Notebookcheck Logo

华硕 GL702VM-GC102D 笔记本电脑简短评测

纤薄游戏笔记本。 华硕为这台17.3寸轻薄笔记本电脑中注入了澎湃的游戏性能。不过,这台设备并不会太吵或过热。由于禁用了集成显卡,它在待机时的功耗较高。
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake
Asus GL702VM-GC102D (GL702 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1886 MHz, Memory: 2002 MHz, GDDR5, 192位界面, ForceWare 375.95
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR4-2132, 单通道, 两个内存槽 (一个已占用)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, IPS, Nvidia G-Sync, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Storage
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1000 GB 
, 7200 rpm, 930 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 24 x 415 x 280
Battery
76 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
FreeDos
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 驱动盘,USB鼠标, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.7 kg, Power Supply: 688 g
Price
1399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG P507
 
77 MB/s +6%
Gigabyte P57X v6
 
76.4 MB/s +5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
 
76 MB/s +5%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
 
72.6 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
23.8 MB/s -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte P57X v6
 
89.9 MB/s +6%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
 
87 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG P507
 
86 MB/s +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
 
84.6 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
27.6 MB/s -67%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
676 MBit/s +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
665 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG P507
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
642 MBit/s -3%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
512 MBit/s -23%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)
538 MBit/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
536 MBit/s 0%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG P507
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
456 MBit/s -15%
318
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 326 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 311.9 cd/m² Minimum: 36 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 326 cd/m²
Contrast: 652:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.37 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
HP Omen 17-w110ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Gigabyte P57X v6
IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GS73VR 6RF
TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.30
SCHENKER XMG P507
IPS, 60 Hz, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
1%
5%
32%
-0%
Display P3 Coverage
65.1
66.6
2%
68
4%
90
38%
64.5
-1%
sRGB Coverage
83.5
84.1
1%
87.5
5%
99.9
20%
83.4
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
61.1
61.5
1%
64
5%
83.6
37%
61
0%
Response Times
-1%
1%
42%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38 ?(12, 26)
37 ?(13, 24)
3%
33.6 ?(14, 19.6)
12%
28 ?(13.2, 14.8)
26%
36 ?(12, 24)
5%
Response Time Black / White *
23 ?(5, 18)
24 ?(4, 20)
-4%
25.6 ?(5.2, 20.4)
-11%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
58%
23 ?(5, 18)
-0%
PWM Frequency
Screen
24%
17%
33%
14%
Brightness middle
326
362
11%
329.2
1%
337.2
3%
288
-12%
Brightness
312
342
10%
321
3%
315
1%
292
-6%
Brightness Distribution
91
87
-4%
93
2%
86
-5%
87
-4%
Black Level *
0.5
0.31
38%
0.267
47%
0.308
38%
0.3
40%
Contrast
652
1168
79%
1233
89%
1095
68%
960
47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.3
4.5
29%
5.93
6%
2.96
53%
5.1
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.69
9.31
20%
11.07
5%
5.45
53%
9.44
19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.37
3.48
53%
6.72
9%
2.57
65%
4.43
40%
Gamma
2.37 93%
2.23 99%
2.12 104%
2.25 98%
2.46 89%
CCT
7116 91%
6144 106%
7611 85%
7114 91%
6687 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55
55
0%
57
4%
74.3
35%
55
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
83
84
1%
87
5%
100
20%
83
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
8% / 16%
8% / 12%
36% / 34%
6% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18034 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
The processor is soldered in.
The processor is soldered in.
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5126
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20111
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8238
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
61 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
134 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
678 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
74 fps
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG P507
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points +10%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points +10%
MSI GP72-2QEi781
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
142 Points +6%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points +4%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points 0%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GP72-2QEi781
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
694 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG P507
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
682 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points 0%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635 Points -6%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20283 Points +1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20111 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20090 Points 0%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5484 Points +7%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5126 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4926 Points -4%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
2926 Points
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11903 Points
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3663 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11033 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
269.2 Points +16%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
252 Points +8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
