Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 21 scores (from 31 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
内置扬声器。华为为MediaPad M3 Lite,配备了四个扬声器,以产生生动而强大的声场。也就是说,乍一看,该设备是一个典型的中档平板电脑,还有几个开口。
Source: PC Perspective
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionFor the price, the Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 10 is a tablet worth considering with a few caveats. In combination with EMUI 5.1, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 CPU and 3GB of flash memory make for a tablet that’s responsive, even after extended periods of use. It’s front-facing camera has a higher megapixel count than many others in the sub-$300 range, which makes this a good device for Skyping with family over a long distance. The speakers and beautiful IPS LCD screen also make consuming content easy to enjoy.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/14/2018
Source: PC Mag
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionFor $250, the Huawei MediaPad Lite 10 is a sleek tablet with a big, crisp screen and booming speakers at a reasonable price. Unfortunately, it's just not reasonable enough to compete with the Amazon Fire HD 10, which is available for $100 less and offers the same performance. It's also uncomfortably close in price to the $329 Apple iPad, which offers a faster processor, a sharper screen, and access to Apple's App Store, which still has an advantage over Android when it comes to quality tablet apps. So unless you absolutely need access to Google Play, you're better off paying a lot less for the Fire HD 10 or a bit more for the iPad.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Computer Shopper
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionAlthough the 10-inch Huawei M3 Lite cuts a stylish frame, it's not just about looks. The tablet packs impressive battery life and a crisp display, although it's no benchmark speed demon.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Neowin
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionI've always been a fan of using tablets for consumption tasks. Historically, I've used an iPad for this, but iPads are getting really expensive, given that Apple keeps adding 'pro' features. Indeed, it seems that the era of consumption tablets is behind us, so I found the MediaPad M3 Lite to be refreshing.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Futurezone.at
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/16/2017
Source: e-media - 10/17

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Mag
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 97% price: 93% performance: 100% features: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: WinFuture
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/25/2017
Source: Tablet Blog
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/23/2017
Source: WinFuture
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/08/2017
Source: Computerhoy
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Ofertaman
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/22/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/24/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Androidiani
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/14/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 75% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tutto Android
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 73% features: 78% display: 75% mobility: 86% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Tablets Magazine
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hitek
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: 01Net
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 60% mobility: 90%
Source: Les Androides
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/17/2017
Source: Komputerswiat
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Tabletowo
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Helpix
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Product Test
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% display: 86% mobility: 100%
Source: Yamobi
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/29/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: Tek.no
NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Lyd og Billede
DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Ljud och Bild
SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 505:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
435: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.