Notebookcheck

华为MateBook D 14 W00D (Ryzen 5, Vega 8) 笔记本电脑评测

Mike Wobker, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Zewei Shen), 07/21/2019
Windows Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen)

锐龙本。 华为为其MateBook D配备了AMD 锐龙CPU，以此提供了一款极具吸引力的办公笔记本，其设计也非常适合商业环境。 我们在评测中评估了Ryzen APU带给MateBook D买家的期望。

Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL (MateBook D Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Memory
8192 MB 
, 双通道，板载
Display
14 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, BOE083C, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
AMD CZ FCH
Storage
SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, 256 GB 
, , 202 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio combo port, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16 x 323 x 221
Battery
57.4 Wh, 7565 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 0.9 MP, 16:9, (1280 x 720)
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 背光键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, Huawei PC Manager, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.47 kg, Power Supply: 203 g
Price
3999元 （国内为荣耀Magicbook锐龙版） ~ 699 Euro
Links
Huawei homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D

Size Comparison

329 mm 242 mm 21.9 mm 1.8 kg324.2 mm 237.7 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg322 mm 212 mm 19 mm 1.5 kg323 mm 221 mm 16 mm 1.5 kg323 mm 228 mm 14.9 mm 1.5 kg
Left side: 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C (also serving as power connection), HDMI, 1x USB 3.0
Left side: 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C (also serving as power connection), HDMI, 1x USB 3.0
Rignt side: audio combo port, 1x USB 2.0
Rignt side: audio combo port, 1x USB 2.0

