.7
39%
4.3
44%
2.72
65%
1.64
79%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
31
19.4
37%
7.8
75%
5.92
81%
3.31
89%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
6
2.5
58%
0.99
83%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.9
2.2
72%
3.6
54%
2.74
65%
1.71
78%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.16 102%
2.43 91%
2.38 92%
2.32 95%
CCT
6914 94%
6252 104%
6928 94%
6794 96%
6291 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
42.2
41.2
-2%
59.1
40%
61
45%
52
23%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
64.9
64.1
-1%
90.6
40%
94
45%
82
26%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
13% / 18%
9% / 27%
-1% / 17%
12% / 27%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation Sweeps (calibrated)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 25510 Hz ≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 25510 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 25510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9247 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
DPC-Latencies
HWiNFO
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U: Ø388 (376.46-534.9)
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø538 (523.46-671.14)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
160 Points ∼100% +21%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i5-8350U
152 Points ∼95% +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 Points ∼91% +10%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼90% +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
  (132 - 139, n=3)
135 Points ∼84% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
132 Points ∼83%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20 - 184, n=248)
113 Points ∼71% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Core i5-8250U
684 Points ∼100% +26%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i5-8350U
625 Points ∼91% +16%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
  (541 - 589, n=3)
561 Points ∼82% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
541 Points ∼79%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
531 Points ∼78% -2%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Core i5-8250U
529 Points ∼77% -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32 - 721, n=258)
322 Points ∼47% -40%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.92 Points ∼100% +24%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Core i5-8250U
1.63 Points ∼85% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
1.55 Points ∼81%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
  (1.5 - 1.58, n=3)
1.543 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.09 - 1.98, n=272)
1.155 Points ∼60% -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
7.17 Points ∼100% +18%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
  (6.04 - 6.74, n=3)
6.29 Points ∼88% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
6.08 Points ∼85%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Core i5-8250U
5.63 Points ∼79% -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.33 - 7.22, n=411)
2.54 Points ∼35% -58%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
233.53 Points ∼100% +28%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Core i5-8250U
224.76 Points ∼96% +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Core i5-8250U
219.99 Points ∼94% +20%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (34.8 - 277, n=118)
186 Points ∼80% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
182.93 Points ∼78%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
  (118 - 183, n=3)
161 Points ∼69% -12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
33496 Points ∼100% +36%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Core i5-8250U
30794 Points ∼92% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Core i5-8250U
30696 Points ∼92% +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
24713 Points ∼74%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3963 - 41665, n=129)
24638 Points ∼74% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
  (23903 - 24713, n=2)
24308 Points ∼73% -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (797 - 30250, n=137)
2072 ms * ∼100% -51%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
  (1376 - 1659, n=3)
1488 ms * ∼72% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
1376.3 ms * ∼66%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel Core i5-8250U
1297.7 ms * ∼63% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel Core i5-8250U
1247.6 ms * ∼60% +9%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
1121 ms * ∼54% +19%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8059
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7183 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
21110 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
8680 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4349
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
12294
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
5.45 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
44.28 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.55 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
6.08 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
42.64 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
1.33 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
132 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
46.34 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
541 Points
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
3071 Points ∼100% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3048 Points ∼99% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
2806 Points ∼91%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
2711 Points ∼88% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (2359 - 2924, n=3)
2696 Points ∼88% -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (678 - 3704, n=63)
2318 Points ∼75% -17%
Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6529 Points ∼100% +24%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
6378 Points ∼98% +21%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
6079 Points ∼93% +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5271 Points ∼81%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1690 - 7281, n=63)
5083 Points ∼78% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (3759 - 5271, n=3)
4755 Points ∼73% -10%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7845 Points ∼100% +13%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
7614 Points ∼97% +9%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
7149 Points ∼91% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6969 Points ∼89%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3073 - 8549, n=63)
6631 Points ∼85% -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (5848 - 6969, n=3)
6547 Points ∼83% -6%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3860 Points ∼100% +15%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
3802 Points ∼98% +13%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, SK hynix SC311 M.2
3577 Points ∼93% +6%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3514 Points ∼91% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
3361 Points ∼87%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (2673 - 3376, n=3)
3137 Points ∼81% -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1102 - 4344, n=66)
3026 Points ∼78% -10%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
5069 Points ∼100% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4868 Points ∼96% +5%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, SK hynix SC311 M.2
4768 Points ∼94% +3%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
4747 Points ∼94% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4650 Points ∼92%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (4123 - 4650, n=3)
4473 Points ∼88% -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1283 - 5363, n=191)
3980 Points ∼79% -14%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
4051 Points ∼100% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
3714 Points ∼92%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3676 Points ∼91% -1%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, SK hynix SC311 M.2
3600 Points ∼89% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3574 Points ∼88% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (2937 - 3714, n=3)
3415 Points ∼84% -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1027 - 4182, n=217)
3014 Points ∼74% -19%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3714 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4465 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4650 points
Help
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell Latitude 7390
SK hynix SC311 M.2
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
 
