Notebookcheck

DevilTech HellMachine 笔记本测评

Florian Glaser, 12/17/2012
Ivy Bridge Gaming

两倍. 之后,我们已在审议GeForce®(精视™)GTX680M SLI在几个星期前,一个SLI配置两个GTX-670MX-GPU(图形处理器)的正视我们的基准。 Deviltech是世界上第一家提供这样一个17英寸的笔记本电脑。幕启地狱机器上。

Deviltech HellMachine

Editor's Note (December 14, 2012): The following review has not yet been edited for grammatical errors. A final draft of the review will be released soon.

For the original German review, see here.

The HellMachine lives up to its name. The desktop replacement available from 1,489 Euro upwards, is mainly aimed at avid gamers. It is based on the 419 x 293 x 54 mm big and nearly 4 kg heavy Clevo-P370EM barebone, which we had already reviewed in the form of Schenker's XMG P722 PRO.

Deviltech offer a wide range of configuration options. Except for the display (17.3-inch non-glare) nearly all components are customizable. Deviltech e.g. install either the tried and tested Windows 7 or the brand new Windows 8 as operating system. We appreciate that operating system and keyboard are available in different languages.

As expected, the processors stem from Intel's popular Ivy Bridge generation. In addition to the Core i7-3630QM (2.4 - 3.4 GHz) also the more expensive Core i7-3740QM (2.7 - 3.7 GHz) and Core i7-3840QM (2.8 - 3.8 GHz) models are offered. The DDR3 RAM varies from 4 to 32 GB (4 slots). Depending on the type, mass storage capacities of up to 120 or 1000 GB are possible (two 2.5-inch slots).

The graphics solution is either a single GeForce GTX 680M or a dual GPU configuration of two GTX 670MX or two GTX 680M graphics adapters. Either a Blu-ray burner, a Blu-ray combo drive or a standard DVD-burner handle optical media. The default WLAN card can be replaced by a better module for a surcharge (Killer Wireless-N).

Our test sample, which is equipped with a Core i7-3630QM, a 120 GB SSD, 8 GB RAM, Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit and the GTX 670MX SLI solution, is currently priced at 1,640 Euro. As we already pointed out, the case equals the Schenker XMG P722's. So we will skip the section on case, connectivity and input devices and directly start with the display.

编者注(12月14日,2012):下面的审查尚未被编辑语法错误。最后草案的审查将很快被释放。

 

对于的德国原装审查,在这里看到。

 

该HellMachine辜负它的名字。可从1,489欧元以上的台式机替代品,主要是针对狂热的游戏玩家。它是基于419所述293×54毫米的大,近4公斤重的的蓝天,P370EM准系统,我们已经审查的形式Schenker的XMG P722 PRO。

 

Deviltech提供范围广泛的配置选项。除显示屏(17.3英寸无眩光),几乎所有的部件都可以自定义。 Deviltech例如安装久经考验的Windows 7或全新的Windows8操作系统。我们对此表示赞赏操作系统和键盘可在不同的语言。

 

正如预期的那样,源于英特尔的流行Ivy Bridge的新一代处理器的。除了酷睿i7-3630QM(2.4 - 3.4千兆赫),也更昂贵的酷睿i7-3740QM(2.7 - 3.7 GHz的)和酷睿i7-3840QM(2.8 - 3.8 GHz的)模型提供。的DDR3 RAM为4到32 GB(4槽)。根据不同的类型,多达120或1000 GB的大容量的存储容量是可能的(两个2.5英寸插槽)。

 

图形解决方案是一个单一的GeForce®(精视™)GTX680M或GTX670MX或两个GTX680M图形适配器的双GPU配置。无论是蓝光刻录机,蓝光康宝驱动器或DVD刻录机标准处理的光学介质。默认的无线局域网卡,可以更换一个更好的模块附加费(杀手的Wireless-N)。

 

我们的测试样机,它配备了一个酷睿i7-3630QM,120 GB固态硬盘,8 GB RAM,Windows7家庭高级版64位和GTX的670MX SLI解决方案,目前的售价为1640欧元。正如我们已经指出的那样,情况等于全球国际货运代理XMG P722。因此,我们将跳过此部分的情况下,连接和输入设

Display

The matte 16:9 Full-HD panel is referred to as Chi Mei N173HGE. Some readers of several gaming notebook reviews, might recognize this name.  Besides Clevo, MSI also frequently install this display (see e.g. GE70 or GT70). Likewise, Asus like to employ this model (e.g, in the G75VW and N75SF). As the Chi Mei N173HGE's image quality is rather high-end, this is no surprise.

16:9全高清面板的磨砂被称为奇美N173HGE。几个游戏笔记本,有些读者可能会认识到这个名字。除了蓝天,微星还经常安装这显示(例如GE70或GT70)。同样,华硕喜欢采用这种模式(例如,在的G75VW和N75SF)的。 ,由于奇美N173HGE的图像质量是相当高的高端,这是毫无疑问的。

278
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
258
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
242
cd/m²
273
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 291 cd/m² Average: 269.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 280 cd/m²
Contrast: 683:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)

The panel deserves praise for its good brightness. According to our measurements with the X-Rite i1Pro 2, we calculated an average of 270 cd/m². The subprime brightness distribution (~83 %) does not have a negative impact in practice. However, the low black value (~0,4 cd/m²) is perceptible. Compared to ordinary panels, dark  elements appear significantly less grayish. While this is hardly important for Office and Internet tasks, it is easily recognizable in entertainment media.

