Notebookcheck

欧乐风Armor 6智能手机评测

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zewei Shen), 02/21/2019
Android Touchscreen Smartphone

坚固且配置齐全的户外智能手机。 欧乐风Armor 6是一款坚固耐用的中端智能手机,具有全面的功能,拥有从人群中脱颖而出的特性。继续阅读以了解这种厨房水槽的设计是否有效以及Armor 6在我们的测试中的表现如何。

Ulefone Armor 6 (Armor Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio P60
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
6.2 inch 18.7:9, 2246 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, 多点触控电容屏, IPS LCD, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 116 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: USB-Type-C, Card Reader: 最高128 GB的microSD卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计,指南针,陀螺仪,接近传感器,, OTG,Coulometer,UV传感器, Miracast,LED通知灯,VoLTE,VoWiFI
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900; B2, B3, B5, B8. 2G CDMA: 850, 900; BC0, BC1. 3G WCDMA: 850, 900, 1,700, 1,900, 2,100; B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. 3G TDSCDMA: 1,900, 2015; B34, B39. 4G FDD-LTE: 700, 800, 850, 900, 1,700, 1,800, 1,900, 2,100, 2,600; B1, B2, B3, B4,, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 13.2 x 166 x 83
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP,内插至21 MP和8 MP,内插至13 MP
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP,内插至13 MP
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, USB线,USB OTG线,3.5毫米耳机插孔适配器,充电器, Ulefone , 12 Months Warranty, fanless, ruggedized
Weight
268 g, Power Supply: 68 g
Price
310 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Ulefone Armor 6
Ulefone Armor 6
Ulefone Armor 6

Size Comparison

176 mm 84 mm 15 mm 364 g168.8 mm 85.6 mm 15.9 mm 334 g167 mm 78 mm 13.8 mm 248 g166 mm 83 mm 13.2 mm 268 g163 mm 76.6 mm 14 mm 256 g146 mm 74.4 mm 12.6 mm 200 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +96%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
344 (min: 219, max: 350) MBit/s ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=348)
217 MBit/s ∼32% -37%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
207 (min: 162, max: 243) MBit/s ∼31% -40%
Ulefone Armor X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 MBit/s ∼15% -71%
Oukitel WP2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
86.4 (min: 43, max: 107) MBit/s ∼13% -75%
Poptel P9000 Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash
71.6 MBit/s ∼11% -79%
CAT S31
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41.6 MBit/s ∼6% -88%
Poptel P60
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 128 GB eMMC Flash
40.4 (min: 10, max: 55) MBit/s ∼6% -88%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100% +108%
Ulefone Armor 6
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
311 (min: 292, max: 329) MBit/s ∼48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=348)
209 MBit/s ∼32% -33%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
182 (min: 136, max: 231) MBit/s ∼28% -41%
Ulefone Armor X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼16% -67%
Oukitel WP2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 (min: 42, max: 118) MBit/s ∼16% -67%
Poptel P9000 Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash
83.2 MBit/s ∼13% -73%
Poptel P60
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 128 GB eMMC Flash
67.6 (min: 17, max: 90) MBit/s ∼10% -78%
CAT S31
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash
39.3 MBit/s ∼6% -87%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø337 (219-350)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø311 (292-329)
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS Test: Ulefone Armor 6 - Overview
GPS Test: Ulefone Armor 6 - Overview
GPS Test: Ulefone Armor 6 - Lake
GPS Test: Ulefone Armor 6 - Lake
GPS Test: Ulefone Armor 6 - Loop
GPS Test: Ulefone Armor 6 - Loop
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera in portrait mode
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera in portrait mode
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera with HDR mode enabled
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera with HDR mode enabled
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera
Default camera app: Pro mode
Default camera app: Pro mode
Default camera app: Settings
Default camera app: Settings
Default camera app: Focus settings
Default camera app: Focus settings
Default camera app: Filters
Default camera app: Filters
Default camera app: Auto mode
Default camera app: Auto mode
Default camera app: Video mode
Default camera app: Video mode
Default camera app: Video settings
Default camera app: Video settings
 

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
431
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 432 cd/m² Average: 412.9 cd/m² Minimum: 7.12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 418 cd/m²
Contrast: 2090:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Ulefone Armor 6
IPS LCD, 2246x1080, 6.2
Poptel P60
LCD IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Poptel P9000 Max
LCD IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Ulefone Armor X
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Oukitel WP2
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
CAT S31
IPS, 1280x720, 4.7
Honor 8X
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Screen
-42%
-57%
-21%
-60%
-10%
-56%
-11%
Brightness middle
418
401
-4%
406
-3%
564
35%
472
13%
784
88%
484
16%
489
17%
Brightness
413
387
-6%
397
-4%
541
31%
456
10%
750
82%
469
14%
486
18%
Brightness Distribution
91
92
1%
90
-1%
91
0%
86
-5%
92
1%
93
2%
93
2%
Black Level *
0.2
0.14
30%
0.38
-90%
0.37
-85%
0.32
-60%
0.45
-125%
0.55
-175%
0.34
-70%
Contrast
2090
2864
37%
1068
-49%
1524
-27%
1475
-29%
1742
-17%
880
-58%
1438
-31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
7.5
-67%
6.7
-49%
5.1
-13%
9.1
-102%
4.28
5%
7.3
-62%
3.8
16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.8
16.1
-137%
13.8
-103%
9.6
-41%
14.8
-118%
8.75
-29%
11.1
-63%
7.1
-4%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.3
9.6
-191%
8.5
-158%
5.4
-64%
9.6
-191%
6.1
-85%
7.4
-124%
4.4
-33%
Gamma
2.24 98%
1.99 111%
2.21 100%
2.1 105%
1.75 126%
2.49 88%
2.16 102%
2.22 99%
CCT
7205 90%
8242 79%
8858 73%
7755 84%
8713 75%
7175 91%
8534 76%
7213 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9868 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.8 ms).
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
6950 Points ∼86%
Poptel P60
4778 Points ∼59% -31%
Poptel P9000 Max
3278 Points ∼40% -53%
Ulefone Armor X
3184 Points ∼39% -54%
Oukitel WP2
3042 Points ∼38% -56%
CAT S31
2300 Points ∼28% -67%
Honor 8X
7141 Points ∼88% +3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
8101 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6950 - 7434, n=4)
7197 Points ∼89% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2828 - 9868, n=301)
4744 Points ∼59% -32%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
9513 Points ∼98%
Poptel P60
6036 Points ∼62% -37%
Poptel P9000 Max
4609 Points ∼48% -52%
Ulefone Armor X
4298 Points ∼44% -55%
Oukitel WP2
4012 Points ∼42% -58%
CAT S31
3080 Points ∼32% -68%
Honor 8X
8939 Points ∼92% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
9664 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (9065 - 10191, n=4)
9666 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3977 - 13531, n=469)
5176 Points ∼54% -46%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
2675 Points ∼99%
Poptel P60
1455 Points ∼54% -46%
Poptel P9000 Max
1205 Points ∼45% -55%
Ulefone Armor X
645 Points ∼24% -76%
Oukitel WP2
920 Points ∼34% -66%
Honor 8X
2702 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2257 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2013 - 2675, n=4)
2420 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (939 - 4439, n=316)
1762 Points ∼65% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
881 Points ∼20%
Poptel P60
382 Points ∼9% -57%
Poptel P9000 Max
321 Points ∼7% -64%
Ulefone Armor X
102 Points ∼2% -88%
Oukitel WP2
343 Points ∼8% -61%
Honor 8X
801 Points ∼18% -9%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4468 Points ∼100% +407%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (721 - 900, n=4)
846 Points ∼19% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (138 - 8206, n=316)
1492 Points ∼33% +69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
1037 Points ∼28%
Poptel P60
457 Points ∼12% -56%
Poptel P9000 Max
384 Points ∼10% -63%
Ulefone Armor X
125 Points ∼3% -88%
Oukitel WP2
399 Points ∼11% -62%
Honor 8X
950 Points ∼26% -8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3669 Points ∼100% +254%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (853 - 1054, n=4)
988 Points ∼27% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (170 - 5200, n=319)
1393 Points ∼38% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
2765 Points ∼98%
Poptel P60
1476 Points ∼52% -47%
Poptel P9000 Max
1178 Points ∼42% -57%
Ulefone Armor X
658 Points ∼23% -76%
Oukitel WP2
1072 Points ∼38% -61%
Honor 8X
2697 Points ∼95% -2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2832 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2388 - 2765, n=3)
2639 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=332)
1731 Points ∼61% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
1441 Points ∼21%
Poptel P60
599 Points ∼9% -58%
Poptel P9000 Max
