Huawei Y7
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 11 scores (from 16 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei Y7
Convincing. The Huawei Y7 aims to convince its buyers with a metal case, a strong processor, and a large battery. While these assets are good, the competition in the 200-Euro price range (~$238) is strong. You can find out in our test how the Huawei Y7 fares.
Source: Ausdroid
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe story of the Y7 is very much told when looking at the competition. The competitors are, for the most part, currently offering more for either the same price, or just a little extra – more resolution, more memory, even more camera sensors – the only place the Y7 truly shines is the battery which is something.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/05/2017
Source: Gadgetguy
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSo, is the Huawei Y7 fifty per cent better than the Huawei Y5 2017? No, of course not. If I had to put a figure on it, I’d say it’s two hundred and fifty per cent better.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 98% performance: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Chip.de
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 86% features: 78% display: 84% mobility: 97%
Source: Curved
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 69% performance: 67% display: 64% mobility: 77%
Source: Chip.de
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 71% performance: 69% features: 55% display: 86% mobility: 92%
Source: Inside Handy
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Android Mag
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 93% performance: 60% features: 60% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 80%
Source: 4G News
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 65% mobility: 85% workmanship: 65%
Source: Android Geek
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/21/2017
Source: Android Geek
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/21/2017
Source: GadgetGear.nl
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/07/2017
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 50% display: 40% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Top for Phone
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/18/2017
Source: Tabletowo
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: Antyweb
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/13/2017
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 505:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
435: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.