惠普 Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV 变形本简短评测

Name: HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV
Brand: HP

来回翻转。 惠普现在在15寸的Pavilion x360变形本上提供Kaby Lake处理器的选项。在升级到第七代处理器之外，还有一些其他的变化。这些变化能够让我们转变对于Pavilion的看法嘛？还是依旧无法让我们满意？

Sam Medley (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 01/07/2017 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Skylake Tablet Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of CUKUSA.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV (Pavilion x360 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620 - 1024 MB VRAM, Core: 1050 MHz, Memory: 798 MHz, 集成, 21.20.16.4471

Memory

8 GB

, DDR3L, 1600 MHz, 单通道

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, 10点多点触控, Chi Mei CHMN15D3, IPS, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

WDC WD10SPCX-60KHST0, 1 TB, 5400 RPM, SATA, 918 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Combo in/out, Card Reader: 多合一读卡器, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/)

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 23.9 x 382 x 248.9

Battery

48 Wh, 45908 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 8 h

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p 摄像头

Additional features

Speakers: 2, 立体声, 朝下, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, None, McAfee LiveSafe™ 30-day trial offer, B & O PLAY Audio, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.3 kg, Power Supply: 340 g

Price

799.99 USD

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Dell Inspiron 15 5568 Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360	79 MB/s +22%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE	77.8 MB/s +20%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV	64.8 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE	64.1 MB/s -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568	21 MB/s -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV	87.9 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE	86.8 MB/s -1%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360	85.6 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE	84 MB/s -4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568	26.5 MB/s -70%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	575 MBit/s +67%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	344 MBit/s
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	85.5 MBit/s -75%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	525 MBit/s +70%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	309 MBit/s
HP ProBook 455 T1B79UT Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	88.7 MBit/s -71%


200.01 cd/m²	226.2 cd/m²	193.2 cd/m²
197.4 cd/m²	230.8 cd/m²	197.9 cd/m²
204.2 cd/m²	227 cd/m²	219.3 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Chi Mei CHMN15D3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 230.8 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 210.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Contrast: 641:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.58 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.94 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Chi Mei CHMN15D3, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Chi Mey CHMN15D3, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE AU Optronics B140HAN03.0, a-Si WLED TFT, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080	Dell Inspiron 15 5568 AU Optronics B156HW01 V0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Display		-2%	-2%	43%	-11%
Display P3 Coverage	42.8	41.84 -2%	41.92 -2%	62 45%	38.04 -11%
sRGB Coverage	63.8	62.7 -2%	62.9 -1%	89.5 40%	57.1 -11%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	44.3	43.25 -2%	43.32 -2%	63.3 43%	39.3 -11%
Response Times		11%	-39%	-47%	2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36.8 ?(13.2, 23.6)	30.8 ?(12.8, 18) 16%	53 ?(19, 34) -44%	53 ?(17, 36, Plateau) -44%	42 ?(19, 23) -14%
Response Time Black / White *	26.8 ?(6, 20.8)	22 ?(11.2, 10.8) 18%	26 ?(6, 20) 3%	33 ?(7, 26) -23%	22 ?(6, 16) 18%
PWM Frequency	201.6 ?(99)	200 ?(90) -1%	50 ?(50) -75%	50 ?(10) -75%
Screen		13%	20%	0%	9%
Brightness middle	230.8	225 -3%	236 2%	340 47%	266 15%
Brightness	211	210 0%	212 0%	302 43%	249 18%
Brightness Distribution	84	85 1%	78 -7%	77 -8%	85 1%
Black Level *	0.36	0.22 39%	0.18 50%	0.31 14%	0.26 28%
Contrast	641	1023 60%	1311 105%	1097 71%	1023 60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.58	4.13 10%	3.92 14%	6.75 -47%	4.98 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.23	9.36 17%	9.2 18%	12.4 -10%	11.82 -5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.94	2.53 14%	2.35 20%	8.47 -188%	2.68 9%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.6 ^85%	2.34 ^94%	2.22 ^99%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6233 ^104%	6360 ^102%	6161 ^106%	6557 ^99%	6583 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	41	39.8 -3%	40 -2%	58 41%	36 -12%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	64	62.5 -2%	63 -2%	89 39%	57 -11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		7% / 10%	-7% / 5%	-1% / -1%	0% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13.2 ms rise
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

201.6 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 201.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 201.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R10 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R15 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Intel Core i5-7200U	11396 Points 0%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel Core i5-7200U	11371 Points
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel Core i5-6200U	9723 Points -14%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Intel Core i5-7200U	4985 Points 0%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel Core i5-7200U	4965 Points
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel Core i5-6200U	4368 Points -12%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel Core i5-7200U	1.47 Points
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel Core i5-6200U	1.28 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel Core i5-7200U	3.58 Points
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel Core i5-6200U	3.16 Points -12%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points +1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 Intel Core i7-6500U	128 Points 0%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel Core i5-7200U	128 Points
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel Core i5-6200U	113 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Intel Core i5-7200U	321 Points 0%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel Core i5-7200U	321 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 Intel Core i7-6500U	308 Points -4%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel Core i5-6200U	284 Points -12%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel Core i5-7200U	490.3 s *

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel Core i5-7200U	680 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

7464

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11371

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4965

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.47 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

25.27 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.58 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

128 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

34.27 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

321 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Radeon R7 M460, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	3694 Points +13%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8	3607 Points +11%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	3268 Points 0%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	3258 Points
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0	3026 Points -7%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8	4433 Points +7%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	4130 Points
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	3859 Points +1%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	3828 Points

PCMark 7 Score		2897 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3258 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3828 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4130 points
Help

... in comparison

	HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV	HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0	Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	Dell Inspiron 15 5568 Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-12%	8296%	6987%	6240%
Read Seq	104.5	106.9 2%	529 406%	490.5 369%	458.6 339%
Write Seq	110.1	106 -4%	508 361%	452.3 311%	270 145%
Read 512	41.38	33.01 -20%	409.8 890%	386.2 833%	397.4 860%
Write 512	61.5	51.2 -17%	316.5 415%	219.9 258%	242 293%
Read 4k	0.5	0.373 -25%	36.01 7102%	34.35 6770%	19.88 3876%
Write 4k	1.09	1.097 1%	106.7 9689%	91.2 8267%	86.7 7854%
Read 4k QD32	1.52	1.029 -32%	384.8 25216%	378.9 24828%	275.3 18012%
Write 4k QD32	1.06	1.055 0%	237.3 22287%	152.2 14258%	197.6 18542%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Transfer Rate Minimum: 12.7 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 111.3 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 84 MB/s

Access Time: 20.2 ms

Burst Rate: 182.4 MB/s

CPU Usage: 13.4 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE AMD Radeon R7 M460, i5-7200U	2141 Points +59%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U	1506 Points +12%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	1403 Points +4%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	1347 Points
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	1280 Points -5%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE AMD Radeon R7 M460, i5-7200U	1816 Points +26%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U	1549 Points +8%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	1437 Points
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	1133 Points -21%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	957 Points -33%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Inspiron 15 5568 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U	8388 Points +39%
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	6670 Points +10%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	6042 Points
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	5440 Points -10%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	777 Points +16%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	670 Points
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	618 Points -8%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	35413 Points +10%
HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	32197 Points

3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		44091 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5040 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		616 points
Help

Noise Level

Idle		31 / 31.1 / 31.1 dB(A)
Load		38.5 / 44 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29.8 dB(A)

	HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U	HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0	Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE Radeon R7 M460, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	Dell Inspiron 15 5568 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
Noise		4%	3%	4%	-0%
off / environment *	29.8	28.9 3%	30.15 -1%	30.16 -1%	31.2 -5%
Idle Minimum *	31	29.6 5%	30.2 3%	30.16 3%	32.8 -6%
Idle Average *	31.1	29.6 5%	30.2 3%	30.16 3%	32.8 -5%
Idle Maximum *	31.1	30.2 3%	31 -0%	30.5 2%	33.8 -9%
Load Average *	38.5	39 -1%	38 1%	37.2 3%	36.3 6%
Load Maximum *	44	39.9 9%	38.6 12%	37 16%	36.3 17%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


29.2 °C	33.2 °C	27.2 °C
23.8 °C	29.4 °C	26.6 °C
21.6 °C	22.6 °C	24.2 °C

Maximum: 33.2 °C
Average: 26.4 °C


28.2 °C	39 °C	37.4 °C
28.6 °C	30 °C	26 °C
28.4 °C	25.6 °C	24.2 °C

Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 29.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 38.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Therometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.6 °C / 78.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.2 °C / 5.7 F).

HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.3 / 0.6 Watt
Idle	5.3 / 7.9 / 9.7 Watt
Load	25.4 / 31.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 6200U, HD Graphics 520, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M460, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, a-Si WLED TFT, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Dell Inspiron 15 5568 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption		-2%	-11%	7%	2%
Idle Minimum *	5.3	4.3 19%	3.9 26%	3.7 30%	4.34 18%
Idle Average *	7.9	8.2 -4%	7.8 1%	7.16 9%	7.5 5%
Idle Maximum *	9.7	9 7%	8.4 13%	8.3 14%	8.4 13%
Load Average *	25.4	29.8 -17%	37 -46%	30.4 -20%	30.4 -20%
Load Maximum *	31.2	36.4 -17%	46 -47%	30.3 3%	32.5 -4%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		10h 46min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 45min

	HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh	HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 510-15IKB 80VC000XGE i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M460, 35 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53 Wh	Dell Inspiron 15 5568 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh
Battery Runtime		10%	-13%	40%	-20%
Reader / Idle	646			957 48%	449 -30%
WiFi v1.3	366	401 10%	320 -13%	561 53%	299 -18%
Load	105			126 20%	93 -11%

Pros

+ 坚固的外壳

+ 高反馈度的键盘

+ 扬声器能够产生完整的声音(使用音效软件)

+ 出色的计算性能

+ 低功耗

+ 众多的接口

+ 外壳颜色选择独一无二

Cons

- 极低速的机械硬盘

- 看上去很廉价的触摸板

- 喷漆容易划伤

- 屏幕亮度低且模糊

- 镜面屏反射过强

- 令人失望的续航能力

- 没有USB-C

- 对于作为平板使用来说设备过大过重

In review: HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

新一代的HP Pavilion X360好坏参半，虽然在键盘和处理器上有着明显的改进，但在屏幕和续航能力上却有所退步。Pavilion意在作为一台出色的办公设备，因为其搭载的Core i5处理器比处理基本的工作和多任务外有着更强的性能。然而对于多媒体应用来说，糟糕的屏幕仅仅是能用且不适用于长时间的视频观看。虽然有着2合1的功能，但Pavilion过大过重的机身使得长时间使用平板模式变成了不可能。所以变形能力感觉只是一个附加功能，不是太实用。

最大的问题在于低下的硬盘速度。5400RPM的机械硬盘对于今天的标准来说早已过时而且足以将任何一台出色的笔记本电脑拖到平均水平。再加上糟糕的触摸板，低亮度不出彩的屏幕以及难以进行维护，我们很难推荐Pavilion。它大多的优点都在于纯粹的外观上，而在真正重要的部分做的并不好。在同一个价位上，竞品提供了相同的Kaby Lake处理器，但有着更快的SSD，在同等的支出水平下，这些竞品是更好的选择。

在800美元的价位上，惠普 Pavilion并不是一个值得选择的产品。诚然升级到Kaby Lake处理器是十分受欢迎的，但这无法成为购买它的理由。用于应该考虑其他的2合1设备，比如联想Yoga 710-14IKB。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV - 2016-12-22 12/22/2016 v6^(old)
Sam Medley

Chassis

82 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

89%

Pointing Device

56%

Connectivity

41 / 81 → 51%

Weight

61 / 20-67 → 87%

Battery

88%

Display

70%

Games Performance

56 / 85 → 66%

Application Performance

72 / 92 → 78%

Temperature

87%

Noise

86 / 95 → 91%

Audio

80%

Average

72%

76%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5192 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 Pavilion x360 15t X3W72AV 变形本简短评测

Sam Medley, 2017-01- 7 (Update: 2020-06- 8)