477 Points ∼7% -67%
Ulefone Armor X
167 Points ∼2% -88%
Oukitel WP2
491 Points ∼7% -66%
Honor 8X
1316 Points ∼19% -9%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
6898 Points ∼100% +379%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1159 - 1441, n=3)
1341 Points ∼19% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=332)
2053 Points ∼30% +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
1581 Points ∼30%
Poptel P60
690 Points ∼13% -56%
Poptel P9000 Max
550 Points ∼11% -65%
Ulefone Armor X
200 Points ∼4% -87%
Oukitel WP2
558 Points ∼11% -65%
Honor 8X
1485 Points ∼28% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
5230 Points ∼100% +231%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1309 - 1595, n=3)
1495 Points ∼29% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=333)
1743 Points ∼33% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
2478 Points ∼93%
Poptel P60
1374 Points ∼52% -45%
Poptel P9000 Max
1118 Points ∼42% -55%
Ulefone Armor X
585 Points ∼22% -76%
Oukitel WP2
1054 Points ∼40% -57%
CAT S31
560 Points ∼21% -77%
Honor 8X
2663 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2528 Points ∼95% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2149 - 2512, n=4)
2411 Points ∼91% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (918 - 4216, n=392)
1695 Points ∼64% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
628 Points ∼13%
Poptel P60
386 Points ∼8% -39%
Poptel P9000 Max
322 Points ∼7% -49%
Ulefone Armor X
87 Points ∼2% -86%
Oukitel WP2
149 Points ∼3% -76%
CAT S31
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 8X
798 Points ∼17% +27%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4746 Points ∼100% +656%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (628 - 864, n=4)
741 Points ∼16% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 5246, n=394)
1222 Points ∼26% +95%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
733 Points ∼18%
Poptel P60
439 Points ∼11% -40%
Poptel P9000 Max
383 Points ∼10% -48%
Ulefone Armor X
107 Points ∼3% -85%
Oukitel WP2
184 Points ∼5% -75%
CAT S31
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 8X
945 Points ∼24% +29%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3972 Points ∼100% +442%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (733 - 1011, n=4)
870 Points ∼22% +19%
Average of class Smartphone (184 - 4734, n=402)
1171 Points ∼29% +60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
2511 Points ∼92%
Poptel P60
1365 Points ∼50% -46%
Poptel P9000 Max
1176 Points ∼43% -53%
Ulefone Armor X
581 Points ∼21% -77%
Oukitel WP2
1126 Points ∼41% -55%
Honor 8X
2645 Points ∼97% +5%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2720 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2159 - 2587, n=3)
2419 Points ∼89% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4215, n=426)
1593 Points ∼59% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
861 Points ∼10%
Poptel P60
587 Points ∼7% -32%
Poptel P9000 Max
480 Points ∼6% -44%
Ulefone Armor X
129 Points ∼2% -85%
Oukitel WP2
98 Points ∼1% -89%
Honor 8X
1280 Points ∼15% +49%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
8261 Points ∼100% +859%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (861 - 1112, n=3)
985 Points ∼12% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=426)
1658 Points ∼20% +93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
1008 Points ∼18%
Poptel P60
654 Points ∼11% -35%
Poptel P9000 Max
553 Points ∼10% -45%
Ulefone Armor X
156 Points ∼3% -85%
Oukitel WP2
123 Points ∼2% -88%
Honor 8X
1445 Points ∼25% +43%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
5687 Points ∼100% +464%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1008 - 1273, n=3)
1133 Points ∼20% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6454, n=434)
1423 Points ∼25% +41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
22137 Points ∼63%
Poptel P60
10234 Points ∼29% -54%
Poptel P9000 Max
10560 Points ∼30% -52%
Ulefone Armor X
10195 Points ∼29% -54%
Oukitel WP2
8284 Points ∼24% -63%
CAT S31
6396 Points ∼18% -71%
Honor 8X
17450 Points ∼50% -21%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
34928 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (18065 - 24828, n=4)
22182 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=585)
13215 Points ∼38% -40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
18998 Points ∼23%
Poptel P60
1152 Points ∼1% -94%
Poptel P9000 Max
10012 Points ∼12% -47%
Ulefone Armor X
3585 Points ∼4% -81%
Oukitel WP2
8830 Points ∼11% -54%
CAT S31
5042 Points ∼6% -73%
Honor 8X
21533 Points ∼26% +13%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
82125 Points ∼100% +332%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (16820 - 20991, n=4)
