三星 Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ 智能手机简短评测

Name: Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ
Brand: Samsung

售价更低。 三星Galaxy Ace 4的售价不足200欧元（约1531人民币），比前代产品还低了70欧元（约535人民币）。你可以得到一款支持LTE网络而且有些改进的新产品，例如它有更大的屏幕。不过Ace 4是价格下降，质量反而提高了吗？

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Sabine Kückemanns (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 11/04/2014 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

HTC Desire 510 HTC Desire 310 Huawei Ascend Y530 Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 Nokia Lumia 630 Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ LG L70 Sony Xperia E1 DIN A6 ❌

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


353 cd/m²	339 cd/m²	330 cd/m²
349 cd/m²	336 cd/m²	328 cd/m²
355 cd/m²	336 cd/m²	327 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 355 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 339.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 336 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.19 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.75 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.36
CCT: 7152 K

	Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD	Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R Adreno 305, S4 Plus MSM8930, 8 GB SSD	HTC Desire 510 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD	LG L70 Adreno 302, 200 8210, 4 GB Flash	Nokia Lumia 630 Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 8 GB SSD
Screen		-22%	-85%	-27%	-16%	-1%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	336	458 36%	355 6%	346 3%	355 6%	441 31%
Brightness (cd/m²)	339	430 27%	371 9%	339 0%	350 3%	417 23%
Brightness Distribution (%)	92	86 -7%	80 -13%	91 -1%	91 -1%	89 -3%
Black Level * (cd/m²)		0.49	0.37	0.52	0.73	0.54
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.19	7.02 -35%	12.13 -134%	7.17 -38%	7.19 -39%	4.83 7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.75	8.63 -130%	14.77 -294%	7.42 -98%	5.63 -50%	6.2 -65%
Gamma	2.36 ^93%	2.77 ^79%	2.42 ^91%	2.5 ^88%	1.97 ^112%	2.6 ^85%
CCT	7152 ^91%	7355 ^88%	17097 ^38%	10363 ^63%	6293 ^103%	8364 ^78%
Contrast (:1)		935	959	665	486	817

* ... smaller is better

Geekbench 3 | Linpack Android / IOS | Smartbench 2012 | AnTuTu v5

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	474 Points
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	432 Points -9%
HTC Desire 510	475 Points 0%
LG L70	325 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	341 Points -28%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	1413 Points
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	788 Points -44%
HTC Desire 510	1421 Points +1%
LG L70	608 Points -57%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	1169 Points -17%

Linpack Android / IOS
Single Thread (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	110 MFLOPS
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	25.25 MFLOPS -77%
HTC Desire 510	105.7 MFLOPS -4%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	88.4 MFLOPS -20%
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	219 MFLOPS
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	146.9 MFLOPS -33%
HTC Desire 510	259.5 MFLOPS +18%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	225.8 MFLOPS +3%

Smartbench 2012
Productivity Index (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	6346 points
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	2599 points -59%
HTC Desire 510	6053 points -5%
Gaming Index (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	4266 points
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	3505 points -18%
HTC Desire 510	4259 points 0%

AnTuTu v5 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	21404 Points
HTC Desire 510	20041 Points -6%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB SSD

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD

HTC Desire 510 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB SSD

LG L70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210, Qualcomm Adreno 302, 4 GB Flash

Nokia Lumia 630 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD

3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	4565 Points
HTC Desire 510	4626 Points +1%
LG L70	3687 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	4399 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	3985 Points
HTC Desire 510	4037 Points +1%
LG L70	3545 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	4068 Points +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	9304 Points
HTC Desire 510	9458 Points +2%
LG L70	4289 Points -54%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	6150 Points -34%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	15 fps
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	15 fps 0%
LG L70	12.7 fps -15%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	11 fps -27%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	5.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	5.5 fps +4%
LG L70	4.3 fps -19%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	5.7 fps +8%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	8.2 fps
HTC Desire 510	8.4 fps +2%
LG L70	5.9 fps -28%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	1.8 fps
HTC Desire 510	1.8 fps 0%
LG L70	1.3 fps -28%

WebXPRT 2013
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	201 Points
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	152 Points -24%
HTC Desire 510	200 Points 0%
LG L70	150 Points -25%
Nokia Lumia 630	138 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	188 Points -6%
Photo Effects (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	1602 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	2333 ms * -46%
HTC Desire 510	1423 ms * +11%
LG L70	1970 ms * -23%
Nokia Lumia 630	2075 ms * -30%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	1700 ms * -6%
Face Detection (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	112.3 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	4950 ms * -4308%
HTC Desire 510	3134 ms * -2691%
LG L70	5098 ms * -4440%
Nokia Lumia 630	5885 ms * -5140%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	3046 ms * -2612%
Stocks Dashboard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	2006 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	1799 ms * +10%
HTC Desire 510	2080 ms * -4%
LG L70	2379 ms * -19%
Nokia Lumia 630	2429 ms * -21%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	2219 ms * -11%
Offline Notes (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	1895 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	2723 ms * -44%
HTC Desire 510	2016 ms * -6%
LG L70	2485 ms * -31%
Nokia Lumia 630	2738 ms * -44%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	2074 ms * -9%

Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	1173 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	1234 ms * -5%
HTC Desire 510	1265 ms * -8%
LG L70	1170 ms * -0%
Nokia Lumia 630	1412 ms * -20%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	1414 ms * -21%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	2555 Points
HTC Desire 510	2717 Points +6%
LG L70	1746 Points -32%
Nokia Lumia 630	1085 Points -58%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	14555 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	18650 ms * -28%
HTC Desire 510	14332 ms * +2%
LG L70	16461 ms * -13%
Nokia Lumia 630	25790 ms * -77%

Vellamo 3.x
Browser (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	1982 Points
HTC Desire 510	2139 Points +8%
Multicore Beta (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	1234 Points
HTC Desire 510	1226 Points -1%
Metal (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	799 Points
HTC Desire 510	767 Points -4%

Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	2798 Points
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	1561 Points -44%
HTC Desire 510	2759 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	1641 Points -41%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	96 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	40.34 MB/s -58%
HTC Desire 510	86.2 MB/s -10%
LG L70	53.1 MB/s -45%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	103.3 MB/s +8%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	16 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	2.99 MB/s -81%
HTC Desire 510	7.29 MB/s -54%
LG L70	6.82 MB/s -57%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	12.54 MB/s -22%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	11 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	6.56 MB/s -40%
HTC Desire 510	8.55 MB/s -22%
LG L70	9.83 MB/s -11%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	13.61 MB/s +24%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ	1.5 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R	0.31 MB/s -79%
HTC Desire 510	1.05 MB/s -30%
LG L70	0.63 MB/s -58%
Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032	2.52 MB/s +68%

Max. Load

Idle


32.1 °C	33 °C	31.9 °C
32.4 °C	33.8 °C	32.1 °C
31.5 °C	33 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 33.8 °C
Average: 32.4 °C


32 °C	34.2 °C	32 °C
31.1 °C	34.8 °C	30.9 °C
32.5 °C	34.7 °C	29.8 °C

Maximum: 34.8 °C
Average: 32.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.1 °C | Room Temperature 22.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	0.3 / 0.8 / 1.2 Watt
Load	1.8 / 2.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC 940

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		24h 12min
WiFi Surfing		9h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 41min

	Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 SM-G357FZ Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD	Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 GT-S7275R Adreno 305, S4 Plus MSM8930, 8 GB SSD	HTC Desire 510 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB SSD	LG L70 Adreno 302, 200 8210, 4 GB Flash	Nokia Lumia 630 Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto G 1. Gen XT1032 Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 8 GB SSD
Battery runtime		-8%	8%	2%	16%	34%
H.264 (h)	10.4				12.3 18%
WiFi (h)	9.9	9.2 -7%	9.5 -4%	8.7 -12%	14.6 47%	15.5 57%
Load (h)	3.7	3.4 -8%	4.4 19%	4.3 16%	3.1 -16%	4.1 11%

Galaxy Ace 4相比Galaxy Ace 3的得分更低是由于我们重新设计之后的评分系统，不过这并不会改变三星Galaxy Ace 4相比前作售价更低且质量更高的事实。它提供了更优秀的性能表现，一块优质的AMOLED屏幕，更好的前置相机，整体的功耗也有所降低，因此电池续航更长。售价199欧元（约1531人民币，网购价会更低），三星Galaxy Ace 4提供了相当丰富的功能，例如对快速的LTE Cat.4网络制式的支持。它和高端设备的最大区别在于软件功能和较低的屏幕分辨率之上。

如果你打算购买一款售价低于200欧元（约1531人民币）的智能手机，正在考虑Galaxy Ace 4的话，那么就不得不接受它质量一般的相机和效果很普通的扬声器。它的通话质量也不像更贵的设备一样清晰流畅。不过，Galaxy Ace 4在这个价位上提供了相当多的功能，不仅是因为对于LTE的支持，还有它相比同价位产品更强劲的性能。

这意味着我们认为它十分值得考虑购买，特别是考虑到在这个市场区间内高质量的相机和扬声器本来就十分罕见。假如你不经常使用手机拍照，听音乐会选择使用耳机的话，Galaxy Ace 4会十分适合你。另外，它还有一块在这个价位中独一无二的采用AMOLED技术的屏幕，强大的性能，和高速LTE网络连接。听上去很值，不是吗？

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。