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
635 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
630 (min: 523, max: 670) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
616 (min: 569, max: 634) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
HP ProBook 445 G6
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
577 (min: 462, max: 630) MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
502 (min: 323, max: 535) MBit/s ∼79% -21%
Average of class Office
  (5 - 1334, n=226)
476 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
304 MBit/s ∼48% -52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
675 (min: 561, max: 737) MBit/s ∼100% +31%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
638 (min: 570, max: 673) MBit/s ∼95% +24%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
590 (min: 528, max: 688) MBit/s ∼87% +15%
HP ProBook 445 G6
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
527 (min: 323, max: 637) MBit/s ∼78% +3%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
514 MBit/s ∼76%
Average of class Office
  (34 - 1176, n=226)
452 MBit/s ∼67% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
332 MBit/s ∼49% -35%
295
cd/m²		283
cd/m²		282
cd/m²
277
cd/m²		287
cd/m²		270
cd/m²
257
cd/m²		275
cd/m²		254
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE083C
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 295 cd/m² Average: 275.6 cd/m² Minimum: 9.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 284 cd/m²
Contrast: 1148:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 5
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
64.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 41.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 1.99
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
BOE083C, , 1920x1080, 14		HP ProBook 445 G6
Chi Mei CMN14D4, , 1920x1080, 14		Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
AU Optronics AUO403D B140HAN04.0, , 1920x1080, 14		Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
B140HAN04.2, , 1920x1080, 14		Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, , 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
11%
9%
-4%
4171%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42.4 (22.8, 19.6)
40 (23, 17)
6%
40 (19, 21)
6%
44.8 (20.4, 24.4)
-6%
41 (21, 20)
3%
Response Time Black / White *
32.8 (18, 14.8)
26 (15, 11)
21%
29 (17, 12)
12%
33.6 (18, 15.6)
-2%
30 (18, 12)
9%
PWM Frequency
198.4 (99)
208 (50)
5%
25000 (20)
12501%
Screen
1%
14%
3%
10%
Brightness middle
287
200
-30%
267
-7%
289
1%
291
1%
Brightness
276
196
-29%
257
-7%
271
-2%
276
0%
Brightness Distribution
86
67
-22%
91
6%
87
1%
90
5%
Black Level *
0.25
0.17
32%
0.2
20%
0.19
24%
0.27
-8%
Contrast
1148
1176
2%
1335
16%
1521
32%
1078
-6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.4
4.26
21%
3.79
30%
5.6
-4%
3.86
29%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
18.1
9.7
46%
8.18
55%
20.8
-15%
8.26
54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
5
4.71
6%
4.7
6%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.1
3.15
-2%
1.49
52%
2.7
13%
5.33
-72%
Gamma
1.99 111%
2.31 95%
2.48 89%
1.96 112%
2.25 98%
CCT
6769 96%
6882 94%
6659 98%
6506 100%
7426 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
41.8
40
-4%
38
-9%
37.2
-11%
62
48%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
64.6
62
-4%
59
-9%
58.5
-9%
98
52%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / 3%
12% / 13%
-1% / 2%
2091% / 970%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.8 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 198.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9331 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620Tooltip
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U: Ø583 (578.22-612.26)
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø525 (518.44-565)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
Intel Core i5-8265U
161 Points ∼100% +16%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel Core i3-8145U
150 Points ∼93% +8%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼89% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
139.52 Points ∼87% 0%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
139 Points ∼86%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
  (124 - 142, n=15)
136 Points ∼84% -2%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
135 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Office
  (20 - 199, n=538)
112 Points ∼70% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
Intel Core i5-8265U
623 Points ∼100% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
618 (min: 591.81, max: 618.71) Points ∼99% 0%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
615 (min: 576.4, max: 616.38) Points ∼99%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
612 Points ∼98% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
  (510 - 642, n=16)
598 Points ∼96% -3%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
Intel Core i5-8250U
565 Points ∼91% -8%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel Core i3-8145U
361 Points ∼58% -41%
Average of class Office
  (36 - 1050, n=545)
345 Points ∼55% -44%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
615 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
47.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
139 Points
Help
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
3269 Points ∼100%
HP ProBook 445 G6
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
3059 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3014 Points ∼92% -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (2351 - 3363, n=12)
2971 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
2804 Points ∼86% -14%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
GeForce MX230, 8265U, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ
2685 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Office
  (320 - 3884, n=155)
2658 Points ∼81% -19%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
UHD Graphics 620, 8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
2392 Points ∼73% -27%
Productivity
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
GeForce MX230, 8265U, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ
6755 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
5758 Points ∼85% +6%
Average of class Office
  (1266 - 7964, n=155)
5490 Points ∼81% +1%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
5425 Points ∼80%
HP ProBook 445 G6
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
5351 Points ∼79% -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
UHD Graphics 620, 8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5274 Points ∼78% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4964 Points ∼73% -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (3113 - 5574, n=12)
4571 Points ∼68% -16%
Essentials
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
GeForce MX230, 8265U, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ
7981 Points ∼100% +18%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
7373 Points ∼92% +9%
Average of class Office
  (2683 - 9790, n=155)
6983 Points ∼87% +3%
HP ProBook 445 G6
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
6933 Points ∼87% +3%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
UHD Graphics 620, 8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
6911 Points ∼87% +2%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
6756 Points ∼85%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6646 Points ∼83% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (5288 - 7272, n=12)
6483 Points ∼81% -4%
Score
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
GeForce MX230, 8265U, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ
3764 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
3534 Points ∼94%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
3526 Points ∼94% 0%
HP ProBook 445 G6
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
3470 Points ∼92% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3321 Points ∼88% -6%
Average of class Office
  (803 - 4597, n=156)
3276 Points ∼87% -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (2501 - 3685, n=12)
3182 Points ∼85% -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
UHD Graphics 620, 8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
3179 Points ∼84% -10%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4870 Points ∼100% +10%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
UHD Graphics 620, 8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
4556 Points ∼94% +3%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
4420 Points ∼91%
HP ProBook 445 G6
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
4379 Points ∼90% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (3437 - 4870, n=11)
4211 Points ∼86% -5%
Average of class Office
  (1226 - 5428, n=350)
4024 Points ∼83% -9%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3550 Points ∼100% +4%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
3420 Points ∼96%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (3049 - 3550, n=14)
3340 Points ∼94% -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
UHD Graphics 620, 8145U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
3281 Points ∼92% -4%
HP ProBook 445 G6
Vega 8, 2500U, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB
3218 Points ∼91% -6%
Average of class Office
  (1169 - 4770, n=410)
3058 Points ∼86% -11%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3420 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4420 points
Help
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF		HP ProBook 445 G6
SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB		Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ		Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ		Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027		Average SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
78%
-19%
128%
45%
-2%
-2%
Write 4K
72.31
110.4
53%
55.04
-24%
72.17
0%
96.83
34%
60.54
-16%
71.3 (66.9 - 74.7, n=3)
-1%
Read 4K
30.77
39.46
28%
28.79
-6%
35.25
15%
36.99
20%
21.63
-30%
25.3 (14.9 - 30.8, n=3)
-18%
Write Seq
468.1
807.5
73%
307.5
-34%
1411.91
202%
463.1
-1%
450.9
-4%
473 (448 - 502, n=3)
1%
Read Seq
517.6
1130
118%
430
-17%
1523.25
194%
794.2
53%
482.3
-7%
517 (499 - 534, n=3)
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
214.2
260.8
22%
149.5
-30%
102.06
-52%
291.7
36%
248.9
16%
