摩托罗拉 Moto G2 智能手机简短评测
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 355 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 348.2 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 349 cd/m²
Contrast: 873:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.74 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.52 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.63
CCT: 7336 K
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 8 GB SSD | Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 8 GB SSD | HTC Desire 510 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD | Alcatel One Touch Pop C7 Mali-400 MP2, MT6582M, 4 GB Flash | Nokia Lumia 630 Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 5 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB iNAND Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -10% | -63% | -43% | -35% | 23% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 349 | 441 26% | 355 2% | 351 1% | 355 2% | 469 34% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 348 | 417 20% | 371 7% | 329 -5% | 350 1% | 452 30% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 89 -7% | 80 -17% | 88 -8% | 91 -5% | 94 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.4 | 0.54 -35% | 0.37 7% | 0.44 -10% | 0.73 -83% | 0.49 -23% |
| Contrast (:1) | 873 | 817 -6% | 959 10% | 798 -9% | 486 -44% | 957 10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.74 | 4.83 -29% | 12.13 -224% | 9.86 -164% | 7.19 -92% | 2.05 45% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.52 | 6.2 -37% | 14.77 -227% | 9.33 -106% | 5.63 -25% | 1.45 68% |
| Gamma | 2.63 84% | 2.6 85% | 2.42 91% | 2.19 100% | 1.97 112% | 2 110% |
| CCT | 7336 89% | 8364 78% | 17097 38% | 10114 64% | 6293 103% | 6441 101% |
* ... smaller is better
Linpack Android / IOS | Geekbench 3 | Smartbench 2012 | AnTuTu v5 | AndEBench | ANDEBench PRO | Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 | PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 | |
| HTC Desire 510 | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop C7 | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Huawei Ascend G610 | |
| Acer Liquid E700 Trio | |
| Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ | |
| LG L Bello | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 | |
| HTC Desire 510 | |
| Alcatel One Touch Pop C7 | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Huawei Ascend G610 | |
| Acer Liquid E700 Trio | |
| Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ | |
| LG L Bello | |
| AnTuTu v5 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| HTC Desire 510 | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ | |
| ANDEBench PRO - Device Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| Acer Liquid E700 Trio | |
| Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - --- (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| HTC Desire 510 | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | 3DMark | Epic Citadel | Basemark X 1.1 | Anomaly 2 Benchmark
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Huawei Ascend G610 | |
| Acer Liquid E700 Trio | |
| Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ | |
| LG L Bello | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Huawei Ascend G610 | |
| Acer Liquid E700 Trio | |
| Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ | |
| LG L Bello | |
| GFXBench 3.0 - on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| HTC Desire 510 | |
| Acer Liquid E700 Trio | |
| Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 | |
| HTC Desire 510 | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Huawei Ascend G610 | |
| Acer Liquid E700 Trio | |
| Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ | |
| LG L Bello | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 | |
| HTC Desire 510 | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Huawei Ascend G610 | |
| Acer Liquid E700 Trio | |
| Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ | |
| LG L Bello | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 | |
| HTC Desire 510 | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Huawei Ascend G610 | |
| Acer Liquid E700 Trio | |
| Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ | |
| LG L Bello | |
| Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| HTC Desire 510 | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Acer Liquid E700 Trio | |
| Anomaly 2 Benchmark | |
| Low Quality Test (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| HTC Desire 510 | |
| High Quality Test (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| HTC Desire 510 | |
| Peacekeeper - --- (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 | |
| Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 | |
| HTC Desire 510 | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Huawei Ascend G610 | |
| Acer Liquid E700 Trio | |
| Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 | |
| HTC Desire 510 | |
| Google Nexus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ | |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Idle |  0.6 / 1 / 1.2 Watt |
| Load |
1.9 / 3.5 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 | |
| Motorola Moto G 2. Gen XT1068 Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 8 GB SSD | Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 8 GB SSD | HTC Desire 510 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD | Google Nexus 5 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB iNAND Flash | Nokia Lumia 630 Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Acer Liquid E700 Trio Mali-400 MP2, MT6582, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 7% | -9% | -18% | -14% | 3% | |
| H.264 (h) | 15.7 | 12.3 -22% | ||||
| WiFi (h) | 15.1 | 15.5 3% | 9.5 -37% | 12.2 -19% | 14.6 -3% | 8.5 -44% |
| Load (h) | 3.7 | 4.1 11% | 4.4 19% | 3.1 -16% | 3.1 -16% | 5.5 49% |
摩托罗拉在Moto G2中延续了简洁智能手机的设计理念，采用了原生安卓系统和可更换后盖设计。Moto G2可能并非一款让人惊艳的设备，但它会以忠实可靠的实用性让你满意。
在第二代Moto G中，摩托罗拉所做的很好的一个改进是：尽管它的前置扬声器仍非完美，但已经十分不错了。它的相机质量也有了显著的提高，不过也有继续改进的空间，例如在视频拍摄分辨率方面。Moto G2支持双卡双待，这是一个十分实用的功能。它的系统性能并不出色，因为摩托罗拉沿用了前代产品的处理器，不过它的游戏性能依然很好。
它的主要问题在于没有提供电源适配器，机身也不够坚固，同时GPS模组的响应较慢。你可能也会对难以取下的后盖和没有增大的电池容量感到困惑。
整体上，摩托罗拉Moto G的新一代产品是一个非常成功的更新，它在设计上并无特色，不过在实际使用中十分可靠。如果你在寻找一款简单实用的智能手机的话，摩托罗拉Moto G2是一个不错的选择。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