Problem: Nvidia graphics cards and the N173HGE are not an ideal fit. Some users will be bothered about the horizontal stripes often occurring in dark szenes, especially in horror films and shooters (Alan Wake, Metro 2033 etc.). Although the image looks normal most of the time, Clevo should consider a change. The AU Optronics B173HW01 V5 in the previous test model did not suffer from this problem.

面板值得赞扬其良好的亮度。根据我们的测量用的X-Rite i1Pro2,我们计算出的平均值为270坎德拉/平方米。次级亮度分布(〜83%)在实践中不会有负面影响。然而,黑色值低(约0.4 cd /m²的)是可感知的。普通板相比,,黑暗元素出现显着少浅灰色的。虽然这是很难Office和Internet重要的任务,它是在娱乐媒体中很容易辨认。

 

问题:NVIDIA®(英伟达™)图形卡和N173HGE是再合适不过的了。有些用户会被询问的横条纹往往在黑暗szenes发生,尤其是在恐怖电影和射手(心灵杀手,“地铁2033”等)。虽然图像看起来正常的大部分时间,蓝天应该考虑改变。友达光电B173HW01 V5在前面的测试模型并没有受到这方面的问题。

Deviltech HellMachine vs. sRGB (grid)
Deviltech HellMachine vs. sRGB (grid)
Deviltech HellMachine vs. AdobeRGB (grid)
Deviltech HellMachine vs. AdobeRGB (grid)
Deviltech HellMachine vs. Schenker XMG P722 PRO (grid)
Deviltech HellMachine vs. Schenker XMG P722 PRO (grid)

The display performs pretty well in the remaining aspects. While inferior panels achieve a contrast of about 200:1, the Chi Mei nearly reaches 700:1. Moreover, the color coverage (sRGB coverage is quite good) is decent. So, the image looks vibrant. Due to the anti-reflective surface and the decent brightness, the notebook gives a great experience outdoors.

显示在剩余的几个方面的表现相当不错。而劣质面板实现了约200:1的对比度,奇美几乎达到700:1。此外,彩色覆盖率(的sRGB覆盖面是相当不错的)是体面的。因此,图像看起来充满活力。由于防反射表面和体面的亮度的笔记本电脑提供了一个很好的经验户外活动。

outdoors
outdoors
Deviltech HellMachine outdoors

There is little to complain about the viewing angles too. The figure below shows that the user hardly experiences any shifts in display color in horizontal direction. As it is a TN panel, it does not score that well in vertical direction. The image either looks too bright or dark from an oblique angle.

有什么可抱怨的视角。下图显示了用户几乎没有遇到任何的变化,在水平方向的显示颜色。因为它是一个TN面板,它不得分,以及在垂直方向上。的图像,无论是从倾斜角度看起来太亮或太暗。

Viewing angles: Deviltech HellMachine
Viewing angles: Deviltech HellMachine

Performance

Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge

Processor

To meet demands for high performance, Deviltech equip the HellMachine with a powerful quad core CPU. Because of its decent price-performance ratio we opted for a Core i7-3630QM.

This high-end CPU contains 1.4 billion transistors and, alike all other Ivy Bridge models, it is manufactured using 22 nm lithography. In contrast to the more expensive Core i7-3840QM it »only« houses 6 instead of 8 MB L3 cache.

Typically Intel, the present processor generation supports a lot of features. In addition to Hyper Threading (simulates virtual cores), especially the Turbo Boost technology is interesting. The base clock is automatically increased by several 100 MHz under load. The Core i7-3630QM supports a maximum of 3.4 GHz. The TDP of 45 Watt exceeds the average of notebooks (dual core CPUs: maximum of 35 Watt).

Because of SLI compatibility the HD Graphics 4000 can not be used. We will analyze whether it is worth buying a more powerful CPU model by means of several benchmarks.

处理器

 

为了满足对高性能的需求,Deviltech装备HellMachine一个强大的四核心CPU。由于其体面的价格性能比,我们选择了酷睿i7-3630QM。

 

这种高端的CPU包含140亿晶体管和,都Ivy Bridge的所有其他机型,它采用22纳米光刻技术制造的。在较昂贵的核心酷睿i7-3840QM呢?“的房子,而不是8 MB的L3高速缓存。

 

通常情况下,本处理器英特尔新一代支持的特定功能。除了超执行绪(模拟虚拟内核),特别是Turbo Boost技术是有趣的。基准时钟数100 MHz的负载下自动增加。酷睿i7-3630QM,支持最高3.4 GHz的。 45瓦的TDP超过笔记本电脑(双核CPU:最大35瓦)的平均水平。

 

由于SLI兼容性的高清显卡4000不能使用。我们将分析是否值得购买更强大的CPU模型,通过几个基准。

Systeminfo CPUZ CPU
Systeminfo CPUZ Cache
Systeminfo CPUZ Mainboard
Systeminfo CPUZ RAM
Systeminfo CPUZ RAM SPD
Systeminfo HWiNFO
Systeminfo CrystalDiskMark
Systeminfo DPC Latenzen
System information: Deviltech HellMachine

Turbo Boost

The Turbo Boost technology is not limited in any way. The processor achieves about 3.3 GHz in single core rendering and about 3.2 GHz in multi core rendering of Cinebench R10. Moreover, the clock rate also easily exceeds the 3 GHz mark in demanding scenarios. Even during the stress test the Intel monitor displayed an average of 3.2 GHz.

