华硕 VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T 变形本简短评测

Name: Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T
Brand: Asus

21小时。 时尚的铝合金外壳搭配360度转轴。这台售价650欧元（约4844人民币）的机型能否和更昂贵的竞争对手一较高下呢？它的待机续航达到了21小时，而上网浏览续航时间为何不足5个小时？

Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 09/03/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Windows Touchscreen Skylake

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T (VivoBook Flip TP301 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i3-6100U 2 x 2.3 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 520, Core: 950 MHz, Memory: 798 MHz

Memory

8 GB

, 单通道, DDR3L 1600 MHz SDRAM, 板载内存 4 GB , 内存槽最大支持 8 GB

Display

13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, 10点触控, BOE HB133WX1-402, TN, 可选 IPS 全高清 (1920x1080), glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP, 128 GB

, SATA 2.5寸, 50 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 音频输出和麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Sensors: 陀螺仪

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 323 x 227

Battery

55 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3 芯, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 10 h

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 90万像素 640x480

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声， SonicMaster Lite 技术, Keyboard: 孤岛式, 45瓦电源适配器, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.658 kg, Power Supply: 172 g

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T DIN A4 ❌

Headphone/microphone, USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-C), 2x USB 3.0, HDMI, power-in

USB 2.0, card reader, volume control, power button

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T	31 MB/s
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T	27.9 MB/s -10%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368	20.4 MB/s -34%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N	14.3 MB/s -54%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T	38.7 MB/s
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T	37.17 MB/s -4%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N	25.2 MB/s -35%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368	24.73 MB/s -36%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng Intel Wireless-AC 7265	439 MBit/s +89%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (Seb)	232 MBit/s
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (Seb)	134 MBit/s -42%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (Seb)	457 MBit/s
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng Intel Wireless-AC 7265	323 MBit/s -29%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (Seb)	281 MBit/s -39%


170 cd/m²	174 cd/m²	173 cd/m²
156 cd/m²	166 cd/m²	158 cd/m²
158 cd/m²	162 cd/m²	164 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE HB133WX1-402 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 174 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 164.6 cd/m² Minimum: 9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 166 cd/m²
Contrast: 377:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.99 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
63% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.02% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T BOE HB133WX1-402, , 1920x1080, 13.30	Dell Inspiron 13 5368 AUO B133HAB, , 1920x1080, 13.30	Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Sharp LQ133T1JW02, , 2560x1440, 13.30	HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng LG Philips LGD0000, , 2560x1440, 13.30	Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T AUO B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.30
Display		-7%	63%	55%	53%
Display P3 Coverage	41.63	38.88 -7%	69.6 67%	66.8 60%	65.1 56%
sRGB Coverage	62.6	57.7 -8%	98 57%	92.8 48%	93 49%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	43.02	40.17 -7%	70.7 64%	67.3 56%	66.5 55%
Response Times		-130%	557%	-37%	55%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	38 ?(19, 19)	44 ?(20, 24) -16%	36 ?(12, 24) 5%	24 ?(11, 36) 37%	29 ?(15, 14) 24%
Response Time Black / White *	9 ?(4, 5)	31 ?(15, 16) -244%	30 ?(8, 22) -233%	19 ?(10, 28) -111%	22 ?(5, 17) -144%
PWM Frequency	50 ?(90)		1000 ?(10) 1900%		192 ?(30) 284%
Screen		21%	72%	49%	35%
Brightness middle	166	240 45%	320 93%	324 95%	302 82%
Brightness	165	229 39%	308 87%	324 96%	298 81%
Brightness Distribution	90	92 2%	91 1%	90 0%	90 0%
Black Level *	0.44	0.24 45%	0.17 61%	0.34 23%	0.21 52%
Contrast	377	1000 165%	1882 399%	953 153%	1438 281%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.07	4.75 -17%	3.18 22%	4.36 -7%	6.33 -56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.38	9.09 -42%	9.91 -55%		11.89 -86%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.99	4.3 -8%	4.13 -4%	4.62 -16%	8.13 -104%
Gamma	2.49 ^88%	2.5 ^88%	2.03 ^108%	2.18 ^101%	2.52 ^87%
CCT	7491 ^87%	5893 ^110%	6752 ^96%	6857 ^95%	6811 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	40	36.79 -8%	65 63%	60 50%	60 50%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	63	57.39 -9%	98 56%	93 48%	93 48%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-39% / -5%	231% / 161%	22% / 38%	48% / 42%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4 ms rise
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

