惠普 Pavilion 14-al103ng 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP Pavilion 14-al103ng
Brand: HP

Kaby Lake处理器的升级。惠普的14英寸笔记本电脑具有强大的处理器。低系统噪声，发热少，拥有IPS屏幕。听起来不错。然而，Pavilion有一些缺点。

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 01/13/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Pavilion 14-al103ng (Pavilion 14-bf Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620, Core: 1000 MHz, 单声道, 21.20.16.4542

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4-2400, 单声道, 两个插槽(一个被占)

Display

14.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AU Optronics, IPS, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0, 500 GB

, 5400 rpm, 420 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 音响结合, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0

Networking

RealTek Semiconductor RTL8101/2/3 Family Fast Ethernet NIC (10/100MBit/s), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.5 x 338.6 x 224.3

Battery

41 Wh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 9 h

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: no, Cyberlink Power Media Player 14, Cyberlink PowerDirector 14, McAfee LiveSafe (试用版), MS Office 365 (试用版), 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.58 kg, Power Supply: 283 g

Price

599 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng	73.7 MB/s +35%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng	54.5 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK	49.5 MB/s -9%
Medion Akoya S4219	36.3 MB/s -33%
Dell Latitude 14 3470	23.5 MB/s -57%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261	19.1 MB/s -65%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Medion Akoya S4219	87.9 MB/s 0%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng	87.6 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK	83.4 MB/s -5%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng	80.8 MB/s -8%
Dell Latitude 14 3470	27.6 MB/s -68%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261	26.1 MB/s -70%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)	563 MBit/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	268 MBit/s
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter	165 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)	547 MBit/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	291 MBit/s
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Atheros AR5BWB222 Wireless Network Adapter	143 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	51 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	46 MBit/s


197 cd/m²	182 cd/m²	192 cd/m²
202 cd/m²	200 cd/m²	192 cd/m²
192 cd/m²	183 cd/m²	181 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 202 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 191.2 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 200 cd/m²
Contrast: 1429:1 (Black: 0.14 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.94 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
55% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.79% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
54.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.58% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Pavilion 14-al103ng IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	HP Pavilion 14-al003ng LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Dell Latitude 14 3470 TN LED, 1366x768, 14.00	Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 14.00	Medion Akoya S4219 IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display			1%	10%	17%	62%
Display P3 Coverage	36.58		36.97 1%	40.21 10%	42.88 17%	61.7 69%
sRGB Coverage	54.9		55.6 1%	60.5 10%	64.1 17%	84.8 54%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	37.79		38.2 1%	41.55 10%	44.3 17%	62 64%
Response Times		19%	9%	8%	10%	38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	53 ?(18, 35)	36.4 ?(18, 18.4) 31%	42 ?(15, 27) 21%	47 ?(25, 22) 11%	45 ?(17, 28) 15%	33 ?(11, 22) 38%
Response Time Black / White *	27 ?(8, 19)	25.2 ?(14, 11.2) 7%	28 ?(8, 20) -4%	26 ?(18, 8) 4%	26 ?(7, 19) 4%	17 ?(7, 10) 37%
PWM Frequency					50 ?(60)	50 ?(40)
Screen		-9%	-2%	-68%	-1%	14%
Brightness middle	200	220 10%	230 15%	206 3%	257 29%	216 8%
Brightness	191	209 9%	226 18%	193 1%	263 38%	211 10%
Brightness Distribution	90	88 -2%	86 -4%	87 -3%	90 0%	65 -28%
Black Level *	0.14	0.28 -100%	0.2 -43%	0.48 -243%	0.24 -71%	0.2 -43%
Contrast	1429	786 -45%	1150 -20%	429 -70%	1071 -25%	1080 -24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.06	4.58 9%	5.07 -0%	11 -117%	5.44 -8%	3.7 27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.91	11.47 -5%	10.07 8%	19.57 -79%	10.93 -0%	5.88 46%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.94	2.34 41%	3.64 8%	11.51 -192%	3.95 -0%	2.67 32%
Gamma	2.41 ^91%	2.26 ^97%	2.46 ^89%	2.23 ^99%	2.29 ^96%	2.65 ^83%
CCT	6159 ^106%	6661 ^98%	6521 ^100%	13671 ^48%	6896 ^94%	6418 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	35	34.6 -1%	35 0%	38.46 10%	40 14%	55 57%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	55	54.2 -1%	55 0%	60.61 10%	64 16%	85 55%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		5% / -4%	3% / 0%	-17% / -42%	9% / 4%	38% / 27%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8 ms rise
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 35 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5010

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11407

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

7778

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

129 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

330 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

38.23 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | JetStream 1.1

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Intel Core i5-6267U	123 Points -5%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng Intel Core i5-6200U	115 Points -11%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Intel Core i3-6100U	97 Points -25%
Medion Akoya S4219 Intel Pentium N3700	37 Points -71%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Intel Core i5-7200U	330 Points
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	324 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Intel Core i5-6267U	314 Points -5%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng Intel Core i5-6200U	270 Points -18%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Intel Core i3-6100U	250 Points -24%
Medion Akoya S4219 Intel Pentium N3700	141 Points -57%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Intel Core i5-7200U	11407 Points
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	11042 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Intel Core i5-6267U	10595 Points -7%
Medion Akoya S4219 Intel Pentium N3700	4375 Points -62%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Intel Core i5-7200U	5010 Points
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	4911 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Intel Core i5-6267U	4903 Points -2%
Medion Akoya S4219 Intel Pentium N3700	1200 Points -76%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	3191 Points +10%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Intel Core i5-7200U	2890 Points
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	6723 Points +4%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Intel Core i5-7200U	6436 Points