Turbo Boost技术,是不以任何方式限制。达到大约3.3 GHz的单核心渲染,并在多核心渲染的Cinebench R10的3.2 GHz的处理器。此外,时钟速率也很容易超过3 GHz的标记,在苛刻的场景。即使在压力测试中,英特尔显示器显示平均3.2 GHz的。

Single core  load
Single core load
Multi core load
Multi core load
CPU- & GPU load
CPU- & GPU load

CPU Performance

The Cinebench R11.5 attests the Core i7-3630QM an excellent performance. In achieving 6.46 points the quad core CPU calculates about twice as fast as its Core i5-3360M dual core brother (3.25 points @ Dell Latitude E5530) in the multi CPU test. Compared to the Core i7-3740QM our Ivy Bridge model is nearly 7 % (6.93 points @ One M73-2N) slower. The Core i7-3840QM is about 10 % faster (7.15 points @ One M73-2N).

In our opinion the small performance gain does only partly justify the big surcharge. As the graphics card is the limiting factor in games, gamers will already be contented with the Core i7-3630QM. The results of Cinebench R10 are available in the table below.

CINEBENCH R11.5证明了酷睿i7-3630QM出色的表现。为了达到6.46点四核心CPU计算速度的两倍,它的酷睿i5-3360M双核兄弟([email protected] E5530)在多CPU测试。相比酷睿i7-3740QM我们的Ivy Bridge的模型是近7%(6.93点慢M73-2N)。酷睿i7-3840QM大约快10%(7.15点,M73-2N)。

 

在我们看来不小的性能增益只有部分大附加费的理由。由于显卡的限制因素,在游戏中,玩家将已经满足酷睿i7-3630QM。 Cinebench R10的结果在下面的表中的可用。

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit (sort by value)
Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
5821 Points ∼64%
Core i7-3740QM
One M73-2N
6366 Points ∼70% +9%
Core i7-3840QM
One M73-2N
6551 Points ∼72% +13%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit (sort by value)
Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
22003 Points ∼54%
Core i7-3740QM
One M73-2N
24299 Points ∼60% +10%
Core i7-3840QM
One M73-2N
25245 Points ∼62% +15%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
5821 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
22003 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.41 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
6.46 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
46.69 fps
Help

SLI

GTX 670MX SLI
GTX 670MX SLI

Dual GPU solutions like the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI are controversial. They improve the performance. If the GPU driver supports an appropriate profile, the frame rates can sometimes increase by up to 80 to 100 %. 

But, high waste heat and huge energy demands requiring a good cooling system and a big power supply are negative aspects. The HellMachine comes with a 1.6 kg 300 watt model. Another problem is micro stuttering. Sometimes it comes to large time intervals between images. So, the movements do no longer appear to be smooth to the human eye. In extreme scenarios games look smoother on single card systems. Moreover, 3D programs can even run slower without SLI profile. This is currently true for Need for Most: Most Wanted. Fortunately, Nvidia offers a handy update function.

Regardless of the upgrade, we recommend checking whether Nvidia made a completely new version available after some weeks. The beta driver 310.61 used in the benchmarks installs without troubles.

GeForce®(精视™)GTX670MX SLI双GPU解决方案,如存在争议。它们改善了性能。如果GPU驱动程序支持一个适当的配置文件,帧速率有时可以增加高达80至100%。

 

但是,高浪费的热和巨大的能源需求,需要一个良好的冷却系统和一个大的电源是消极的方面。该HellMachine配备了一个1.6公斤300瓦的。另一个问题是,微口吃。有时,它到大图像之间的时间间隔。所以,运动不再出现是光滑的人的眼睛。在极端的情况下,游戏看起来更平滑的单卡系统。此外,3D节目,甚至可以没有SLI配置文件的运行速度较慢。这是目前最需要最期待的。幸运的是,NVIDIA提供了一个方便的更新功能。

 

无论在升级,我们建议您检查,是否Nvidia的几个星期后,一个全新的版本。 310.61测试版驱动程序的基准测试中使用的安装麻烦。

Graphics Card

GPU infos
GPU infos

Technically, the GeForce GTX 670MX is based on the modern Kepler architecture, which uses 28 nm lithography. The clock rates of 600 and 1,400 MHz (core/memory) are a little lower than the GTX 670M's (598/1,500 MHz), which, other than its name would suggest, belongs to the older Fermi generation and uses 40 nm lithography.

Due to more shaders (960 vs. 336, not directly comparable) and more transistors (2.54 vs. 1.95 billions) the GTX 670MX is nevertheless faster while the Kepler GPU is, as expected, slower that the GeForce GTX 675M. The Fermi model not only scores points because of its wider interface (256 vs. 192 Bit).

However, it is a different story, how a dual GPU solution of two GTX 670MX cards performs. Can the Kepler model in SLI mode maybe even best Nvidia's flagship, the GeForce GTX 680M? Our benchmarks will provide the answer.