AS SSD
22%
-60%
-63%
-26%
-9%
Score Total
2829
3774
33%
857
-70%
885
-69%
1961
-31%
2487 (1663 - 3111, n=12)
-12%
Score Write
1285
1553
21%
311
-76%
419
-67%
883
-31%
1113 (514 - 1644, n=12)
-13%
Score Read
1052
1497
42%
359
-66%
306
-71%
698
-34%
921 (724 - 1078, n=12)
-12%
Access Time Write *
0.042
0.036
14%
0.056
-33%
0.057
-36%
0.037
12%
0.0377 (0.027 - 0.049, n=12)
10%
Access Time Read *
0.049
0.041
16%
0.075
-53%
0.099
-102%
0.061
-24%
0.0748 (0.041 - 0.113, n=12)
-53%
4K-64 Write
1067.44
1308.86
23%
210.34
-80%
308.75
-71%
712.48
-33%
876 (274 - 1392, n=12)
-18%
4K-64 Read
762.59
1217.77
60%
282.75
-63%
235.66
-69%
610.64
-20%
679 (530 - 786, n=12)
-11%
4K Write
85.66
105.25
23%
63.57
-26%
73.85
-14%
98.37
15%
102 (77.4 - 138, n=12)
19%
4K Read
43.16
47.2
9%
27.31
-37%
24.41
-43%
38.35
-11%
46.1 (32.4 - 53.8, n=12)
7%
Seq Write
1314.74
1384.87
5%
369.9
-72%
364.45
-72%
720.49
-45%
1346 (1118 - 1646, n=12)
2%
Seq Read
2482.71
2315.96
-7%
485.52
-80%
455.47
-82%
494.33
-80%
1964 (864 - 2724, n=12)
-21%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Sequential Read: 1834 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1388 MB/s
512K Read: 792.6 MB/s
512K Write: 1302 MB/s
4K Read: 53.07 MB/s
4K Write: 97.34 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 276.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 196 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3512 Points ∼100% +12%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (1668 - 4317, n=15)
3177 Points ∼90% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
3123 Points ∼89%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1821 Points ∼52% -42%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1657 Points ∼47% -47%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1606 Points ∼46% -49%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (230 - 4905, n=336)
1208 Points ∼34% -61%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
843 Points ∼100% +61%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (523 - 702, n=4)
602 Points ∼71% +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
523 Points ∼62%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (85 - 905, n=26)
434 Points ∼51% -17%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
2874 Points ∼100% +41%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
2036 Points ∼71%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (1095 - 2901, n=13)
1984 Points ∼69% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1197 Points ∼42% -41%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1169 Points ∼41% -43%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (222 - 3726, n=218)
980 Points ∼34% -52%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
959 Points ∼33% -53%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
17325 Points ∼100% +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
14071 Points ∼81%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (7309 - 18177, n=13)
12994 Points ∼75% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9711 Points ∼56% -31%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9291 Points ∼54% -34%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
8104 Points ∼47% -42%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1484 - 21755, n=246)
7196 Points ∼42% -49%
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark 11
3DMark 11
3DMark 11 Performance
3153 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
69209 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8099 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1724 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
807 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
587 points
Help
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 103.117.2fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 12.3fps
Rocket League (2017) 52.9fps

