欧乐风Armor 6智能手机评测

Name: Ulefone Armor 6
Brand: Ulefone

坚固且配置齐全的户外智能手机。 欧乐风Armor 6是一款坚固耐用的中端智能手机，具有全面的功能，拥有从人群中脱颖而出的特性。继续阅读以了解这种厨房水槽的设计是否有效以及Armor 6在我们的测试中的表现如何。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 02/21/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Ulefone

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Ulefone Armor 6 (Armor Series)

Processor

Mediatek Helio P60 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73 / A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G72 MP3

Memory

6 GB

Display

6.20 inch 18.7:9, 2246 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, 多点触控电容屏, IPS LCD, glossy: yes

Storage

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, 116 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: USB-Type-C, Card Reader: 最高128 GB的microSD卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计，指南针，陀螺仪，接近传感器，, OTG，Coulometer，UV传感器， Miracast，LED通知灯，VoLTE，VoWiFI

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900; B2, B3, B5, B8. 2G CDMA: 850, 900; BC0, BC1. 3G WCDMA: 850, 900, 1,700, 1,900, 2,100; B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. 3G TDSCDMA: 1,900, 2015; B34, B39. 4G FDD-LTE: 700, 800, 850, 900, 1,700, 1,800, 1,900, 2,100, 2,600; B1, B2, B3, B4,, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 13.2 x 166 x 83

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP，内插至21 MP和8 MP，内插至13 MP
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP，内插至13 MP

Additional features

Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, USB线，USB OTG线，3.5毫米耳机插孔适配器，充电器, Ulefone , 12 Months Warranty, fanless, ruggedized

Weight

268 g, Power Supply: 68 g

Price

310 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco F1 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	647 (598^min - 665^max) MBit/s +108%
Ulefone Armor 6 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash	311 (292^min - 329^max) MBit/s
Honor 8X Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	182 (136^min - 231^max) MBit/s -41%
Ulefone Armor X PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	103 MBit/s -67%
Oukitel WP2 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash	102 (42^min - 118^max) MBit/s -67%
Poptel P9000 Max Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash	83.2 MBit/s -73%
Poptel P60 Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 128 GB eMMC Flash	67.6 (17^min - 90^max) MBit/s -78%
CAT S31 Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash	39.3 MBit/s -87%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Poco F1 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	675 (630^min - 704^max) MBit/s +96%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s +9%
Ulefone Armor 6 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash	344 (219^min - 350^max) MBit/s
Honor 8X Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	207 (162^min - 243^max) MBit/s -40%
Ulefone Armor X PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	98.3 MBit/s -71%
Oukitel WP2 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash	86.4 (43^min - 107^max) MBit/s -75%
Poptel P9000 Max Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 64 GB eMMC Flash	71.6 MBit/s -79%
CAT S31 Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 16 GB eMMC Flash	41.6 MBit/s -88%
Poptel P60 Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763V, 128 GB eMMC Flash	40.4 (10^min - 55^max) MBit/s -88%

Ulefone Armor 6; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø337 (219-350)

Ulefone Armor 6; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø311 (292-329)

Photo taken with the rear-facing camera in portrait mode

Photo taken with the rear-facing camera with HDR mode enabled

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour


431 cd/m²	428 cd/m²	399 cd/m²
432 cd/m²	418 cd/m²	396 cd/m²
413 cd/m²	406 cd/m²	393 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 432 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 412.9 cd/m² Minimum: 7.12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 418 cd/m²
Contrast: 2090:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24