19409 Points ∼24% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1152 - 162695, n=585)
18721 Points ∼23% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
19616 Points ∼31%
Poptel P60
10956 Points ∼17% -44%
Poptel P9000 Max
10129 Points ∼16% -48%
Ulefone Armor X
4188 Points ∼7% -79%
Oukitel WP2
8703 Points ∼14% -56%
CAT S31
5291 Points ∼8% -73%
Honor 8X
20468 Points ∼32% +4%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
63159 Points ∼100% +222%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (17082 - 21601, n=4)
19959 Points ∼32% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=586)
15739 Points ∼25% -20%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
34 fps ∼23%
Poptel P60
21 fps ∼14% -38%
Poptel P9000 Max
17 fps ∼11% -50%
Ulefone Armor X
5.9 fps ∼4% -83%
Oukitel WP2
17 fps ∼11% -50%
CAT S31
5.6 fps ∼4% -84%
Honor 8X
39 fps ∼26% +15%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
150 fps ∼100% +341%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (30 - 38, n=4)
34.8 fps ∼23% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=609)
32.5 fps ∼22% -4%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
32 fps ∼53%
Poptel P60
22 fps ∼37% -31%
Poptel P9000 Max
16 fps ∼27% -50%
Ulefone Armor X
9.2 fps ∼15% -71%
Oukitel WP2
15 fps ∼25% -53%
CAT S31
9.8 fps ∼16% -69%
Honor 8X
36 fps ∼60% +13%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
60 fps ∼100% +88%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (31 - 40, n=4)
34.5 fps ∼58% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=612)
25.9 fps ∼43% -19%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
18 fps ∼25%
Poptel P60
10 fps ∼14% -44%
Poptel P9000 Max
6.8 fps ∼10% -62%
Ulefone Armor X
2.7 fps ∼4% -85%
Oukitel WP2
7.1 fps ∼10% -61%
CAT S31
1.9 fps ∼3% -89%
Honor 8X
21 fps ∼30% +17%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
71 fps ∼100% +294%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (16 - 20, n=4)
18.5 fps ∼26% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=530)
17.6 fps ∼25% -2%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
17 fps ∼29%
Poptel P60
10 fps ∼17% -41%
Poptel P9000 Max
6.8 fps ∼12% -60%
Ulefone Armor X
5.1 fps ∼9% -70%
Oukitel WP2
6.7 fps ∼12% -61%
CAT S31
4.3 fps ∼7% -75%
Honor 8X
19 fps ∼33% +12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
58 fps ∼100% +241%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (17 - 29, n=4)
20.8 fps ∼36% +22%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=534)
16.7 fps ∼29% -2%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
12 fps ∼34%
Poptel P60
6.6 fps ∼19% -45%
Poptel P9000 Max
4.5 fps ∼13% -62%
Ulefone Armor X
1.6 fps ∼5% -87%
Honor 8X
14 fps ∼40% +17%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
35 fps ∼100% +192%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (9.6 - 12, n=4)
11.4 fps ∼33% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 88, n=391)
14.9 fps ∼43% +24%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
11 fps ∼20%
Poptel P60
6.3 fps ∼12% -43%
Poptel P9000 Max
4.6 fps ∼9% -58%
Ulefone Armor X
3.3 fps ∼6% -70%
Oukitel WP2
4.5 fps ∼8% -59%
Honor 8X
13 fps ∼24% +18%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
54 fps ∼100% +391%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (11 - 20, n=4)
13.3 fps ∼25% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (3.5 - 110, n=394)
14.3 fps ∼26% +30%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
2.6 fps ∼12%
Poptel P60
1.4 fps ∼6% -46%
Oukitel WP2
1.3 fps ∼6% -50%
Honor 8X
4.1 fps ∼19% +58%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
22 fps ∼100% +746%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2.6 - 6.4, n=3)
4.37 fps ∼20% +68%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 59, n=97)
9.25 fps ∼42% +256%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
4.3 fps ∼31%
Poptel P60
2.2 fps ∼16% -49%
Oukitel WP2
0.86 fps ∼6% -80%
Honor 8X
2.6 fps ∼19% -40%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
14 fps ∼100% +226%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2.1 - 4.3, n=3)
3 fps ∼21% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 31, n=97)
6.32 fps ∼45% +47%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
6.9 fps ∼22%
Poptel P60
3.7 fps ∼12% -46%
Oukitel WP2
2 fps ∼6% -71%
Honor 8X
5.2 fps ∼17% -25%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
31 fps ∼100% +349%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6.6 - 8.6, n=3)
7.37 fps ∼24% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 59, n=97)
13.8 fps ∼45% +100%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
7.6 fps ∼24%
Poptel P60
3.8 fps ∼12% -50%
Oukitel WP2
2.3 fps ∼7% -70%
Honor 8X
4.6 fps ∼14% -39%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
