Notebookcheck

ODYS Vario Pro 12 (Z8350, 高清) 变形本简短评测

Sascha Mölck, Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), 04/08/2017
Convertible / 2-in-1 Touchscreen Windows

手写输入。 来自Odys的这台变形本支持主动式手写笔,可以方便地使用Windows Ink功能。同时它运行安静,电池续航优秀,搭配了一块IPS屏幕。260欧元(约1900人民币)的售价也十分优惠。

ODYS Vario Pro 12
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Core: 200-500 MHz, 单通道, 20.19.15.4474
Memory
2048 MB 
, DDR3-1600, 单通道, 板载内存
Display
11.6 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 135 PPI, 电容式,10点触控,支持主动式手写笔, MS_9003, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 17 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: microSD, Sensors: 加速感应器,霍尔感应器, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8723BS (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.5 x 284 x 202
Battery
9000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 8 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 32 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, 主动式手写笔, Microsoft Office Home and Student 2016 (试用版), 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
1.2 kg, Power Supply: 132 g
Price
300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Connectivity

Right side: combo audio, micro HDMI, card reader (microSD), power, USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-A)
Right side: combo audio, micro HDMI, card reader (microSD), power, USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-A)
Left side: USB 2.0 (Type-A)
Left side: USB 2.0 (Type-A)
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ODYS Vario Pro 12
Realtek RTL8723BS
52 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ODYS Vario Pro 12
Realtek RTL8723BS
46 MBit/s ∼100%
267
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
242
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
233
cd/m²
233
cd/m²
246
cd/m²
209
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 282 cd/m² Average: 249.6 cd/m² Minimum: 55 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 74 %
Center on Battery: 282 cd/m²
Contrast: 762:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.63 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.04 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
67% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
ODYS Vario Pro 12
MS_9003, , 1366x768, 11.6
Medion Akoya E2215T
AU Optronics B116HAN03.1, , 1920x1080, 11.6
HP x360 310 G1
Samsung SEC3953, , 1366x768, 11.6
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
Chi Mei N116HSE-DA2, , 1920x1080, 11.6
Response Times
38%
30%
41%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
60 (31, 29)
31 (13, 18)
48%
43 (20, 23)
28%
37 (16, 21)
38%
Response Time Black / White *
36 (22, 14)
26 (6, 20)
28%
25 (7, 18)
31%
20 (6, 14)
44%
PWM Frequency
50 (20)
396 (90)
Screen
16%
-62%
1%
Brightness middle
282
338
20%
199
-29%
257
-9%
Brightness
250
309
24%
186
-26%
235
-6%
Brightness Distribution
74
76
3%
76
3%
80
8%
Black Level *
0.37
0.39
-5%
0.8
-116%
0.25
32%
Contrast
762
867
14%
249
-67%
1028
35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.63
3.94
30%
11.92
-112%
7.98
-42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.28
9.96
12%
20.52
-82%
12.25
-9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.04
2.54
50%
12.92
-156%
7.87
-56%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.38 92%
2.04 108%
2.3 96%
CCT
7254 90%
6902 94%
13589 48%
8815 74%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
43
46
7%
36
-16%
55
28%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
67
71
6%
56
-16%
84
25%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
27% / 20%
-16% / -47%
21% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31 ms rise
↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
921
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
3076
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
1988
Help
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
951 Points ∼9% +3%
Medion Akoya E2215T
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
938 Points ∼9% +2%
ODYS Vario Pro 12
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
921 Points ∼9%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
884 Points ∼8% -4%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
ODYS Vario Pro 12
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
3076 Points ∼6%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
2966 Points ∼6% -4%
Medion Akoya E2215T
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
2897 Points ∼6% -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
2575 Points ∼5% -16%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
ODYS Vario Pro 12
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
2289 Points ∼7%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
2175 Points ∼7% -5%
Medion Akoya E2215T
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
2130 Points ∼7% -7%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
ODYS Vario Pro 12
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
760 Points ∼16%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
743 Points ∼16% -2%
Medion Akoya E2215T
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
726 Points ∼15% -4%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
ODYS Vario Pro 12
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
44.098 Points ∼13%
Medion Akoya E2215T
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
42.548 Points ∼13% -4%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
41.589 Points ∼12% -6%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
6122 ms * ∼10% -9%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
5758.2 ms * ∼10% -2%
ODYS Vario Pro 12
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
5630.4 ms * ∼9%
Medion Akoya E2215T
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
5508.9 ms * ∼9% +2%
Octane V2 - Total Score
ODYS Vario Pro 12
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
7265 Points ∼15%
Medion Akoya E2215T
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
7142 Points ∼14% -2%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
6382 Points ∼13% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
6343 Points ∼13% -13%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1437 points
Help
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
HP x360 310 G1
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
1445 Points ∼24% +1%
ODYS Vario Pro 12
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1437 Points ∼24%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1419 Points ∼23% -1%
Medion Akoya E2215T
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1282 Points ∼21% -11%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1246 Points ∼20% -13%
32 GB eMMC Flash
Sequential Read: 168.3 MB/s
Sequential Write: 43.13 MB/s
512K Read: 155 MB/s
512K Write: 33.71 MB/s
4K Read: 15.91 MB/s
4K Write: 11.64 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 32.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 13.65 MB/s
ODYS Vario Pro 12
32 GB eMMC Flash
Medion Akoya E2215T
64 GB eMMC Flash
HP x360 310 G1
Toshiba MQ01ABF050
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
32 GB eMMC Flash
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-19%
-43%
-47%
Write 4k QD32
13.65
10.05
-26%
0.033
-100%
1.435
-89%
Read 4k QD32
32.2
15.11
-53%
0.851
-97%
11.04
-66%
Write 4k
11.64
7.915
-32%
0.013
-100%
1.423
-88%
Read 4k
15.91
13.09
-18%
0.439
-97%
7.82
-51%
Write 512
33.71
27.45
-19%
42.7
27%
16.9
-50%
Read 512
155
155.3
0%
34.45
-78%
125.4
-19%
Write Seq
43.13
39.77
-8%
102.9
139%
44.24
3%
Read Seq
168.3
169.6
1%
99.47
-41%
142.8
-15%
3DMark 11 Performance
339 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8350
298 Points ∼1% 0%
ODYS Vario Pro 12
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8350
297 Points ∼1%
Medion Akoya E2215T
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8350
297 Points ∼1% 0%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300
293 Points ∼1% -1%
HP x360 310 G1
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Pentium N3540
221 Points ∼0% -26%
low med. high ultra
Trackmania Nations Forever (2008) 10524.7fps
Max. Load
 24.5 °C27 °C36.5 °C 
 24.1 °C27.1 °C34.9 °C 
 23.9 °C24.7 °C30.3 °C 
Maximum: 36.5 °C
Average: 28.1 °C
34.5 °C25 °C24.2 °C
36.5 °C25.9 °C24.5 °C
30.3 °C25.6 °C24.8 °C
Maximum: 36.5 °C
Average: 27.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30.4 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F, ranging from 20.8 to 67.1 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.4 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.3 °C / 86.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.2 °C / 84.6 F (-1.1 °C / -1.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.230.331.22532.932.232.9313535.1354030.528.330.55029.331.429.36326.227.526.28026.525.826.510025.525.325.512524.924.124.916024.623.524.62002322.12325026.121.726.131533.821.133.840046.720.646.750048.22048.263053.519.453.580054.118.754.1100064.418.664.4125066.11866.1160061.91861.9200057.417.657.4250057.517.757.5315056.717.856.7400058.518.258.5500059.618.359.6630057.818.457.8800050.718.450.7100004618.6461250042.918.542.91600042.318.642.3SPL71.730.671.7N25.31.425.3median 50.7median 18.6median 50.7Delta10.81.710.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseODYS Vario Pro 12Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
ODYS Vario Pro 12 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 1.1 / 1.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.8 / 7.8 / 8.2 Watt
Load midlight 14.8 / 14.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 38)
7h 33min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
HP x360 310 G1
N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 30 Wh
684 min ∼26% +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR
Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 33 Wh
643 min ∼24% +42%
Medion Akoya E2215T
Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 38 Wh
474 min ∼18% +5%
ODYS Vario Pro 12
Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail),  Wh
453 min ∼17%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 8.2 Wh
294 min ∼11% -35%

