ZTE Axon Mini Premium
Specifications
ZTE Axon Mini Premium (Axon Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 8 x 1.7 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 405
Memory
3 GB
Display
5.20 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, 3-Punkt-Touch, kapazitiv, druckempfindlich, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 22.51 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3,5 mm Klinkenbuchse, Card Reader: microSD bis zu 128 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Fingerabdruck-Identifikation, Iris-Scan, 3D Force-Touch; Bewegungssensor, Annäherungssensor, Lichtsensor,
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0, Cat 4 LTE (700/800/900/1.800/2.100/2.600 MHz); GSM/UMTS (850/900/1.800/1.900 MHz), WCDMA (900/2.100 MHz), Dual SIM, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 143.5 x 70
Battery
2800 mAh, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 24 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 24 h
Operating System
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix Videos @720p
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix Autofokus, Doppel-LED-Blitz, Videos @1080p
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix Autofokus, Doppel-LED-Blitz, Videos @1080p
Additional features
Speakers: Monolautsprecher, Keyboard: virtuelle QWERTZ-Tastatur, Keyboard Light: yes, Modulares Netzteil mit USB-Kabel, Stereo-Headset, Schutzhülle, Kurzanleitung, Google Paket, AccuWeather WPS Office, Perfect Piano, Virenscanner, Soundrekorder, Sprachassistent, AliveShare, 24 Months Warranty, Dual-SIM, Formfaktor: Nano-SIM (1x shared mit microSD), fanless
Weight
140 g, Power Supply: 56 g
Price
389 Euro
Links
Price comparison
Average Score:
Average of 11 scores (from 12 reviews)
Average of 11 scores (from 12 reviews)
price: 80%, performance: 64%, features: 64%, display: 89% mobility: 85%, workmanship: 75%, ergonomy: 81%, emissions: 96%
Reviews for the ZTE Axon Mini Premium
ZTE Axon Mini Premium Smartphone Review | Notebookcheck
Pressure sensitive. ZTE's Axon Mini Premium Edition has a total of three methods for unlocking the screen: Force Touch, fingerprint reader and iris scanner - and that in the upper mid-range! The configuration is impressive and everyday performance is good. However, it has some shortcomings.
Pressure sensitive. ZTE's Axon Mini Premium Edition has a total of three methods for unlocking the screen: Force Touch, fingerprint reader and iris scanner - and that in the upper mid-range! The configuration is impressive and everyday performance is good. However, it has some shortcomings.
ZTE Axon Mini Review: In Depth
Source: Recombu
EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At just under £230, the ZTE Axon Mini is for the most part a handset worth considering. The UI needs a lot of work and the phone as a whole could have been refined a little more before hitting the market, but it boasts respectable performance, a nice screen, a surprisingly good camera and a solid feature set for the price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Recombu
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionAt just under £230, the ZTE Axon Mini is for the most part a handset worth considering. The UI needs a lot of work and the phone as a whole could have been refined a little more before hitting the market, but it boasts respectable performance, a nice screen, a surprisingly good camera and a solid feature set for the price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
ZTE Axon Mini (Premium Edition) review
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I wouldn’t recommend the Axon Mini over other mid-range options. It’s got a good screen, is a quick device when it works, and has some nice extra features, such as the pressure-sensitive touch screen. But having experienced performance issues and finding myself still confused by the phone's downright strange design, I can’t really say it’s worth going with ZTE over better-known brands. I can’t think of why you would choose the Axon Mini over say the OnePlus X. ZTE’s device is slightly more expensive than the OnePlus, and if my experience is anything to go by, sometimes it won’t even work.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 80% performance: 50% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 40%
Source: Trusted Reviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionI wouldn’t recommend the Axon Mini over other mid-range options. It’s got a good screen, is a quick device when it works, and has some nice extra features, such as the pressure-sensitive touch screen. But having experienced performance issues and finding myself still confused by the phone's downright strange design, I can’t really say it’s worth going with ZTE over better-known brands. I can’t think of why you would choose the Axon Mini over say the OnePlus X. ZTE’s device is slightly more expensive than the OnePlus, and if my experience is anything to go by, sometimes it won’t even work.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 80% performance: 50% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 40%
ZTE Axon Mini review
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you’ve felt that we’ve been too critical of the smartphone thus far – it is this price point that caused us to be. Well, that and the fact that we really liked the vanilla Android-toting Axon Pro. The Mini packs a lot of tech, impressive on paper but not so much in real life. Force Touch – great, but unresponsive and unnatural-feeling; fingerprint scanner – awesome, but not quick or reliable; iris scanner and voice unlock – clunky and impractical; 13 MP camera sounds great, but performs worse than some cheaper handsets we’ve reviewed. It feels more like a tech fan’s toy than an actual, fleshed out upper-midrange smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Phone Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIf you’ve felt that we’ve been too critical of the smartphone thus far – it is this price point that caused us to be. Well, that and the fact that we really liked the vanilla Android-toting Axon Pro. The Mini packs a lot of tech, impressive on paper but not so much in real life. Force Touch – great, but unresponsive and unnatural-feeling; fingerprint scanner – awesome, but not quick or reliable; iris scanner and voice unlock – clunky and impractical; 13 MP camera sounds great, but performs worse than some cheaper handsets we’ve reviewed. It feels more like a tech fan’s toy than an actual, fleshed out upper-midrange smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 40%
The Axon Mini gets some Premium treatment with its pressure-sensitive display
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall the Axon Mini is an interesting device, ZTE has added quite a bit of extra value with the pressure-sensitive display, the fingerprint reader and the high-end audio. The 3GB of RAM is also good to see, as is 32GB of storage. The main thing I feel that lets down the phone is the processor, it isn’t a deal breaker, but having a better processor would seem more appropriate alongside all those extra features.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/21/2015
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 80% display: 95% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Authority
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionOverall the Axon Mini is an interesting device, ZTE has added quite a bit of extra value with the pressure-sensitive display, the fingerprint reader and the high-end audio. The 3GB of RAM is also good to see, as is 32GB of storage. The main thing I feel that lets down the phone is the processor, it isn’t a deal breaker, but having a better processor would seem more appropriate alongside all those extra features.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/21/2015
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 80% display: 95% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
ZTE Axon Mini
Source: Chinahandys.net
DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
ZTE Axon Mini
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computerbild
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
ZTE Axon Mini (Premium Edition)
Source: Connect - Heft 7/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Connect - Heft 7/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 83%
Zte Axon Mini
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/12/2016
Source: Android Mag
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/12/2016
3D Touch für die Mittelklasse
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 82% display: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: Curved
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 82% display: 90% mobility: 90%
ZTE AXON mini
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/14/2016
Source: Android Mag
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/14/2016
ZTE Axon Mini – Der Druck macht den Unterschied
Source: Android TV DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android TV
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 100% workmanship: 80%
ZTE Axon Mini
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 92%
Source: MobiFlip
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 92%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 405:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
616 MSM8939v2: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
