Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Graphics 6100

Intel Iris Graphics 6100

英特尔Iris Graphics 6100 (GT3) 是一款集成的Braodwell架构显卡,在2015年第一季度发布。它主要使用于几颗低电压处理器中(28瓦TDP)如酷睿i5-5257U或i7-5557U。酷睿i5和酷睿i7芯片拥有48个执行单元(EU),而酷睿i3版本仅提供47个。根据处理器型号的不同,它的最高核心频率在1000和1100MHz之间。

架构和特性

Broadwell处理器集成显卡采用了基于英特尔第八代(Gen8)架构,在各方面相比之前的Gen7.5(Haswell)有了优化。除此之外,称作“子片”(subslice)的着色器阵列获得了重新设计,现在各提供了8个执行单元(EU)。三个子片组成一个“片”(slice),共计24个执行单元。加上其他改进如更大L1缓存和优化的前端等,这块集成相比前代产品速度更快、更加高效。

 Iris Graphics 6100是Broadwell系列显卡的顶级版本,包括两组共48个执行单元。除此之外,它也有一个低端(GT1,12个EU),一个中端(GT2,24个EU)和一个高端版本(GT3e,48个EU+eDRAM)。

所有Broadwell显卡都支持OpenCL 2.0和DirectX 11.2。它的视频引擎现在可以同时使用固有硬件以及可用的处理器着色器协同解码H.265视频。最多三个显示器可以通过DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3(最大3840×2160 @ 60Hz)或HDMI 1.4a(最大3840×2160 @ 24Hz)连接。但是它并不支持HDMI 2.0。

性能

根据处理器型号的不同,它的最高核心频率在1000和1100MHz之间。尽管Iris Graphics 6100在技术上与HD Graphics 6000相同,但较高的TDP(28瓦相对于15瓦)使它可以更好地利用Turbo Boost技术进行加速,提供更高的性能。总体而言,Iris 6100应比GeForce 820M独立显卡稍快。

不过,2014/2015年的游戏通常只可在低设置下流畅运行。

功耗

采用了新的14纳米工艺,Broadwell低电压芯片的TDP为28瓦,因此适用于中等尺寸的超极本。它的TDP可以定制,能够进一步降低(到23瓦),这会对性能有显著影响。