32 fps ∼100% +321%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6.2 - 7.6, n=3)
7 fps ∼22% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (0.77 - 63, n=96)
15.1 fps ∼47% +99%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
7 fps ∼20%
Poptel P60
3.8 fps ∼11% -46%
Poptel P9000 Max
2.4 fps ∼7% -66%
Ulefone Armor X
0.9 fps ∼3% -87%
Oukitel WP2
2.5 fps ∼7% -64%
Honor 8X
7.6 fps ∼22% +9%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
35 fps ∼100% +400%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (5.8 - 7.3, n=4)
6.8 fps ∼19% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 54, n=321)
10.1 fps ∼29% +44%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
7 fps ∼21%
Poptel P60
3.8 fps ∼12% -46%
Poptel P9000 Max
2.4 fps ∼7% -66%
Ulefone Armor X
1.6 fps ∼5% -77%
Oukitel WP2
2.4 fps ∼7% -66%
Honor 8X
6.4 fps ∼19% -9%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
33 fps ∼100% +371%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6.7 - 7.4, n=4)
7.03 fps ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 58, n=324)
9.12 fps ∼28% +30%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
131861 Points ∼50%
Poptel P60
83745 Points ∼32% -36%
Poptel P9000 Max
54819 Points ∼21% -58%
Ulefone Armor X
46435 Points ∼18% -65%
Oukitel WP2
51621 Points ∼20% -61%
Honor 8X
140188 Points ∼53% +6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
263165 Points ∼100% +100%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (119367 - 137018, n=4)
130285 Points ∼50% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (41483 - 348178, n=213)
121109 Points ∼46% -8%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
105997 Points ∼47%
Poptel P60
64189 Points ∼28% -39%
Ulefone Armor X
37586 Points ∼17% -65%
Oukitel WP2
42273 Points ∼19% -60%
CAT S31
24865 Points ∼11% -77%
Honor 8X
112870 Points ∼50% +6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
227026 Points ∼100% +114%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (91667 - 110668, n=3)
102777 Points ∼45% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 273655, n=428)
79983 Points ∼35% -25%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
1128 Points ∼87%
Poptel P60
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Poptel P9000 Max
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Ulefone Armor X
7 Points ∼1% -99%
Oukitel WP2
10 Points ∼1% -99%
CAT S31
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Honor 8X
1207 Points ∼93% +7%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
1296 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1083 - 1161, n=3)
1124 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=542)
714 Points ∼55% -37%
Graphics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
1486 Points ∼19%
Poptel P60
866 Points ∼11% -42%
Poptel P9000 Max
641 Points ∼8% -57%
Ulefone Armor X
188 Points ∼2% -87%
Oukitel WP2
642 Points ∼8% -57%
CAT S31
256 Points ∼3% -83%
Honor 8X
1456 Points ∼18% -2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
7945 Points ∼100% +435%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1262 - 1532, n=3)
1427 Points ∼18% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=542)
1806 Points ∼23% +22%
Memory (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
2276 Points ∼52%
Poptel P60
1136 Points ∼26% -50%
Poptel P9000 Max
779 Points ∼18% -66%
Ulefone Armor X
900 Points ∼21% -60%
Oukitel WP2
926 Points ∼21% -59%
CAT S31
328 Points ∼8% -86%
Honor 8X
4360 Points ∼100% +92%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3239 Points ∼74% +42%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2150 - 2721, n=3)
2382 Points ∼55% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=542)
1328 Points ∼30% -42%
System (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
4736 Points ∼73%
Poptel P60
2465 Points ∼38% -48%
Poptel P9000 Max
1868 Points ∼29% -61%
Ulefone Armor X
1491 Points ∼23% -69%
Oukitel WP2
1330 Points ∼20% -72%
CAT S31
899 Points ∼14% -81%
Honor 8X
5529 Points ∼85% +17%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
6506 Points ∼100% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (3817 - 4736, n=3)
4180 Points ∼64% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=542)
2662 Points ∼41% -44%
Overall (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6
2062 Points ∼54%
Poptel P60
384 Points ∼10% -81%
Poptel P9000 Max
308 Points ∼8% -85%
Ulefone Armor X
206 Points ∼5% -90%
Oukitel WP2
295 Points ∼8% -86%
CAT S31
1 Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 8X
2410 Points ∼63% +17%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3838 Points ∼100% +86%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1830 - 2096, n=3)
1996 Points ∼52% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=546)
1319 Points ∼34% -36%

Legend

 
Ulefone Armor 6 Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Poptel P60 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Poptel P9000 Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Armor X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel WP2 Mediatek MT6750T, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
CAT S31 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
75.959 Points ∼100% +69%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
47.012 Points ∼62% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (41.7 - 48.9, n=4)
45.3 Points ∼60% +1%
Ulefone Armor 6 (Chrome 71)
45.017 (min: 8) Points ∼59%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=467)
37.7 Points ∼50% -16%
Poptel P60 (Chrome 71)
22.098 Points ∼29% -51%
Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68)
18.86 Points ∼25% -58%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
18.148 Points ∼24% -60%
Oukitel WP2 (Chroome Mobile 70)
15.734 Points ∼21% -65%
CAT S31
12.442 Points ∼16% -72%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points ∼100% +75%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
9095 Points ∼63% +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (8287 - 9059, n=4)
8679 Points ∼60% +5%
Ulefone Armor 6 (Chrome 71)
8287 Points ∼57%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=603)
5838 Points ∼40% -30%
Poptel P60 (Chrome 71)
3998 Points ∼28% -52%
Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68)
3441 Points ∼24% -58%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
3151 Points ∼22% -62%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
3082 Points ∼21% -63%
CAT S31
2010 Points ∼14% -76%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
CAT S31
17827.9 ms * ∼100% -304%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
15875.7 ms * ∼89% -259%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
13902.5 ms * ∼78% -215%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)
13902.5 ms * ∼78% -215%
Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68)
13879.9 ms * ∼78% -214%
Poptel P60 (Chrome 71)
13076.9 ms * ∼73% -196%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=622)
11167 ms * ∼63% -153%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (4309 - 4611, n=4)
4423 ms * ∼25% -0%
Ulefone Armor 6 (Chrome 71)
4416.2 ms * ∼25%
Honor 8X
4247.7 ms * ∼24% +4%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
2713.6 ms * ∼15% +39%