50 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points +37%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Intel Core i5-6200U	113 Points +19%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Intel Core i7-6500U	104 Points +9%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T Intel Core i3-6100U	95 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Intel Core m3-6Y30	85 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Intel Core i7-6500U	321 Points +32%
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Intel Core i7-6500U	312 Points +28%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Intel Core i5-6200U	284 Points +16%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T Intel Core i3-6100U	244 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Intel Core m3-6Y30	208 Points -15%

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

30.5 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

244 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

95 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8	3699 Points +25%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	3161 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP	2960 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128	2727 Points -8%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8	4577 Points +11%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP	4121 Points
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	3971 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128	3496 Points -15%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2960 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4121 points
Help

	Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP	Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8	Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Lite-On CV1-8B256	HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP	Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Lite-On CV1-8B128
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		610%	761%	389%	406%
Read Seq	396	479 21%	507 28%	491.8 24% 491.8 24%	497 26%
Write Seq	133.5	270.1 102%	354.4 165%	264.5 98% 264.5 98%	182.9 37%
Read 512	259.5	428.3 65%	355.3 37%	396.2 53% 396.2 53%	353 36%
Write 512	23.86	267.9 1023%	353.9 1383%	264.5 1009% 264.5 1009%	144.1 504%
Read 4k	5.783	23.77 311%	32.66 465%	30.88 434% 30.88 434%	31.89 451%
Write 4k	8.507	81.4 857%	81.6 859%	75.6 789% 75.6 789%	62 629%
Read 4k QD32	97.5	333.6 242%	277.6 185%	31.85 -67% 31.85 -67%	207.7 113%
Write 4k QD32	8.515	200.9 2259%	261.2 2968%	73.9 768% 73.9 768%	131.8 1448%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP

Sequential Read: 396 MB/s

Sequential Write: 133.5 MB/s

512K Read: 259.5 MB/s

512K Write: 23.86 MB/s

4K Read: 5.783 MB/s

4K Write: 8.507 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 97.5 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 8.515 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1490 Points +41%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1415 Points +33%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1326 Points +25%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1326 Points +25%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U	1060 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	714 Points -33%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	7945 Points +68%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	7843 Points +66%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	7439 Points +57%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	7439 Points +57%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	5510 Points +17%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U	4724 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	911 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	853 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	853 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		1141 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		3915 points
Help

... in comparison

Rise of the Tomb Raider | BioShock Infinite | Thief

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8	17.3 fps +24%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP	14 fps
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128	8.4 fps -40%

BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8	32.2 fps +33%
Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	29.6 fps +22%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP	27.3 fps +12%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP	24.3 fps
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128	20.2 fps -17%

Thief - 1024x768 Very Low Preset
Dell Inspiron 13 5368 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8	24.3 fps +83%
Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP	13.3 fps

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	43	24.3	18.4
Thief (2014)	13.3	8.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	14	9

Noise Level

Idle		31.3 / 31.3 / 32.9 dB(A)
Load		35 / 34.9 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


24.3 °C	24.5 °C	25.1 °C
24.2 °C	25.7 °C	25.4 °C
24.2 °C	24.5 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 25.7 °C
Average: 24.8 °C


25.1 °C	25.4 °C	25.1 °C
25.9 °C	26.6 °C	25.5 °C
24.9 °C	24.7 °C	24.7 °C

Maximum: 26.6 °C
Average: 25.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).

Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.26 / 0.4 Watt
Idle	2.95 / 5.6 / 7.7 Watt
Load	22.6 / 23.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF128HCHP, TN, 1920x1080, 13.30	Dell Inspiron 13 5368 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30	Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Lite-On CV1-8B256, IPS, 2560x1440, 13.30	HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP, IPS, 2560x1440, 13.30	Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Lite-On CV1-8B128, IPS with 72% NTSC, 1920x1080, 13.30
Power Consumption		-22%	-67%	-25%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	2.95	4.4 -49%	6.2 -110%	3.9 -32%	3.4 -15%
Idle Average *	5.6	6.1 -9%	8 -43%	7.4 -32%	7 -25%
Idle Maximum *	7.7	6.8 12%	11.6 -51%	9.2 -19%	7.6 1%
Load Average *	22.6	29 -28%	40 -77%	28.1 -24%	19 16%
Load Maximum *	23.5	31.9 -36%	36.6 -56%	27.6 -17%	20.1 14%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		21h 00min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 50min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 13min

	Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh	Dell Inspiron 13 5368 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh	Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T-746N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh	HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh	Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 54 Wh
Battery Runtime		-40%	-24%	72%	13%
Reader / Idle	1260	674 -47%	669 -47%		1027 -18%
WiFi v1.3	290	240 -17%	382 32%	500 72%	386 33%
Load	193	86 -55%	85 -56%		239 24%
H.264			393

Pros

+ 坚固，高品质的机身

+ 易于维护更新

+ 非常清凉安静

+ 低功耗

Cons

- 相对较短的电池续航

- 键盘反馈僵硬

- TN屏幕较暗

- 低于90％亮度屏幕采用50赫兹的闪烁亮度控制

- 缓慢的SATA固态硬盘

- HD 520整合显卡性能低

In review: Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T. Test model courtesy of Cyberport.de

华硕再次为我们带来了一台优点众多的产品，但它同时也存在一些不小的问题。VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T在较低的售价上，应该可以成为一款有潜力的变形本。在650欧元（约4864人民币）的价位上，它搭配了铝合金机身，全高清分辨率，丰富的接口，不错的可维护性，高速固态硬盘和实用的电池续航时间。

不过，这台华硕设备的入门机型也有一些缺点，TN屏幕的可视角度窄不太适合作为平板使用。而略为僵硬的键盘和不太稳定的屏幕转轴也同样会影响使用感受。因为这些缺点，我们不太推荐这台测试机，不过它的高配机型十分值得考虑。升级之后，它搭配同样分辨率的IPS屏幕，可视角度更宽，以及GeForce 920M显卡和256 GB固态硬盘，售价999欧元（约7476人民币）起。更贵的高配机型可能也是搭配的较慢的SATA固态硬盘，不过容量更大。

需要更丰富接口的用户可以考虑Acer Aspire R13 R7-372T，不过它也更笨重一些。Zenbook UX360CA，Aspire R13 R7-372T和Spectre x360相比都有两个优势：M.2固态硬盘速度更快以及效果更好的IPS屏幕。Spectre x360 13-4104ng还提供了品质更高的机身，和Aspire R13 R7一样，它们的屏幕分辨率也更高。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Asus VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T - 2016-08-30 08/30/2016 v5.1^(old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis

87 / 98 → 89%

Keyboard

71%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

46 / 80 → 57%

Weight

67 / 35-78 → 74%

Battery

80%

Display

74%

Games Performance

54 / 68 → 79%

Application Performance

76 / 87 → 87%

Temperature

96%

Noise

90%

Audio

59 / 91 → 65%

Camera

23 / 85 → 27%

Average

70%

78%

Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 VivoBook Flip TP301UA-DW006T 变形本简短评测

Sebastian Jentsch, 2016-09- 3 (Update: 2016-09-10)