从技术上讲,GeForce®(精视™)GTX670MX是基于现代开普勒架构,它采用28纳米光刻技术。的时钟速率为600和1400兆赫(核心/显存)是有点低比的GTX670M的(一分之五百九十八,500兆赫),它的名字将建议,所属的老费米代,并采用40纳米光刻技术。

 

由于着色器(960比336,没有直接的可比性)和更多的晶体管(2.54与1.95亿元)GTX670MX仍然是更快,,而开普勒GPU,符合市场预期,速度较慢,GeForce®(精视™)GTX6.75亿。 Fermi模型不仅得分点,因为其更广泛的接口(256 - 192位)。

 

然而,这是一个不同的故事,如何在双GPU解决方案,两个GTX670MX卡的执行。开普勒模型,甚至最好的NVIDIA®(英伟达™)的旗舰产品,GeForce®(精视™)GTX680M SLI模式吗?我们的基准,将提供答案。

GPU Performance

In modern DirectX 11 benchmarks the second graphics card significantly increases the performance. In achieving 7,042 points, the Kepler team is about 95 % faster than a single GTX 670MX in 3DMark 11 (GPU-Score @ performance preset). Likewise, the GeForce GTX 680M does not stand a chance against the SLI combo. 5,967 points (Deviltech Devil 6700) equal minus 15 %.

The differences in the Unigine Heaven 2.1 benchmark (1,280 x 1,024, high, tessellation normal) are similarly high. While a GTX 680M laptop achieves about 74 fps (Schenker XMG P702), the test sample is 18% faster. (87,2 fps). If SLI is deactivated, the frame rate of the GTX 670MX is about 50 % lower (46,5 fps).

在第二个图形卡的DirectX11基准显着提高性能。为了达到7,042点,开普勒团队约95%的速度比单一的GTX670MX在3DMark11([email protected])。同样,GeForce®(精视™)GTX680M并没有机会对SLI组合。等于5,967点(Deviltech恶魔6700),减去15%。

 

的Unigine天堂2.1基准测试(1,280×1,024,高,镶嵌正常)的差异是同样高。虽然GTX680M笔记本电脑达到约74 FPS(辛克XMG P702)的,测试样品的快18%。 (87,2 FPS)。如果被关闭SLI,GTX670MX的帧速率降低约50%(46,5 FPS)。

Unigine Heaven 3.0 - 1920x1080 DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders AA:Off AF:Off (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
66.1 fps ∼25%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech Hellmachine
34.9 fps ∼13% -47%
GeForce GTX 680M SLI / Core i7-3960X
Schenker XMG U702
107.5 fps ∼40% +63%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Schenker XMG P502
57.6 fps ∼21% -13%
3DMark 03 Standard
78213 points
3DMark 05 Standard
29851 points
3DMark 06 Standard
23606 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
23526 points
3DMark 11 Performance
6459 points
Help

Mass storage

Samsung SSD 840
Samsung SSD 840

The 120 GB model of the brand new Samsung SSD 840 delivers mixed performance. Let's start with the positive aspects: In sequential reading the seven mm flat SATA-III model does not only outperform its SSD 830 predecessor (505 MB/s @ One M73-2N), but also the popular Crucial Real SSD M4 (489 MB/s @ Gigabyte U2442N). 512 MB/s in the AS SSD benchmark suggest a great performance.

It's a pity, that the results in the writing tests are anything but outstanding. In achieving 130 MB/s it is significantly slower than the RealSSD M4 (~200 MB/Sek) and the SSD 830 (~330 MB/s). But, the access times are rather decent. 0.08 ms in writing can only be bested be few competitors. Overall, the performance of the Samsung SSD 840 is decent.

Windows appears to run significantly slower with an HDD. You'll soon learn to appreciate the advantages of the SSD technology (shorter boot, load and transfer times).

全新的三星SSD840可提供120 GB型号不一。让我们先在积极的方面:在顺序读取的7个毫米平SATA-III模型不仅优于其SSD830的前身(505 MB / [email protected]),但也的流行关键的实时SSD M4(489 MB / S @,技嘉U2442N)。 512 MB/ s的AS SSD Benchmark的建议的一大表现。

 

遗憾的是,在编写测试的结果是什么,但优秀的。在达到130 MB/ s的显着慢于光RealSSD M4(约200 MB / SEK)和SSD830(330 MB/秒)。但是,访问的时间是相当体面的。 0.08毫秒以书面形式只能被击败竞争对手少。总体而言,性能的三星SSD840是体面的。

 

运行Windows出现显着慢的硬盘。您会很快学会欣赏的SSD技术的优势(更短的启动,负载和传输时间)。

Samsung SSD 840 Series 120 GB (MZ-7TD120)
Sequential Read: 509.8 MB/s
Sequential Write: 137.5 MB/s
512K Read: 431.9 MB/s
512K Write: 134 MB/s
4K Read: 23.4 MB/s
4K Write: 56.05 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 268.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 134.5 MB/s

System Performance

It is hardly surprising that the HellMachine delivers a high system performance. Although 17,855 point in PCMark Vantage are not sufficient for a top rank, the result is still above average. The Toshiba Qosmio X870-119 (17,187 points) and the Alienware M14x R2 (18,158 points) achieved similar results in this test while the Alienware M18x R2 (22,421 points) still maintains the lead.

