Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 10 scores (from 16 reviews)
Reviews for the Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Source: Techradar
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionApple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Laptop Mag
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe updated MacBook packs more performance and battery life into a wonderfully thin and light design, but Apple didn't address the biggest drawbacks.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tab Times
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionAs a Mac user of many years, the 12-inch Macbook definitely requires a compromise in the way I work. For example, my 15-inch Macbook Pro with Retina Display powers a two screen set up and the Macbook 2016 is incapable of doing that, especially as none of Apple’s official adapters currently offer DisplayPort functionality. Ironically, Google makes a USB Type-C to DisplayPort adapter that is perfect for this task, but with the limitations of a single port, the Macbook doesn’t stack up to my particular usage.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Pocket Lint
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe 12-inch MacBook has divided opinion since day one, having done-away with a full-size USB port for the smaller USB Type-C. A couple of years down the line and this will be a more standard format, but the bigger issue is the MacBook's persistence to offer just one of these ports for both charging and connectivity. If you're a casual or cloud-based user that won't be a big issue though. Just as we said of the first iteration: the 12-inch MacBook is all about portability; it's a laptop so thin, so sleek, so light, that everything else has been pushed by the wayside.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionApple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Laptop Mag
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Slashgear
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionI'll be sticking with my first-gen MacBook, then, though that's not going to stop me recommending it to those who travel frequently, have mainstream needs for processing, and who are willing to pay a premium for OS X on a notebook that's still a relatively rare sight in the wild. Apple doesn't expect it to be the Mac for every user: that's why it's not the only Mac. Just make sure you're going into it with your eyes wide open.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/02/2016
Source: It Pro
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe 12in Retina MacBook isn’t for everyone. If you value portability and battery life above all and predominately use wireless peripherals as well as cloud apps and storage, then this MacBook will be a great fit. If you use lots of demanding applications, need to connect lots of wired peripherals or just can’t get on with the low-travel keyboard, then one of Apple’s more conventional MacBooks will be a better choice.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Engadget
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionApple deserves credit for improving the MacBook's battery life and disk speeds, but other than that, this is, for better and worse, the same machine as last year's model. If you previously shied away from the 12-inch MacBook because of the "one port" thing, this still isn't the laptop for you.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Laptop Mag
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIn hands-on use, the new MacBook feels almost exactly like the previous version. If you've got the 2015 MacBook, there's no need to upgrade, but if you were holding off to see what the second generation looked like, the potential boost to performance and battery life makes me feel even more confident about using this as primary laptop, especially for frequent travelers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/08/2016
Source: Spiegel Online
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/30/2016
Source: Mobileimho.ru
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: 3DNews.ru
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/12/2016
Source: Ferra.ru
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/21/2016
Comment
Intel HD Graphics 515:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
6Y54: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.