	Ulefone Armor 6 IPS LCD, 2246x1080, 6.20	Poptel P60 LCD IPS, 2160x1080, 5.70	Poptel P9000 Max LCD IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50	Ulefone Armor X IPS, 1440x720, 5.50	Oukitel WP2 IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00	CAT S31 IPS, 1280x720, 4.70	Honor 8X LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.50	Xiaomi Poco F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Screen		-42%	-57%	-21%	-60%	-10%	-56%	-11%
Brightness middle	418	401 -4%	406 -3%	564 35%	472 13%	784 88%	484 16%	489 17%
Brightness	413	387 -6%	397 -4%	541 31%	456 10%	750 82%	469 14%	486 18%
Brightness Distribution	91	92 1%	90 -1%	91 0%	86 -5%	92 1%	93 2%	93 2%
Black Level *	0.2	0.14 30%	0.38 -90%	0.37 -85%	0.32 -60%	0.45 -125%	0.55 -175%	0.34 -70%
Contrast	2090	2864 37%	1068 -49%	1524 -27%	1475 -29%	1742 -17%	880 -58%	1438 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.5	7.5 -67%	6.7 -49%	5.1 -13%	9.1 -102%	4.28 5%	7.3 -62%	3.8 16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.8	16.1 -137%	13.8 -103%	9.6 -41%	14.8 -118%	8.75 -29%	11.1 -63%	7.1 -4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.3	9.6 -191%	8.5 -158%	5.4 -64%	9.6 -191%	6.1 -85%	7.4 -124%	4.4 -33%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	1.99 ^111%	2.21 ^100%	2.1 ^105%	1.75 ^126%	2.49 ^88%	2.16 ^102%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	7205 ^90%	8242 ^79%	8858 ^73%	7755 ^84%	8713 ^75%	7175 ^91%	8534 ^76%	7213 ^90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 26 ms rise
53.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	9513 Points
Poptel P60	6036 Points -37%
Poptel P9000 Max	4609 Points -52%
Ulefone Armor X	4298 Points -55%
Oukitel WP2	4012 Points -58%
CAT S31	3080 Points -68%
Honor 8X	8939 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco F1	9664 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (8609 - 11387, n=7)	9916 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +59%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	6950 Points
Poptel P60	4778 Points -31%
Poptel P9000 Max	3278 Points -53%
Ulefone Armor X	3184 Points -54%
Oukitel WP2	3042 Points -56%
CAT S31	2300 Points -67%
Honor 8X	7141 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F1	8101 Points +17%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6934 - 7954, n=7)	7309 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +56%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	19616 Points
Poptel P60	10956 Points -44%
Poptel P9000 Max	10129 Points -48%
Ulefone Armor X	4188 Points -79%
Oukitel WP2	8703 Points -56%
CAT S31	5291 Points -73%
Honor 8X	20468 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F1	63159 Points +222%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (17082 - 22323, n=5)	20432 Points +4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	18998 Points
Poptel P60	1152 Points -94%
Poptel P9000 Max	10012 Points -47%
Ulefone Armor X	3585 Points -81%
Oukitel WP2	8830 Points -54%
CAT S31	5042 Points -73%
Honor 8X	21533 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco F1	82125 Points +332%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (16820 - 21847, n=5)	19897 Points +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	22137 Points
Poptel P60	10234 Points -54%
Poptel P9000 Max	10560 Points -52%
Ulefone Armor X	10195 Points -54%
Oukitel WP2	8284 Points -63%
CAT S31	6396 Points -71%
Honor 8X	17450 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco F1	34928 Points +58%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (18065 - 24828, n=5)	22578 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	1008 Points
Poptel P60	654 Points -35%
Poptel P9000 Max	553 Points -45%
Ulefone Armor X	156 Points -85%
Oukitel WP2	123 Points -88%
Honor 8X	1445 Points +43%
Xiaomi Poco F1	5687 Points +464%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1008 - 1755, n=6)	1421 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points +274%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	861 Points
Poptel P60	587 Points -32%
Poptel P9000 Max	480 Points -44%
Ulefone Armor X	129 Points -85%
Oukitel WP2	98 Points -89%
Honor 8X	1280 Points +49%
Xiaomi Poco F1	8261 Points +859%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (861 - 1593, n=6)	1272 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points +386%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	2511 Points
Poptel P60	1365 Points -46%
Poptel P9000 Max	1176 Points -53%
Ulefone Armor X	581 Points -77%
Oukitel WP2	1126 Points -55%
Honor 8X	2645 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco F1	2720 Points +8%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2159 - 2720, n=6)	2494 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	1581 Points
Poptel P60	690 Points -56%
Poptel P9000 Max	550 Points -65%
Ulefone Armor X	200 Points -87%
Oukitel WP2	558 Points -65%
Honor 8X	1485 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco F1	5230 Points +231%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1309 - 1817, n=6)	1649 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +491%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	1441 Points