这是不足为奇的HellMachine提供了一个较高的系统性能。虽然17,855点在PCMark Vantage是不够的最高排名,结果仍然是高于平均水平。在本次测试的Alienware M18x R2(22,421点)仍保持着领先的东芝Qosmio X870-119(17,187点)和Alienware M14x的R2(18,158点)取得了类似的结果。

PCMark Vantage Result
17855 points
PCMark 7 Score
4689 points
Help

Gaming Performance

Dual GPU power
Dual GPU power

We ran 25 games on the HellMachine for the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI to leave a lot of footprints in our database. With a few exceptions (e. g. Dirt Showdown) the second graphics card was always active and provided a huge improvement.

Most of the titles ran about twice as fast in SLI mode. Summarizing over all games, a single GTX 670MX is about 66% slower in ultra settings (1,920 x 1,080, maximum graphics details). Two GeForce GTX 680Mk are »only« about 40 % (Schenker XMG U702) to 50 % (Schenker XMG P722) faster than a single one.

Speaking of the GTX 680M: Depending on the game Nvidia's premium model is faster or slower than the GTX 670MX SLI. There is no clear winner. As the two are about equally fast, and the GTX 680M costs nearly 200 Euro more, price-conscious gamers should definitely consider the SLI combo.

Nearly all titles run without stuttering with a second GeForce GTX 670MX in maximum details. Sometimes there are even reserve capacities for high-quality anti-aliasing. You'll find a detailed table at the end of the article.

我们跑了25场比赛的HellMachine SLI GeForce®(精视™)GTX670MX在我们的数据库中留下了很多的脚印。除少数例外(如污垢摊牌)第二个图形卡始终处于激活状态,并提供一个巨大的进步。

 

大部分的标题以最快的速度在SLI模式下跑两次。总结以上所有的游戏,一个单一的GTX670MX超的设置(1920×1080,最大图形细节)慢了约66%。两个GeForce GTX680Mk的是只«约40%(全球国际货运代理XMG U702)至50%(全球国际货运代理XMG P722)的速度比一个单一的。

 

说到GTX680M:根据游戏Nvidia的溢价模型,是比GTX670MX SLI更快或更慢。有没有明确的赢家。由于两人都同样快,和GTX680M花费近200欧元,对价格敏感的玩家一定要考虑的SLI组合。

 

几乎所有的冠军运行,无口吃第二的GeForce®(精视™)GTX670MX最大的细节。有时甚至有储备能力,高画质反锯齿,。在文章的结尾,你会发现一个详细的表。

low med. high ultra
Battlefield 3 (2011) 103.590.68141.9fps
CoD: Modern Warfare 3 (2011) 260179163.8115fps
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) 88.363.4fps
Anno 2070 (2011) 253.8160.4106.450.8fps
Alan Wake (2012) 128.788.545.9fps
Mass Effect 3 (2012) 6059.959.9fps
Risen 2: Dark Waters (2012) 92.399.677.946.1fps
Diablo III (2012) 340.8284.2261.1170.9fps
Dirt Showdown (2012) 94.57774.631.4fps
Max Payne 3 (2012) 76.577.760.447.7fps
Darksiders II (2012) 192.1113fps
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 140.7102.984.626.7fps
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 232.7220.8208.2168fps
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 85.445.835.2fps
F1 2012 (2012) 1241029879fps
Borderlands 2 (2012) 117.8112.6104.278.9fps
Fifa 13 (2012) 361.2331.6315.4207.2fps
World of Tanks v8 (2012) 113.743.851.933fps
Dishonored (2012) 129129.3129.4126.6fps
Medal of Honor: Warfighter (2012) 151.3128.9113.247.2fps
Need for Speed: Most Wanted (2012) 59.659.448.829fps
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 (2012) 185.9171.7124.485.7fps
Hitman: Absolution (2012) 67.662.753.324.7fps
Assassin´s Creed III (2012) 57.755.731.2fps
Far Cry 3 (2012) 107.797.772.127fps

Emissions

System Noise

The noise is typical for high-end laptops: acceptable while idle and clearly audible under load. 43.4 dB during 3DMark06 is a bit quieter than the identical Schenker XMG P722, which reached marginally higher 43.8 dB with a GeForce GTX 680M SLI solution inside.

If the notebook only runs undemanding tasks or idle, the three case fans sometimes turn off completely. However, not always. In between the fans accelerate and become fairly loud without reason - a sharp contrast to the silence. Clevo should definitely improve the fan control a little bit. We would prefer a constant, moderate noise level. The typical gamer will find the noise tolerable.