232.4 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
230.8 Points -1%
PCMark 7 Score
4114 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4670 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6361 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4809 points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points +3%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4670 Points
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4206 Points -10%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4012 Points -14%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points +12%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5014 Points +4%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4809 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4774 Points -1%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
Transfer Rate Minimum: 52.7 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 137.9 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 104.7 MB/s
Access Time: 17.4 ms
Burst Rate: 92.8 MB/s
CPU Usage: 2.6 %
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
MSI CX72-7QLi581
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Gigabyte P57X v6
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-20%
12718%
7576%
5569%
Read Seq
134.6
102.8
-24%
1156
759%
481.7
258%
334.3
148%
Write Seq
130.6
100.2
-23%
294.9
126%
315.4
142%
319
144%
Read 512
44.85
34.83
-22%
616
1273%
303.1
576%
242.3
440%
Write 512
63.3
46.87
-26%
294.7
366%
314.4
397%
254.4
302%
Read 4k
0.602
0.422
-30%
42.7
6993%
25.93
4207%
20.3
3272%
Write 4k
1.146
1.063
-7%
153.3
13277%
84.6
7282%
42.51
3609%
Read 4k QD32
1.106
0.918
-17%
600
54150%
273.9
24665%
251.6
22649%
Write 4k QD32
1.186
1.064
-10%
295.3
24799%
274.9
23079%
167.1
13989%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
19244 points
3DMark 11 Performance
11159 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
113032 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22619 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9432 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5067 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3536 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
23356 Points +63%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20656 Points +44%
MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
17738 Points +24%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
14904 Points +4%
XMG P723 Pro
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire, Intel Core i7-4800MQ
14696 Points +3%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
14317 Points
SCHENKER XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
14222 Points -1%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
8597 Points -40%
MSI GL72 6QF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5825 Points -59%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
86780 Points +10%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
79578 Points +1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
79107 Points
XMG P723 Pro
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire, Intel Core i7-4800MQ
77275 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
69834 Points -12%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
67791 Points -14%
MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
66398 Points -16%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
34892 Points -56%
MSI GL72 6QF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
33474 Points -58%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
15806 Points +40%
MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
11869 Points +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11506 Points +2%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11311 Points
XMG P723 Pro
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire, Intel Core i7-4800MQ
11296 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG P507
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11045 Points -2%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), Intel Core i7-4790K
5701 Points -50%
MSI GL72 6QF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4705 Points -58%
low med. high ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 344.9 325.4 286.2 138.4
BioShock Infinite (2013) 195.1 177.3 166.4 98.9
Battlefield 4 (2013) 180.1 167.2 151.4 99.1
X-Plane 10.25 (2013) 81.8 46.6 24.5 24.5
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) 147.5 130.9 109 85.7
GTA V (2015) 122.3 117.7 90.3 48.2
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 51.2 49.1 47.5
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 65 61.9 48.7 27.3
FIFA 17 (2016) 232.7 216.2 198.6 197.9
Mafia 3 (2016) 51.3 47.1 40.1
Battlefield 1 (2016) 116.4 104.9 87.4 79
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 209.3 179.6 165.1 153.9
Titanfall 2 (2016) 143.4 143 89.3 80.2
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
123.8 fps +25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
103.8 (19.8min - 180.2max) fps +5%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
100 fps +1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
98.9 fps
SCHENKER XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
98.1 fps -1%
Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
138.4 fps
Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
99.1 fps
SCHENKER XMG P507
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
92.9 fps -6%
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.933.335.734.637.92537.740.541.239.637.73140.640.942.939.940.64034.431.933.235.234.45034.531.130.532.334.56329.629.930.628.229.68027.127.528.12627.110027.427.327.52627.412529.429.329.825.429.416027.52924.723.327.520026.127.623.923.826.125025.829.722.422.725.83152832.322.321.62840026.830.220.520.226.850023.126.719.919.623.16302429.819.918.62480028.330.12118.628.3100028.133.119.31828.1125030.535.319.117.430.5160031.836.819.917.931.8200033.438.518.817.533.4250032.937.419.117.832.9315027.937.618.217.927.9400023.329.618.91823.350002227.618.618.322630020.625.918.718.420.6800019.924.118.718.419.91000018.821.218.518.418.81250018.519.518.318.218.51600018.318.918.218.418.3SPL40.946.231.530.540.9N3.34.91.61.43.3median 26.8median 29.6median 19.3median 18.4median 26.8Delta3.33.31.41.13.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus GL702VM-GC102D