209 (198 - 214, n=3)
-2%
Read 4K Q32T1
241.1
308
28%
207.2
-14%
170.91
-29%
352
46%
267.6
11%
234 (226 - 241, n=3)
-3%
Write Seq Q32T1
482
816.3
69%
389.2
-19%
1429.4
197%
468.1
-3%
534.1
11%
494 (482 - 505, n=3)
2%
Read Seq Q32T1
536.5
1783
232%
497.1
-7%
3203.7
497%
1489
178%
562.8
5%
552 (537 - 560, n=3)
3%
AS SSD
109%
-66%
162%
66%
-2%
16%
Copy Game MB/s
330.79
166.41
521
Copy Program MB/s
159.75
88.37
259
Copy ISO MB/s
575.71
310.15
514
Score Total
747
1785
139%
782
5%
2478
232%
1386
86%
875
17%
918 (747 - 1040, n=3)
23%
Score Write
293
735
151%
153
-48%
575
96%
524
79%
216
-26%
341 (293 - 378, n=3)
16%
Score Read
296
717
142%
411
39%
1277
331%
586
98%
437
48%
376 (296 - 431, n=3)
27%
Access Time Write *
0.07
0.048
31%
0.4
-471%
0.059
16%
0.048
31%
0.13
-86%
0.0603 (0.055 - 0.07, n=3)
14%
Access Time Read *
0.135
0.062
54%
0.432
-220%
0.054
60%
0.184
-36%
0.092
32%
0.1193 (0.092 - 0.135, n=3)
12%
4K-64 Write
195.61
587.69
200%
87.19
-55%
371.47
90%
390.87
100%
137.29
-30%
233 (196 - 263, n=3)
19%
4K-64 Read
220.71
527.85
139%
325.38
47%
1035.25
369%
425.45
93%
364.16
65%
298 (221 - 353, n=3)
35%
4K Write
51.66
76.68
48%
26.46
-49%
63.94
24%
89.96
74%
51.65
0%
60.7 (51.7 - 66.1, n=3)
17%
4K Read
25.12
34.12
36%
36.4
45%
38.63
54%
40.9
63%
26.87
7%
28.6 (25.1 - 30.6, n=3)
14%
Seq Write
457.92
707.7
55%
392.72
-14%
1395
205%
434.46
-5%
268.59
-41%
474 (458 - 487, n=3)
4%
Seq Read
500.47
1545.5
209%
487.61
-3%
2030
306%
1201.27
140%
458.32
-8%
500 (476 - 522, n=3)
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
94% / 96%
-43% / -46%
145% / 148%
56% / 57%
-2% / -2%
7% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
Sequential Read: 523.8 MB/s
Sequential Write: 469.2 MB/s
512K Read: 394.4 MB/s
512K Write: 374.4 MB/s
4K Read: 25.05 MB/s
4K Write: 58.76 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 226.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 206.2 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
3565 Points ∼100%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, Intel Core i5-8265U
3318 Points ∼93% -7%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (1668 - 4317, n=29)
3308 Points ∼93% -7%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
3164 Points ∼89% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
2757 Points ∼77% -23%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1776 Points ∼50% -50%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8145U
1415 Points ∼40% -60%
Average of class Office
  (185 - 5332, n=662)
1323 Points ∼37% -63%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, Intel Core i5-8265U
710 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (523 - 742, n=13)
647 Points ∼91%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
556 Points ∼78%
Average of class Office
  (76 - 1158, n=56)
481 Points ∼68%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
2381 Points ∼100%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, Intel Core i5-8265U
2369 Points ∼99% -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (1095 - 2901, n=26)
2092 Points ∼88% -12%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
1940 Points ∼81% -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
1647 Points ∼69% -31%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1245 Points ∼52% -48%
Average of class Office
  (138 - 4109, n=481)
1017 Points ∼43% -57%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8145U
838 Points ∼35% -65%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
17661 Points ∼100%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, Intel Core i5-8265U
15299 Points ∼87% -13%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (7309 - 19351, n=25)
14378 Points ∼81% -19%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
13634 Points ∼77% -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
10209 Points ∼58% -42%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9730 Points ∼55% -45%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8145U
7152 Points ∼40% -60%
Average of class Office
  (1208 - 27117, n=527)
7057 Points ∼40% -60%
3DMark 11 Performance
3682 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8316 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2184 points
Help
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230
27.96 fps ∼100% +41%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
19.84 fps ∼71%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (7.6 - 21, n=22)
16.3 fps ∼58% -18%
HP ProBook 445 G6
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
13.9 fps ∼50% -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
13.26 fps ∼47% -33%
Average of class Office
  (1.8 - 54.8, n=258)
10.9 fps ∼39% -45%
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
9.9 fps ∼35% -50%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
Intel Core i3-8145U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
6 fps ∼21% -70%
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 19.84 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 28.98 16.37 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 69 60 34.8 32.6 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 26.5 19.4 18.2 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 47.1 19.8 18.4 12 fps