Pros

+ IPS屏幕
+ 运行安静
+ 电池续航优秀
+ 主动式手写笔

Cons

- 屏幕较暗
- 不支持USB-C
- 无线网络模组速度较慢
In review: Odys Vario Pro 12. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Odys Vario Pro 12. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

Cherry Trail架构的凌动处理器位Vario Pro提供了足够简单办公应用和上网浏览的性能。显卡中集成的视频解码器也可以帮助处理器缓解视频播放带来的压力。因此,这款设备可以搭配电视作为多媒体终端。       

Odys的Vario Pro 12是一台十分全面的11.6寸设备,由于搭配了手写笔它可以很好地从同类设备中脱颖而出。

它的键盘总体上十分不错。同时它还有优秀的电池续航和两年质保。IPS屏幕提供了稳定的可视角度范围和优秀的对比度。不过它的亮度还有待提高。主动式手写笔结合Windows Ink功能十分便于使用。

和许多同类设备相似,这台Odys变形本仅搭配2GB内存和32GB闪存,略显局促。我们认为一台Windows系统设备需要至少4GB内存和64GB硬盘空间。缺少USB-C接口也让人感觉有些遗憾,在2017年推出的新设备应该将这个接口作为标配。我们也不太满意它较慢的无线网络模组。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

ODYS Vario Pro 12 - 04/03/2017 v6
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
77 / 98 → 79%
Keyboard
74%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
35 / 80 → 44%
Weight
73 / 35-78 → 87%
Battery
90%
Display
78%
Games Performance
31 / 68 → 45%
Application Performance
44 / 87 → 51%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
48 / 91 → 52%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Average
67%
79%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > ODYS Vario Pro 12 (Z8350, 高清) 变形本简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2017-04- 8 (Update: 2017-04- 8)