系统噪声

 

噪音是典型的高端笔记本电脑:可以接受的,而空闲和负载下清晰可闻。 43.4分贝在3DMark06的是一个有点噪音比相同的全球国际货运代理XMG P722,达到稍高43.8分贝的与GeForce®(精视™)GTX680M SLI解决方案内。

 

如果笔记本电脑只能运行要求不高的任务或闲置,三个机箱风扇有时会完全关闭。然而,并非总是如此。在球迷之间的加速和没有理由变得相当响亮的 - 的沉默形成了鲜明对比。蓝天一定要提高风扇控制一点点。我们希望能有一个恒定的,温和的噪音水平。典型的玩家会发现的噪音容忍的。

Noise Level

Idle
30.3 / 35.9 / 38 dB(A)
DVD
38.2 / dB(A)
Load
43.4 / 46.3 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm distance)

Temperature

Stress test (Furmark & Prime)
Stress test (Furmark & Prime)

Considering it is a gaming notebook, the case temperatures are surprisingly low. Even under stress we only measured 30 °C on the keyboard side and 29 °C on the bottom side. The Schenker XMG P722 reached 36 °C on average. While running Office or Internet tasks the 17-incher remains pleasantly cool. Left running idle for two hours, the HellMachine leveled out at lukewarm 26 °C.

Inside the case: no rude surprise too. The temperature of the Core i7 3630QM increased to nearly 90 °C (CPUID Hardware Monitor) in the stress test, but this is not yet a critical level. At the end of the stress test the Nvidia GPUs reached temperatures of 80 and 60 °C, while the GTX 680M in the Schenker XMG P722 exceeded 90 °C.

考虑到这是一个游戏笔记本的情况下,温度出奇的低。即使在压力下,我们只测量30°C在键盘上侧和29°C底部。全球国际货运代理XMG P722平均达到36°C。在运行Office或Internet任务的17英寸依然凉爽宜人。左怠速运转两小时,HellMachine夷为平地,在不冷不热26°C。

 

里面的情况:没有粗鲁的惊喜。的酷睿i73630QM的温度上升到接近90°C(CPUID硬件监控)在压力测试,但是这还不是一个临界水平。 Nvidia的GPU(图形处理器)的压力测试结束时达到了80和60°C的温度,而在全球国际货运代理XMG P722 GTX680M超过90°C。

Max. Load
 34.3 °C35.2 °C30.2 °C 
 31.7 °C31.8 °C30.1 °C 
 28.7 °C25.9 °C25.9 °C 
Maximum: 35.2 °C
Average: 30.4 °C
29.8 °C33 °C31.5 °C
27.2 °C32 °C31.9 °C
26.2 °C25.1 °C26.4 °C
Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 29.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.5 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-550

Battery Life

Power Consumption

Compared to the Schenker XMG U702 gaming bolide (Clevo P570WM barebone) recently reviewed Deviltech's HellMachine seems almost frugal. The 17-inch high-end competitor powered by a very fast desktop CPU and two GTX 680M graphics cards requires about +100 % energy.

While the Deviltech model needs about 116 watt (average, 3DMark 06) and 191 watt (maximum, full load) the counterpart from Schenker requires 219 und 440 watt. The differences are also huge in idle mode (28 - 40 watt vs. 67 - 83 watt). The reason for the sightly lower values of the XMG P722 could be the deactivated keyboard light. All measurements of the HellMachine were done with SLI.

 

耗电量

 

与全球国际货运代理XMG U702游戏火流星(蓝天P570WM准系统)最近检讨Deviltech的HellMachine看来几乎是节俭。 17英寸的高端的竞争对手非常快的桌面CPU和GTX680M显卡的供电需要约100%的能量。

 

,虽然Deviltech模型需要约116瓦(平均,3DMark 06测试)和191瓦(最大,满载)对应从全球国际货运代理需要219 UND440瓦特。在空闲模式(28 - 40比67瓦 - 83瓦)的差异也是巨大的。的XMG P722悦目的较低值的原因可能是停用的键盘灯。进行SLI所有的HellMachine测量。

 

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.7 / 1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 28.4 / 36.2 / 40 Watt
Load midlight 115.5 / 191 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940

Battery Life

Maximum battery life (Reader's test)
Reader's Test
Minimum battery life (Classic test)
Classic Test

Although the laptop comes with a powerful 8-cell battery, the battery runtimes cannot convince. Depending on the load and the display brightness, the 17-incher only runs 1.5 - 3.5 hours.

High-end laptops which only contain a single GPU and use Nvidia's Optimus technology, can be used significantly longer away from an outlet. The battery life of the MSI GT70 exceeds 5.5 hours under ideal conditions. The Asus G75VW and Samsung 700G7C deliver equally poor values.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
3h 29min
WiFi Surfing
2h 16min
DVD
1h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 52min

Verdict

Deviltech HellMachine (manufacturer's picture)
Deviltech HellMachine

With the 17-inch HellMachine, Deviltech sell an extremely fast desktop replacement. Due to its quad core CPU (Ivy Bridge) and two gaming graphics cards (Kepler) the notebook outperforms nearly all competitors.

The case is decent too. In addition to the lit keyboard we appreciate its rich connectivity (4x USB 3.0!). The high-end non-glare panel, the decent sound and the rather cool surfaces are further pros.

However, the HellMachine does not really win fame in the system noise, battery life, touchpad and power consumption categories. Because of its high weight (about 4 kg) and big 300 watt power adapter, the 17-incher is primarily designed for stationary use.

You might be willing to ignore the weaknesses as there are many upgrade and maintenance options. In our opinion 1,637 Euro is a reasonable price.