* ... smaller is better

Ulefone Armor 6Poptel P60Poptel P9000 MaxUlefone Armor XOukitel WP2CAT S31Honor 8XXiaomi Pocophone F1Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-26%
-31%
-30%
-41%
27%
27%
-5%
-28%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
72.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
21%
53.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-12%
62.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
47.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-20%
59.5
-1%
68.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
65.8 (58.8 - 73.5, n=9)
9%
47 (19.2 - 87.1, n=355)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
80.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
72.89 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-4%
81.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
72.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-4%
81.8
8%
75.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
77.8 (72.3 - 85.9, n=9)
3%
65.2 (29.8 - 96.5, n=355)
-14%
Random Write 4KB
19.87
15.18
-24%
11.23
-43%
10.17
-49%
13.23
-33%
14.81
-25%
59.87
201%
17.81
-10%
19.4 (8.48 - 59.9, n=11)
-2%
17.7 (0.14 - 250, n=650)
-11%
Random Read 4KB
81.33
69.7
-14%
35.1
-57%
14.7
-82%
26.89
-67%
14.28
-82%
49.54
-39%
101.01
24%
65.4 (20.7 - 86.2, n=11)
-20%
41 (1.59 - 173, n=650)
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB
188.45
188.76
0%
129.64
-31%
82.85
-56%
98.58
-48%
62.13
-67%
169.98
-10%
155.57
-17%
169 (90 - 191, n=11)
-10%
85.5 (2.99 - 253, n=650)
-55%
Sequential Read 256KB
290.76
288.22
-1%
269.44
-7%
255.34
-12%
267.61
-8%
71.06
-76%
283.87
-2%
705.38
143%
264 (144 - 293, n=11)
-9%
240 (12.1 - 912, n=650)
-17%
Max. Load
 30.5 °C30 °C31.6 °C 
 30.8 °C30.4 °C32.5 °C 
 29.4 °C29.9 °C30 °C 
Maximum: 32.5 °C
Average: 30.6 °C
26.1 °C28 °C31.6 °C
25.8 °C28.3 °C31.3 °C
26.2 °C27.1 °C29 °C
Maximum: 31.6 °C
Average: 28.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204038.92528.132.93124.627.54023.4215035.733.76326.127.88025.932.5100254312521.128.41601737.220016.140.425013.546.531516.253.740014.954.750014.759.363014.263.980014.364.9100013.366.1125014.166.5160013.971.4200013.679.9250014.479.9315014.278.8400014.776.1500014.174.8630014.380.1800014.578.21000014.868.11250015.358.91600015.452.2SPL26.488.3N0.867.5median 14.5median 64.9Delta0.812.831.134.129.223.52620.323.22131.928.827.424.82920.524.219.318.4171821.417.422.814.430.615.837.516.347.315.45514.762.116.271.214.776.613.879.11477.314.473.814.171.814.682.314.678.414.476.714.476.114.871.515.270.114.766.314.859.626.988.60.968.6median 14.7median 70.11.418.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseUlefone Armor 6Poptel P60
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Ulefone Armor 6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Poptel P60 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 45.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.16 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 2.04 / 2.09 Watt
Load midlight 3.4 / 7.31 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Ulefone Armor 6
5000 mAh
Poptel P60
5000 mAh
Poptel P9000 Max
9000 mAh
Ulefone Armor X
5500 mAh
Oukitel WP2
10214 mAh
CAT S31
4000 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P60
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
12%
13%
-12%
-3%
12%
-8%
-3%
-1%
4%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.81
10%
0.92
-2%
1.22
-36%
1.14
-27%
0.73
19%
0.92
-2%
0.65
28%
0.813 (0.56 - 1.08, n=4)
10%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=681)
2%
Idle Average *
2.04
2.14
-5%
1.9
7%
2.07
-1%
1.99
2%
2.21
-8%
2.3
-13%
1.97
3%
2.27 (1.72 - 3.3, n=4)
-11%
1.731 (0.6 - 6.2, n=680)
15%
Idle Maximum *
2.09
2.16
-3%
2.19
-5%
2.14
-2%
2.03
3%
2.25
-8%
2.32
-11%
2.01
4%
2.3 (1.76 - 3.3, n=4)
-10%
2.01 (0.74 - 6.6, n=681)
4%
Load Average *
3.4
3.02
11%
3.1
9%
4.92
-45%
3.72
-9%
2.99
12%
4.37
-29%
4.29
-26%
3.63 (3.11 - 4.4, n=4)
-7%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=675)
-19%
Load Maximum *
7.31
4.01
45%
3.12
57%
5.4
26%
5.96
18%
4.12
44%
6.13
16%
9.05
-24%
6.21 (5 - 7.34, n=4)
15%
5.82 (1.2 - 14.2, n=675)
20%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 34min
Ulefone Armor 6
5000 mAh
Poptel P60
5000 mAh
Poptel P9000 Max
9000 mAh
Ulefone Armor X
5500 mAh
Oukitel WP2
10214 mAh
CAT S31
4000 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
874
1214
39%
1346
54%
845
-3%
1146
31%
1074
23%
852
-3%
808
-8%

