技嘉 P55W v7 笔记本简短评测

Name: Gigabyte P55W v7
Brand: Gigabyte

标准v7。 技嘉新游戏本的目标用户是那些追求极致性价比而愿意在其余配置上做出让步的玩家。比起上一代来说，P55W v7提供了稍强的整体性能，噪音温度稍低的系统。

Sven Kloevekorn, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 03/14/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigabyte P55W v7 (P55 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1405 MHz, Memory: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 378.49, Nvidia Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, SO-DIMM DDR4, 2400 MHz, 单通道, 两条插槽中一条被占用, 最大 32 GB

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 全高清, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel HM175

Storage

Liteonit CV3-8D256, 256 GB

, SATA-3-SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. 插槽: 1x M.2 type 2280 (支持 PCIe/NVMe) & 1x 2.5 inch

Soundcard

Realtek ALC255 @ High Definition Audio-Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机 (音频输出) + 麦克风 (音频输入), 都是 3.5-mm 接口, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Optical drive

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 34 x 380 x 269

Battery

63 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 6 芯

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, 2 x 2瓦, Keyboard: 巧克力, Keyboard Light: yes, 180瓦电源适配器, Adobe Reader XI, CyberLink PowerDVD 12, MS Office 365 trial, 多种厂商工具, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.628 kg, Power Supply: 646 g

Price

1700 EUR

Links

Gigabyte homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Gigabyte P55W v7 Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Gigabyte P55W v6 MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US SCHENKER XMG P507 DIN A4 ❌

Left: Kensington, vent, mini-DisplayPort, Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, USB 3.0

Right: audio-in (mic), audio-out (headset), 2x USB 3.0, DVD burner, power

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG P507	77 MB/s +1%
Gigabyte P55W v7	76 MB/s
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T	75 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte P55W v6	73 MB/s -4%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US	23.4 MB/s -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte P55W v7	88 MB/s
Gigabyte P55W v6	87 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG P507	86 MB/s -2%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T	85 MB/s -3%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US	23.5 MB/s -73%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	507 MBit/s +8%
Gigabyte P55W v6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	492 MBit/s +5%
Gigabyte P55W v7 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	470 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	677 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte P55W v7 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	663 MBit/s
Gigabyte P55W v6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	660 MBit/s 0%


270 cd/m²	271 cd/m²	283 cd/m²
280 cd/m²	287 cd/m²	299 cd/m²
295 cd/m²	304 cd/m²	309 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 309 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 288.7 cd/m² Minimum: 9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 287 cd/m²
Contrast: 990:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.66 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Gigabyte P55W v7 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US 1920x1080, 15.60	SCHENKER XMG P507 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.60	Gigabyte P55W v6 LG Philips LP156WF4 (LGD040E), 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		2%	3%	2%	-1%
Display P3 Coverage	63.5	64.5 2%	65.6 3%	64.5 2%	63.2 0%
sRGB Coverage	82	83.4 2%	84.3 3%	83.4 2%	80.6 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	59.9	60.9 2%	61.7 3%	61 2%	59 -2%
Response Times		-4%	-3%	6%	-38%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	37 ?(15, 22)	40 ?(15, 25) -8%	36.8 ?(16.4, 20.4) 1%	36 ?(12, 24) 3%	56 ?(23, 33) -51%
Response Time Black / White *	25 ?(5, 20)	25 ?(5, 20) -0%	26.4 ?(5.2, 21.2) -6%	23 ?(5, 18) 8%	31 ?(8, 23) -24%
PWM Frequency
Screen		3%	16%	-1%	-6%
Brightness middle	287	321 12%	302 5%	288 0%	280 -2%
Brightness	289	296 2%	303 5%	292 1%	294 2%
Brightness Distribution	87	88 1%	87 0%	87 0%	82 -6%
Black Level *	0.29	0.33 -14%	0.169 42%	0.3 -3%	0.46 -59%
Contrast	990	973 -2%	1787 81%	960 -3%	609 -38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.92	4.42 10%	4.61 6%	5.1 -4%	4.48 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11	9.78 11%	9.98 9%	9.44 14%	10.16 8%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.66	3.34 9%	3.32 9%	4.43 -21%	2.69 27%
Gamma	2.32 ^95%	2.4 ^92%	2.24 ^98%	2.46 ^89%	2.37 ^93%
CCT	6482 ^100%	6213 ^105%	6358 ^102%	6687 ^97%	6455 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	54	55 2%	55.4 3%	55 2%	53 -2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	82	83 1%	84.4 3%	83 1%	80 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		0% / 2%	5% / 11%	2% / 0%	-15% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte P55W v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	156 Points
SCHENKER XMG P507 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points -5%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points -5%
Gigabyte P55W v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	143 Points -8%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	138 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte P55W v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	733 Points
SCHENKER XMG P507 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	682 Points -7%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	680 Points -7%
Gigabyte P55W v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	673 Points -8%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	658 Points -10%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

156 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

733 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	4741 Points +18%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4059 Points +1%
Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)	4014 Points 0%
Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256	4013 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256	5317 Points
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	5109 Points -4%
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5046 Points -5%
Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)	4784 Points -10%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4013 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5317 points
Help

