惠普 EliteBook Folio G1 亚笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA
Brand: HP

不只是一件电子产品?! 惠普也推出了被动散热商务笔记本电脑，EliteBook Folio G1是一台轻盈纤薄的12.5寸设备。不出意料的是，它的性能并不出众，这个小巧亚笔记本电脑可以胜任工作环境的需要吗？

Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 06/25/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Laptop / Notebook Skylake Ultrabook Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA (EliteBook Folio Series)

Processor

Intel Core m5-6Y54 2 x 1.1 - 2.7 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 515, Core: 900 MHz

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR3-1866, 双通道, 板载, 无插槽

Display

12.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 176 PPI, AUO226D, IPS, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH

Storage

Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, 256 GB

Soundcard

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机接口

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 12.4 x 292 x 209

Battery

38 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 惠普长效 4 芯, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 11.5 h

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清摄像头，为Windows Hello搭配的红外摄像头

Additional features

Speakers: 四个高品质立体声扬声器, Bang & Olufsen, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 45瓦电源适配器，说明书, 惠普工具软件, Foxit Phantom PDF, Intel WiDi, 36 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

979 g, Power Supply: 285 g

Price

1520 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Dell XPS 13-9350 Dell Latitude 13 7370 HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz DIN A4 ❌

Right side: 2x USB 3.1 Type-C (Gen. 2) with Thunderbolt support

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	634 MBit/s 0%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	631 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	466 MBit/s +14%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	407 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	570 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	397 MBit/s

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.


300 cd/m²	301 cd/m²	291 cd/m²
307 cd/m²	289 cd/m²	286 cd/m²
310 cd/m²	318 cd/m²	276 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AUO226D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 318 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 297.6 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 291 cd/m²
Contrast: 1070:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.84 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
64.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.03% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.96% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
44.45% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 12.50, 1920x1080, IPS	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 12.00, 2304x1440, IPS	Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 13.30, 3200x1800, IPS	Dell Latitude 13 7370 13.30, 1920x1080, IPS	Dell XPS 13-9350 13.30, 1920x1080, IPS	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS 14.00, 1920x1080, IPS	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 14.00, 2560x1440, IPS
Display		48%	32%	18%	1%	30%	51%
Display P3 Coverage	44.45	66.8 50%	59.1 33%	52.2 17%	44.53 0%	58.9 33%	67.9 53%
sRGB Coverage	65.2	95.4 46%	85.5 31%	78.3 20%	66.8 2%	83.1 27%	96.8 48%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	45.96	68 48%	61 33%	53.9 17%	45.97 0%	60.3 31%	70 52%
Response Times		-28%	-16%	-49%		-32%	-28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	32 ?(14.8, 17.2)	41.2 ?(15.6, 25.6) -29%	38 ?(24, 14, Spikes in between) -19%	50.4 ?(20.4, 30) -58%		47.2 ?(18.8, 28.4) -48%	46.4 ?(16.4, 30) -45%
Response Time Black / White *	24 ?(12.4, 11.6)	30.4 ?(6.8, 23.6) -27%	27 ?(13, 14, Spikes in between) -13%	33.6 ?(13.2, 20.4) -40%		27.6 ?(4.4, 23.2) -15%	26.4 ?(6.8, 19.6) -10%
PWM Frequency			1429 ?(20)
Screen		24%	0%	-2%	5%	14%	9%
Brightness middle	289	387 34%	390 35%	261 -10%	277.5 -4%	321.7 11%	327 13%
Brightness	298	358 20%	352 18%	241 -19%	276 -7%	301 1%	316 6%
Brightness Distribution	87	88 1%	81 -7%	85 -2%	88 1%	89 2%	87 0%
Black Level *	0.27	0.47 -74%	0.69 -156%	0.26 4%	0.191 29%	0.294 -9%	0.35 -30%
Contrast	1070	823 -23%	565 -47%	1004 -6%	1453 36%	1094 2%	934 -13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.82	1.6 67%	3.04 37%	4.3 11%	4.88 -1%	3.96 18%	4.39 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.73	4 63%	7.01 35%	8.66 19%		6.69 38%	7.27 32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.84	1 74%	2.88 25%	5.82 -52%	4.26 -11%	3.15 18%	4.69 -22%
Gamma	2.41 ^91%	2.26 ^97%	2.43 ^91%	2.44 ^90%	2.59 ^85%	2.34 ^94%	2.15 ^102%
CCT	6492 ^100%	6680 ^97%	6848 ^95%	6771 ^96%	6562 ^99%	7082 ^92%	7101 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	42.03	61.6 47%	55 31%	49.18 17%	41.6 -1%	53.8 28%	62.52 49%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	64.8	82.2 27%	85 31%	77.84 20%	65.79 2%	82.7 28%	96.71 49%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		15% / 22%	5% / 4%	-11% / -4%	3% / 4%	4% / 11%	11% / 13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.4 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