Noise Level

Idle
29.5 / 29.5 / 30.4 dB(A)
Load
31.5 / 33.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.531.133.135.130.12526.228.225.227.927.23124.927.925.729.128.74025.825.425.327.726.75030.330.128.927.429.76324.222.822.122.925.98023.823.622.723.424.210024.924.223.923.625.612523.12321.722.622.816021.622.422.421.322.920022.122.221.821.222.725022.22221.922.12231522.321.521.121.421.54002221.520.620.621.850021.821.52120.621.963021.320.220.32021.380020.42019.419.320.6100021.62119.418.622.7125021.320.219.418.122.1160021.620.919.317.323.3200020.920.418.61722.6250020.319.118.316.422.2315020.919.216.816.323400019.21816.61621.250001817.216.115.819.6630016.616.31615.717.7800015.915.915.715.616.31000015.816.315.615.915.91250015.616.915.416.215.61600015.418.315.617.215.4SPL32.231.530.429.733.5N1.71.61.41.31.9median 21.3median 20.2median 19.4median 18.1median 21.9Delta21.72.42.41.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHuawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
Max. Load
 44.2 °C44.3 °C42.8 °C 
 40.7 °C40.4 °C35.7 °C 
 31.8 °C29.8 °C27.7 °C 
Maximum: 44.3 °C
Average: 37.5 °C
42.2 °C45 °C43.6 °C
36.1 °C40.5 °C39.8 °C
29.8 °C33 °C33.3 °C
Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 38.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-3.7 °C / -6.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.630.5252625.73125.927.34026.225.95029.829.96324.423.58022.223.710024.426.412522.728.91602239.120021.845.925021.546.931521.348.340020.752.150020.556.963019.858.180018.866.2100018.668.112501864.1160017.459.1200016.856.4250016.351.6315016.149.4400015.964.1500015.564.7630015.661.4800015.658.11000015.357.61250015.350.61600015.146.4SPL29.574N1.331.4median 18median 56.4Delta2.56.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXLApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.41 / 0.57 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.3 / 7.8 / 8.46 Watt
Load midlight 36.9 / 49.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
2500U, Vega 8, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, IPS, 1920x1080, 14		HP ProBook 445 G6
2500U, Vega 8, SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14		Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
8265U, GeForce MX230, Kingston RBU-SNS8180DS3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14		Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14		Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
8145U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14		Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027, IPS, 1920x1080, 14		Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
 		Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
6%
2%
-7%
30%
18%
-2%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
5.3
4.8
9%
3.7
30%
6.2
-17%
2.9
45%
3.7
30%
5.27 (3.7 - 7.6, n=28)
1%
7.56 (2.34 - 32, n=973)
-43%
Idle Average *
7.8
6.9
12%
6.1
22%
8.6
-10%
5.6
28%
6.9
12%
8.16 (5.86 - 12.9, n=28)
-5%
11.4 (4.2 - 42, n=973)
-46%
Idle Maximum *
8.46
9.8
-16%
8.3
2%
9.7
-15%
6.1
28%
8.4
1%
9.83 (6.36 - 13.7, n=28)
-16%
13.8 (5 - 67, n=973)
-63%
Load Average *
36.9
35
5%
43
-17%
37.4
-1%
29
21%
32
13%
37.5 (24.1 - 50.6, n=28)
-2%
37.2 (7.43 - 99.3, n=958)
-1%
Load Maximum *
49.4
39.7
20%
61.6
-25%
44.8
9%
35.3
29%
32.6
34%
44.4 (26.5 - 61.6, n=28)
10%
46 (12.2 - 129, n=960)
7%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
18h 57min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 41min
Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL
2500U, Vega 8, 57.4 Wh		HP ProBook 445 G6
2500U, Vega 8, 45 Wh		Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T
8265U, GeForce MX230, 37 Wh		Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, 45 Wh		Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8
8145U, UHD Graphics 620, 50.7 Wh		Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh		Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
-29%
-39%
-43%
13%
21%
-24%
Reader / Idle
1137
621
-45%
545
-52%
1414
24%
572 (101 - 1857, n=800)
-50%
WiFi v1.3
542
351
-35%
331.3
-39%
323
-40%
614
13%
597
10%
417 (105 - 1104, n=356)
-23%
Load
101
93
-8%
65
-36%
129
28%
101 (37 - 259, n=755)
0%

Pros

+ 好看且坚固的机身
+ 出色的续航
+ 不错的屏幕色准
+ 性价比高

Cons

- -接口少
- 功耗高
- 色域差
- 没有升级选项
- 低光下有PWM调光

Verdict - A good performance with a mediocre display

华为MateBook D 14笔记本电脑评测. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany
华为MateBook D 14笔记本电脑评测. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany

虽然大多数其他制造商在使用AMD处理器时并不能提供最好的性能，但华为在MateBook D的超薄笔记本电脑中展示了AMD技术的良好实施。性能高于同定位英特尔型号，并且只有续航时间略差。然而，两种设备之间的价格差异是一个很大的优势，因为我们在这里测试的带有AMD CPU的笔记本电脑的售价比配备较弱的Intel CPU的型号低300欧元（国内差价仅为700元，i5版Magicbook）。

华为MateBook D通过使用AMD处理器提供了更高的性能，但也继承了英特尔版本中已有的弱点。

之前列出的关于屏幕和接口的负面观点基本上和英特尔版一样，这也阻止了这台华为笔记本电脑获得更高的评价。总的来说，这台轻薄的设备在任何办公室环境都很搭，并且还能够满足这种环境对笔记本电脑性能的要求。

Huawei MateBook D 14 W00D-53010GXL - 10/29/2019 v7
Mike Wobker

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
87%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
47 / 80 → 58%
Weight
69 / 20-75 → 90%
Battery
91%
Display
83%
Games Performance
56 / 78 → 71%
Application Performance
74 / 95 → 78%
Temperature
91%
Noise
97%
Audio
70%
Camera
51 / 85 → 60%
Average
76%
85%
Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为MateBook D 14 W00D (Ryzen 5, Vega 8) 笔记本电脑评测
Mike Wobker, 2019-07-21 (Update: 2019-07-21)