Notebookcheck Logo

微星 GE72 7RE Apache Pro 笔记本电脑简短评测

入门级游戏体验。 微星GE72的2017更新版由于几个原因而十分有趣。首先，英特尔最新架构处理器酷睿i7-7700HQ首次亮相。另外，它搭配了英伟达的最新中高端GTX 1050 Ti显卡。我们对这台17寸机型的游戏性能进行了详尽测试。
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows
MSI GE72 7RE-046 (GE72 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1493 MHz, Memory: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 373.06, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, 单通道, 2个内存槽1个已占用, 最大支持 32 GB
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 全高清, 120 Hz, glossy: no
Mainboard
HM175
Storage
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, 256 GB 
, 固态硬盘 + HGST Travelstar HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB 机械硬盘 @ 7200 rpm. 插槽: 1x m.2 Typ 2280 (可选 NVMe/PCIe) & 1x 2,5 寸
Soundcard
Realtek ALC899 @ High Definition Audio-Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机 (S/PDIF)，麦克风, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Networking
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Optical drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 32 x 420 x 288
Battery
51.4 Wh, 4730 mAh Lithium-Ion, 6 芯
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清 (720p @ 30 fps)
Additional features
Speakers: 4.1 Dynaudio (Nahimic Audio Enhancer), Keyboard: 孤岛式，SteelSeries, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器：150瓦，配件：快速开始说明，质保卡，恢复指南, 软件: CyberLink PowerDVD 12, Killer Performance Suite, Magix Suite, MS Office 365 试用版, Norton Security 试用版, XSplit Gamecaster 1年使用期, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.98 kg, Power Supply: 516 g
Price
1550 EUR
Links
MSI homepage
MSI notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Aorus X7 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
554 MBit/s +88%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s +80%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
294 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
676 MBit/s +96%
Aorus X7 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
496 MBit/s +44%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
345 MBit/s
217
cd/m²		251
cd/m²		226
cd/m²
225
cd/m²		253
cd/m²		228
cd/m²
218
cd/m²		231
cd/m²		217
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 253 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 229.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 253 cd/m²
Contrast: 1054:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
76% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
85.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
MSI GE72 7RE-046
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080		Aorus X7 v6
B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), 2560x1440		HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080		MSI GS73VR 6RF
1920x1080		Asus GL702VM-GC102D
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080
Display
-26%
-24%
-1%
-24%
Display P3 Coverage
90.7
60.9
-33%
66.6
-27%
90
-1%
65.1
-28%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
84.2
-16%
84.1
-16%
99.9
0%
83.5
-16%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
85.2
61.2
-28%
61.5
-28%
83.6
-2%
61.1
-28%
Response Times
-13%
-102%
-6%
-99%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
27 ?(13, 14)
31 ?(11, 20)
-15%
37 ?(13, 24)
-37%
28 ?(13.2, 14.8)
-4%
38 ?(12, 26)
-41%
Response Time Black / White *
9 ?(6, 3)
10 ?(3, 7)
-11%
24 ?(4, 20)
-167%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
-7%
23 ?(5, 18)
-156%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-18%
10%
20%
-16%
Brightness middle
253
343
36%
362
43%
337.2
33%
326
29%
Brightness
230
312
36%
342
49%
315
37%
312
36%
Brightness Distribution
86
80
-7%
87
1%
86
0%
91
6%
Black Level *
0.24
0.5
-108%
0.31
-29%
0.308
-28%
0.5
-108%
Contrast
1054
686
-35%
1168
11%
1095
4%
652
-38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.01
7.33
-46%
4.5
10%
2.96
41%
6.3
-26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.4
10.79
-4%
9.31
10%
5.45
48%
11.69
-12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.26
7.6
-5%
3.48
52%
2.57
65%
7.37
-2%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.19 100%
2.23 99%
2.25 98%
2.37 93%
CCT
6329 103%
9024 72%
6144 106%
7114 91%
7116 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
76
55
-28%
55
-28%
74.3
-2%
55
-28%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
84
-16%
84
-16%
100
0%
83
-17%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-19% / -19%
-39% / -11%
4% / 12%
-46% / -29%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
170 Points +17%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points +2%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
145 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
807 Points +10%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points -7%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points -7%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points -8%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.93 Points +17%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.69 Points +2%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.65 Points
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points -9%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X7 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.88 Points +10%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.1 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points -8%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.41 Points -9%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
10841
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.65 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
63.8 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
145 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
732 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
108.3 fps
Help
PCMark 7 Score
5810 points
Help
PCMark 7 - Score
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5946 Points +2%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5810 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5556 Points -4%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4114 Points -29%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY		Aorus X7 v6
