联想 IdeaPad 510-15ISK 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
Brand: Lenovo

白色视野。 尽管我们的测试编辑不愿意迎娶这台联想的轻盈小巧的15寸多媒体设备，但他并不介意和它建立商务联系。这台新设备搭配了独立GeForce 940MX显卡，在测试中没有表现出任何缺陷。它最大的特色依然是它白色的外观，这可能会对女性消费者有更大的吸引力。

Sven Kloevekorn, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 10/08/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK (Ideapad 510 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1242 MHz, Memory: 1800 MHz, DDR3, ForceWare 359.23

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4, 2133 MHz, 双通道, 1x 板载 + 1x 插槽, 两个内存槽一个已占用

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LGD04A7 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPK2 , IPS, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, 1000 GB

, 5400 rpm

Soundcard

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频输入输出接口, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, MMC, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Optical drive

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE0N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 22.9 x 379 x 260

Battery

30 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 100万像素

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声/Harman, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.2 kg, Power Supply: 209 g

Price

799 EUR

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Asus N552VX-FY103T Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK HP Pavilion 14-al003ng DIN A4 ❌

Left: power-in, Ethernet (fold-out), HDMI, USB 3.0, audio in/out, SD card

Right: LED, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, DVD drive, Kensington

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng	73.7 MB/s +341%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1	57.4 MB/s +244%
Asus N552VX-FY103T	55 MB/s +229%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK	16.7 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus N552VX-FY103T	84.7 MB/s +222%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng	80.8 MB/s +207%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK	26.3 MB/s

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)	331 MBit/s +26%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	276 MBit/s +5%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (Seb)	263 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	334 MBit/s +27%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)	327 MBit/s +25%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (Seb)	262 MBit/s


295 cd/m²	305 cd/m²	308 cd/m²
249 cd/m²	284 cd/m²	275 cd/m²
246 cd/m²	260 cd/m²	261 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LGD04A7 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPK2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 308 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 275.9 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 284 cd/m²
Contrast: 861:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.86 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.26% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1	Asus N552VX-FY103T	HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Display		96%	60%
Display P3 Coverage	39.26	84.2 114%	67.9 73%
sRGB Coverage	58.7	99.7 70%	87.7 49%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	40.59	82.7 104%	64 58%
Response Times		631%	-7%	2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	40 ?(19, 21)	44 ?(24, 20, starke Schwankungen mit/ohne PSU) -10%	42 ?(18, 24) -5%	36.4 ?(18, 18.4) 9%
Response Time Black / White *	24 ?(9, 15)	23 ?(7, 16, Plateau) 4%	26 ?(5, 21) -8%	25.2 ?(14, 11.2) -5%
PWM Frequency	50 ?(90)	1000 ?(80) 1900%
Screen		-15%	25%	8%
Brightness middle	284	234 -18%	336 18%	220 -23%
Brightness	276	219 -21%	304 10%	209 -24%
Brightness Distribution	80	80 0%	85 6%	88 10%
Black Level *	0.33	0.48 -45%	0.34 -3%	0.28 15%
Contrast	861	488 -43%	988 15%	786 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.21	11.8 -64%	5.26 27%	4.58 36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	15.12	20.69 -37%	10.49 31%	11.47 24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.86	13.3 -94%	4.26 38%	2.34 66%
Gamma	2.46 ^89%	2.47 ^89%	2.35 ^94%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6726 ^97%	17098 ^38%	6758 ^96%	6661 ^98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	37	74 100%	57 54%	34.6 -6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	58	100 72%	88 52%	54.2 -7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		237% / 127%	26% / 28%	5% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

50 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus N552VX-FY103T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	146 Points +34%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	119 Points +9%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng Intel Core i5-6200U	115 Points +6%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK Intel Core i5-6200U	109 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus N552VX-FY103T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	673 Points +130%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	295 Points +1%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK Intel Core i5-6200U	293 Points
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng Intel Core i5-6200U	270 Points -8%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

109 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

293 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	3452 Points +5%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3390 Points +3%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	3294 Points
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280	3238 Points -2%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	4503 Points +15%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3970 Points +2%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	3907 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3294 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3907 points
Help

	Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	HP Pavilion 14-al003ng SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		42%	12563%
Read Seq	84.5	108.1 28%	469.3 455%
Write Seq	69.9	105.6 51%	309.1 342%
Read 512	28.87	35.32 22%
Write 512	28.08	46.13 64%
Read 4k	0.326	0.413 27%	14 4194%
Write 4k	0.595	0.9 51%	73.9 12320%
Read 4k QD32	0.602	0.895 49%	149.5 24734%
Write 4k QD32	0.612	0.884 44%	204.6 33331%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB

Transfer Rate Minimum: 36.4 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 101.3 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 78.4 MB/s

Access Time: 18.2 ms

Burst Rate: 185 MB/s

CPU Usage: 5.9 %

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus N552VX-FY103T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	4416 Points +88%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	4239 Points +81%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2508 Points +7%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2343 Points

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus N552VX-FY103T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	21794 Points +155%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	21635 Points +153%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	8541 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	3555 Points +125%
Asus N552VX-FY103T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ	3233 Points +105%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	1580 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		2424 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5765 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1381 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	85.2	45	39.3	13.6
The Witcher 3 (2015)	30.1	17.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	30.8	18.1

Noise Level

Idle		33.6 / 33.6 / 33.9 dB(A)
Load		37.5 / 38.3 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


37.2 °C	35 °C	26.9 °C
36.5 °C	34.6 °C	26.8 °C
33.8 °C	34.1 °C	27.2 °C

Maximum: 37.2 °C
Average: 32.5 °C


25.1 °C	36.3 °C	37.2 °C
24.6 °C	31 °C	39 °C
27.1 °C	29 °C	34 °C

Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 31.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39.2 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.1 °C / 93.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.3 °C / -9.6 F).

Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Asus N552VX-FY103T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

HP Pavilion 14-al003ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.3 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	7.7 / 11.7 / 13.6 Watt
Load	48.3 / 41 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus N552VX-FY103T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, AH-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	HP Pavilion 14-al003ng 6200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280, LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Power Consumption		-22%	-39%	19%
Idle Minimum *	7.7	8.3 -8%	7 9%	4 48%
Idle Average *	11.7	12.1 -3%	10.9 7%	6.4 45%
Idle Maximum *	13.6	15.4 -13%	12.9 5%	7 49%
Load Average *	48.3	56 -16%	72 -49%	45.5 6%
Load Maximum *	41	70 -71%	109 -166%	62.2 -52%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		7h 23min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 45min
DVD		2h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 13min

	Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh	Asus N552VX-FY103T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 44 Wh	HP Pavilion 14-al003ng 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
Battery Runtime		77%	-2%	46%
Reader / Idle	443	667 51%	357 -19%
WiFi v1.3	225	386 72%	268 19%	329 46%
Load	73	152 108%	68 -7%
H.264		335

Pros

+ 轻盈纤薄

+ 经典机身设计与白色材质

+ 不错的工艺品质

+ 支持TPM 2.0

+ 两个维护底盖

+ 优秀的加速利用率

+ 安静清凉

Cons

- 缓慢的SD读卡器

- 风扇只有拆机才可以接触到

- 较小的色域覆盖

- 屏幕闪烁

- 未使用固态硬盘造成系统响应较慢

- 缓慢的传统硬盘

- 电池续航短

In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

联想IdeaPad 510-15ISK是一款引人注目的设备。

选择它的用户可以得到一台做工精良，轻盈纤薄的多媒体笔记本电脑，它结合了不错的输入设备，一块IPS屏幕和GeForce 940MX独立显卡，售价不足800欧元（约5926人民币）。尽管这个机型没有搭配固态硬盘，但它没有任何技术上的弱点。

不过，它在很多方面表现平平。至少它高对比度IPS屏幕的色彩准确度还有改进的空间，同时一般的性能和不算出色的输入设备也是如此。再加上缺少固态硬盘让它的系统运行更加迟缓。它的电池续航让不错的便携型打了折扣，而音响系统也很难达到多媒体设备的一般水平。

不过，它提供了维护底盖和TPM模组，系统运行安静而清凉让它对处理器加速的效率很高，这都为它赢得了加分。我们认为如果考虑到性价比的话，如果它的售价可以降低100欧元（约740人民币）的话将会十分值得考虑选购。从我们的经验来看它在不久之后就会开始降价。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK - 2016-09-29 09/29/2016 v5.1^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis

81 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

79%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

45 / 81 → 56%

Weight

62 / 20-67 → 89%

Battery

74%

Display

83%

Games Performance

64 / 85 → 75%

Application Performance

72 / 92 → 78%

Temperature

93%

Noise

81 / 95 → 85%

Audio

64%

Camera

58 / 85 → 68%

Average

73%

79%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 IdeaPad 510-15ISK 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sven Kloevekorn, 2016-10- 8 (Update: 2016-10-12)