惠普 EliteBook 725 G3 亚笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA
Brand: HP

更似中产，不再精英。 惠普的最新亚笔记本电脑EliteBook 725 G3用实际行动表现了对AMD处理器的支持。遗憾的是，它的表现和接近1000欧元（约7436人民币）的售价并不相称。我们的测试机提供了很短的电池续航，吵闹的风扇和昏暗、低对比、可视角度窄的屏幕。

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 08/30/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Business Carrizo Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA (EliteBook 700 Series)

Processor

AMD Pro A10-8700B 4 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Carrizo

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Core: 720 MHz, 单通道, 16.300.2311.0 (Crimson 16.7.3)

Memory

4 GB

, DDR3-1600, 单通道, 2个内存槽1个已占用

Display

12.50 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 125 PPI, LG Philips, TN LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

AMD KernCZ

Storage

Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630, 500 GB

, 7200 rpm, 420 GB free

Soundcard

Conexant CX20724 @ AMD K15.6 - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensors: 加速传感器, TPM 1.2

Networking

Broadcom BCM5762 NetXtreme PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 18.9 x 311 x 218.9

Battery

44 Wh, 0 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 7 Professional (64 Bit) + Windows 10 Pro (64 Bit)

Camera

Webcam: 高清摄像头

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, Windows 10 DVD, 驱动程序 DVD, Cyberlink PowerDVD 12, Cyberlink YouCam, Foxit PhantomPDF, MS Office (试用版), MS Security Essentials, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

1.26 kg, Power Supply: 306 g

Price

1135 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

HP EliteBook 725 G2 Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Dell Latitude 12 E5270 HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP EliteBook 820 G3	73.7 MB/s +36%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE	62.1 MB/s +15%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA	54.2 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 12 E5270	216.4 MB/s +165%
HP EliteBook 820 G3	86.9 MB/s +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE	84.9 MB/s +4%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA	81.8 MB/s

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	570 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	397 MBit/s


260 cd/m²	267 cd/m²	248 cd/m²
239 cd/m²	241 cd/m²	234 cd/m²
221 cd/m²	224 cd/m²	226 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 267 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 240 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 239 cd/m²
Contrast: 446:1 (Black: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 9.52 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
71.12% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.03% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
48.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
47.15% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA TN LED, 1366x768	HP EliteBook 725 G2 TN-Panel, 1366x768	Dell Latitude 12 E5270 TN, 1366x768	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE IPS, 1366x768	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 IPS, 1920x1080	HP EliteBook 820 G3 TN LED, 1366x768	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz IPS, 2304x1440
Display		-14%	-17%	2%	46%	-17%	39%
Display P3 Coverage	47.15	40.56 -14%	39.06 -17%	48.19 2%	72.3 53%	38.9 -17%	66.8 42%
sRGB Coverage	71	61 -14%	58.7 -17%	72.6 2%	93.8 32%	58.5 -18%	95.4 34%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	48.71	41.92 -14%	40.36 -17%	49.79 2%	73.8 52%	40.2 -17%	68 40%
Response Times			5%	1%		-19%	-5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	50 ?(27, 23)		45.2 ?(22.4, 22.8) 10%	42.8 ?(18.8, 24) 14%		58 ?(24.8, 33.2) -16%	41.2 ?(15.6, 25.6) 18%
Response Time Black / White *	24 ?(20, 4)		24 ?(6.8, 17.2) -0%	27.2 ?(12.4, 14.8) -13%		29.2 ?(12, 17.2) -22%	30.4 ?(6.8, 23.6) -27%
PWM Frequency			1000 ?(90)	220 ?(90)
Screen		-30%	-11%	42%	63%	-8%	51%
Brightness middle	241	188 -22%	161 -33%	262 9%	367.1 52%	244 1%	387 61%
Brightness	240	186 -22%	152 -37%	251 5%	341 42%	240 0%	358 49%
Brightness Distribution	83	91 10%	90 8%	88 6%	85 2%	84 1%	88 6%
Black Level *	0.54	0.86 -59%	0.29 46%	0.26 52%	0.3 44%	0.6 -11%	0.47 13%
Contrast	446	219 -51%	555 24%	1008 126%	1224 174%	407 -9%	823 85%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.04	12.31 -53%	10.31 -28%	3.55 56%		9 -12%	1.6 80%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	13.9		18.58 -34%	5.85 58%		15.73 -13%	4 71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.52	12.56 -32%	11.3 -19%	3.36 65%		9.48 -0%	1 89%
Gamma	2.42 ^91%	1.86 ^118%	2.57 ^86%	2.39 ^92%		2.44 ^90%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	11362 ^57%	12047 ^54%	13574 ^48%	5985 ^109%		11116 ^58%	6680 ^97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	45.03	38.6 -14%	37.32 -17%	45.9 2%		37.18 -17%	61.6 37%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	71.12		58.82 -17%			58.63 -18%	82.2 16%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-22% / -26%	-8% / -10%	15% / 28%	55% / 56%	-15% / -11%	28% / 41%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 27 ms rise
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

