Acer Chromebook CB314-2HT-NX.AWGEK.003
Specifications

Acer Chromebook CB314-2HT-NX.AWGEK.003 (Chromebook 314 Series)
Processor
Mediatek MT8183 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Memory
8 GB  
, DDR4
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
 128GB
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.7 x 325.4 x 232
Battery
, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 15 h
Operating System
Google Chrome OS
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet
Weight
1.5 kg
Price
350 Euro
Price comparison
                    
                    Average Score: 
Average of 2 scores (from 2 reviews)
Average of 2 scores (from 2 reviews)
Reviews for the Acer Chromebook CB314-2HT-NX.AWGEK.003
 Acer Chromebook 314 CB314-2H Review
Source: ARS Guide EN→zh-CN
 EN→zh-CN
For the price, the Acer Chromebook 314 CB314-2H is a fine Chromebook. It’s usable, and while not exactly speedy, it’s fast enough for simple, everyday tasks. Yet, we still keep coming back to that underwhelming screen and feel that it would have been a much better option with a bit more oomph. If budgets are tight and you just need something workable for college or surfing the web, reading emails, and watching videos, there’s enough to like about this 314. Beyond that, there’s not enough here for this Chromebook to stand out.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/07/2024
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: ARS Guide
 EN→zh-CN
 EN→zh-CNFor the price, the Acer Chromebook 314 CB314-2H is a fine Chromebook. It’s usable, and while not exactly speedy, it’s fast enough for simple, everyday tasks. Yet, we still keep coming back to that underwhelming screen and feel that it would have been a much better option with a bit more oomph. If budgets are tight and you just need something workable for college or surfing the web, reading emails, and watching videos, there’s enough to like about this 314. Beyond that, there’s not enough here for this Chromebook to stand out.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/07/2024
Rating: Total score: 86%
 Acer Chromebook 314 (NX.AWGEK.003) review: Too much Chromebook for too little?
Source: Expert Reviews EN→zh-CN
 EN→zh-CN
Up to a point, the Chromebook 314 does a pretty good job of convincing you that you’re using a mid-range £400 Chromebook, even though you’ve spent £100 less. However, neither the touchpad nor the keyboard get the feel quite right, while the performance keeps reminding you that this is still a low-end laptop. If you’re only interested in browsing and using Google’s Workspace apps, you’ll probably get by, but for anything else you’re going to wish you had splashed out a little more on something faster. Even then, we’d recommend the cheaper non-touchscreen option. It has less storage but it’s arguably better value.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/20/2022
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews
 EN→zh-CN
 EN→zh-CNUp to a point, the Chromebook 314 does a pretty good job of convincing you that you’re using a mid-range £400 Chromebook, even though you’ve spent £100 less. However, neither the touchpad nor the keyboard get the feel quite right, while the performance keeps reminding you that this is still a low-end laptop. If you’re only interested in browsing and using Google’s Workspace apps, you’ll probably get by, but for anything else you’re going to wish you had splashed out a little more on something faster. Even then, we’d recommend the cheaper non-touchscreen option. It has less storage but it’s arguably better value.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/20/2022
Rating: Total score: 60%
Comment
ARM Mali-G72 MP3:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT8183: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