Iris Series

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 40 @ 0.2 - 1.3 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 6100 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 5100 40 @ 0.2 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameBroadwell GT3
ArchitectureGen. 8 Broadwell
Pipelines48 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1100 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_1), OpenGL 4.3
Power Consumption28 Watt
Transistor Count1.9 Billion
technology14 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement05.01.2015
CPU in Iris Graphics 6100GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-5557U2 x 3100 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i5-5287U2 x 2900 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Core i5-5257U2 x 2700 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel Core i3-5157U2 x 2500 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1000 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1000 - 1100 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.4 pt (1%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -83%
...
Intel UHD Graphics 615
0.3731 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
0.3744 -6%
0.3754 -6%
0.3776 -5%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
0.3849 -3%
0.3877 -3%
0.3886 -2%
AMD FirePro M4100
0.3904 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
0.3922 -1%
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
0.3981
0.3986 0%
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
0.4002 1%
0.4086 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
0.4123 4%
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
0.4141 4%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
0.4148 4%
AMD Radeon R5 M335
0.415 4%
AMD Radeon R5 M330
0.42 6%
0.4255 7%
...
21.1 5200%
max:
33.3 8265%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
425 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
377 Points (1%)
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -70%
...
328.8 -13%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
329 -13%
334 -11%
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
336.2 -11%
343.7 -9%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
344.7 -9%
349 -7%
Intel HD Graphics 630
368 -2%
371.8 -1%
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
377
381 1%
389.1 3%
397 5%
409.5 9%
AMD Radeon R7 M360
410 9%
417 11%
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
419.6 11%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
442.5 17%
450.5 19%
...
19434 5055%
max:
36485 9578%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
89341 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 43469     avg: 46800     median: 46800 (6%)     max: 50131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5746     avg: 6119     median: 6141 (7%)     max: 6637 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 7175     avg: 7743     median: 7798 (2%)     max: 8199 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 811     avg: 880     median: 864.5 (2%)     max: 981 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 857     avg: 917     median: 874 (1%)     max: 1020 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 60636     avg: 64246     median: 61997 (7%)     max: 70106 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1581     avg: 1763     median: 1768 (2%)     max: 1884 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1471     avg: 1656     median: 1694.5 (1%)     max: 1765 Points
171.8 -90%
...
AMD Radeon R5 M240
1588 -4%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics
1597 -4%
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
1600 -3%
1600 -3%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
1602 -3%
1621 -2%
1625 -2%
1628 -2%
AMD Radeon R5 M320
1652 0%
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
1656
1671 1%
1674 1%
AMD Radeon R5 M330
1684 2%
1689 2%
Intel HD Graphics 630
1696 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
1703 3%
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
1708 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
1708 3%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
1711 3%
...
59943 3520%
max:
106023 6302%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
6531 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
5717 Points (3%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
5410 -5%
5411 -5%
5452 -5%
5560 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
5573 -3%
5594 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
5595 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
5631 -2%
5698 0%
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
5717
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
5735 0%
5833 2%
5870 3%
5896 3%
5926 4%
5948 4%
5957 4%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
5961 4%
5977 5%
...
132443 2217%
max:
170928 2890%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 7929     avg: 8675     median: 8764 (12%)     max: 9332 Points
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
14.6 fps (6%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
20.2 fps (5%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
2.7 fps (0%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
5.8 fps (1%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
1.6 fps (0%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
4.1 fps (1%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.1 fps (0%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
12.3 fps (5%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
12 fps (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 7690     avg: 7993     median: 7832.5 (6%)     max: 8615 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 20.23     avg: 24.9     median: 24.9 (9%)     max: 28.68 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 29.16     avg: 34.9     median: 36.4 (2%)     max: 37.51 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
48.8 fps (3%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
102.1 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
145 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
390 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1115 points (1%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
43.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
43 Watt (6%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
850 MHz (33%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
749 MHz (30%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
13.5 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
20.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
78  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
45.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
66.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
22.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
63.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
48.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
13.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
24.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
33.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1280x720
19.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
13.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1366x768
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
31  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
21  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
34.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.7 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.8 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
29.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
28.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
43.8 51.2 55.5 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
37.1 37.2 42.7 (!) ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.1 22.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1366x768
45.1 54 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.9 37.4 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.5 22.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16 16.9 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
32.2 38.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.4 26.3 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.5 10.3 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.2  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
19.1 21.6 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
87.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
44.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
15 16 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
15.3 16.3 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.1 10.4 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
83.4 83.7 103 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.3 25.8 28.6 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.4 13.8 14.2 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
27.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
39.3 45.7 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.1 27.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9 9.9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
19 20.8 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14 15.4 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.7 8.7 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.1 7.5 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
28.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
20  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
32.7 40.2 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
43.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
58 60 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37 38 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24 26 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16 16 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
19.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
24.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
36 36.3 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.7 29.4 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.3 16 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
27.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
18.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
52.5 63 (!) ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
45.8 46.5 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.3 28.2 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
178.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
29  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
93.4 93.6 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.8 35.7 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.8 21.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5 14.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
17.3 20.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.7 14.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.7 11.6 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.4 5.7 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
78.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
22.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
21.5 23 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.1 18.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.9 13.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.7 7 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
34.6 44.5 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28 28.6 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.3 23.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.2 7.7 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
57.6 62.5 64.6 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.7 34.3 34.9 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20.9 23.4 25 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.8 11.7 12.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
112.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
81.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
63  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
73.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
44.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
57.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
41.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Control13.5
Total War: Three Kingdoms20.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark9.4
Team Fortress 286784015.9
Dirt 445.8
Rocket League66.624.4
For Honor22.7
Farming Simulator 1763.648.821
Deus Ex Mankind Divided13.5
Mirror's Edge Catalyst24.616
Overwatch33.625
Doom
The Division19.1
XCOM 213.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider9.7
Rainbow Six Siege3119.711.79.7
Just Cause 32117.5
Star Wars Battlefront34.620.79.8
Call of Duty: Black Ops 329.118.3
Anno 220528.915.8
FIFA 16503921
World of Warships50352116
Metal Gear Solid V3625107.2
Mad Max20106.1
Dota 2 Reborn87.644.520.518.4
Batman: Arkham Knight16137
The Witcher 31610
Dirt Rally90261412.5
GTA V27.922.4
Battlefield Hardline432795.5
Evolve201586
Dragon Age: Inquisition28.319.3
Far Cry 420
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare3619.913.6
Civilization: Beyond Earth43.423.215.912.6
F1 201459382516
The Evil Within19.915.49.4
Ryse: Son of Rome24.414.97.36.9
Alien: Isolation36271611.3
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor27.818.610.88.6
Fifa 15584627
Sims 4178.35525.217.4
Risen 3: Titan Lords2918.26.74.2
GRID: Autosport94352113
Thief1913116
Battlefield 435.126.817.26.4
Dota 278.149.526.3
Company of Heroes 222.4
Metro: Last Light2218137
BioShock Infinite4028237
Tomb Raider62332312
Crysis 32215.911.34.4
Counter-Strike: GO112.581.26332.8
Diablo III73.854.644.829.2
Anno 207057.541.42613.3
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim41.423.915.28.3
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
25
17
10
1
31
10
2
29
4
1
29
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 19. 02:04:06

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.078s ... 0.079s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.079s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.079s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.079s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.079s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.079s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5945 +0.039s ... 0.118s

#10 got single benchmarks 5945 +0.018s ... 0.136s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.136s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.846s ... 0.982s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.982s

#14 Got 225 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 1.001s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.001s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.043s ... 1.043s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +1.815s ... 2.859s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.006s ... 2.864s

#19 return log +0s ... 2.864s

Notebook reviews with Intel Iris Graphics 6100 graphics card

Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 (2015年初) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 (2015年初) 笔记本电脑简短评测

愿力量与你同在。 创新的压力触控板可能是2015年初版MacBook Pro Retina 13最有趣的一项新功能了——除此之外,它更多是改进而非变革。尽管整体上它依然非常出色:但Windows设备正在缩小差距。...
Intel Core i5-5257U | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | 13.30" | 1.6 kg

Acer Aspire V3-371-55EH: Intel Core i5-5257U, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-371-55EH

Medion Akoya E6418-MD99620: Intel Core i5-5257U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya E6418-MD99620

Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03: Intel Core i5-5257U, 13.30", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter