微软 Lumia 550 智能手机简短评测
Microsoft Lumia 550 (Lumia Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 4 x 1.1 GHz, Cortex-A7
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 304
Memory
1024 MB
Display
4.70 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel, 电容式, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB
, 3.14 GB free
Weight
142 g, Power Supply: 32 g
Price
139 €
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro
Maximum: 547 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 535.4 cd/m² Minimum: 7.27 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 536 cd/m²
Contrast: 865:1 (Black: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.81 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 7.72 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.18
CCT: 8701 K
| Microsoft Lumia 550 Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia E4g Mali-T760 MP2, MT6732, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J1 Mali-400 MP2, SC8830, 4 GB Flash | Microsoft Lumia 535 Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 8 GB eMMC Flash | LG Joy Adreno 302, 200 8210, 4 GB Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 28% | -13% | 3% | -28% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 536 | 458 -15% | 370 -31% | 431 -20% | 322 -40% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 535 | 434 -19% | 364 -32% | 424 -21% | 313 -41% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 88 -7% | 95 0% | 90 -5% | 91 -4% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.62 | 0.21 66% | 0.63 -2% | 0.64 -3% | 0.31 50% |
| Contrast (:1) | 865 | 2181 152% | 587 -32% | 673 -22% | 1039 20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.81 | 6.95 -20% | 5.99 -3% | 3.6 38% | 11.57 -99% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.3 | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.72 | 4.87 37% | 7.28 6% | 3.71 52% | 14.02 -82% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.38 92% | 2.59 85% | 2.4 92% | 2.45 90% |
| CCT | 8701 75% | 6635 98% | 7949 82% | 6878 95% | 17420 37% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 84.3705 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
AnTuTu v6 | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | BaseMark OS II | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 550 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 550 | |
| Sony Xperia E4g | |
| LG Joy | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 550 | |
| Sony Xperia E4g | |
| LG Joy | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 550 | |
| Sony Xperia E4g | |
| Microsoft Lumia 535 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J1 | |
| LG Joy | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 550 | |
| Sony Xperia E4g | |
| LG Joy | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 550 | |
| Sony Xperia E4g | |
| Samsung Galaxy J1 | |
| LG Joy | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 550 | |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0 / 0.6 Watt |
| Idle |  0.55 / 2.69 / 2.93 Watt |
| Load |
3.94 / 4.24 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Microsoft Lumia 550 Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia E4g Mali-T760 MP2, MT6732, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Microsoft Lumia 535 Adreno 302, 200 MSM8212, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J1 Mali-400 MP2, SC8830, 4 GB Flash | LG Joy Adreno 302, 200 8210, 4 GB Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 44% | -12% | 59% | 14% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 17.1 | 15.2 -11% | 15.8 -8% | 21 23% | 17 -1% |
| H.264 (h) | 6.9 | 8.8 28% | 5.4 -22% | 8.5 23% | 8.8 28% |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 7.4 | 7.5 1% | 10.8 46% | 5.9 -20% | |
| Load (h) | 2.2 | 5.7 159% | 2.1 -5% | 5.4 145% | 3.3 50% |
| WiFi (h) | 6.3 |
Pros
+ 低售价
+ 可更换电池
+ 可更换后盖
+ 照片品质高
+ 720p屏幕
+ 不错的通话音质
+ 可以满足日常使用的电池续航
Cons
- 充电时间长
- 机身不抗压
- 在一些情况下功耗高
- 软件不完全稳定
- 一些Win10功能不支持
- 前置相机分辨率低
微软为Lumia 550贴上了比前代产品更高的价码，不过它也有更多的亮点：支持LTE，更高分辨率的屏幕以及更大的电池容量。但是，无法否认的还有它前置相机的像素数有所降低，同时没有再预装一些应用如MixRadio或HereDrive+。Lumia 535的一些优势，例如可更换的电池、micro-SD卡槽和可更换的后盖都得到了保留。Lumia 550的屏幕尺寸相比前作有些缩小，同时它受到了Windows 10移动版一些bug的影响。持此之外，这个操作系统的一些重要功能如“Continuum”或通过虹膜扫描登录在Lumia 550中都没有得到支持。
整体上，Lumia 550是一款性价比合理的不错智能手机，它的速度足够日常使用，也提供了优质的屏幕，对LTE的支持以及micro-SD卡槽和可更换电池。
它的机身质量可以给人不错的印象，不过抗压能力较差。它的信号接受很好，通话质量也可以让人满意，主相机可以拍摄质量不错的照片。它的屏幕明亮，色彩还原准确。系统的操作流畅，性能可以满足大部分日常需要。它的电池可以提供一整天的续航时间。市面上90欧元（约645人民币）的售价让人很难再挑剔什么了。不过，更坚固的机身和更好的前置相机将会让Lumia 550更进一步。微软需要调整他们不够稳定的操作系统的功耗问题。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Microsoft Lumia 550
- 02/26/2016 v5 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