Poptel P60	599 Points -58%
Poptel P9000 Max	477 Points -67%
Ulefone Armor X	167 Points -88%
Oukitel WP2	491 Points -66%
Honor 8X	1316 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco F1	6898 Points +379%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1159 - 1680, n=6)	1495 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +1035%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	2765 Points
Poptel P60	1476 Points -47%
Poptel P9000 Max	1178 Points -57%
Ulefone Armor X	658 Points -76%
Oukitel WP2	1072 Points -61%
Honor 8X	2697 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco F1	2832 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2388 - 2924, n=6)	2664 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	733 Points
Poptel P60	439 Points -40%
Poptel P9000 Max	383 Points -48%
Ulefone Armor X	107 Points -85%
Oukitel WP2	184 Points -75%
CAT S31	0 Points -100%
Honor 8X	945 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco F1	3972 Points +442%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (733 - 1273, n=8)	1052 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)	2755 Points +276%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	628 Points
Poptel P60	386 Points -39%
Poptel P9000 Max	322 Points -49%
Ulefone Armor X	87 Points -86%
Oukitel WP2	149 Points -76%
CAT S31	0 Points -100%
Honor 8X	798 Points +27%
Xiaomi Poco F1	4746 Points +656%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (628 - 1119, n=8)	910 Points +45%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)	2751 Points +338%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	2478 Points
Poptel P60	1374 Points -45%
Poptel P9000 Max	1118 Points -55%
Ulefone Armor X	585 Points -76%
Oukitel WP2	1054 Points -57%
CAT S31	560 Points -77%
Honor 8X	2663 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco F1	2528 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2149 - 2528, n=8)	2455 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)	3163 Points +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	1037 Points
Poptel P60	457 Points -56%
Poptel P9000 Max	384 Points -63%
Ulefone Armor X	125 Points -88%
Oukitel WP2	399 Points -62%
Honor 8X	950 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F1	3669 Points +254%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (853 - 1282, n=8)	1116 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)	6737 Points +550%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	881 Points
Poptel P60	382 Points -57%
Poptel P9000 Max	321 Points -64%
Ulefone Armor X	102 Points -88%
Oukitel WP2	343 Points -61%
Honor 8X	801 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco F1	4468 Points +407%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (721 - 1122, n=8)	964 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)	9723 Points +1004%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	2675 Points
Poptel P60	1455 Points -46%
Poptel P9000 Max	1205 Points -55%
Ulefone Armor X	645 Points -76%
Oukitel WP2	920 Points -66%
Honor 8X	2702 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F1	2257 Points -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2013 - 2918, n=8)	2540 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)	4224 Points +58%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	32 fps
Poptel P60	22 fps -31%
Poptel P9000 Max	16 fps -50%
Ulefone Armor X	9.2 fps -71%
Oukitel WP2	15 fps -53%
CAT S31	9.8 fps -69%
Honor 8X	36 fps +13%
Xiaomi Poco F1	60 fps +88%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (31 - 40, n=6)	34.2 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +164%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	34 fps
Poptel P60	21 fps -38%
Poptel P9000 Max	17 fps -50%
Ulefone Armor X	5.9 fps -83%
Oukitel WP2	17 fps -50%
CAT S31	5.6 fps -84%
Honor 8X	39 fps +15%
Xiaomi Poco F1	150 fps +341%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (30 - 38, n=6)	35.8 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +626%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	17 fps
Poptel P60	10 fps -41%
Poptel P9000 Max	6.8 fps -60%
Ulefone Armor X	5.1 fps -70%
Oukitel WP2	6.7 fps -61%
CAT S31	4.3 fps -75%
Honor 8X	19 fps +12%
Xiaomi Poco F1	58 fps +241%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (17 - 29, n=6)	20.2 fps +19%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +325%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	18 fps
Poptel P60	10 fps -44%
Poptel P9000 Max	6.8 fps -62%
Ulefone Armor X	2.7 fps -85%
Oukitel WP2	7.1 fps -61%
CAT S31	1.9 fps -89%
Honor 8X	21 fps +17%
Xiaomi Poco F1	71 fps +294%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (16 - 21, n=6)	19.2 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +681%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	11 fps
Poptel P60	6.3 fps -43%
Poptel P9000 Max	4.6 fps -58%
Ulefone Armor X	3.3 fps -70%
Oukitel WP2	4.5 fps -59%
Honor 8X	13 fps +18%
Xiaomi Poco F1	54 fps +391%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (11 - 20, n=6)	12.5 fps +14%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +454%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	12 fps