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256		MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122		Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
124%
49%
-37%
-86%
Read Seq
540
1499
178%
1156
114%
334.3
-38%
134.6
-75%
Write Seq
495.7
1411
185%
294.9
-41%
319
-36%
130.6
-74%
Read 4k
22.7
44.33
95%
42.7
88%
20.3
-11%
0.602
-97%
Write 4k
112.9
155.5
38%
153.3
36%
42.51
-62%
1.146
-99%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
AS SSD
hddimg
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Sequential Read: 540 MB/s
Sequential Write: 495.7 MB/s
512K Read: 455.1 MB/s
512K Write: 481.4 MB/s
4K Read: 22.7 MB/s
4K Write: 112.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 372.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 212.9 MB/s
3DMark Vantage P Result
30690 points
3DMark 11 Performance
9269 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
69304 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
20933 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6959 points
Help
3DMark | 3DMark 11 | Unigine Heaven 4.0
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17068 Points +111%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
15806 Points +95%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11506 Points +42%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11311 Points +40%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
8086 Points
1280x720 Sky Diver Graphics
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
55278 Points +103%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
53469 Points +97%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
37413 Points +38%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
27202 Points
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
23591 Points +132%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
20656 Points +103%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14904 Points +46%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14317 Points +41%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
10186 Points
Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
109.1 fps +125%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
103.1 (24.3min - 206.9max) fps +113%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
48.5 fps
Battlefield 1
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
124 fps +144%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
110.1 fps +117%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
79 fps +56%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
50.8 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
136 fps +140%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
118.9 fps +110%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
87.4 fps +54%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
56.7 fps
low med. high ultraQHD4K
Dirt Rally (2015) 93.4 65.7 57.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 48.7 26.9 17.6
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 60 41 19
Mad Max (2015) 89.7 82.7 28.6
Anno 2205 (2015) 63.7 20.6 24
Fallout 4 (2015) 56 46.2 18.5
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) 72.4 62.7 22.4
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) 47.8 23.5 17.1
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 92.2 74.4 28.4
Just Cause 3 (2015) 58.9 52.7 22.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 47.4 39.7 17.6
XCOM 2 (2016) 37.7 19 10.3
Far Cry Primal (2016) 53 40 17
The Division (2016) 45 34.9 16.6
Hitman 2016 (2016) 38.4 36.6 16.3
Need for Speed 2016 (2016) 60.4 46.4 21.3
Doom (2016) 68.3 63.8 21.2
Overwatch (2016) 118 71 38.3
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 50.3 45.1 16.2
No Man's Sky (2016) 44.6 22 18.1
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 38.3 19.7 12.3
FIFA 17 (2016) 130 128 66.1
Mafia 3 (2016) 28.7 9.8
Battlefield 1 (2016) 56.7 50.8 19.8
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 130 117 59.7
Titanfall 2 (2016) 62 56.2 18.7
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) 67.4 58.8 27.4
Dishonored 2 (2016) 48.7 39.6 18.2
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) 42.4 26.6 14.4
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 64.5 24.3
For Honor (2017) 66 () 62 () 45 ()
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 106 46.1 40.3 9.8
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) 105 50.2 27.9 23
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) 112 46.6 29.8 25.8 0
Rocket League (2017) 158 61
Dirt 4 (2017) 74.2 39.2
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 105 74.4
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 54.1 45.2
F1 2017 (2017) 66 40 16
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) 89 31.6 21.8
FIFA 18 (2017) 149 62.3
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 121 62 43 29 12
The Evil Within 2 (2017) 61.8 36.1 32.9 31 2
ELEX (2017) 102 52.2 41.9 31 19.6 6.6
Destiny 2 (2017) 116 65.5 62.1 51.1 26.1 17.8
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 77 45 38 28 20 4
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 191 129 67.8 42.4 30.8 18.9
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 115 66 54.7 50.9 30.3 9.7
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 135 75 65 43 19.5 5.7
Fortnite (2018) 61 45.1 28.8 8.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 74 37.1 23.4
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 107 49.5 40.5 28 16.9 6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 77.3 69.9 61.2 45.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 95 47 43 39 25 12
The Crew 2 (2018) 51 44.1
Monster Hunter World (2018) 93 41.2 35.5 27.9
F1 2018 (2018) 146 81 62 37 28 15
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 97 38 31 25 17 8
FIFA 19 (2018) 192 169 157 150 51.3
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) 122 62 55 40
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 77 41 31 17
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) 35.5 10.2
Hitman 2 (2018) 55.6 39 29.7 23.6
Fallout 76 (2018) 48.4 45.3