4662

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

5907

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

2200

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

18.32 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

2.29 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.82 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

22.48 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

192 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

70 Points

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points +86%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	123 Points +76%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel Core i5-6300U	121 Points +73%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel Core i5-6200U	112 Points +60%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	91 Points +30%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	90 Points +29%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	74 Points +6%
Acer Extensa 2510-34Z4 Intel Core i3-4030U	70 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	70 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G2 AMD A10 Pro-7350B	55 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Intel Core i7-6500U	325 Points +69%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	311 Points +62%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel Core i5-6300U	305 Points +59%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel Core i5-6200U	289 Points +51%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	218 Points +14%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	192 Points
Acer Extensa 2510-34Z4 Intel Core i3-4030U	187 Points -3%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	187 Points -3%
HP EliteBook 725 G2 AMD A10 Pro-7350B	151 Points -21%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel Core i5-6300U	10432 Points +77%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel Core i5-6200U	9728 Points +65%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	7355 Points +25%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	6309 Points +7%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	5907 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G2 AMD A10 Pro-7350B	4951 Points -16%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel Core i5-6300U	4625 Points +110%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel Core i5-6200U	4408 Points +100%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	3353 Points +52%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	2777 Points +26%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	2200 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G2 AMD A10 Pro-7350B	1907 Points -13%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel Core i5-6300U	199.1 Points +79%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	188 Points +69%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	143 Points +29%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	130.7 Points +18%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	123.2 Points +11%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	111.2 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	66.4 Points -40%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	3814 ms *
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	2262 ms * +41%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	1976 ms * +48%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	1770 ms * +54%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	1663 ms * +56%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel Core i5-6200U	1283 ms * +66%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	1203 ms * +68%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel Core i5-6300U	1196 ms * +69%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel Core i5-6300U	30812 Points +90%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	29020 Points +79%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel Core i5-6200U	26857 Points +66%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	21739 Points +34%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	18464 Points +14%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	17378 Points +7%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	16222 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Pro A10-8700B	9042 Points -44%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score		2331 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2706 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		2710 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3691 points
Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8 | PCMark 7

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook 820 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3400 Points +26%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15	3291 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	3262 Points +21%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Pro A10-8700B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	2706 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	2550 Points -6%
HP EliteBook 725 G2 Radeon R6 (Kaveri), A10 Pro-7350B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	2291 Points -15%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook 820 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4581 Points +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	4335 Points +17%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15	4273 Points +16%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Pro A10-8700B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	3691 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	3550 Points -4%
HP EliteBook 725 G2 Radeon R6 (Kaveri), A10 Pro-7350B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	3227 Points -13%

PCMark 7 - Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	3777 Points +62%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15	3263 Points +40%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Pro A10-8700B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	2331 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G2 Radeon R6 (Kaveri), A10 Pro-7350B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	1869 Points -20%

	HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	HP EliteBook 725 G2 Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630	Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive	HP EliteBook 820 G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-11%	-26%	18%	13315%	9582%
Read Seq	125.3	116.8 -7%	113.8 -9%	107.9 -14%	1255 902%	754 502%
Write Seq	124.3	115.6 -7%	108.5 -13%	110.2 -11%	1240 898%	638 413%
Read 512	40.95	39.14 -4%	24.9 -39%	36.26 -11%	1131 2662%	616 1404%
Write 512	57.6	49.61 -14%	51.9 -10%	77.1 34%	811 1308%	678 1077%
Read 4k	0.495	0.453 -8%	0.398 -20%	0.497 0%	51 10203%	14.6 2849%
Write 4k	1.13	0.947 -16%	0.654 -42%	3.136 178%	134.1 11767%	20.5 1714%
Read 4k QD32	1.129	1.019 -10%	0.798 -29%	1.155 2%	549 48527%	464 40998%
Write 4k QD32	1.133	0.931 -18%	0.636 -44%	0.766 -32%	343.9 30253%	315 27702%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630

Transfer Rate Minimum: 63.9 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 134.5 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 105.2 MB/s