Noise Level

Idle
31.4 / 31.4 / 31.5 dB(A)
HDD
31.5 dB(A)
Load
40.9 / 46.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
SCHENKER XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Noise
-8%
-7%
-5%
-6%
off / environment *
30.5
30
2%
29.7
3%
28.4
7%
30
2%
Idle Minimum *
31.4
33
-5%
33.2
-6%
31.9
-2%
31
1%
Idle Average *
31.4
34
-8%
33.2
-6%
32
-2%
32
-2%
Idle Maximum *
31.5
35
-11%
33.2
-5%
34
-8%
38
-21%
Load Average *
40.9
45
-10%
47.5
-16%
47
-15%
46
-12%
Load Maximum *
46.2
52
-13%
52.5
-14%
49.4
-7%
49
-6%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 40.2 °C53.1 °C41 °C 
 27.1 °C47.2 °C26 °C 
 27.9 °C27.3 °C27.5 °C 
Maximum: 53.1 °C
Average: 35.3 °C
42.2 °C44.9 °C44.1 °C
36.3 °C36.3 °C30.6 °C
23.5 °C25.1 °C28.7 °C
Maximum: 44.9 °C
Average: 34.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53.1 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.9 °C / 82.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1 °C / 1.8 F).
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
SCHENKER XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Heat
5%
-13%
0%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
53.1
45
15%
59
-11%
50.8
4%
49.3
7%
Maximum Bottom *
44.9
54.3
-21%
66
-47%
60
-34%
52.7
-17%
Idle Upper Side *
32.9
29.6
10%
33.2
-1%
27.4
17%
32.6
1%
Idle Bottom *
33.4
28.6
14%
30.6
8%
28.8
14%
29.5
12%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.334.639.32541.739.641.73142.839.942.84037.235.237.25037.532.337.56341.828.241.88030.32630.310040.72640.712548.325.448.316049.623.349.620047.623.847.62505222.75231558.221.658.240063.920.263.95005719.65763056.618.656.680057.218.657.2100056.51856.5125054.817.454.8160057.117.957.1200058.117.558.1250058.217.858.231506017.960400066.21866.2500059.818.359.8630053.418.453.4800048.518.448.51000048.918.448.91250048.718.248.71600043.418.443.4SPL71.330.571.3N28.31.428.3median 56.5median 18.4median 56.5Delta5.11.15.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus GL702VM-GC102DApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Asus GL702VM-GC102D audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.44 / 0.57 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 15.6 / 20.2 / 21.4 Watt
Load midlight 90 / 147 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
SCHENKER XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Power Consumption
-24%
-39%
-40%
9%
Idle Minimum *
15.6
19
-22%
18.4
-18%
22.6
-45%
11
29%
Idle Average *
20.2
25
-24%
22.8
-13%
32.7
-62%
16
21%
Idle Maximum *
21.4
31
-45%
24
-12%
32.8
-53%
21
2%
Load Average *
90
90
-0%
175.5
-95%
114.7
-27%
80
11%
Load Maximum *
147
193
-31%
229.5
-56%
167.9
-14%
174
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
5h 53min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)
4h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 27min
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 76 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 95 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh
MSI GS73VR 6RF
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh
SCHENKER XMG P507
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 60 Wh
Battery Runtime
11%
5%
-13%
22%
Reader / Idle
353
432
22%
418
18%
353
0%
409
16%
H.264
262
233
-11%
WiFi v1.3
250
247
-1%
201
-20%
213
-15%
274
10%
Load
87
115
32%
103
18%
66
-24%
123
41%

Pros

+ 磨砂IPS屏幕
+ 全高清分辨率
+ G-Sync
+ 大容量存储空间
+ 空余M.2插槽
+ Thunderbolt 3

Cons

- 集成显卡关闭
- 无法发挥全部加速性能
- 在待机时功耗较高
- 点击触控版偶尔失灵
In review: Asus GL702VM-GC102D. Test model provided by Notebook.de
In review: Asus GL702VM-GC102D. Test model provided by Notebook.de

GL702VM是华硕带来的一台相对纤薄的17.3寸游戏本。别被它纤细的小身板骗了,其实它机身内搭配了十分强劲的硬件。一块四核酷睿i7处理器和英伟达GeForce GTX 1060显卡的组合可以在全高清分辨率和高设定下运行绝大部分最新游戏。英伟达的G-Sync技术更保证了画面的流畅。尽管硬件十分强大,它的发热量仍然得到了很好的控制。这台笔记本的噪音也不会让人无法接受。

GL702VM是华硕带来的一台十分优秀的17.3寸游戏笔记本电脑。

归功于1TB的硬盘,它并不会很快在存储空间上捉襟见肘,不过用户也可以自行升级。这需要打开机身底盖,同时用户也可以在它的一个空余M.2插槽中安装固态硬盘(SATA或NVMe)。磨砂的IPS屏幕提供了稳定的可视角度和充足的亮度。它的对比度相比之下略显不足。内置键盘可以满足日常使用的需要。如果你需要大量打字的话,就可能需要考虑别的机型了。由于它禁用了内置显卡,在待机时的功耗相比较高。也因此它的电池续航受到了不必要的负面影响。不过,作为游戏本来说这并不是个致命缺陷。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Asus GL702VM-GC102D - 12/05/2016 v5.1(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
69 / 81 → 85%
Weight
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Battery
76%
Display
84%
Games Performance
93%
Application Performance
86%
Temperature
88 / 95 → 93%
Noise
82 / 90 → 91%
Audio
63%
Camera
23 / 85 → 27%
Average
74%
84%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 GL702VM-GC102D 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2016-12-10 (Update: 2016-12-11)