Noise Level

Idle
34 / 35 / 36 dB(A)
DVD
40 / dB(A)
Load
41 / 49 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ		Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK		HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ		MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ		Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Noise
-4%
-1%
2%
6%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.4
5%
30.5
-2%
Idle Minimum *
34
33
3%
33
3%
31.9
6%
31.4
8%
Idle Average *
35
35
-0%
34
3%
32
9%
31.4
10%
Idle Maximum *
36
40
-11%
35
3%
34
6%
31.5
12%
Load Average *
41
43
-5%
45
-10%
47
-15%
40.9
-0%
Load Maximum *
49
54
-10%
52
-6%
49.4
-1%
46.2
6%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 45.4 °C44.8 °C39 °C 
 45.1 °C45.8 °C38.6 °C 
 40.3 °C39.8 °C28.1 °C 
Maximum: 45.8 °C
Average: 40.8 °C
34.7 °C38.4 °C45.2 °C
30.5 °C37.5 °C40.4 °C
24.7 °C30.2 °C36.6 °C
Maximum: 45.2 °C
Average: 35.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47.4 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.3 °C / 104.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.4 °C / -20.5 F).
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ		Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK		HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ		MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ		Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Heat
-3%
-2%
-7%
-8%
Maximum Upper Side *
45.8
47.5
-4%
45
2%
50.8
-11%
53.1
-16%
Maximum Bottom *
45.2
54.5
-21%
54.3
-20%
60
-33%
44.9
1%
Idle Upper Side *
31.7
28.6
10%
29.6
7%
27.4
14%
32.9
-4%
Idle Bottom *
29.9
28.8
4%
28.6
4%
28.8
4%
33.4
-12%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203237.12541.243.53142.143.54028.531.35027.431.96325.336.58024.438.310023.846.612522.150.916023.755.22002258.525020.860.931518.968.940019.372.850018.376.263018.175.280017.172.910001774125017.477.3160017.182.2200017.682.9250017.883.231501881.1400018.377.2500018.573.3630018.875.4800019.273.81000019.675.51250020.173.81600020.567.9SPL30.491N1.486.8median 18.8median 74Delta1.44.339.334.639.341.739.641.742.839.942.837.235.237.237.532.337.541.828.241.830.32630.340.72640.748.325.448.349.623.349.647.623.847.65222.75258.221.658.263.920.263.95719.65756.618.656.657.218.657.256.51856.554.817.454.857.117.957.158.117.558.158.217.858.26017.96066.21866.259.818.359.853.418.453.448.518.448.548.918.448.948.718.248.743.418.443.471.330.571.328.31.428.3median 56.5median 18.4median 56.55.11.15.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GE72 7RE-046Asus GL702VM-GC102D
MSI GE72 7RE-046 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus GL702VM-GC102D audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.8 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 14 / 20 / 25 Watt
Load midlight 82 / 135 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ		Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK		HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ		MSI GS73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ		Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
Power Consumption
-67%
-28%
-44%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
14
29
-107%
19
-36%
22.6
-61%
15.6
-11%
Idle Average *
20
31
-55%
25
-25%
32.7
-64%
20.2
-1%
Idle Maximum *
25
38
-52%
31
-24%
32.8
-31%
21.4
14%
Load Average *
82
111
-35%
90
-10%
114.7
-40%
90
-10%
Load Maximum *
135
253
-87%
193
-43%
167.9
-24%
147
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
3h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 15min
MSI GE72 7RE-046
51.4 Wh		Aorus X7 v6
94 Wh		HP Omen 17-w110ng
95 Wh		MSI GS73VR 6RF
65 Wh		Asus GL702VM-GC102D
76 Wh
Battery Runtime
-1%
27%
16%
35%
H.264
195
233
19%
262
34%
WiFi v1.3
184
182
-1%
247
34%
213
16%
250
36%

Pros

+ Dragon Center with many features (e.g. fan control)
+ top modern hardware thanks to Kaby Lake und Pascal
+ highly configurable keyboard light
+ Optimus graphics switch
+ 120 Hz panel
+ SSD plus HDD

Cons

- display frame poorly fixed in the test model
- strange behavior of the CPU clock rate
- card reader at USB 2.0 level
- GPU throttling under full load
- no Thunderbolt 3
- poor battery
In review: MSI GE72 7RE Apache Pro. Test model provided by MSI Germany.
In review: MSI GE72 7RE Apache Pro. Test model provided by MSI Germany.

尽管GE72 7RE缺少一个虚拟实境的认证标签，它仍然可以被视作一台游戏笔记本电脑。英伟达的最新GeForce GTX 1050 Ti显卡提供了充足的性能，可以在1,920 x 1,080像素分辨率和高设置下提供不错的帧率。

当分辨率提高到3K和4K时，它的性能将会明显下降，要求较高的游戏将会无法流畅运行。用户需要考虑增加预算购置搭配GTX 1060的机型。长远来看，6GB的显存相比4GB的设备会有更长的寿命，而不需要增加太多的预算。

我们认为英特尔的Kaby Lake架构表现平平，在处理器性能上只有很小的提升。

正在实惠型多媒体笔记本电脑和高端游戏本间犹豫不定的用户可能会对GE72 7RE十分满意。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。 

MSI GE72 7RE-046 - 12/28/2016 v6(old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis
74 / 98 → 75%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
57 / 81 → 71%
Weight
57 / 10-66 → 83%
Battery
69%
Display
83%
Games Performance
90%
Application Performance
91%
Temperature
87 / 95 → 91%
Noise
70 / 90 → 78%
Audio
75%
Average
76%
82%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 微星 GE72 7RE Apache Pro 笔记本电脑简短评测
Florian Glaser, 2017-01-10 (Update: 2017-01-11)