	Gigabyte P55W v7 Liteonit CV3-8D256	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	SCHENKER XMG P507 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Gigabyte P55W v6 Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		28%	249%	227%	-6%
Read Seq	466.2	462.5 -1%	1696 264%	1857 298%	511 10%
Write Seq	261.9	462.7 77%	1584 505%	1240 373%	161.1 -38%
Read 512	252.5	335 33%	1044 313%	971 285%	338 34%
Write 512	254.8	407.1 60%	1562 513%	1239 386%	160.8 -37%
Read 4k	25.4	25.61 1%	50.8 100%	54.1 113%	26.2 3%
Write 4k	55	86.3 57%	139.2 153%	167.4 204%	76.7 39%
Read 4k QD32	358.5	246.7 -31%	591 65%	695 94%	264.7 -26%
Write 4k QD32	240.1	301.5 26%	422.8 76%	386.8 61%	160.3 -33%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Liteonit CV3-8D256

Sequential Read: 466.2 MB/s

Sequential Write: 261.9 MB/s

512K Read: 252.5 MB/s

512K Write: 254.8 MB/s

4K Read: 25.4 MB/s

4K Write: 55 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 358.5 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 240.1 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11872 Points +4%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11622 Points +2%
Gigabyte P55W v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11426 Points
Gigabyte P55W v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11422 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P507 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11045 Points -3%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	15466 Points +5%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	15387 Points +5%
Gigabyte P55W v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14792 Points +1%
Gigabyte P55W v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14693 Points
SCHENKER XMG P507 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14222 Points -3%

3DMark 11 Performance		11778 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		21839 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9669 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)			70.4	38.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)			72.6	61.8
Battlefield 1 (2016)			77.6	73.6
Dishonored 2 (2016)		80.2	60.2	46.5
Resident Evil 7 (2017)			98.5	83

Noise Level

Idle		33 / 34 / 35 dB(A)
HDD		34 dB(A)
DVD		37 / dB(A)
Load		39 / 50 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


49.6 °C	43.6 °C	31.1 °C
49 °C	45.4 °C	31.8 °C
45.1 °C	44.3 °C	28.3 °C

Maximum: 49.6 °C
Average: 40.9 °C


26.3 °C	38.7 °C	47.7 °C
29.7 °C	44.7 °C	47.1 °C
28.5 °C	44.5 °C	46.3 °C

Maximum: 47.7 °C
Average: 39.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.1 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-16.2 °C / -29.2 F).

Gigabyte P55W v7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG P507 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.4 / 0.8 Watt
Idle	8 / 13 / 18 Watt
Load	76 / 143 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Gigabyte P55W v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	Gigabyte P55W v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Power Consumption		-35%	-97%	-21%	-0%
Idle Minimum *	8	16 -100%	25.4 -218%	11 -38%	8 -0%
Idle Average *	13	19 -46%	30.3 -133%	16 -23%	13 -0%
Idle Maximum *	18	23 -28%	31.5 -75%	21 -17%	17 6%
Load Average *	76	68 11%	111.8 -47%	80 -5%	71 7%
Load Maximum *	143	157 -10%	163.2 -14%	174 -22%	165 -15%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		13h 9min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 46min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 38min

	Gigabyte P55W v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 63 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh	MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 51 Wh	SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 60 Wh	Gigabyte P55W v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 63 Wh
Battery Runtime		-36%	-73%	-14%	-8%
Reader / Idle	789	315 -60%	137 -83%	409 -48%	610 -23%
WiFi v1.3	346	220 -36%	101 -71%	274 -21%	352 2%
Load	98	87 -11%	35 -64%	123 26%	95 -3%
H.264		235			338

Pros

+ 无可挑剔的制造工艺，看起来很坚固的外壳

+ 相对较长的电池续航时间

+ 强大游戏性能（考虑价格因素）

+ 出色的输入设备

+ USB 3.1 Gen.2 Type-C

+ IPS屏幕

+ 无 PWM

Cons

- 在高转速下风扇有时啸叫

- 塑料易划伤外壳

- 接口位置排布不方便使用

- 相对速度较低的固态硬盘

- 响应时间不理想

- 无Thunderbolt 3

Gigabyte P55W v7. Test model courtesy of Gigabyte Germany

技嘉又一次在合适的地方做了一些缩减，让P55W v7这台总体上来说不错的笔记本电脑与其他游戏本相争。通过省去的特性诸如Thunderbolt 3与G-Sync让用户生下数百欧元----这些妥协无关性能。

仅考虑相对较低的价格，我们对它的输入设备以及IPS屏幕十分满意，但后者有一些限制。同样对坚固的塑料外壳及易于移除的底壳我们也很满意。但接口的排布，相对较慢的屏幕响应时间以及和原来一样无法令人完全满意的SSD并不让人喜欢。高负载下的高频噪音是技嘉P55W v7的唯一真正缺点。但这个可能是特殊情况。因此，它值得推荐但需要注意噪声。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Gigabyte P55W v7 - 2017-02-28 02/28/2017 v6^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis

79 / 98 → 81%

Keyboard

81%

Pointing Device

78%

Connectivity

60 / 81 → 74%

Weight

59 / 10-66 → 87%

Battery

87%

Display

86%

Games Performance

92%

Application Performance

91%

Temperature

86 / 95 → 90%

Noise

71 / 90 → 79%

Audio

68%

Camera

71 / 85 → 84%

Average

78%

84%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 技嘉 P55W v7 笔记本简短评测

Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-03-14 (Update: 2017-03-14)