LatencyMon with wireless modules turned off

LatencyMon with wireless modules turned on

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	124 Points +12%
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points +5%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Core m5-6Y54	111 Points
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel Core m5-6Y57	101 Points -9%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel Core m7-6Y75	100 Points -10%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	91 Points -18%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	90 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS Intel Core i5-6300U	91 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	303 Points +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS Intel Core i5-6300U	301 Points +20%
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel Core i5-6200U	287 Points +15%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Core m5-6Y54	250 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	218 Points -13%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel Core m7-6Y75	214 Points -14%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel Core m5-6Y57	180 Points -28%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

111 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

250 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

35.98 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 HD Graphics 520, 16384, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3305 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS HD Graphics 520, 8192, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	3237 Points +7%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 HD Graphics 515, 8192, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	3048 Points 0%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA HD Graphics 515, 8192, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	3037 Points
Dell XPS 13-9350 HD Graphics 520, 8192, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D	2983 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T HD Graphics 515, 8192, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2	2614 Points -14%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 8192, Apple SSD AP0256	2550 Points -16%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 HD Graphics 520, 16384, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4058 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS HD Graphics 520, 8192, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	3989 Points +16%
Dell XPS 13-9350 HD Graphics 520, 8192, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D	3658 Points +7%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 HD Graphics 515, 8192, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	3528 Points +3%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA HD Graphics 515, 8192, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	3430 Points
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T HD Graphics 515, 8192, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2	3298 Points -4%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 HD Graphics 520, 16384, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4241 Points +2%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 HD Graphics 515, 8192, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	4238 Points +2%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA HD Graphics 515, 8192, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	4146 Points
Dell XPS 13-9350 HD Graphics 520, 8192, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D	4078 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS HD Graphics 520, 8192, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	3944 Points -5%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 8192, Apple SSD AP0256	3550 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T HD Graphics 515, 8192, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2	3472 Points -16%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3037 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3430 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4146 points
Help

	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256	Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2	Dell Latitude 13 7370 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	Dell XPS 13-9350 Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-62%	-46%	-6%	-27%	12%	22%
Read Seq	1482	754 -49%	475.2 -68%	1354 -9%	1097 -26%	1720 16%	1649 11%
Write Seq	1232	638 -48%	423.7 -66%	1132 -8%	307.7 -75%	1263 3%	1265 3%
Read 4k	46.96	14.6 -69%	28.57 -39%	42.13 -10%	38.52 -18%	49.65 6%	53.3 14%
Write 4k	100.7	20.5 -80%	90.7 -10%	105.8 5%	113 12%	123 22%	159.9 59%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2

Sequential Read: 1482 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1232 MB/s

512K Read: 1191 MB/s

512K Write: 1220 MB/s

4K Read: 46.96 MB/s

4K Write: 100.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 464 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 292.1 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel HD Graphics 520	1558 Points +15%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520	1539 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS Intel HD Graphics 520	1396 Points +3%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515	1360 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515	1277 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515	1188 Points -13%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 515	1094 Points -20%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel HD Graphics 520	1398 Points +11%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520	1377 Points +10%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515	1254 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS Intel HD Graphics 520	1227 Points -2%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515	1186 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515	1083 Points -14%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 515	992 Points -21%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel HD Graphics 520	5931 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS Intel HD Graphics 520	5659 Points +8%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520	5471 Points +4%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515	5257 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515	4446 Points -15%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 515	3481 Points -34%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515	3434 Points -35%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel HD Graphics 520	7966 Points +13%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515	7035 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS Intel HD Graphics 520	7031 Points 0%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520	6708 Points -5%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515	6078 Points -14%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 515	4658 Points -34%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515	4286 Points -39%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel HD Graphics 520	861 Points +10%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520	842 Points +8%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515	780 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS Intel HD Graphics 520	772 Points -1%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515	682 Points -13%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 515	509 Points -35%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515	464 Points -41%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel HD Graphics 520	929 Points +10%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520	900 Points +7%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515	844 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS Intel HD Graphics 520	826 Points -2%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515	735 Points -13%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 515	565 Points -33%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515	507 Points -40%

3DMark 11 Performance		1360 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5257 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		780 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
Tomb Raider (2013)	54.4	22.8	15.9
BioShock Infinite (2013)	49.9	24.8	15.3
The Witcher 3 (2015)	12.8

Max. Load

Idle


35.7 °C	42.7 °C	40.3 °C
33.6 °C	33.6 °C	35.2 °C
32.1 °C	29.7 °C	32.8 °C

Maximum: 42.7 °C
Average: 35.1 °C


41.9 °C	45.8 °C	37.3 °C
37.9 °C	39.3 °C	35.3 °C
33.8 °C	30.9 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 45.8 °C
Average: 37.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 37.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke 62 Max

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).

