HTC 10 Evo
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix BSI sensor, ƒ/2.0
Price comparison
Average of 14 scores (from 29 reviews)
Reviews for the HTC 10 Evo
Source: PC Authority
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe HTC 10 evo isn’t awful, and the earbuds are effective, but at $710 it offers poor value for money. If that’s your budget, buy the similarly priced OnePlus 3T instead – or alternatively, find a good deal on the HTC 10.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: GSM Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWe spent just over a week writing this review and in that time, the price of the HTC 10 evo fell from around €500 to €450. That's more palatable, but we think it has room to go lower. Then we could conceive recommending this phone - for all its flaws, it does shine on occasion.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/21/2017
Source: Toptenreviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIn the great scheme of things this isn’t a terrible phone, but there’s no good reason to choose it over others.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/15/2017
Source: T Break
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionOverall, the HTC 10 evo is good device from HTC that I think could have been much better and faster had HTC used a better chipset. It has a beautiful design, highly impressive audio capabilities and a really good but slow camera. But in the price range for AED 1800, there are devices that offer better bang for your money.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% performance: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Stuff TV
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe big question mark right now is price. In the US, where the Evo is known as the HTC Bolt, you can only get one on Sprint and it'll set you back US$600, which pushes it out of contention. We'll have to pay £420 here in the UK, which is better, but still more than the OnePlus 3T.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Evo is a phone that does most things ok, but fails to excite and makes bizarre choice along the way. There are better options out there'
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionAlthough HTC hasn't confirmed the price yet, it says the 10 Evo will be the best in its class - of £450 to £500 phones. However, that conveniently ignores cheaper phones such as the OnePlus 3 which has a faster processor, more RAM and more storage, and it certainly makes the newcomer appear overpriced even considering its IP57 rating and its clever headphones. However, we'll update this with a definitive conclusion once we've spent more time with the phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: Pocket Lint
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe HTC 10 Evo presents a strange combination of specs. On the one side there's stellar audio performance, hampered by the lack of a conventional 3.5mm headphone socket, there's great performance, but with and older chipset that does still seem to get a little warm.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobile Choice
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThis phone is an absolute cracker. Apart from the slight off-note with the older processor, its specs check out and that gorgeous unimetal body is absolutely stunning.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: Chip.de
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% features: 89% display: 86% mobility: 65%
Source: Curved
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 84% display: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: Inside Handy
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Pit
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: Curved
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: Netzwelt
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: Toms Hardware Italia
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: 90 Sekund
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 50% features: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: XT Mobile
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/03/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/08/2017
Source: Zing
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/25/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/22/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/26/2016
Source: Tek.no
NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tweak.dk
DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Mobil.se
SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 78%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 430:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
810 MSM8994: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