Noise Level

Idle
28.9 / 28.9 / 28.9 dB(A)
Load
31.2 / 31.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28.9 dB(A)
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, SK hynix SC311 M.2
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
Noise
-10%
-7%
-6%
-12%
off / environment *
28.9
29.2
-1%
29.5
-2%
30.4
-5%
30.3
-5%
Idle Minimum *
28.9
29.2
-1%
29.5
-2%
30.4
-5%
30.3
-5%
Idle Average *
28.9
29.2
-1%
29.5
-2%
30.4
-5%
30.3
-5%
Idle Maximum *
28.9
29.2
-1%
29.5
-2%
30.4
-5%
30.3
-5%
Load Average *
31.2
39.7
-27%
32.4
-4%
33.7
-8%
38.9
-25%
Load Maximum *
31.2
39.7
-27%
39.9
-28%
33
-6%
39
-25%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.127.829.12527.627.226.9312925.226.44027.123.730502524.930.46323.722.822.98022.821.920.810023.92223.612522.121.722.416021.520.221.220021.520.922.125021.720.421.931520.920.420.740021.319.620.45002119.52063020.119.119.180020.318.519.3100019.718.219.6125019.817.519.2160019.916.719.1200019.516.318.4250018.81617.4315020.215.417.6400019.815.216.6500017.1151663001614.915.680001514.714.8100001514.714.51250014.614.414.41600014.514.314.4SPL31.228.930.1N1.51.21.3median 19.9median 17.5median 19.1Delta22.42.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
Stress test: Prime95 solo
Stress test: Prime95 solo
Stress test: FurMark solo
Stress test: FurMark solo
Stress test: FurMark+Prime95
Stress test: FurMark+Prime95
Max. Load
 32 °C38.1 °C42.4 °C 
 31.2 °C37.6 °C43 °C 
 28 °C30.8 °C34.7 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 35.3 °C
41.3 °C41.6 °C33.6 °C
38.6 °C46 °C32.2 °C
27.7 °C27.8 °C26.3 °C
Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 35 °C
Power Supply (max.)  33.8 °C | Room Temperature 20.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.2 °C / 104 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.7 °C / 94.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.6 °C / 83.5 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
Vega 8, PRO 2500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, SK hynix SC311 M.2
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
Heat
3%
-2%
3%
-14%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
43.2
-0%
43.1
-0%
39.3
9%
43.1
-0%
Maximum Bottom *
46
43.1
6%
55.2
-20%
43.1
6%
45.9
-0%
Idle Upper Side *
24.5
24.8
-1%
23.7
3%
25.4
-4%
32.4
-32%
Idle Bottom *
25.9
24.1
7%
23.6
9%
25.6
1%
32.2
-24%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.829.22527.230.13125.225.64023.724.75024.928.76322.824.48021.9251002223.412521.724.316020.228.620020.931.725020.435.531520.446.640019.648.750019.556.263019.159.180018.560.1100018.261.8125017.560.3160016.757.6200016.357.725001659.5315015.458.3400015.25450001559.1630014.960800014.760.81000014.760.51250014.457.31600014.353SPL28.971N1.227.6median 17.5median 57.6Delta2.48.535.233.129.43035.63331.73130.428.126.928.125.627.225.83025.332.826.13923.345.121.951.12157.818.259.118.259.817.765.117.170.316.868.415.771.715.571.715.771.915.670.515.871.116.174.316.574.816.871.817.16417.267.517.263.417.361.62983.11.255.2median 17.2median 65.12.59.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GEDell Latitude 7390
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell Latitude 7390 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.28 / 0.61 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.8 / 8.2 / 9.96 Watt
Load midlight 37.9 / 40.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 12.5
Dell Latitude 7390
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
8550U, GeForce MX150, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
12%
10%
34%
2%
-6%
-10%
Idle Minimum *
5.8
3.11
46%
2.34
60%
2.4
59%
5.3
9%
5.98 (4.5 - 7.6, n=12)
-3%
6.77 (1 - 36, n=572)
-17%
Idle Average *
8.2
5.01
39%
5.6
32%
5.5
33%
7.3
11%
8.94 (7 - 12.9, n=12)
-9%
9.98 (2.06 - 39, n=572)
-22%
Idle Maximum *
9.96
8.11
19%
6.5
35%
6
40%
9.3
7%
10.7 (8.1 - 13.7, n=12)
-7%
12.3 (3.9 - 55, n=572)
-23%
Load Average *
37.9
44.6
-18%
43
-13%
31
18%
39
-3%
38.8 (24.1 - 45.7, n=12)
-2%
33.4 (6.3 - 75, n=562)
12%
Load Maximum *
40.5
51.7
-28%
67.4
-66%
32.6
20%
46
-14%
44 (26.5 - 57.1, n=12)
-9%
40.4 (7.6 - 111, n=565)
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
9h 34min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (EDGE: 44.17763.1.0)
7h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 46min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 36min
Maximum battery runtime
Maximum battery runtime
Minimum battery runtime
Minimum battery runtime
Wi-Fi battery runtime
Wi-Fi battery runtime
Video battery runtime (H.264)
Video battery runtime (H.264)
Charging
Charging
Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE
PRO 2500U, Vega 8, 48 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X280-20KES01S00
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Dell Latitude 7390
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Fujitsu Lifebook U938
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng
8550U, GeForce MX150, 53.2 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
62%
116%
48%
30%
23%
Reader / Idle
574
1212
111%
1660
189%
1167
103%
931
62%
605 (87 - 2557, n=536)
5%
H.264
286
572
100%
749
162%
433
51%
378
32%
461 (182 - 950, n=106)
61%
WiFi v1.3
469
531
13%
506
8%
481
3%
467 (206 - 805, n=189)
0%
Load
96
119
24%
92
-4%
123
28%
116
21%
122 (40 - 347, n=541)
27%

