索尼 Xperia XA 智能手机简短评测

Name: Sony Xperia XA
Brand: Sony

黄金时代？ 索尼Xperia XA是最新推出的一台设计感十足的中端智能手机。爱美人士应该很快就会注意到它很窄的屏幕边框和简洁机身设计。不过它的内在实力也能领先于竞争对手吗？

Andreas Kilian, ✓ Manuel Masiero (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 08/30/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Sony Xperia XA (Xperia Series)

Processor

Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T860 MP2

Memory

2048 MB

Display

5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕, Super Vivid-Modus, Mobile BRAVIA Engine 2, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 8.4 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 200 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器，近距感应器，陀螺仪，指南针, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast, DLNA, nano-SIM, USB-OTG, FM收音机

Networking

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (频段 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20) Cat 4 (最高 50 Mbit/s 上传, 150 Mbit/s 下载), 身体辐射值: 0.473 W/kg, 头部辐射值: 0.471 W/kg, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 143.6 x 66.8

Battery

8.7 Wh, 2300 mAh

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (自动对焦 f/2.0, 1080p 视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (自动对焦 f/2.0, 1080p 视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)

Additional features

Speakers: 底部单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器，USB数据线，耳机, Playstation, FM radio, Movie Creator, TrackID, Sketch, SwiftKey, AR Effect, Spotify, Facebook, Amazon Shopping, Xperia Lounge, Kobo eBooks, Sky Go, AVG Protection, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

137 g, Power Supply: 54 g

Price

300 EUR

Links

Sony homepage
Sony notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	303 MBit/s +228%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	249 MBit/s +169%
Sony Xperia X Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash	244 MBit/s +164%
Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	92.5 MBit/s
Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.8 MBit/s -46%
Wiko Lenny 3 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	44.8 MBit/s -52%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	290 MBit/s +247%
Sony Xperia X Adreno 510, 650 MSM8956, 32 GB eMMC Flash	219 MBit/s +162%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	205 MBit/s +145%
Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	83.6 MBit/s
Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	58.3 MBit/s -30%
Wiko Lenny 3 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.2 MBit/s -41%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Sony Xperia XA

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

OnePlus 3

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

Sony Xperia XA

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

OnePlus 3

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

Sony Xperia XA

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

OnePlus 3

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)


421 cd/m²	471 cd/m²	502 cd/m²
435 cd/m²	518 cd/m²	518 cd/m²
439 cd/m²	479 cd/m²	492 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Super Vivid-Modus, Mobile BRAVIA Engine 2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 518 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 475 cd/m² Minimum: 4.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 518 cd/m²
Contrast: 849:1 (Black: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.35

	Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5.00	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.20	Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.70	Huawei P9 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20	ZTE Blade V7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20	Microsoft Lumia 650 OLED, 1280x720, 5.00
Screen		10%	34%	10%	-14%	20%
Brightness middle	518	289 -44%	386 -25%	505 -3%	409 -21%	349 -33%
Brightness	475	291 -39%	394 -17%	468 -1%	411 -13%	353 -26%
Brightness Distribution	81	96 19%	88 9%	88 9%	96 19%	92 14%
Black Level *	0.61			0.74 -21%	0.38 38%
Contrast	849			682 -20%	1076 27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.8	4.7 31%	1.11 84%	4.1 40%	9.4 -38%	2.6 62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.4	7.3 36%	3.35 71%	5.8 49%	17.6 -54%	8.2 28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7	3 57%	1.34 81%	4.9 30%	11.6 -66%	1.8 74%
Gamma	2.35 ^94%	2.03 ^108%	2.12 ^104%	2.5 ^88%	2.25 ^98%	2.06 ^107%
CCT	8151 ^80%	6291 ^103%	6441 ^101%	7116 ^91%	9597 ^68%	6542 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	48331 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	27232 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	35964 Points -26%
Huawei P9 Lite	50366 Points +4%
ZTE Blade V7	37070 Points -23%
Microsoft Lumia 650	31844 Points -34%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	4685 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	4126 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	4051 Points -14%
Huawei P9 Lite	5339 Points +14%
ZTE Blade V7	3947 Points -16%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	717 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	551 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	756 Points +5%
Huawei P9 Lite	765 Points +7%
ZTE Blade V7	10 Points -99%
Microsoft Lumia 650	546 Points -24%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	669 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	312 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	415 Points -38%
Huawei P9 Lite	818 Points +22%
ZTE Blade V7	430 Points -36%
Microsoft Lumia 650	207 Points -69%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	2289 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1060 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	1380 Points -40%
Huawei P9 Lite	2438 Points +7%
ZTE Blade V7	1188 Points -48%
Microsoft Lumia 650	552 Points -76%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	1043 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	585 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	662 Points -37%
Huawei P9 Lite	1197 Points +15%
ZTE Blade V7	249 Points -76%
Microsoft Lumia 650	435 Points -58%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	28 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	9.7 fps -65%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	20 fps -29%
Huawei P9 Lite	19 fps -32%
ZTE Blade V7	12 fps -57%
Microsoft Lumia 650	5.67 fps -80%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	18 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	5.2 fps -71%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	12 fps -33%
Huawei P9 Lite	19 fps +6%
ZTE Blade V7	12 fps -33%
Microsoft Lumia 650	3.25 fps -82%

GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	7.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1.8 fps -75%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	4.1 fps -43%
Huawei P9 Lite	7.8 fps +8%
ZTE Blade V7	4.5 fps -37%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	15 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	3.8 fps -75%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	8.4 fps -44%
Huawei P9 Lite	8.4 fps -44%
ZTE Blade V7	4.5 fps -70%

GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	4.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Huawei P9 Lite	4.5 fps -6%
ZTE Blade V7	2.9 fps -40%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	11 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Huawei P9 Lite	4.9 fps -55%
ZTE Blade V7	2.9 fps -74%

GFXBench
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	2.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Huawei P9 Lite	2.8 fps +12%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	5.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Huawei P9 Lite	2.9 fps -46%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	11156 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	4400 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	7229 Points -35%
Huawei P9 Lite	11769 Points +5%
ZTE Blade V7	6786 Points -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	10916 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	3838 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	6522 Points -40%
Huawei P9 Lite	11318 Points +4%
ZTE Blade V7	6170 Points -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	12138 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	9022 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	11653 Points -4%
Huawei P9 Lite	13676 Points +13%
ZTE Blade V7	10430 Points -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	1259 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	709 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	916 Points -27%
Huawei P9 Lite	1373 Points +9%
ZTE Blade V7	944 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	525 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	42 Points -92%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	235 Points -55%
Huawei P9 Lite	473 Points -10%
ZTE Blade V7	245 Points -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	603 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	53 Points -91%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	281 Points -53%
Huawei P9 Lite	554 Points -8%
ZTE Blade V7	293 Points -51%

Legend

Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Samsung Exynos 7578, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V7 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	9610 ms *
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	13046 ms * -36%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	11796 ms * -23%
Huawei P9 Lite	9397 ms * +2%
ZTE Blade V7	13761 ms * -43%
Microsoft Lumia 650	18237 ms * -90%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	4046 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	2730 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	3566 Points -12%
Huawei P9 Lite	4756 Points +18%
ZTE Blade V7	2689 Points -34%
Microsoft Lumia 650	2574 Points -36%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	72 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	47 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	64 Points -11%
Huawei P9 Lite	67 Points -7%
Microsoft Lumia 650	52 Points -28%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	27.5 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	16.8 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	22.1 Points -20%
Huawei P9 Lite	29.03 Points +6%
ZTE Blade V7	18.19 Points -34%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5 | BaseMark OS II

AndroBench 3-5
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	22.05 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	21 MB/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	21.92 MB/s -1%
Huawei P9 Lite	38.22 MB/s +73%
ZTE Blade V7	28.07 MB/s +27%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	10.6 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	11.6 MB/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	10.27 MB/s -3%
Huawei P9 Lite	15.35 MB/s +45%
ZTE Blade V7	7.58 MB/s -28%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	68.6 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	72 MB/s +5%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	27.27 MB/s -60%
Huawei P9 Lite	46.24 MB/s -33%
ZTE Blade V7	39.45 MB/s -42%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	240.4 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	147 MB/s -39%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	168.8 MB/s -30%
Huawei P9 Lite	283.5 MB/s +18%
ZTE Blade V7	196.8 MB/s -18%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	50.7 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	46.61 MB/s -8%
Huawei P9 Lite	25.1 MB/s -50%
ZTE Blade V7	20.89 MB/s -59%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	72.9 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	79.8 MB/s +9%
Huawei P9 Lite	60.8 MB/s -17%
ZTE Blade V7	43.67 MB/s -40%

BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	1076 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	643 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016	443 Points -59%
Huawei P9 Lite	1346 Points +25%
ZTE Blade V7	790 Points -27%
Microsoft Lumia 650	575 Points -47%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	27 fps
	very low	29 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	59 fps

Max. Load

Idle


41.7 °C	41.6 °C	37.1 °C
42 °C	41.6 °C	36.6 °C
40.4 °C	40.2 °C	36.3 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 39.7 °C


33.9 °C	38.2 °C	41.4 °C
35.4 °C	37.4 °C	41.7 °C
32.3 °C	38.4 °C	41.5 °C

Maximum: 41.7 °C
Average: 37.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 30.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.04 / 0.22 Watt
Idle	0.72 / 1.5 / 1.57 Watt
Load	3.48 / 6.04 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 2300 mAh	Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh	Microsoft Lumia 650 2000 mAh
Power Consumption		20%	10%	-15%	10%	14%
Idle Minimum *	0.72	0.61 15%	0.96 -33%	0.73 -1%	0.73 -1%	0.7 3%
Idle Average *	1.5	1.41 6%	1.39 7%	2.09 -39%	0.92 39%	1.1 27%
Idle Maximum *	1.57	1.51 4%	1.45 8%	2.11 -34%	0.93 41%	1.18 25%
Load Average *	3.48	2.56 26%	2.65 24%	4.15 -19%	4.47 -28%	4.04 -16%
Load Maximum *	6.04	3.1 49%	3.51 42%	5.05 16%	5.96 1%	4.07 33%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		12h 55min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 50min

	Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 2300 mAh	Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 2540 mAh	Microsoft Lumia 650 2000 mAh
Battery Runtime		92%	111%	59%	47%	13%
Reader / Idle	775	1599 106%	1978 155%	1404 81%		910 17%
H.264	460	658 43%	863 88%	568 23%		510 11%
WiFi v1.3	353	643 82%	628 78%	604 71%	519 47%	345 -2%
Load	170	402 136%	376 121%	272 60%		213 25%

Pros

+ 纤薄的机身

+ 独立相机键

+ microSD卡槽支持App2SD

+ 支持Micacast，USB OTG和DLNA

+ 支持5 GHz无线网

+ 不错的自动对焦前置相机

+ 不错的整体性能

+ 安卓6.0棉花糖

+ 优秀的耳机通话品质

+ 支持快速充电

Cons

- 电池续航短

- 无指纹识别器

- 测试机的触控屏幕存在问题

- 车载功能较弱

- 主相机视频拍摄对焦存在问题

- 不可更换电池

- 未附带Pump Express+ 2.0充电器

In review: Sony Xperia XA (F3111). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

索尼的新Xperia XA中端智能手机凭借优秀的配置得到了一些额外的分数：它16 GB的内部存储空间可以通过micro-SD卡方便地扩展，micro-USB接口支持OTG功能，同时还提供了NFC功能。不过，可以用于更便捷地解锁手机的指纹识别器并没有得到支持。喜欢拍照的用户应该会对独立的快门键情有独钟，而它的主相机也有很高的像素数以及自动对焦功能。与同类机型相似的是，用户需要在照片品质上做出一些妥协。我们也很喜欢它性能优秀的MediaTek整合芯片和明亮的屏幕。不过，反复出现的触控屏幕问题，在测试中让我们感到十分烦躁。对很多潜在消费者来说无法接受的一点可能会是它较短的电池续航。

Xperia XA的主要卖点是它纤薄的外形，同时快速的处理器、明亮的屏幕和可扩展的存储空间也十分让人喜欢。最后，较短的续航时间破坏了这台测试机均衡的整体表现。

市场价270欧元（约2011人民币）的Xperia XA属于目前中端智能手机市场较贵的机型。我们的测试结果表明，华为 P9 Lite将会是它的主要竞争机型之一。这款机型提供了更大的屏幕，更长的电池续航和内置的指纹识别器，它的起售价也同样为270欧元（约2011人民币）。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Sony Xperia XA - 2016-08-10 08/10/2016 v5.1^(old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis

83%

Keyboard

68 / 75 → 90%

Pointing Device

77%

Connectivity

45 / 60 → 74%

Weight

93%

Battery

88%

Display

81%

Games Performance

25 / 63 → 40%

Application Performance

44 / 70 → 63%

Temperature

87%

Noise

100%

Audio

56 / 91 → 62%

Camera

70%

Average

71%

81%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 索尼 Xperia XA 智能手机简短评测

Andreas Kilian, 2016-08-30 (Update: 2016-08-31)