Poptel P60	6.6 fps -45%
Poptel P9000 Max	4.5 fps -62%
Ulefone Armor X	1.6 fps -87%
Honor 8X	14 fps +17%
Xiaomi Poco F1	35 fps +192%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (9.6 - 12, n=6)	11.6 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +725%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	7 fps
Poptel P60	3.8 fps -46%
Poptel P9000 Max	2.4 fps -66%
Ulefone Armor X	1.6 fps -77%
Oukitel WP2	2.4 fps -66%
Honor 8X	6.4 fps -9%
Xiaomi Poco F1	33 fps +371%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6.7 - 7.4, n=6)	7.03 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +520%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	7 fps
Poptel P60	3.8 fps -46%
Poptel P9000 Max	2.4 fps -66%
Ulefone Armor X	0.9 fps -87%
Oukitel WP2	2.5 fps -64%
Honor 8X	7.6 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco F1	35 fps +400%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (5.8 - 7.7, n=6)	7.05 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +756%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	6.9 fps
Poptel P60	3.7 fps -46%
Oukitel WP2	2 fps -71%
Honor 8X	5.2 fps -25%
Xiaomi Poco F1	31 fps +349%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6.6 - 8.6, n=7)	7.5 fps +9%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)	44 fps +538%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	7.6 fps
Poptel P60	3.8 fps -50%
Oukitel WP2	2.3 fps -70%
Honor 8X	4.6 fps -39%
Xiaomi Poco F1	32 fps +321%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6.2 - 8.3, n=7)	7.63 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)	64.3 fps +746%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	2.6 fps
Poptel P60	1.4 fps -46%
Oukitel WP2	1.3 fps -50%
Honor 8X	4.1 fps +58%
Xiaomi Poco F1	22 fps +746%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2.6 - 6.4, n=7)	4.49 fps +73%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)	32.8 fps +1162%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	4.3 fps
Poptel P60	2.2 fps -49%
Oukitel WP2	0.86 fps -80%
Honor 8X	2.6 fps -40%
Xiaomi Poco F1	14 fps +226%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2.1 - 4.3, n=7)	2.87 fps -33%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)	25.6 fps +495%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	131861 Points
Poptel P60	83745 Points -36%
Poptel P9000 Max	54819 Points -58%
Ulefone Armor X	46435 Points -65%
Oukitel WP2	51621 Points -61%
Honor 8X	140188 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco F1	263165 Points +100%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (119367 - 138589, n=5)	131946 Points 0%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	105997 Points
Poptel P60	64189 Points -39%
Ulefone Armor X	37586 Points -65%
Oukitel WP2	42273 Points -60%
CAT S31	24865 Points -77%
Honor 8X	112870 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco F1	227026 Points +114%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (91667 - 110668, n=4)	102435 Points -3%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	2062 Points
Poptel P60	384 Points -81%
Poptel P9000 Max	308 Points -85%
Ulefone Armor X	206 Points -90%
Oukitel WP2	295 Points -86%
CAT S31	1 Points -100%
Honor 8X	2410 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco F1	3838 Points +86%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1830 - 2096, n=4)	1980 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +179%
System (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	4736 Points
Poptel P60	2465 Points -48%
Poptel P9000 Max	1868 Points -61%
Ulefone Armor X	1491 Points -69%
Oukitel WP2	1330 Points -72%
CAT S31	899 Points -81%
Honor 8X	5529 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco F1	6506 Points +37%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (3817 - 4736, n=4)	4114 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +104%
Memory (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	2276 Points
Poptel P60	1136 Points -50%
Poptel P9000 Max	779 Points -66%
Ulefone Armor X	900 Points -60%
Oukitel WP2	926 Points -59%
CAT S31	328 Points -86%
Honor 8X	4360 Points +92%
Xiaomi Poco F1	3239 Points +42%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1958 - 2721, n=4)	2276 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +175%
Graphics (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	1486 Points
Poptel P60	866 Points -42%
Poptel P9000 Max	641 Points -57%
Ulefone Armor X	188 Points -87%
Oukitel WP2	642 Points -57%
CAT S31	256 Points -83%
Honor 8X	1456 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco F1	7945 Points +435%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1262 - 1590, n=4)	1468 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +857%
Web (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor 6	1128 Points
Poptel P60	10 Points -99%
Poptel P9000 Max	10 Points -99%
Ulefone Armor X	7 Points -99%
Oukitel WP2	10 Points -99%
CAT S31	10 Points -99%
Honor 8X	1207 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco F1	1296 Points +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1083 - 1161, n=4)	1130 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +33%