随着17英寸HellMachine的,Deviltech一个非常快速的台式机替代品出售。由于四核心CPU(Ivy Bridge的)和两个游戏显卡(开普勒)笔记本的性能优于几乎所有的竞争对手。

 

的情况下是不错的。除了背光键盘,我们体会到它的丰富的连接(4个USB3.0!)。高端无眩光面板,体面的声音和冷的表面而更多的优点。

 

然而,HellMachine并没有真正赢得名声系统中的噪音,电池寿命,触摸板和电力消费类别。由于其高重量(约4公斤)和大300瓦的电源适配器,17英寸,主要是用来固定使用。

 

你可能会愿意忽略的弱点,因为有很多升级和维护选项。在我们看来,1637欧元是一个合理的价格。

In comparison

Far Cry 3 - 1920x1080 DX11 Ultra Preset (HDAO, Enhanced Alpha To Coverage) AA:4x MS (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
27 fps ∼36%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
13.7 fps ∼18% -49%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Schenker XMG P502
23.6 fps ∼32% -13%
Hitman: Absolution - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS AF:16x (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
24.7 fps ∼25%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
12.7 fps ∼13% -49%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Schenker XMG P502
22.6 fps ∼23% -9%
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 - 1920x1080 (Extra) High / On, FXAA AA:4xMS (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
85.7 fps ∼54%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
46.2 fps ∼29% -46%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Schenker XMG P502
75.3 fps ∼48% -12%
Need for Speed: Most Wanted - 1920x1080 High / On (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
29 fps ∼48%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
29 fps ∼48% 0%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Schenker XMG P502
51.4 fps ∼86% +77%
Medal of Honor: Warfighter - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS AF:16x (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
47.2 fps ∼59%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
25 fps ∼31% -47%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Schenker XMG P502
40.9 fps ∼51% -13%
Dishonored - 1920x1080 High / On, FOV: 75 AA:FX (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
126.6 fps ∼97%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
75.4 fps ∼58% -40%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Schenker XMG P502
115.7 fps ∼89% -9%
Fifa 13 - 1920x1080 High AA:4xMS (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
207.2 fps ∼52%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
180.6 fps ∼45% -13%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Schenker XMG P502
256.9 fps ∼64% +24%
Borderlands 2 - 1920x1080 (Ultra) High / On (PhysX low) AA:FX AF:8x (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
78.9 fps ∼62%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
45.3 fps ∼36% -43%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Schenker XMG P502
71.1 fps ∼56% -10%
F1 2012 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
79 fps ∼69%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
46 fps ∼40% -42%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Schenker XMG P502
87 fps ∼76% +10%
Guild Wars 2 - 1920x1080 All Maximum / On AA:FX (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
35.2 fps ∼38%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
18.8 fps ∼21% -47%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Schenker XMG P502
31.9 fps ∼35% -9%
Counter-Strike: GO - 1920x1080 (Very) High, FXAA AA:4x MS AF:8x (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
168 fps ∼59%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
95.7 fps ∼34% -43%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Schenker XMG P502
128 fps ∼45% -24%
Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
26.7 fps ∼18%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
13.1 fps ∼9% -51%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Schenker XMG P502
22.7 fps ∼15% -15%
Darksiders II - 1920x1080 2/4 Shadows, No Ambient Occlusion, AA:Low (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
113 fps ∼58%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
63.2 fps ∼32% -44%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Schenker XMG P502
108.8 fps ∼56% -4%
Max Payne 3 - 1920x1080 Very High, DX11 AA:Very High FX AF:8x (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
47.7 fps ∼56%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
24.8 fps ∼29% -48%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Deviltech Devil 6700
42.6 fps ∼50% -11%
Dirt Showdown - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
31.4 fps ∼36%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
32.4 fps ∼37% +3%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Deviltech Devil 6700
52.9 fps ∼61% +68%
Diablo III - 1920x1080 High AA:on (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
170.9 fps ∼66%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
89.5 fps ∼34% -48%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Deviltech Devil 6700
159.6 fps ∼61% -7%
Risen 2: Dark Waters - 1920x1080 Ultra / on AA:on AF:8x (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
46.1 fps ∼56%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
23.4 fps ∼29% -49%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Deviltech Devil 6700
42.2 fps ∼51% -8%
Alan Wake - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:4x AF:8x (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
45.9 fps ∼53%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
23 fps ∼27% -50%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Deviltech Devil 6700
41.9 fps ∼48% -9%
Anno 2070 - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:on AF:4x (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
50.8 fps ∼32%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
32.4 fps ∼20% -36%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Deviltech Devil 6700
51 fps ∼32% 0%
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:8x AF:16x (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
63.4 fps ∼73%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
34.3 fps ∼39% -46%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Deviltech Devil 6700
54.2 fps ∼62% -15%
CoD: Modern Warfare 3 - 1920x1080 Extra, all on, Image Quality: Native AA:4x (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
115 fps ∼72%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
61 fps ∼38% -47%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Deviltech Devil 6700
102.8 fps ∼65% -11%
Battlefield 3 - 1920x1080 ultra AA:4x MS AF:16x (sort by value)
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
41.9 fps ∼41%
GeForce GTX 670MX / Core i7-3630QM
Deviltech HellMachine
21.8 fps ∼21% -48%
GeForce GTX 680M / Core i7-3610QM
Deviltech Devil 6700
34.7 fps ∼34% -17%
In Review: Deviltech HellMachine (manufacturer's pictures)
In Review: DevilTech HellMachine

