华为 MediaPad M2 10 平板电脑简短评测
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch (MediaPad Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 930 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T628 MP4
Memory
2048 MB
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB
, 8 GB free
Weight
500 g, Power Supply: 64 g
Price
500 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 397 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 383.2 cd/m² Minimum: 23.01 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 385 cd/m²
Contrast: 939:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.31 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.58 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.4
CCT: 7044 K
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash | LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -1% | -11% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 385 | 355 -8% | 343 -11% | 394 2% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 383 | 367 -4% | 328 -14% | 392 2% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 89 -2% | 88 -3% | 80 -12% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.41 | 0.53 -29% | 0.38 7% | 0.51 -24% |
| Contrast (:1) | 939 | 670 -29% | 903 -4% | 773 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.31 | 3.2 40% | 6.86 -29% | 3.59 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.57 | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.58 | 4.36 22% | 6.95 -25% | 4.25 24% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.2 100% | 2.32 95% | 2.56 86% |
| CCT | 7044 92% | 7240 90% | 7249 90% | 7148 91% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 5208 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 5208 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 5208 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Geekbench 3 | 3DMark | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | AnTuTu v6 | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | AndroBench 3-5 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
| LG G Pad II 10.1 | |
| Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 | LG G Pad II 10.1 | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | ||||
| high (fps) | 27 | |||
| Dead Trigger 2 | ||||
| high (fps) | 30 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.04 / 0.36 Watt |
| Idle |  1.6 / 4.13 / 4.22 Watt |
| Load |
6.57 / 8.32 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash | LG G Pad II 10.1 Adreno 330, 800 MSM8974, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A30 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 9.7 SM-T555 Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 35% | -19% | 19% | |
| H.264 (h) | 10 | 17 70% | 8.9 -11% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 11.6 | 13 12% | 8.1 -30% | 14.4 24% |
| Load (h) | 4.4 | 5.4 23% | 3.7 -16% | 5 14% |
Pros
+ 时尚坚固的金属机身
+ 多样的机型配置
+ 优秀的软件系统
+ 无线模组的信号不错
+ 作为平板非常优秀的相机
+ 非常明亮的全高清屏幕
+ 优秀的性能
+ 不会变热
+ 不错的音响效果
+ 长电池续航
Cons
- 负载下降频
- 受压会扭曲作响
- 屏幕的色彩偏差较大
尽管设计不算独一无二，华为的MediaPad仍然不同寻常。它的坚固金属机身以及明亮屏幕都十分引人注目，优秀的扬声器和电池续航则让它更加全面。它支持手写笔，指纹识别器也可以作为额外的控制方式。售价更高的设备也很少搭配了如此高分辨率的相机。
华为的MediaPad M2 10几乎没有什么弱点，对于正在寻找一台搭配优秀扬声器的中端多媒体平板电脑的用户来说十分值得考虑。
这台平板主要有三个方面华为可以考虑改进：它的处理器在负载下会自动降频，它本应可以为游戏玩家带来更高的性能。它的机身在扭曲时会嘎吱作响，同时屏幕的色彩差和略微偏蓝都让人遗憾。
整体上，华为MediaPad M2 10是一台成功的产品，值得考虑选购。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Huawei MediaPad M2 10 inch
- 04/18/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Tablet - Weighted Average
Price comparison