Legend

Ulefone Armor 6 Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Poptel P60 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Poptel P9000 Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Ulefone Armor X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Oukitel WP2 Mediatek MT6750T, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

CAT S31 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Average Mediatek Helio P60

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points +132%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	76 Points +69%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)	47.01 Points +4%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (41.7 - 48.9, n=6)	45.8 Points +2%
Ulefone Armor 6 (Chrome 71)	45.02 (8^min) Points
Poptel P60 (Chrome 71)	22.1 Points -51%
Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68)	18.86 Points -58%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)	18.15 Points -60%
Oukitel WP2 (Chroome Mobile 70)	15.73 Points -65%
CAT S31	12.44 Points -72%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)	33503 Points +304%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	14514 Points +75%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)	9095 Points +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (8287 - 10257, n=7)	8975 Points +8%
Ulefone Armor 6 (Chrome 71)	8287 Points
Poptel P60 (Chrome 71)	3998 Points -52%
Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68)	3441 Points -58%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)	3151 Points -62%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)	3082 Points -63%
CAT S31	2010 Points -76%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
CAT S31	17828 ms * -304%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)	15876 ms * -260%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)	13903 ms * -215%
Oukitel WP2 (Chrome Mobile 70)	13903 ms * -215%
Poptel P9000 Max (Chrome 68)	13880 ms * -214%
Poptel P60 (Chrome 71)	13077 ms * -196%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (4309 - 4773, n=6)	4486 ms * -2%
Ulefone Armor 6 (Chrome 71)	4416 ms *
Honor 8X	4248 ms * +4%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	2714 ms * +39%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +64%

* ... smaller is better

	Ulefone Armor 6	Poptel P60	Poptel P9000 Max	Ulefone Armor X	Oukitel WP2	CAT S31	Honor 8X	Xiaomi Poco F1	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-2%	-26%	-31%	-30%	-41%	27%	27%	30%	596%
Sequential Read 256KB	290.8	288.2 -1%	269.4 -7%	255.3 -12%	267.6 -8%	71.1 -76%	283.9 -2%	705 142%	283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=74) -3%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 419%
Sequential Write 256KB	188.4	188.8 0%	129.6 -31%	82.8 -56%	98.6 -48%	62.1 -67%	170 -10%	155.6 -17%	193 ?(72.3 - 314, n=74) 2%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 493%
Random Read 4KB	81.3	69.7 -14%	35.1 -57%	14.7 -82%	26.89 -67%	14.28 -82%	49.54 -39%	101 24%	82.4 ?(8.63 - 247, n=74) 1%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 204%
Random Write 4KB	19.87	15.18 -24%	11.23 -43%	10.17 -49%	13.23 -33%	14.81 -25%	59.9 201%	17.81 -10%	54 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=74) 172%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 1269%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	75.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	80 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	72.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -4%	81.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8%	72.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -4%	81.8 8%	75.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	85.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%	78.1 ?(29.2 - 153.8, n=34) 3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	60.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	72.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 21%	53.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -11%	62.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	47.92 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -20%	59.5 -1%	68.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%	65.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 9%	61.8 ?(26.1 - 81.9, n=34) 3%

Max. Load

Idle


30.5 °C	30 °C	31.6 °C
30.8 °C	30.4 °C	32.5 °C
29.4 °C	29.9 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 32.5 °C
Average: 30.6 °C


