联想 Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE 变形本简短评测

Name: Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE
Brand: Lenovo

Surface追随者。 这台二合一设备追随微软Surface Pro 4的脚步，应该也会被拿来与之比较。联想的这台变形本提供了更好的连接性和更优秀的固态硬盘，不过在屏幕和相机上则略显不足。

Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 11/10/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Skylake Windows Touchscreen Convertible / 2-in-1

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE (Miix 510 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 520

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4 双通道

Display

12.20 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 186 PPI, 10点触控, native pen support, Unknown, IPS, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, 256 GB

, 185 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Brightness Sensor, Micro-SIM (可选 LTE)

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.9 x 300 x 205

Battery

50 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 英特尔 SR1 Real Battery, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 8 h

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Primary Camera: 2 MPix 定焦
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix 后置，搭配闪光灯

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声，支持Dolby Audio, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, 45瓦电源适配器，使用电池的主动式手写笔，手写笔架，保护套, Lenovo ID, Always Online, App Explorer for FPC, CCSDK, WRITEit, PC Manager, Cloud Disk, Microsoft Office Desktop, Yandex, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.236 kg, Power Supply: 176 g

Price

980 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 510-12ISK sitting on the keyboard dock

Size Comparison

Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 DIN A4 ❌

Power adapter, USB 3.0, USB 3.0 Type-C, right + left dual array microphone

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)	638 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Dell Wireless 1820A 802.11ac	579 MBit/s -9%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 Broadcom BCM4356 802.11ac 2x2:2 (876 Mbps)	534 MBit/s -16%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	505 MBit/s -21%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	526 MBit/s +5%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)	500 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Dell Wireless 1820A 802.11ac	461 MBit/s -8%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 Broadcom BCM4356 802.11ac 2x2:2 (876 Mbps)	453 MBit/s -9%


331 cd/m²	343 cd/m²	333 cd/m²
323 cd/m²	327 cd/m²	319 cd/m²
315 cd/m²	323 cd/m²	303 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Unknown tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 343 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 324.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 327 cd/m²
Contrast: 934:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 9.52 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE Unknown, , 1920x1200, 12.20	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Samsung 123YL01-001 ID: SDC3853, , 2736x1824, 12.30	HP Elite x2 1012 G1 LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.10	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Panasonic VVX12T041N00, , 2160x1440, 12.00	Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Samsung L_QLLTN120QL01L01, , 2160x1440, 12.00	Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 TMA 1200 Unknown Vendor, , 2160x1440, 12.00
Display		3%	-18%	3%	6%	3%
Display P3 Coverage	64.5	65 1%	53.8 -17%	65.5 2%	68.1 6%	65.8 2%
sRGB Coverage	92	96.5 5%	73.7 -20%	96.1 4%	97.4 6%	96.2 5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	65.5	67 2%	53.8 -18%	66.9 2%	70.2 7%	66.8 2%
Response Times		-45%	0%	230%	33%	25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	33 ?(21, 12)	46 ?(17.2, 28.8, plateau, spikes in between) -39%	33.2 ?(15.2, 18) -1%	20 ?(5, 15, detail 5 schraffiert) 39%	30 ?(11, 19) 9%	25 ?(9, 16) 24%
Response Time Black / White *	23 ?(10, 13)	31.2 ?(6, 25.2, Spikes in between) -36%	22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4) 1%	34 ?(15, 19, PWM@100% mit/ohne PSU) -48%	16 ?(4.4, 11.6) 30%	17 ?(4, 13) 26%
PWM Frequency	125 ?(90)	50 ?(50) -60%		1000 ?(100) 700%	200 ?(18) 60%
Screen		21%	1%	6%	4%	4%
Brightness middle	327	413 26%	322 -2%	345 6%	341 4%	451 38%
Brightness	324	396 22%	319 -2%	328 1%	318 -2%	425 31%
Brightness Distribution	88	87 -1%	97 10%	91 3%	87 -1%	80 -9%
Black Level *	0.35	0.36 -3%	0.42 -20%	0.38 -9%	0.36 -3%	0.37 -6%
Contrast	934	1147 23%	767 -18%	908 -3%	947 1%	1219 31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.54	3.09 53%	6.02 8%	8.4 -28%	6 8%	11.04 -69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	15.59		10.06 35%	11.9 24%		14.92 4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.52	3.92 59%	6.29 34%	4.3 55%	8.12 15%	10.45 -10%
Gamma	2.35 ^94%	2.3 ^96%	2.4 ^92%	2.63 ^84%	2.23 ^99%	2 ^110%
CCT	8802 ^74%	7333 ^89%	7712 ^84%	7368 ^88%	7011 ^93%	8849 ^73%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	59	61 3%	47.8 -19%	62 5%	63.4 7%	74 25%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	92	97 5%	73.2 -20%		97.4 6%	100 9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-7% / 4%	-6% / -3%	80% / 50%	14% / 10%	11% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