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	3906 Points +7%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Intel Core i5-7200U	3637 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	7303 Points +7%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Intel Core i5-7200U	6830 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Intel Core i5-7200U	219 Points
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel Core i7-6500U	213.8 Points -2%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng Intel Core i5-6200U	194.5 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Intel Core i5-6267U	130.9 Points -40%
Medion Akoya S4219 Intel Pentium N3700	59.3 Points -73%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3040 points
Help

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	3710 Points +22%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-8D512	3545 Points +17%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280	3238 Points +7%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Toshiba MQ01ACF050	3074 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0	3040 Points
Medion Akoya S4219 HD Graphics (Braswell), N3700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1645 Points -46%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0

Transfer Rate Minimum: 47 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 115.6 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 85.7 MB/s

Access Time: 18.4 ms

Burst Rate: 202 MB/s

CPU Usage: 9.8 %

	HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0	Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Liteonit CV3-8D512	Dell Latitude 14 3470 Toshiba MQ01ACF050	Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	Medion Akoya S4219 128 GB eMMC Flash	HP Pavilion 14-al003ng SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		12166%	-3%	12735%	1396%	8742%
Read Seq	113.3	484.1 327%	108.9 -4%	510 350%	151.2 33%	469.3 314%
Write Seq	110.2	449.8 308%	103.2 -6%	458.8 316%	55.7 -49%	309.1 180%
Read 512	30.83	399.1 1195%		399.7 1196%	156.6 408%
Write 512	47.13	355.1 653%		299.3 535%	46.9 0%
Read 4k	0.34	33.44 9735%	0.362 6%	35.27 10274%	16.29 4691%	14 4018%
Write 4k	0.981	67.5 6781%	0.946 -4%	90.2 9095%	16.5 1582%	73.9 7433%
Read 4k QD32	0.72	368.5 51081%	0.721 0%	397.7 55136%	20.62 2764%	149.5 20664%
Write 4k QD32	1.026	280.6 27249%	0.901 -12%	257.3 24978%	18.86 1738%	204.6 19842%

3DMark 11 Performance		1538 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2508 Points +77%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK Intel Iris Graphics 550, Intel Core i5-6267U	1782 Points +26%
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1481 Points +5%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1414 Points
Dell Latitude 14 3470 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U	1063 Points -25%
Medion Akoya S4219 Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Pentium N3700	468 Points -67%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	43.5	25	20.6	7.1

Noise Level

Idle		31.2 / 31.3 / 31.3 dB(A)
Load		32.4 / 34.3 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


24.3 °C	33 °C	35.2 °C
23.6 °C	31.7 °C	37.6 °C
23 °C	24.9 °C	32.1 °C

Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 29.5 °C


31.5 °C	31.7 °C	25.4 °C
36.8 °C	31.3 °C	24.6 °C
32.1 °C	26.4 °C	25.3 °C

Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 29.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.1 °C / 89.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-4.4 °C / -7.9 F).

HP Pavilion 14-al103ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.36 / 0.46 Watt
Idle	5.5 / 8.2 / 8.9 Watt
Load	29.1 / 29.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		5h 30min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 48.9 Wh	392 min +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510S-14ISK 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 30 Wh	384 min +16%
HP Pavilion 14-al103ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh	330 min
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh	329 min 0%
Medion Akoya S4219 N3700, HD Graphics (Braswell), 35 Wh	318 min -4%
Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh	278 min -16%

Pros

+ IPS面板

+ 全高清分辨率

+ 运行安静

+ 低温

Cons

- 屏幕反光

- 平庸的电池续航

- 仅限快速以太网

- 无ac Wi-Fi

- 仅一年保修

In review: HP Pavilion 14-al103ng. Test model courtesy of Cyberport.de

Pavilion与Skylake model的不同，仅仅存在于处理器和硬盘驱动器方面。惠普的14英寸机型配备了Kaby Lake一代的Core i5处理器，它可以满足大多数用户的需求。当BIOS中风扇选项始终禁用时，笔记本电脑运行安静。此外，它几乎不发烫。笔记本电脑内部有一个500GB的硬盘驱动器。替换为固态硬盘时，需要打开外壳。惠普的Pavilion在这方面不是特别方便。

正在寻找一个安静的14英寸的、拥有一个强大处理器的设备，以此作为家庭使用的用户，将会对Pavilion感到满意。

我们不能提供更多的购买理由。惠普对所有组件进行了过度削减。虽然，搭载的是视角稳定的IPS屏幕，但是它亮度过低而且表面反光。14英寸的笔记本电脑是为移动使用而制造的。但是，Pavilion的电池续航能力不支持这一点。除此之外，惠普仅安装快速以太网端口。千兆以太网是当前的标准。该笔记本电脑内部还有一个慢速Wi-Fi模块。在接近600欧元（〜635美元）的价位，买家可以预期获得一个搭载固态硬盘而不是机械硬盘的设备。最后一点，HP仅提供一年保修。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP Pavilion 14-al103ng - 2016-12-30 12/30/2016 v6^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

70 / 98 → 71%

Keyboard

70%

Pointing Device

67%

Connectivity

36 / 80 → 45%

Weight

68 / 20-67 → 100%

Battery

85%

Display

79%

Games Performance

55 / 68 → 80%

Application Performance

75 / 92 → 82%

Temperature

94%

Noise

92%

Audio

50%

Camera

49 / 85 → 58%

Average

68%

77%

Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 Pavilion 14-al103ng 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sascha Mölck, 2017-01-13 (Update: 2017-01-14)