Notebookcheck

Nokia 1.3智能手机评测:弱点不少的小诺基亚

小事烦人。 基亚1.3应该靠便宜的价格说服买家。 有了可更换的电池和用于解锁的人脸识别功能,它有了一个良好的开端,但是由于细节上的错误,它并不能使用户的日常使用轻松自如。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Zewei Shen),
ARM Android Smartphone
Nokia 1.3
Nokia 1.3 (1 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 308
Memory
1024 MB 
Display
5.71 inch 19.5:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3,5mm音频端口, Card Reader: 最大400GB的microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度传感器,接近传感器
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.35 x 147.3 x 71.2
Battery
3000 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix Kontrast-AF,LED闪灯
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 背面单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 充电器,USB电缆, 24 Months Warranty, LTE Cat. 4 (150Mbps/50Mbps); SAR值:0.38 W / kg(头部),0.86 W / kg(身体), fanless
Weight
155 g, Power Supply: 48 g
Price
99 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
68 %7
06/2020
Nokia 1.3
SD 215, Adreno 308
155 g16 GB eMMC Flash5.71"1520x720
75 %7
06/2020
Motorola Moto E6s
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
160 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.1"1560x720
75 %7
01/2020
Huawei Y6s
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300
150 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.09"1560x720
74 %7
LG K40S
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
173 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.1"1560x720

Size Comparison

156.3 mm 73.9 mm 8.6 mm 173 g156.3 mm 73.5 mm 8 mm 150 g155.6 mm 73 mm 8.5 mm 160 g147.3 mm 71.2 mm 9.35 mm 155 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Y6s
802.11 b/g/n
58.3 (min: 55, max: 61) MBit/s ∼100% +15%
LG K40S
802.11 b/g/n
58 (min: 53, max: 59) MBit/s ∼99% +14%
Nokia 1.3
802.11 b/g/n
50.8 (min: 44, max: 55) MBit/s ∼87%
Motorola Moto E6s
802.11 b/g/n
43 (min: 26, max: 61) MBit/s ∼74% -15%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Y6s
802.11 b/g/n
55.8 (min: 53, max: 65) MBit/s ∼100% +7%
LG K40S
802.11 b/g/n
55.1 (min: 51, max: 59) MBit/s ∼99% +6%
Nokia 1.3
802.11 b/g/n
52.2 (min: 27, max: 61) MBit/s ∼94%
Motorola Moto E6s
802.11 b/g/n
35.4 (min: 5, max: 57) MBit/s ∼63% -32%
010203040506070Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø50.7 (44-55)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø52.1 (27-61)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
65.2 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
68.3 ∆E
66 ∆E
30 ∆E
49.9 ∆E
37 ∆E
78.6 ∆E
43 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
94.4 ∆E
71.2 ∆E
52.2 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia 1.3: 47.72 ∆E min: 14.19 - max: 94.45 ∆E
ColorChecker
1.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia 1.3: 4.84 ∆E min: 1.89 - max: 8.73 ∆E
420
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 456 cd/m² Average: 406.4 cd/m² Minimum: 11.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 456 cd/m²
Contrast: 1382:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.22 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
94% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.186
Nokia 1.3
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Motorola Moto E6s
IPS, 1560x720, 6.1
Huawei Y6s
IPS, 1560x720, 6.09
LG K40S
IPS, 1560x720, 6.1
Response Times
-4%
-11%
-3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
55 (28, 27)
64 (31, 33)
-16%
54 (25, 29)
2%
50 (25, 25)
9%
Response Time Black / White *
26 (11, 15)
24 (3, 21)
8%
32 (15, 17)
-23%
30 (15, 15)
-15%
PWM Frequency
100 (10)
100 (10)
Screen
17%
-17%
9%
Brightness middle
456
488
7%
424
-7%
487
7%
Brightness
406
481
18%
397
-2%
471
16%
Brightness Distribution
83
95
14%
85
2%
91
10%
Black Level *
0.33
0.25
24%
0.35
-6%
0.28
15%
Contrast
1382
1952
41%
1211
-12%
1739
26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.22
5.02
4%
6.45
-24%
5.56
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.38
8.99
-7%
12.76
-52%
9.64
-15%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.4
4.4
31%
8.5
-33%
5.2
19%
Gamma
2.186 101%
2.252 98%
2.231 99%
2.124 104%
CCT
8108 80%
7841 83%
9108 71%
7932 82%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
7% / 12%
-14% / -16%
3% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 28 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18037 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
3476 Points ∼60%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5197 Points ∼90% +50%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
3936 Points ∼68% +13%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3993 Points ∼69% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
3476 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=482)
5782 Points ∼100% +66%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
4339 Points ∼63%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6873 Points ∼100% +58%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
4658 Points ∼68% +7%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4764 Points ∼69% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
4339 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=640)
6325 Points ∼92% +46%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
819 Points ∼40%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1189 Points ∼58% +45%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1015 Points ∼49% +24%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
966 Points ∼47% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
819 Points ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5721, n=518)
2065 Points ∼100% +152%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
242 Points ∼9%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
742 Points ∼27% +207%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
712 Points ∼26% +194%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
704 Points ∼26% +191%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
242 Points ∼9% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=518)
2719 Points ∼100% +1024%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
287 Points ∼13%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
810 Points ∼35% +182%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
763 Points ∼33% +166%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
749 Points ∼33% +161%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
287 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=518)
2285 Points ∼100% +696%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
844 Points ∼44%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1124 Points ∼59% +33%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
1017 Points ∼53% +20%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
902 Points ∼47% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
844 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=610)
1906 Points ∼100% +126%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
245 Points ∼11%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
655 Points ∼29% +167%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
403 Points ∼18% +64%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
440 Points ∼20% +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
245 Points ∼11% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=609)
2237 Points ∼100% +813%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
291 Points ∼15%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
722 Points ∼37% +148%
Huawei Y6s
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
465 Points ∼24% +60%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
497 Points ∼26% +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
291 Points ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=612)
1929 Points ∼100% +563%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
10678 Points ∼70%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
14651 Points ∼97% +37%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10194 Points ∼67% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
10678 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=758)
15147 Points ∼100% +42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
4622 Points ∼18%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11220 Points ∼44% +143%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10804 Points ∼42% +134%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
4622 Points ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=756)
25423 Points ∼100% +450%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
5289 Points ∼26%
Motorola Moto E6s
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11836 Points ∼59% +124%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10662 Points ∼53% +102%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
5289 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=756)
20067 Points ∼100% +279%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
20125 Points ∼37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
20125 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 110361, n=87)
53684 Points ∼100% +167%
MEM (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
9394 Points ∼17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
9394 Points ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9394 - 122714, n=86)
55496 Points ∼100% +491%
GPU (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
0 Points ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
0 Points ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (29020 - 224320, n=86)
100672 Points ∼100%
CPU (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
23816 Points ∼23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
23816 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23816 - 185108, n=86)
103884 Points ∼100% +336%
Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
53335 Points ∼17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
53335 Points ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=86)
314420 Points ∼100% +490%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
6.3 fps ∼15%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼44% +202%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
6.3 fps ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=764)
43.3 fps ∼100% +587%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
11 fps ∼36%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
26 fps ∼86% +136%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
11 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=773)
30.3 fps ∼100% +175%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
2.5 fps ∼10%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.9 fps ∼39% +296%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
2.5 fps ∼10% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=669)
25.5 fps ∼100% +920%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 1.3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215, Adreno 308, 1024
5 fps ∼23%
LG K40S
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
17 fps ∼79% +240%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
 
