LG X Power K220
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.4
Price comparison
Average of 23 scores (from 42 reviews)
Reviews for the LG X Power K220
持久续航.LG X Power手机试图用低价以及大容量的电池来说服消费者。这家来自韩国的制造商同时也赋予了这台手机快充的功能以及能用来给亲朋好友手机充电的USB OTG功能。让我们在这片评测里看看这个巨大容量的电池究竟可以续航多久,以及这台智能手机的其他闪光点吧。
Source: Yugatech
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionGlobal brands are now making their effort to catch up with local bang-for-the-buck competitors, and the LG X Power is indeed a surprise for us as it’s a phone unexpected for a global brand> At Php8,495, the phone can compete with other devices in its price range with its long-lasting power, good rear optics and capable performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/22/2017
Source: PC Mag
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionFor the price, the LG X Power is a capable phone for Boost Mobile users that can keep you browsing, texting, and talking for hours longer than most comparable devices. The Samsung Galaxy J7 gets you a brighter AMOLED display, a sharper camera, and features like NFC and dual-band Wi-Fi, but it'll cost you $70 more. The LG Stylo 2 is more affordable and has some useful stylus-optimized features, but it's held back by an aging processor.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Good Gear Guide
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionFor a phone that's all about the battery, we expected this to last even longer - like its rivals do. The camera is poor in low light and the components are low powered. There's not much to like here.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Ausdroid
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWho is this phone for? This phone is really for those out there who do not require a flagship phone with the fastest processor or the most stylish design. This is for the average Joe and Jill who want a phone that just works and lasts for a long time before needing to be charged. Sure it may not interact with Android Auto as it should but there was a way around that, but once again, the people who this phone is targetted at are unlikely to use Android Auto. This would be the perfect phone for my mother, my father, probably even my wife, and especially younger kids who MUST have a phone but do not require the best phone around.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/07/2016
Source: Digital Trends
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe LG X Power has a name that may suggest powerful performance, but it’s all about the battery. This mid-ranger isn’t a device made to impress, and it’s really meant for users who don’t do that much on their phones yet often complain about battery life. If messaging and social media are your primary uses, whereas gaming and video are not, the X Power is well suited for you.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 55%
Source: Phone Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWhen you draw the line, the LG X Power hits a few home runs: its battery life topped our charts and that’s truly special. The phone will last you two and even three days on a single charge, something that those owning flagships will envy you for.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: BC Hardware
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionValue is pretty decent as you can pick up this device off-contract at major carriers up here in Canada for $249 CAD. In the USA you should be able to pick it up for well under $200 and depending on where you pick it up, it could be unlocked. At the start of testing, only Bell was carrying it here in the Great White North, but now it's available almost everywhere. Overall this phone is great and delivers on LGs promise of a phone with a huge battery that isn't a huge device. If you're looking for a phone that you'll have to charge a couple times a week instead of a couple times a day, this is about your only choice. As I mentioned earlier, there are a few things that could be better, but overall it won't disappoint; not for the price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/12/2016
Source: Mobile Syrup
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionNow we return to the question posed at the beginning of this review: is the LG X Power good enough to be someone’s starter phone? My answer would have to be no. I wish for the sake of its glorious battery, that I could recommend it, but it’s many flaws disallow me from doing so in good conscience. There are simply better options in the same range.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/11/2016
Source: Smartphone Magazin - 2/2017

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 97%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - 2/2017

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 89%
Source: Chip.de
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 74% features: 66% display: 74% mobility: 99%
Source: Inside Handy
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Connect - 01/2017

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: A1 Blog
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2016
Source: Teltarif
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 100%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/23/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: WinFuture
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/06/2016
Source: Turn On
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/05/2016
Source: WinFuture
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/06/2016
Source: Movil Zona
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Source: Zona Movilidad
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/31/2016
Source: El Androide Libre
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Long, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Xataka
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 75% display: 60% mobility: 98% workmanship: 60%
Source: Tuexperto
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: Computerhoy
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: Esperienza Mobile
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 85% performance: 60% display: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/11/2016
Source: Geek 4 You
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Smartphone Italia
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/20/2016
Rating: price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 100% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Techzilla.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/14/2016
Source: Androidiani
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/06/2016
Source: Androidiani
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/06/2016
Source: Key for web
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 77%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 79% display: 69% mobility: 90% workmanship: 85%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 85% display: 76% mobility: 95% workmanship: 1% ergonomy: 86%
Source: 90 Sekund
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 46% performance: 70% features: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 30%
Source: Tabletowo
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 75% display: 70% mobility: 95% workmanship: 70%
Source: Spiders Web
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/14/2016
Source: Android.com.pl
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/31/2016
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2017
Comment
ARM Mali-T720 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6735:
64位四核的系统芯片(4个ARM Cortex-A53核心),主频最高1.5 GHz,面向低价平板电脑和智能手机。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