	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515	Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 6Y75, HD Graphics 515	Dell Latitude 13 7370 6Y57, HD Graphics 515	Dell XPS 13-9350 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS 6300U, HD Graphics 520	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520
Heat		4%	16%	-1%	1%	11%	1%
Maximum Upper Side *	42.7	39 9%	39.1 8%	43.2 -1%	45.2 -6%	40 6%	43.2 -1%
Maximum Bottom *	45.8	44 4%	38.7 16%	50.8 -11%	45.2 1%	42.8 7%	47.1 -3%
Idle Upper Side *	32.1	32 -0%	26 19%	30.5 5%	30.4 5%	26.6 17%	30.5 5%
Idle Bottom *	32.3	32 1%	25.7 20%	31.2 3%	31.2 3%	27.4 15%	31.5 2%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.4 / 1.5 Watt
Idle	4.3 / 6 / 6.4 Watt
Load	22.7 / 31.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 1920x1080	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 2304x1440	Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 3200x1800	Dell Latitude 13 7370 6Y57, HD Graphics 515, 1920x1080	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 1920x1080	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 2560x1440
Power Consumption		23%	-4%	-4%	-36%	-54%
Idle Minimum *	4.3	2.7 37%	4.2 2%	5 -16%	7.6 -77%	6.3 -47%
Idle Average *	6	2.7 55%	8.4 -40%	7.5 -25%	9 -50%	9.4 -57%
Idle Maximum *	6.4	7.2 -13%	8.9 -39%	8 -25%	9.6 -50%	10.1 -58%
Load Average *	22.7	22 3%	15.9 30%	15.3 33%	24.5 -8%	33.3 -47%
Load Maximum *	31.2	20.5 34%	22.5 28%	26.8 14%	30.3 3%	49.5 -59%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		8h 46min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 25.10586.0.0)		5h 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		6h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 32min

	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 38 Wh	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 41.4 Wh	Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 45 Wh	Dell Latitude 13 7370 34 Wh	Dell XPS 13-9350 56 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB-005XUS 52 Wh	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 45.6 Wh
Battery Runtime		39%	32%	7%	25%	15%	-11%
Reader / Idle	526		1013 93%	588 12%	782 49%	776 48%	530 1%
H.264	413	512 24%	418 1%	391 -5%			339 -18%
WiFi v1.3	355	501 41%	402 13%	367 3%	451 27%	411 16%	309 -13%
Load	152	231 52%	182 20%	176 16%	150 -1%	123 -19%	131 -14%

Pros

+ 小巧轻盈

+ 坚固的机身

+ 出色的键盘

+ 优秀的全高清屏幕，无闪烁

+ 不错的扬声器

+ 安静的运行

+ 高速无线网络

+ 为Windows Hello搭配的红外摄像头

+ 三年质保

Cons

- 转轴不够稳定

- 点击触控版使用中存在问题

- 在持续负载下性能下降

- 接口非常有限

- 没有提供USB-A转接器

- 无Kensington锁口

- 作为商务设备安全功能有限

In review: HP EliteBook Folio G1. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

我们在评测开始时提出了惠普EliteBook Folio G1究竟能否适应办公需要的问题。在实际使用两周之后，我们可以肯定地回答：是。它有足够的系统性能，优秀的屏幕和可以适应长时间打字的出色键盘来证明自己。

这样一台紧凑的被动散热设备显然并能适应所有的用户。相比尺寸更大的商务设备它显然会受到不少限制，从接口数量、安全功能到持续负载下的性能。这台轻巧设备的被动散热很快就会达到极限。不过它的性能完全可以满足日常办公应用的需要。

整体上，我们对这台设备的整体表现十分满意，但是EliteBook Folio G1还不完美。它出色的机身受到了较弱的转轴的影响。它只提供了三个接口，而重要的USB-A转接器也没有附带。它在功耗上也还有改进的空间。缺少安全锁对于一些用户来说也会是个致命的问题。

惠普EliteBook Folio G1是一台非常优秀的设备，不过你需要注意它的弱点。如果你正在寻找一台超便携设备，需要安静的运行和出色的键盘的话，毫无疑问它将是你最佳的选择。

和竞争对手的比较并不简单，因为它们在我们测试中都得到了不错的分数，同时价位也十分相近。因此你必须十分清楚自己需要的是什么。我们首先将会对比两台最小巧的设备，EliteBook Folio G1和MacBook 12。如果你主要需要一台个人设备，那么Apple的这台笔记本电脑提供了更好的屏幕，更好的触控板和更长的电池续航。EliteBook Folio G1搭配的磨砂屏幕、可选拓展坞以及更优秀的键盘则更加适合工作。惠普同时提供了三年质保，因此它的性价比更高一筹。

主动散热式的商务设备通常更厚重，但提供了更多的接口和更强的性能，特别是在持续负载下。如果你需要一台尽可能便携、安静的设备的话，那么Folio G1将是个不错的选择。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA - 2016-06-09 06/09/2016 v5.1^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

91 / 98 → 93%

Keyboard

92%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

56 / 80 → 71%

Weight

75 / 35-78 → 93%

Battery

88%

Display

88%

Games Performance

55 / 68 → 80%

Application Performance

80 / 87 → 92%

Temperature

89 / 91 → 98%

Noise

100%

Audio

86 / 91 → 95%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Average

79%

90%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1616 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 EliteBook Folio G1 亚笔记本电脑简短评测

Andreas Osthoff, 2016-06-25 (Update: 2016-06-25)