5 fps ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=677)
21.6 fps ∼100% +332%
Nokia 1.3Motorola Moto E6sHuawei Y6sLG K40SAverage 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
19%
15%
5%
-41%
22%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
60.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
57.8 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
39.8 (6.38 - 65.8, n=135)
-33%
50.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=504)
-14%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
80.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
79.3 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
59.1 (8.1 - 87.7, n=135)
-22%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=504)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
38.6
17.7
-54%
18.6
-52%
18.5
-52%
8.05 (0.49 - 44.9, n=253)
-79%
32.1 (0.14 - 319, n=847)
-17%
Random Read 4KB
48.7
69.4
43%
46.7
-4%
53.2
9%
21.6 (2.49 - 62.1, n=253)
-56%
56.2 (1.59 - 324, n=847)
15%
Sequential Write 256KB
48.5
103.5
113%
118
143%
84.5
74%
43 (8.74 - 106, n=253)
-11%
119 (2.99 - 911, n=847)
145%
Sequential Read 256KB
284.8
275
-3%
263.2
-8%
272
-4%
165 (9.66 - 294, n=253)
-42%
324 (12.1 - 1802, n=847)
14%
Max. Load
 44.5 °C39.3 °C38.3 °C 
 43.1 °C38.9 °C39.3 °C 
 41.7 °C38.6 °C39.9 °C 
Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 40.4 °C
37.7 °C39.7 °C44.4 °C
37.4 °C39.7 °C43.7 °C
38.1 °C39.4 °C41.1 °C
Maximum: 44.4 °C
Average: 40.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.428.6253532.43127.127.9402627.95030.429.16325.2288022.721.110025.522.512520.121.816019.225.420017.828.625017.836.131516.14240016.648.750015.954.763014.36080014.764.1100014.871125014.373.1160014.168.2200016.365.5250014.463.7315013.865.1400013.964.5500014.259630014.556.6800014.6681000015671250015.357.81600015.762.8SPL71.226.978.8N25.60.939.8median 15median 60Delta1.611.532.437.43536.527.128.62633.530.437.325.232.322.725.725.525.220.126.419.230.517.835.717.841.116.145.616.652.715.96214.364.214.770.214.874.814.373.714.167.816.367.414.468.113.865.513.956.614.264.114.569.614.676.51574.515.360.615.761.271.226.982.325.60.950.7median 15median 64.11.611.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 1.3Motorola Moto E6s
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 1.3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto E6s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Nokia 1.3
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto E6s
3000 mAh
Huawei Y6s
3020 mAh
LG K40S
3500 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
906
806
-11%
743
-18%
860
-5%
687 (223 - 2636, n=713)
-24%
Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 06min

Pros

+ 最新的安全补丁
+ 顺手
+ 成熟度高
+ 可更换电池
+ 专用的microSD插槽

Cons

- 后盖很难拿下
- 充电时间长
- 性能差
- 面部识别错误

总结——便宜,轻

Nokia 1.3智能手机评测. Test device provided by Nokia Germany.
Nokia 1.3智能手机评测. Test device provided by Nokia Germany.

诺基亚1.3在测试之初就给人留下了不好的印象:后盖没有留给拿指甲掰开的缺口,即使使用特殊工具也很难打开。但是可更换电池实际上是该设备的亮点之一。仍然有一个microSD插槽这一事实也令人愉悦,而且续航时间也是强项之一。诺基亚目前也正竭尽全力为其最便宜的智能手机提供更新和最新安全补丁。

但是,人脸识别让我们失望,而性能仅在极少数情况下够用。成像模糊的相机也成了选择它的绊脚石。

诺基亚1.3不应卖到这个价格,因为有类似的更好替代品。但是,如果后面会降价,那么如果您想要绝对最佳的续航时间并且很少使用智能手机,则可以考虑。

Nokia 1.3 - 05/17/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
60%
Keyboard
62 / 75 → 82%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
33 / 70 → 47%
Weight
92%
Battery
91%
Display
82%
Games Performance
4 / 64 → 6%
Application Performance
31 / 86 → 36%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
50 / 90 → 56%
Camera
34%
Average
62%
68%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Nokia 1.3智能手机评测:弱点不少的小诺基亚
Florian Schmitt, 2020-06-19 (Update: 2020-06-19)