125 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 125 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 125 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Intel Core i5-6300U	122 Points +5%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel Core i5-6200U	114 Points -2%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel Core m5-6Y54	111 Points -4%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54	111 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 Intel Core m5-6Y54	107 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel Core m5-6Y54	99 Points -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	88 Points -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Intel Core i5-6300U	306 Points +24%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel Core i5-6200U	289 Points +17%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel Core m5-6Y54	255 Points +4%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE Intel Core i5-6200U	246 Points
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 Intel Core m5-6Y54	232 Points -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	206 Points -16%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D Intel Core i5-7Y54	205 Points -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel Core m5-6Y54	200 Points -19%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

116 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

246 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

39.88 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	3281 Points +1%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	3264 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	2983 Points -9%
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG	2979 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	2770 Points -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	2733 Points -16%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027	2717 Points -17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	2426 Points -26%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	4197 Points
Acer Spin 7 SP714-51-M09D HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Kingston RBUSNS4180S3256GG	4076 Points -3%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	3996 Points -5%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	3932 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	3837 Points -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	3697 Points -12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	3186 Points -24%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027	2721 Points -35%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3264 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4197 points
Help

	Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Liteon L8H-256V2G	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-39%	-27%	-38%	-36%	-25%
Read Seq	1271	666 -48%	501 -61%	518 -59%	497.9 -61%	512 -60%
Write Seq	305.4	154.2 -50%	297.2 -3%	199.9 -35%	153.5 -50%	462.1 51%
Read 512	651	266.3 -59%	351.7 -46%	374.9 -42%	401.2 -38%	376 -42%
Write 512	305.2	154.2 -49%	295.7 -3%	201 -34%	154.5 -49%	295.2 -3%
Read 4k	41.07	28.51 -31%	28.31 -31%	29.3 -29%	36.2 -12%	31.83 -22%
Write 4k	122.7	101.5 -17%	90.3 -26%	76.8 -37%	95.5 -22%	64.5 -47%
Read 4k QD32	411.2	368.3 -10%	285 -31%	272 -34%	389.5 -5%	269.6 -34%
Write 4k QD32	305.1	153.6 -50%	268.4 -12%	197.1 -35%	154 -50%	178.2 -42%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256

Sequential Read: 1271 MB/s

Sequential Write: 305.4 MB/s

512K Read: 651 MB/s

512K Write: 305.2 MB/s

4K Read: 41.07 MB/s

4K Write: 122.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 411.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 305.1 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1428 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	1402 Points +7%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1306 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	1200 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	1014 Points -22%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	781 Points -40%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	7455 Points +19%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	7307 Points +17%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	6308 Points +1%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	6271 Points
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	5638 Points -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	5259 Points -16%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	905 Points
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	797 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	697 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		1428 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		4755 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite | Thief | Rise of the Tomb Raider

BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	58.1 fps +25%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	54.4 fps +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	52.4 fps +13%
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	46.3 fps
HP Elite x2 1012 G1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G	44.1 fps -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	33.1 fps -29%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027	26.5 fps -43%

Thief - 1024x768 Very Low Preset
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	18.2 fps
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027	13.9 fps -24%

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset
Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	17.4 fps
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2	17 fps -2%
Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027	7.3 fps -58%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	46.3	24.9
Thief (2014)	18.2	11.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	17.4	9.2

Noise Level

Idle		30.15 / 30.8 / 31 dB(A)
Load		36.8 / 33.8 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.15 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


26.3 °C	27.6 °C	27.2 °C
26.8 °C	27.3 °C	27.5 °C
36.8 °C	33.8 °C	35.4 °C

Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 29.9 °C


25.1 °C	26.1 °C	25 °C
25.4 °C	26.2 °C	25.5 °C
25.1 °C	25.7 °C	25.5 °C

Maximum: 26.2 °C
Average: 25.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.5 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).

Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (62 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.3 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.33 / 0.6 Watt
Idle	4.2 / 11.5 / 11.7 Watt
Load	31 / 27.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1200, 12.20	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30	HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.10	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00	Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027, IPS, 2160x1440, 12.00
Power Consumption		18%	18%	-7%	0%
Idle Minimum *	4.2	4.4 -5%	3.7 12%	7.3 -74%	7.4 -76%
Idle Average *	11.5	9 22%	6.8 41%	10 13%	11.6 -1%
Idle Maximum *	11.7	10.7 9%	7.6 35%	10.15 13%	11.6 1%
Load Average *	31	19.6 37%	22.5 27%	25.2 19%	16.8 46%
Load Maximum *	27.4	19.9 27%	34.5 -26%	29.3 -7%	19.1 30%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		11h 36min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 51min

	Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 50 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 38 Wh	HP Elite x2 1012 G1 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh	Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 41 Wh	Huawei MateBook m5-6Y54 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 33 Wh
Battery Runtime		21%	20%	-2%	34%	-18%
Reader / Idle	696	899 29%	732 5%	640 -8%	861 24%	478 -31%
WiFi v1.3	322	427 33%	443 38%	321 0%	440 37%	263 -18%
Load	111	111 0%	130 17%	112 1%	157 41%	106 -5%
H.264			432	468	450

Pros

+ 优秀的键盘

+ A型和C型USB接口

+ 坚固高品质机身

+ 可选LTE模组

+ 实用的主相机

+ 优秀的麦克风效果

Cons

- 屏幕色彩不够鲜明

- 低于90%屏幕亮度时使用闪烁亮度控制

- 风扇在待机和连接电源时一直旋转

- 无视频输出接口

- 一般的前置摄像头

- 电池续航不算出色

In review: Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE. Test model courtesy of campuspoint

联想Miix 510 Pro是Surface Pro 4的有力挑战者吗？是的，不过这台二合一设备的整体表现并不及更成熟的微软设备。Miix需要更长的电池续航，更好的主相机品质和色彩更绚丽的屏幕，才能得到更高的分数。

我们十分欣赏它的高品质机身和优秀的键盘，不过尺寸较小的触控版则让我们很难满意。它的应用程序性能十分出色，尽管处理器只能在测试中保持标准速度。归功于出色的键盘，不错的麦克风和物理接口（USB-A和C），Miix 510可以成为工作交流极为便利的随身设备。我们更希望它能够在机身上提供一个视频输出接口，用户目前需要购买额外的拓展坞才能连接显示器。

联想为Miix 510提供了多种配置可供用户选择，从入门级到高端各不相同。宏碁也为Switch 12 Alpha采用了相似的策略，它的售价从650欧元到1200欧元不等（约4805到8871人民币）。

Aspire Switch Alpha 12当然也是一个不错的选择，特别是如果你需要更高的屏幕分辨率的话。它不支持LTE，但宏碁提供了512GB固态硬盘可选。一些机型附带手写笔，但更需要注意的是，不是所有机型都附带键盘底座。

搭配Type Cover和256GB硬盘的微软 Surface Pro 4售价1300欧元（约9610人民币）。它的酷睿 i5 6300U处理器性能表现相当（并没有快很多）。Surface Pro搭配的屏幕提供了更高的分辨率，更丰富的色彩和手写笔，但缺少LTE网络和USB-C接口。售价980欧元（约7245人民币）的Miix 510 Pro定位十分合理。我们的测试机型搭配了英特尔酷睿 i5 6200U，8GB DDR4内存和256GB固态硬盘；键盘底座也随机附带。联想的这台二合一设备定价略高于配置相近的Switch 12 Alpha。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Lenovo Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE - 2016-11-01 11/01/2016 v5.1^(old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis

84 / 98 → 86%

Keyboard

84%

Pointing Device

80%

Connectivity

40 / 80 → 50%

Weight

72 / 35-78 → 86%

Battery

84%

Display

81%

Games Performance

55 / 68 → 81%

Application Performance

83 / 87 → 96%

Temperature

89%

Noise

92%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Average

74%

82%

Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Bernie Pechlaner - Senior Tech Writer - 276 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 Miix 510 Pro 80U10006GE 变形本简短评测

Sebastian Jentsch, 2016-11-10 (Update: 2016-11-12)