Pros

+ 高质量轻量化机身
+ 出色的ThinkPad输入设备
+ 高速的SSD
+ 配备指纹识别器和智能读卡器
+ 提升了的可维护性
+ 亮度大于300尼特的雾面IPS
+ 机身温度低
+ 风扇声音小
+ HDMI 2.0以及高分辨率USBC输出
+ 3D性能较X280有所提升

Cons

- 没有雷电3
- 电池不可拆卸
- 板载内存无法升级
- 空载功耗高
- CPU在不插电时性能降低
- 屏幕色域低
- 机身足以装下13.3英寸的屏幕

Error: More than one (2) Pro / Contra Item for this review found!

联想ThinkPad A285 笔记本电脑评测. Test model courtesy of Lenovo Germany.
联想ThinkPad A285 笔记本电脑评测. Test model courtesy of Lenovo Germany.

联想ThinkPad A285终于让用户有机会体验配备AMD处理器的紧凑型ThinkPad笔记本电脑。除了三个基本型号外,这台12.5英寸的设备还可拓展诸如SmartCard读卡器或指纹扫描仪等实用功能。制造商还提供可选的WWAN模块,因此您可以在旅途中使用互联网。

AMD的Ryzen 5 Pro 2500U是A285的优秀CPU,为日常任务提供了充足的性能。该处理器可与英特尔酷睿i5-8250U相媲美,但不适用于持续工作负载。配备Intel CPU的X280速度更快,但这也是由联想设置的不同TDP的结果。

两个处理器之间最大的区别是集成显卡。AMD的Radeon Vega 8性能强得多可以在基准测试中轻松击败英特尔UHD 620。

我们联想ThinkPad A285零售价为5999元。我们特别喜欢其出色的输入设备,256 GB PCIe-SSD可确保高传输速率,从而获得良好的系统性能。高品质和坚固的机身更是锦上添花。它的重量仅为1.1千克,因此您可以轻松携带它或将其放入包中。

“联想ThinkPad A285是一款基于AMD处理器的优质办公设备,与X280相比价格更低。如果您不需要X280的额外CPU性能或更长的续航时间,A285是一个不错的选择。”

但此机器仍然存在一些缺点,例如高功耗,与X280相比,这会影响续航时间。我们测试机上的屏幕也有点差,但这是联想“抽奖”的结果。由于制造商使用了不同的供应商,您永远不知道您将获得哪块屏幕。

板载内存对于商务本来说绝对不是好事,这意味着你以后无法升级。A285也缺乏X280的雷电3支持。尽管如此,该设备的整体印象还是不错的,我们可以推荐它。用户是否愿意为他们的商务本切换到AMD硬件仍有待时间考验,但更低的价格绝对是一个优势。性能差不多的ThinkPad X280配备英特尔CPU,价格上则贵了800元。

Lenovo ThinkPad A285-20MX0002GE - 01/06/2019 v6
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
92 /  98 → 94%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
68 / 80 → 85%
Weight
73 / 35-78 → 89%
Battery
84%
Display
84%
Games Performance
64 / 68 → 94%
Application Performance
79 / 87 → 91%
Temperature
90 / 91 → 99%
Noise
99%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Average
78%
88%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想ThinkPad A285 (Ryzen 5 Pro, Vega 8, FHD)笔记本电脑评测
Sebastian Bade, 2019-02- 8 (Update: 2019-02- 8)