26.1 °C	28 °C	31.6 °C
25.8 °C	28.3 °C	31.3 °C
26.2 °C	27.1 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 31.6 °C
Average: 28.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 29.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Ulefone Armor 6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Poptel P60 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 45.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.16 Watt
Idle	0.9 / 2.04 / 2.09 Watt
Load	3.4 / 7.31 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Ulefone Armor 6 5000 mAh	Poptel P60 5000 mAh	Poptel P9000 Max 9000 mAh	Ulefone Armor X 5500 mAh	Oukitel WP2 10214 mAh	CAT S31 4000 mAh	Honor 8X 3750 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio P60	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		12%	13%	-12%	-3%	12%	-8%	-3%	-6%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.81 10%	0.92 -2%	1.22 -36%	1.14 -27%	0.73 19%	0.92 -2%	0.65 28%	0.97 ?(0.56 - 1.8, n=6) -8%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Average *	2.04	2.14 -5%	1.9 7%	2.07 -1%	1.99 2%	2.21 -8%	2.3 -13%	1.97 3%	2.36 ?(1.72 - 3.3, n=6) -16%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 29%
Idle Maximum *	2.09	2.16 -3%	2.19 -5%	2.14 -2%	2.03 3%	2.25 -8%	2.32 -11%	2.01 4%	2.41 ?(1.76 - 3.4, n=6) -15%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 22%
Load Average *	3.4	3.02 11%	3.1 9%	4.92 -45%	3.72 -9%	2.99 12%	4.37 -29%	4.29 -26%	3.53 ?(2.74 - 4.4, n=6) -4%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -63%
Load Maximum *	7.31	4.01 45%	3.12 57%	5.4 26%	5.96 18%	4.12 44%	6.13 16%	9.05 -24%	6.45 ?(5 - 8.3, n=6) 12%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -14%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		14h 34min

	Ulefone Armor 6 5000 mAh	Poptel P60 5000 mAh	Poptel P9000 Max 9000 mAh	Ulefone Armor X 5500 mAh	Oukitel WP2 10214 mAh	CAT S31 4000 mAh	Honor 8X 3750 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	874	1214 39%	1346 54%	845 -3%	1146 31%	1074 23%	852 -3%	808 -8%

Pros

+ 做工优良

+ 坚固耐用

+ 128 GB存储空间

+ 高对比度IPS屏幕

+ 不错的相机

+ 续航时间长

Cons

- 笨重

- 令人失望的指纹识别器

- 最高亮度对于户外使用来说不太够

欧乐风Armor 6智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of Ulefone Germany.

欧乐风Armor 6是一款极具吸引力且设备齐全的中端智能手机。该设备提供了对元件的良好保护，并且具有较长的续航时间。欧乐风还为Armor 6配备了快速Wi-Fi芯片，合理的相机和高对比度IPS显示屏。不幸的是，它屏幕的最大亮度有点限制了它作为户外智能手机的实用性。

“如果你需要一个户外智能手机，Ulefone Armor 6值得考虑，但只有当价格下降约50欧元才显得合理。在此之前，还有其他类似设备配有更亮的显示器，更适合户外常规使用。”

Helio P60比竞品更强大，但值得一提的是Armor 6也更贵。该设备也有其缺点，例如指纹传感器不准确，在日常生活中几乎无法使用。

总体而言，Armor 6通过提供更强大和更流畅的体验而与竞争对手区别开来。然而，低亮度的屏幕是一个失误，如果你不需要这样的坚固设备，有其他更好的智能手机供您选择。简而言之，欧乐风Armor 6是现在最好的户外智能手机之一，但它的低亮度的屏幕令人失望。

Ulefone Armor 6 - 2019-01-30 01/30/2019 v6^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

88%

Keyboard

70 / 75 → 94%

Pointing Device

85%

Connectivity

45 / 60 → 76%

Weight

87%

Battery

98%

Display

86%

Games Performance

44 / 63 → 70%

Application Performance

64 / 70 → 92%

Temperature

94%

Noise

100%

Audio

66 / 91 → 72%

Camera

66%

Average

76%

84%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 9942 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 欧乐风Armor 6智能手机评测

Marcus Herbrich, 2019-02-21 (Update: 2019-02-21)

欧乐风Armor 6智能手机评测

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Ulefone Armor 6 audio analysis

Poptel P60 audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare