
中端价位的高端智能手机 - Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G 评测
热门机箱,超酷技术。
外观并不重要。Tecno 相信这一点,并在中端智能手机的设计中集成了速度快、内存大的 SoC。虽然这款手机主要在亚洲和非洲销售,但它也可能以具有竞争力的价格吸引西方买家。Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
判决
如果你能买到 Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G,你就能以相对低廉的价格拥有一款配备潜望镜变焦摄像头和快速处理器的智能手机。
虽然手机外壳只是中端水平,但一些内部组件在同价位手机中却令人印象深刻:UFS 4.0 闪存确保了高速数据传输和应用程序加载时间。独立的 ISP 大幅提高了照片质量,12 GB 内存确保了几乎所有应用程序都能在设备上运行。
Wi-Fi 传输速度很快,软件更新承诺长达 5 年。
所以这一切都是阳光和玫瑰吗?嗯,这款手机的散热性能相当一般,导致长时间负载时发热和节流现象严重。此外,由于 PWM 的原因,屏幕在低亮度时会闪烁,亮度和色彩显示效果也很一般。
Tecno 一定是在某些地方偷工减料了,但 Camon 40 Premier 5G 仍然是同价位手机中的佼佼者。也就是说,如果你能买到的话。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在欧洲很难买到 Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G。只有亚马逊网站(Amazon.de)上出售该手机的保护套和其他配件。
在其他国家,Tecno 手机的建议零售价不到 400 欧元。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
机箱和功能 - 中档防水机箱
该制造商以中档手机的价格提供高档手机,平板显示屏周围采用拉丝金属边框。屏幕由大猩猩 7i 玻璃保护。背面是双色塑料:除了深灰色或绿松石色的主色调外,侧面还有一条金属条。这让人联想到经典的相机;据 Tecno 称,这是有意为之。
笨重的相机模块从机身中突出,但用一个金属环将其框住,金属环上刻有技术细节,非常时尚。材料的过渡稍显明显,但总体上是均匀的。外壳的防水和防尘标准为 IP68/69。
这款手机配备了 12GB RAM 和 265GB 大容量存储空间,配置相当不错,但无法通过 microSD 卡进行扩展。如果需要,红外线传感器可将手机变成遥控器,背面的红色 LED 灯可在需要时提供通知信息。
通信和操作 - Tecno-Phone 带 WiFi 6E
尽管价格相对较低,但 Tecno Camon 40 Premier 支持 WiFi 6E,在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中,下载速率高达 1,553 MBit/s。这意味着千兆网络连接也能轻松使用。
这款手机可与 4G 和 5G 移动网络通信,信号质量好,频段充足,可在全球大多数国家使用。
由于帧频高达 144 Hz,屏幕对触摸屏输入的反应非常灵敏。Camon 40 Premier 5G 可以通过 2D 面部识别和显示屏上的光学指纹传感器解锁。指纹扫描仪的位置很好,在测试中工作非常可靠。
软件和可持续性 - 保证 5 年更新
Android 15 作为智能手机操作系统的基础,Tecno 的 HiOS 位于其上。Tecno 承诺 5 年的安全更新和三个新的 版本,即 18。手机上没有臃肿的软件。
一开机,人工智能助理 Ella 就会出现在你面前,这充分体现了 Tecno 对创新的重视。虽然已经具备了一些人工智能功能,但 Ella 的潜力还有待充分发挥。不过,值得注意的是,Ella 目前对欧洲语言的支持有限。
Tecno 在可持续发展方面的努力并不明显,包装中使用塑料薄膜是值得注意的一点。Android Android
摄像头 - 摄像系统良好
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra wide-angle

显示屏--亮度不如 OLED
|
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 654 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.244
Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G OLED, 2800x1260, 6.7" | Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Motorola Edge 60 Fusion P-OLED, 2712x1200, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 37% | 58% | 60% | |
Brightness middle | 654 | 789 21% | 1138 74% | 1281 96% |
Brightness | 650 | 792 22% | 1137 75% | 1281 97% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 98 3% | 97 2% | 94 -1% |
Black Level * | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.07 | 1.2 71% | 1.1 73% | 1.47 64% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.8 | 3.1 54% | 2.6 62% | 3.14 54% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 2.1 53% | 1.6 64% | 2.2 51% |
Gamma | 2.244 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.062 107% |
CCT | 7568 86% | 6634 98% | 6284 103% | 6628 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60.7 Hz Amplitude: 25 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 60.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60.7 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8453 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise | |
↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms). |
性能、排放和电池续航时间--中端手机的强劲动力
使用 Dimensity 8350Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G 配备了非常强大的 SoC,优于同价位的许多其他设备。Tecno 甚至还使用了终极版 SoC,它有一个专门用于图像处理的单元。
在图形处理能力方面,它甚至足以在显示屏的原生分辨率下运行要求更高的游戏。
事实证明,UFS 4.0 内存速度极快,可以快速加载应用程序。
不过,制造商似乎在散热方面有所吝啬:在高负载情况下,温度惊人地接近 50°C 大关。虽然这还不是什么严重的问题,但在炎热的天气里,这一点明显会让人感到不舒服。在 3DMark 压力测试中,也能明显看到 "节流 "现象。
Tecno Camon 40 Premier 甚至配备了真正的立体声扬声器。它们听起来非常均衡,但音量不大。许多蓝牙音频编解码器可用于连接耳机或扬声器,不会出现任何问题,而且音质很好。
电池容量为 5100 毫安时,比上一代产品略高,在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,电池续航时间也延长了几分钟。在正常使用的情况下,这样的续航时间应该可以达到 2 天无需充电。如果手机确实需要插电,充电功率可高达 70 瓦,从 0% 充到 100% 大约需要一个小时。
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (231 - 1106, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Average of class Smartphone (231 - 4555, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.3 | |
Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1) | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 4549, n=6, last 2 years) |
Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G | Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -30% | -57% | -54% | -9% | -39% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 3973 | 1850.76 -53% | 1009.67 -75% | 967.4 -76% | 3691 ? -7% | 2043 ? -49% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 3275 | 1727.3 -47% | 833.64 -75% | 908.8 -72% | 2713 ? -17% | 1658 ? -49% |
Random Read 4KB | 337 | 354.51 5% | 248.81 -26% | 272.1 -19% | 385 ? 14% | 284 ? -16% |
Random Write 4KB | 565 | 420.96 -25% | 266.92 -53% | 286.9 -49% | 415 ? -27% | 328 ? -42% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G | |
Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G | |
Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G |
Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G 5100 mAh | Tecno Camon 30 Premier 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 5110 mAh | Motorola Edge 60 Fusion 5200 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -2% | 26% | 7% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 955 | 937 -2% | 1206 26% | 1023 7% |
Reader / Idle | 1754 | 1966 | ||
H.264 | 1423 | 1161 | ||
Load | 236 | 329 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分

通过 Tecno Camon 40 Premier,您只需花很少的钱就能买到一款具有良好摄像系统和充足电量的手机。
不过,可以看出在机身和散热方面还是有所节省的。
Tecno Camon 40 Premier 5G
- 04/27/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
可能的替代品比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.