Oppo RX17 Neo
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 25 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 10 scores (from 13 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo RX17 Neo
Source: Techradar
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThis is a tricky one to judge. There are parts of the Oppo RX17 Neo we love, like its excellent battery life and bold screen. However, charging that is both slow and micro USB-based seems totally out of place in 2019, and at the price you can get metal and glass phones. They feel more impressive, although Oppo has done a good job of making plastic look like glass here. Your hands won’t be too easily fooled, though. Buy this if battery life is your top priority, and you’ve been put off Huawei and Honor phones recently.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionAt the start of April a review of a sibling unit to this one can be found on Gadgetspeak. So here what is quite a similar product on the face of it, however there are surprises like a fingerprint reader that is normally invisible on the screen.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: El Androide Libre
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/16/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: XGN
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Le monde numerique
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android.com.pl
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: Tabletowo
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 95% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: i2Hard
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/13/2018
Source: Product Test
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% display: 84% mobility: 86%
Source: Helpix
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mega Obzor
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2018
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 512:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 660:
高性能中档ARM SoC,具有8个CPU Kryo 260内核(集群中的4个高速2.2 GHz内核和2个省电1.8 GHz内核)和Adreno 512 GPU。采用14纳米工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
