Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarNokia 1.3智能手机评测：弱点不少的小诺基亚
Comparison Devices
Bewertung | Rating Version | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68.3 % | 7 | 06/2020 | Nokia 1.3 SD 215, Adreno 308 | 155 g | 16 GB eMMC Flash | 5.71" | 1520x720 | |
| 74.8 % | 7 | 06/2020 | Motorola Moto E6s Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 160 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.10" | 1560x720 | |
| 75.3 % | 7 | 01/2020 | Huawei Y6s Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8300 | 150 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.09" | 1560x720 | |
| 74.1 % | 7 | 08/2020 | LG K40S Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 173 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.10" | 1560x720 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| LG K40S | |
| Nokia 1.3 | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| LG K40S | |
| Nokia 1.3 | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 456 cd/m²
Contrast: 1382:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.22 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.186
| Nokia 1.3 IPS, 1520x720, 5.71 | Motorola Moto E6s IPS, 1560x720, 6.10 | Huawei Y6s IPS, 1560x720, 6.09 | LG K40S IPS, 1560x720, 6.10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -4% | -11% | -3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 55 ? | 64 ? -16% | 54 ? 2% | 50 ? 9% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 24 ? 8% | 32 ? -23% | 30 ? -15% |
| PWM Frequency | 100 ? | 100 ? | ||
| Screen | 17% | -17% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 456 | 488 7% | 424 -7% | 487 7% |
| Brightness | 406 | 481 18% | 397 -2% | 471 16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 95 14% | 85 2% | 91 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.25 24% | 0.35 -6% | 0.28 15% |
| Contrast | 1382 | 1952 41% | 1211 -12% | 1739 26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.22 | 5.02 4% | 6.45 -24% | 5.56 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.38 | 8.99 -7% | 12.76 -52% | 9.64 -15% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 4.4 31% | 8.5 -33% | 5.2 19% |
| Gamma | 2.186 101% | 2.252 98% | 2.231 99% | 2.124 104% |
| CCT | 8108 80% | 7841 83% | 9108 71% | 7932 82% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
12% | -14% /
-16% | 3% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1.3 | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| LG K40S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1.3 | |
| Motorola Moto E6s | |
| Huawei Y6s | |
| LG K40S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1.3 | |
| LG K40S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1.3 | |
| LG K40S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1.3 | |
| LG K40S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 1.3 | |
| LG K40S | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia 1.3 | Motorola Moto E6s | Huawei Y6s | LG K40S | Average 16 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 19% | 15% | 5% | -40% | 912% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 284.8 | 275 -3% | 263.2 -8% | 272 -4% | 164.5 ? -42% | 1508 ? 429% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 48.5 | 103.5 113% | 118 143% | 84.5 74% | 43 ? -11% | 1118 ? 2205% |
| Random Read 4KB | 48.7 | 69.4 43% | 46.7 -4% | 53.2 9% | 21.7 ? -55% | 247 ? 407% |
| Random Write 4KB | 38.6 | 17.7 -54% | 18.6 -52% | 18.5 -52% | 8.08 ? -79% | 272 ? 605% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 76.1 ? | 82.3 ? 8% | 80.9 ? 6% | 79.3 ? 4% | 59.1 ? -22% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 59 ? | 63.5 ? 8% | 60.6 ? 3% | 57.8 ? -2% | 39.8 ? -33% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 1.3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 59.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 59.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 59.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (127.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto E6s audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Nokia 1.3 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto E6s 3000 mAh | Huawei Y6s 3020 mAh | LG K40S 3500 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 906 | 806 -11% | 743 -18% | 860 -5% | 914 ? 1% |
Pros
Cons
总结——便宜，轻
诺基亚1.3在测试之初就给人留下了不好的印象：后盖没有留给拿指甲掰开的缺口，即使使用特殊工具也很难打开。但是可更换电池实际上是该设备的亮点之一。仍然有一个microSD插槽这一事实也令人愉悦，而且续航时间也是强项之一。诺基亚目前也正竭尽全力为其最便宜的智能手机提供更新和最新安全补丁。
但是，人脸识别让我们失望，而性能仅在极少数情况下够用。成像模糊的相机也成了选择它的绊脚石。
诺基亚1.3不应卖到这个价格，因为有类似的更好替代品。但是，如果后面会降价，那么如果您想要绝对最佳的续航时间并且很少使用智能手机，则可以考虑。
Nokia 1.3
-
05/17/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt
Pricecompare
