Notebookcheck Logo

联想IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05笔记本电脑评测:带了Office 365的Chromebook竞争者

挺慢的。 联想的14英寸笔记本电脑可能会使Chromebook的情况变得困难。 该设备有着优秀的键盘和为期一年的MS Office 365个人许可证。 计算能力和内存容量并不令人信服。 但是Ideapad的价格不到280欧元。
AMD Laptop / Notebook Windows
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05 (IdeaPad Slim Series)
Processor
AMD A6-9220e 2 x 1.6 - 2.4 GHz, Stoney Ridge
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) - 80 MB VRAM, Core: 600 MHz, Memory: 933 MHz, Single-Channel, Adrenalin 19.20 (26.20.12028.2)
Memory
4 GB 
, DDR4-1866, Single channel, soldered, no slots
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Chi Mei N140HGA-EA1, TN LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
AMD CZ FCH
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 33 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC257 @ AMD K17.1 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: Audiokombo, Card Reader: MicroSD, TPM 2.0
Networking
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20.9 x 327.1 x 235
Battery
35 Wh, 4610 mAh Lithium-Ion, 7.6 V
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: VGA
Primary Camera: 0.3 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声(2x 2W), Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, 微软Office 365一年试用, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
1.4 kg, Power Supply: 166 g
Price
279 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
73.5 %
04/2020
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
A6-9220e, Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
1.4 kg20.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
79.9 %
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605
1.4 kg15 mm14.00"1920x1080
72.5 %
03/2020
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1
Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605
1.7 kg17.95 mm14.00"1920x1080
80.6 %
Lenovo Chromebook S340-14T 81V30002GE
Celeron N4000, UHD Graphics 600
1.4 kg18.8 mm14.00"1920x1080

Size comparison

343 mm 245 mm 17.95 mm 1.7 kg327.1 mm 235 mm 20.9 mm 1.4 kg328.9 mm 234.35 mm 18.8 mm 1.4 kg330 mm 219 mm 15 mm 1.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (18.9 - 193.9, n=17, last 2 years)
66.7 MB/s +126%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
65.7 MB/s +123%
Lenovo Chromebook S340-14T 81V30002GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
47.4 MB/s +61%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
29.5 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.3 MB/s +167%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (23.6 - 239, n=17, last 2 years)
81.3 MB/s +154%
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
33.9 MB/s +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
32 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Intel Wireless AC 9462
326 (274min - 361max) MBit/s +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
309 (261min - 336max) MBit/s
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
306 (207min - 387max) MBit/s -1%
iperf3 receive AX12
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Intel Wireless AC 9462
348 (332min - 353max) MBit/s +35%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
335 (328min - 340max) MBit/s +30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
258 (160min - 297max) MBit/s
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05 AMD A6-9220e, AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge); iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø258 (160-297)
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387 Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel UHD Graphics 605; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø347 (332-353)
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1 Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel UHD Graphics 605; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø334 (328-340)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05 AMD A6-9220e, AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge); iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø309 (261-336)
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387 Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel UHD Graphics 605; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø326 (274-361)
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1 Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel UHD Graphics 605; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø306 (207-387)
220
cd/m²
229
cd/m²
210
cd/m²
233
cd/m²
245
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
231
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
213
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Chi Mei N140HGA-EA1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 245 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 226.4 cd/m² Minimum: 10.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 245 cd/m²
Contrast: 551:1 (Black: 0.445 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.75 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 5.48
ΔE Greyscale 12.85 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.15% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
TN LED, 1920x1080, 14.00
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1
TN LED, 1920x1080, 14.00
Lenovo Chromebook S340-14T 81V30002GE
IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display
-0%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
41.15
40.96
0%
40.35
-2%
sRGB Coverage
61.8
61.1
-1%
60.3
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
42.54
42.37
0%
41.71
-2%
Response Times
5491%
26%
-63%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 ?(24, 20)
42 ?(23, 19)
5%
43 ?(23, 20)
2%
46 ?(20, 26)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
14 ?(10, 4)
28 ?(16, 12)
-100%
13 ?(9, 4)
7%
31 ?(17, 14)
-121%
PWM Frequency
147 ?(60)
24500 ?(20)
16567%
250 ?(20)
70%
Screen
15%
-3%
25%
Brightness middle
245
262
7%
208
-15%
248
1%
Brightness
226
242
7%
192
-15%
237
5%
Brightness Distribution
86
87
1%
85
-1%
85
-1%
Black Level *
0.445
0.505
-13%
0.41
8%
0.31
30%
Contrast
551
519
-6%
507
-8%
800
45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
10.75
5.49
49%
10.1
6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
20.82
10.63
49%
28.85
-39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
5.48
4.38
20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
12.85
4.84
62%
10.96
15%
3.58
72%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.3 96%
2.24 98%
2.17 101%
CCT
15973 41%
6347 102%
11669 56%
6697 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39
39
0%
38
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
62
61
-2%
59
-5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1835% / 1039%
7% / 2%
-19% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 147 Hz ≤ 60 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 147 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 60 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 147 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 Loop

