Motorola Moto 360 2015
Specifications
Motorola Moto 360 2015
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 4 x 1.2 GHz, ARMv7
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 305
Memory
512 MB
Display
1.56 inch, 360 x 330 pixel, kapazitiver Touchsreen, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
4 GB Flash, 4 GB
Connections
Sensors: 3-Achsen-Beschleunigungs- und Gyro-Sensor, Schrittzähler
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 11.4 x 54.6 x 46.6
Battery
Lithium-Ion, 300 mAh, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 36 h
Operating System
Android Wear
Additional features
Ladestation, Netzteil, USB-Kabel, 12 Months Warranty, max. SAR: 0.99 W/kg
Weight
128 g, Power Supply: 120 g
Price
379 Euro
Links
Price comparison
Average Score:
Average of 1 scores (from 1 reviews)
Average of 1 scores (from 1 reviews)
Reviews for the Motorola Moto 360 2015
Motorola Moto 360 (2015) Smartwatch Review | Notebookcheck
Tick-tock again. The second generation of the Moto 360 has undergone a minor facelift. It is state-of-the-art technically and even has a brightness sensor, however the sensor has its quirks. A model designed for women is also available.
Tick-tock again. The second generation of the Moto 360 has undergone a minor facelift. It is state-of-the-art technically and even has a brightness sensor, however the sensor has its quirks. A model designed for women is also available.
Moto 360
Source: It Pro
EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Moto 360 may look beautiful, but it’s nowhere near the most impressive smart watch functionality-wise. For starters, the battery life is awful because Motorola neglected to use efficient components. Android Wear works well, but some aspects - such as voice recognition - leaves a lot to be desired.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: It Pro
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Moto 360 may look beautiful, but it’s nowhere near the most impressive smart watch functionality-wise. For starters, the battery life is awful because Motorola neglected to use efficient components. Android Wear works well, but some aspects - such as voice recognition - leaves a lot to be desired.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 305:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
400 APQ8026: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