Pros

+ 做工优良
+ 坚固耐用
+ 128 GB存储空间
+ 高对比度IPS屏幕
+ 不错的相机
+ 续航时间长

Cons

- 笨重
- 令人失望的指纹识别器
- 最高亮度对于户外使用来说不太够
欧乐风Armor 6智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of Ulefone Germany.
欧乐风Armor 6智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of Ulefone Germany.

欧乐风Armor 6是一款极具吸引力且设备齐全的中端智能手机。该设备提供了对元件的良好保护,并且具有较长的续航时间。欧乐风还为Armor 6配备了快速Wi-Fi芯片,合理的相机和高对比度IPS显示屏。不幸的是,它屏幕的最大亮度有点限制了它作为户外智能手机的实用性。

“如果你需要一个户外智能手机,Ulefone Armor 6值得考虑,但只有当价格下降约50欧元才显得合理。在此之前,还有其他类似设备配有更亮的显示器,更适合户外常规使用。”

Helio P60比竞品更强大,但值得一提的是Armor 6也更贵。该设备也有其缺点,例如指纹传感器不准确,在日常生活中几乎无法使用。

总体而言,Armor 6通过提供更强大和更流畅的体验而与竞争对手区别开来。然而,低亮度的屏幕是一个失误,如果你不需要这样的坚固设备,有其他更好的智能手机供您选择。简而言之,欧乐风Armor 6是现在最好的户外智能手机之一,但它的低亮度的屏幕令人失望。

Ulefone Armor 6 - 01/30/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
70 / 75 → 94%
Pointing Device
85%
Connectivity
45 / 60 → 76%
Weight
87%
Battery
98%
Display
86%
Games Performance
44 / 63 → 70%
Application Performance
64 / 70 → 92%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 72%
Camera
66%
Average
76%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 欧乐风Armor 6智能手机评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-02-21 (Update: 2019-02-21)