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05 AMD A6-9220e, AMD A6-9220e: Ø40.5 (32.79-86.07)
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387 Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel Pentium Silver N5000: Ø227 (224.67-233.04)
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1 Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel Pentium Silver N5000: Ø208 (203.3-210.2)
Ematic EWT117 Intel Atom x5-Z8350, Intel Atom x5-Z8350: Ø84.3 (83.19-88.07)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years)
237 Points +665%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
78 Points +152%
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
76 Points +145%
Chuwi LapBook Pro
Intel Celeron N4100
69 Points +123%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
AMD A6-9220e
31 Points
Average AMD A6-9220e
  ()
31 Points 0%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years)
1757 Points +1943%
Chuwi LapBook Pro
Intel Celeron N4100
251 Points +192%
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
233 Points +171%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
210 Points +144%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
AMD A6-9220e
86 Points
Average AMD A6-9220e
  ()
86 Points 0%
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years)
5879 Points +644%
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1902 Points +141%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1
UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1879 Points +138%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge), A6-9220e, 64 GB eMMC Flash
790 Points
Average AMD A6-9220e, AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
  ()
790 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
64 GB eMMC Flash
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
64 GB eMMC Flash
Chuwi LapBook Pro
64 GB eMMC Flash
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1
64 GB eMMC Flash
Average 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
61%
118%
215%
156%
4705%
Write 4K
4.58
6.435
41%
13.46
194%
24.08
426%
Read 4K
7.106
5.91
-17%
7.071
0%
11.48
62%
Write Seq
37.33
66.7
79%
105.3
182%
149.7
301%
Read Seq
143
268.9
88%
235.5
65%
271.2
90%
Write 4K Q32T1
5.623
7.795
39%
14.68
161%
23.87
325%
22.4 ?(2.17 - 62.9, n=18)
298%
Read 4K Q32T1
9.663
22.76
136%
24.31
152%
30.76
218%
31.5 ?(9.66 - 76.3, n=18)
226%
Write Seq Q32T1
41.03
83
102%
114.2
178%
137.2
234%
104.6 ?(18.4 - 214, n=18)
155%
Read Seq Q32T1
128.3
150
17%
140.7
10%
205.1
60%
166.5 ?(68.9 - 259, n=18)
30%
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2837 - 12349, n=59, last 2 years)
6026 Points +1825%
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
576 Points +84%
Average AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
  (313 - 747, n=3)
548 Points +75%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
425 Points +36%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge), AMD A6-9220e
313 Points
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 18.5 8.6 7.4 3.7
Max. Load
 32.5 °C32.8 °C26.7 °C 
 32.4 °C32.4 °C26.2 °C 
 25.5 °C24.8 °C24.1 °C 
Maximum: 32.8 °C
Average: 28.6 °C
25.9 °C33.2 °C34.9 °C
24.9 °C30.3 °C33.5 °C
23.6 °C24 °C25.2 °C
Maximum: 34.9 °C
Average: 28.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  34.4 °C | Room Temperature 22.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.7 °C / 1.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.233.733.22532.934.132.93131.830.931.84027.62927.65030.62930.66326.927.226.98026.526.426.510027.124.227.112530.824.530.816034.624.534.620037.722.537.725047.121.747.131558.520.258.540066.319.266.350063.718.563.763060.718.860.780066.31866.3100069.117.469.1125067.217.367.2160064.21764.2200065.917.165.9250060.916.960.9315061.617.261.6400065.417.465.4500056.717.656.7630054.617.754.6800053.517.853.51000047.517.747.51250050.517.550.51600048.917.548.9SPL75.929.975.9N361.336median 58.5median 17.7median 58.5Delta9.21.69.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.25 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.2 / 4.9 / 5.4 Watt
Load midlight 13.4 / 14.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)
5h 39min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Average of class Subnotebook
  (303 - 1144, n=63, last 2 years)
629 min +86%
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 41 Wh
555 min +64%
Chuwi LapBook Pro
Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 38 Wh
491 min +45%
Acer Aspire 1 A114-32-P0K1
Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 37 Wh
383 min +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
A6-9220e, Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge), 35 Wh
339 min

Pros

+ 磨砂屏幕
+ 安静
+ 几乎没有温度
+ 整洁的键盘
+ MS Office 365(一年许可证)
+ 两年保固

Cons

- 黑暗,低对比度,视角不稳定的屏幕
- 低功耗APU
- 慢eMMC内存
- 惰性系统
- WLAN平均传输速率
联想IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05笔记本电脑评测, provided by:
联想IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05笔记本电脑评测, provided by:

即使价格(280欧元)似乎很诱人,您也应该三思。这台笔记本计算机的性能会很快达到其极限,并且反应迟钝。也没有任何方式可以加快其速度。

Ideapad Slim 1-14AST-05作为Chromebook的竞争对手并没有令人信服的形象。 Chromebook通常可以更流畅地使用-即使是硬件较弱的型号。

联想决定结合使用性能较差的APU,4 GB RAM和eMMC模块,而Windows 10则使该配置负担很大。该设备最多只能用于打开一个应用程序或网站。屏幕非常低档-这里的关键词是暗,低对比度,不稳定的视角。没有足够的存储空间(初始设置后大约33 GB)。联想否认我们的测试设备可以安装SSD。仅保留通过MicroSD卡进行的内存扩展。

可以说一些积极的事情。联想为Ideapad授予两年保修。不发光的Chiclet键盘给人留下了深刻的印象,也适合进行常规打字工作。还包括价值近70欧元的一年期MS Office 365个人许可证。

因此,Ideapad可作为学生的廉价打字机。但是,它缺乏长久使用能力。 Ideapad在5:39小时后结束了我们实际的WLAN测试(模拟使用脚本调用网页时的负载)-对于学校或大学使用来说,时间太少了。在此,必须始终随身携带充电器。

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05 - 02/17/2020 v7
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
74 / 98 → 75%
Keyboard
79%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
37 / 75 → 49%
Weight
70 / 20-75 → 91%
Battery
67%
Display
72%
Games Performance
12 / 78 → 15%
Application Performance
25 / 85 → 30%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
51 / 91 → 56%
Camera
12 / 85 → 14%
Average
60%
74%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05笔记本电脑评测:带了Office 365的Chromebook竞争者
Sascha Mölck, 2020-04- 1 (Update: 2020-04- 1)