Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarODYS Vario Pro 12 (Z8350, 高清) 变形本简短评测
Connectivity
| SD Card Reader | |
| maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
| average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 74 %
Center on Battery: 282 cd/m²
Contrast: 762:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.63 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.04 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
67% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
46.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
45.16% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 MS_9003, , 1366x768, 11.60 | Medion Akoya E2215T AU Optronics B116HAN03.1, , 1920x1080, 11.60 | HP x360 310 G1 Samsung SEC3953, , 1366x768, 11.60 | Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Chi Mei N116HSE-DA2, , 1920x1080, 11.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 7% | -17% | 32% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 45.16 | 48.12 7% | 37.47 -17% | 63 40% |
| sRGB Coverage | 67.5 | 71.7 6% | 56.4 -16% | 83.9 24% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 46.71 | 49.78 7% | 38.71 -17% | 61.3 31% |
| Response Times | 38% | 30% | 41% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60 ? | 31 ? 48% | 43 ? 28% | 37 ? 38% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 36 ? | 26 ? 28% | 25 ? 31% | 20 ? 44% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 396 ? | ||
| Screen | 16% | -62% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle | 282 | 338 20% | 199 -29% | 257 -9% |
| Brightness | 250 | 309 24% | 186 -26% | 235 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 74 | 76 3% | 76 3% | 80 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.39 -5% | 0.8 -116% | 0.25 32% |
| Contrast | 762 | 867 14% | 249 -67% | 1028 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.63 | 3.94 30% | 11.92 -112% | 7.98 -42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.28 | 9.96 12% | 20.52 -82% | 12.25 -9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.04 | 2.54 50% | 12.92 -156% | 7.87 -56% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.38 92% | 2.04 108% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 7254 90% | 6902 94% | 13589 48% | 8815 74% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 43 | 46 7% | 36 -16% | 55 28% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 67 | 71 6% | 56 -16% | 84 25% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 20% /
17% | -16% /
-41% | 25% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17908 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | ||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 31 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 29 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR | |
| Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 1437 points | |
Help | ||
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP x360 310 G1 | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 32 GB eMMC Flash | Medion Akoya E2215T 64 GB eMMC Flash | HP x360 310 G1 Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -19% | -43% | -47% | |
| Read Seq | 168.3 | 169.6 1% | 99.5 -41% | 142.8 -15% |
| Write Seq | 43.13 | 39.77 -8% | 102.9 139% | 44.24 3% |
| Read 512 | 155 | 155.3 0% | 34.45 -78% | 125.4 -19% |
| Write 512 | 33.71 | 27.45 -19% | 42.7 27% | 16.9 -50% |
| Read 4k | 15.91 | 13.09 -18% | 0.439 -97% | 7.82 -51% |
| Write 4k | 11.64 | 7.915 -32% | 0.013 -100% | 1.423 -88% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 32.2 | 15.11 -53% | 0.851 -97% | 11.04 -66% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 13.65 | 10.05 -26% | 0.033 -100% | 1.435 -89% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 339 points | |
Help | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 | |
| HP x360 310 G1 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| Trackmania Nations Forever (2008) | 105 | 24.7 |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.3 °C / 86.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-2.2 °C / -3.9 F).
ODYS Vario Pro 12 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   1.1 / 1.3 Watt |
| Idle |  4.8 / 7.8 / 8.2 Watt |
| Load |
14.8 / 14.4 Watt |
    
| |
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| HP x360 310 G1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 | |
Pros
Cons
Cherry Trail架构的凌动处理器位Vario Pro提供了足够简单办公应用和上网浏览的性能。显卡中集成的视频解码器也可以帮助处理器缓解视频播放带来的压力。因此，这款设备可以搭配电视作为多媒体终端。
Odys的Vario Pro 12是一台十分全面的11.6寸设备，由于搭配了手写笔它可以很好地从同类设备中脱颖而出。
它的键盘总体上十分不错。同时它还有优秀的电池续航和两年质保。IPS屏幕提供了稳定的可视角度范围和优秀的对比度。不过它的亮度还有待提高。主动式手写笔结合Windows Ink功能十分便于使用。
和许多同类设备相似，这台Odys变形本仅搭配2GB内存和32GB闪存，略显局促。我们认为一台Windows系统设备需要至少4GB内存和64GB硬盘空间。缺少USB-C接口也让人感觉有些遗憾，在2017年推出的新设备应该将这个接口作为标配。我们也不太满意它较慢的无线网络模组。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
ODYS Vario Pro 12
-
04/03/2017 v6(old)
Sascha Mölck