Specifications

Deviltech HellMachine
Processor
Intel Core i7-3630QM 2.4 GHz
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX SLI - 2x 3072 MB, Core: 600 MHz, Memory: 1400 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 310.61 Beta
Memory
8192 MB 
, SO-DIMM DDR3-RAM PC3-12800 (1600 MHz), 4 slots, max. 32 GB
Display
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel, Chi Mei N173HGE (CMO1720), TN LED, Full-HD, diagonal: 43.94 cm, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM77 (Panther Point)
Storage
Samsung SSD 840 Series 120 GB (MZ-7TD120), 120 GB 
, / two 2.5-inch slots (max. 9.5 mm) + mSATA slot
Soundcard
Realtek ALC892 @ Intel Panther Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 eSata, Audio Connections: headphones, mic, line-in, S/PDIF (7.1 out), Card Reader: MMC, RSMMC, SD, Mini SD, SDHC, SDXC, MS, MS Pro, MS Duo, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2230 (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0
Optical drive
Optiarc DVD RW AD-7760H
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 54 x 419 x 293
Battery
89 Wh Lithium-Ion, 5900 mAh, 15.12V, 8 cells , P370BAT-8, 0.45 kg
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2.0 Megapixel
Additional features
Speakers: 2.1 (Sound Blaster X-Fi MB2), Keyboard Light: yes, power adapter: 300 watt, driver DVD, user guide, cleaning cloth, HDD accessories, 24-36 Months Warranty
Weight
4.106 kg, Power Supply: 1.62 kg
Price
1637 Euro

 

All pictures on the right column stem from Schenker's XMG P722 PRO.
All pictures on the right column stem from Schenker's XMG P722 PRO.
The keyboard includes a configurable 3 section light.
The keyboard includes a configurable 3 section light.
Clevo use speakers from Onkyo.
Clevo use speakers from Onkyo.
The sound quality is above average.
The sound quality is above average.
The enter key is also single-row on the German QWERTZ keyboard.
The enter key is also single-row on the German QWERTZ keyboard.
The glossy touchpad works rather poor in practice.
The glossy touchpad works rather poor in practice.
Kensington Lock and RJ-45 Gigabit LAN.
Kensington Lock and RJ-45 Gigabit LAN.
9-in-1 card reader, Line-In, S/PDIF, mic, headphones
9-in-1 card reader, Line-In, S/PDIF, mic, headphones
HDMI, DisplayPort, and power input
HDMI, DisplayPort, and power input
One of a total of five USB ports.
One of a total of five USB ports.
eSATA/USB-2.0 combo and 3x USB 3.0.
eSATA/USB-2.0 combo and 3x USB 3.0.
A web cam is obligatory.
A web cam is obligatory.
The shape of the heat pipe is interesting.
The shape of the heat pipe is interesting.
The Clevo barebone is labeled P370EM.
The Clevo barebone is labeled P370EM.
We like the build quality.
We like the build quality.
The manufacturer uses a matte FullHD display.
The manufacturer uses a matte FullHD display.
The edgy lid is covered by a rubber coating.
The edgy lid is covered by a rubber coating.
The maximum opening angle could be somewhat larger.
The maximum opening angle could be somewhat larger.
Greasy fingers quickly cause finger prints.
Greasy fingers quickly cause finger prints.
The maintenance covers can be easily removed.
The maintenance covers can be easily removed.
Three fans are responsible for cooling.
Three fans are responsible for cooling.
In theory, it is possible to replace the graphics card.
In theory, it is possible to replace the graphics card.
Two of the four RAM slots are beneath the keyboard.
Two of the four RAM slots are beneath the keyboard.
The 300 watt power adapter (left) extremely big.
The 300 watt power adapter (left) extremely big.

Similar Laptops

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight

DevilTech Fragbook (Ivy Bridge) 笔记本测评
GeForce GTX 675M, Core i7 3610QM, 17.3", 3.655 kg

Links

  • Manufacturer's information

Compare Prices

Pros

+对比丰富FHD显示与非反射表面
+温和的气候变暖
+个别配置
+背光键盘
+非常不错的表现
+体面的声音
+维护方便
+许多连接
+没有臃肿软件
 

Cons

-巨大的呼啸电源
-触摸板表面不利
-重案

Error: More than one (2) Pro / Contra Item for this review found!

Shortcut

What we like

The P370EM barebone can be easily maintained

What we'd like to see

It is very likey to get a whistling power supply from Clevo

What surprises us

Two GTX 670MX cost less than a single GTX 680M. 

The competition

The Schenker XMG U702 and the Alienware M18x R2 are probably the toughest competitors.

Rating

Deviltech HellMachine - 11/28/2012 v3(old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
84%
Pointing Device
70%
Connectivity
86%
Weight
55%
Battery
73%
Display
86%
Games Performance
95%
Application Performance
97%
Temperature
90%
Noise
70%
Add Points
85%
Average
81%
85%
Gaming - Weighted Average
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > DevilTech HellMachine 笔记本测评
Florian Glaser, 2012-12-17 (Update: 2014-06-13)