Access Time: 16.6 ms

Burst Rate: 164 MB/s

3DMark 06 Standard Score		5207 points
3DMark 11 Performance		1424 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		34816 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		3524 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		690 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		300 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	1767 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	1432 Points -19%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	1389 Points -21%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	1280 Points -28%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1212 Points -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1210 Points -32%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	1186 Points -33%
HP EliteBook 725 G2 AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri), AMD A10 Pro-7350B	987 Points -44%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	6928 Points +47%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	6309 Points +34%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	6131 Points +30%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	6078 Points +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	5978 Points +27%
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	4717 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G2 AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri), AMD A10 Pro-7350B	3989 Points -15%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	983 Points
HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), AMD Pro A10-8700B	769 Points -22%
Dell Latitude 12 E5270 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	815 Points -17%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6300U	755 Points -23%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	735 Points -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	727 Points -26%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	675 Points -31%
HP EliteBook 725 G2 AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri), AMD A10 Pro-7350B	555 Points -44%

	low	med.	high	ultra
Tomb Raider (2013)	49.5	25.2	18.5
BioShock Infinite (2013)	42.7	24.1	19.4
Battlefield 4 (2013)	21.7	14.4	8.4
Far Cry Primal (2016)	10	7
The Division (2016)	12.3	7.5
Hitman 2016 (2016)	6.1	3.9
Need for Speed 2016 (2016)	11.1	10.4
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)	6	2.3

Noise Level

Idle		30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB(A)
HDD		30.9 dB(A)
Load		38.2 / 38.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.9 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


37.8 °C	42.8 °C	38.7 °C
36 °C	38.6 °C	38.3 °C
33.5 °C	34 °C	37.4 °C

Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 37.5 °C


40.5 °C	54.3 °C	42 °C
40.5 °C	39.7 °C	36.3 °C
38.7 °C	35.5 °C	33.8 °C

Maximum: 54.3 °C
Average: 40.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 44.5 °C | Room Temperature 23.3 °C | Fluke 62 Max

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.3 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).

HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.65 / 0.71 Watt
Idle	5.4 / 7.5 / 13 Watt
Load	41.2 / 44.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA Pro A10-8700B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo)	HP EliteBook 725 G2 A10 Pro-7350B, Radeon R6 (Kaveri)	Dell Latitude 12 E5270 6300U, HD Graphics 520	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 6500U, HD Graphics 520	HP EliteBook 820 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515
Power Consumption		9%	27%	30%	19%	32%	52%
Idle Minimum *	5.4	7 -30%	3.9 28%	3.6 33%	2.7 50%	3.5 35%	2.7 50%
Idle Average *	7.5	8.6 -15%	6 20%	5.9 21%	7.7 -3%	5.4 28%	2.7 64%
Idle Maximum *	13	9.9 24%	6.6 49%	6.6 49%	11 15%	6.2 52%	7.2 45%
Load Average *	41.2	24.4 41%	28.9 30%	28.5 31%	34.8 16%	27.3 34%	22 47%
Load Maximum *	44.7	32.5 27%	41.7 7%	36.8 18%	36.6 18%	39.5 12%	20.5 54%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		9h 13min
WiFi Websurfing (IE 11)		4h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		4h 18min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 23min

	HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA 44 Wh	HP EliteBook 725 G2 46 Wh	Dell Latitude 12 E5270 47 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F60041GE 46 Wh	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 52 Wh	HP EliteBook 820 G3 44 Wh	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 41.4 Wh
Battery Runtime		-2%	43%	57%	105%	62%	118%
Reader / Idle	553	456 -18%	772 40%	795 44%	1134 105%	826 49%
H.264	258	205 -21%	353 37%	386 50%		495 92%	512 98%
WiFi v1.3	281		398 42%	396 41%		373 33%	501 78%
Load	83	110 33%	128 54%	160 93%		144 73%	231 178%
WiFi		258			402

Pros

+ 磨砂屏幕

+ 坚固的机身与优秀的工艺

+ 优秀的输入设备

+ 丰富的可升级选项

+ 三年质保

+ 支持LTE

Cons

- 昏暗的TN屏幕对比度低，可视角度窄

- 吵人的风扇

- 电池续航短

In review: HP EliteBook 725 G3. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

惠普EliteBook 725 G3是一台12.5寸亚笔记本电脑。这个机型的AMD处理器为日常应用提供了足够的性能。这台笔记本电脑采用了优秀的机身，提供了完善的连接性。它的键盘也十分优秀，同时它还有可选的LTE模组，天线和SIM卡槽已经就位。惠普为它提供了3年的质保。

这台测试机的很多方面都存在不足。它只有在待机时可以保持安静，而当风扇开始旋转之后，就会发出哨声一样很吵人的噪音。再加上不菲的价码，它可能很难成为一台称职的商务笔记本电脑。EliteBook 725 G2有一个维护底盖，可以不使用任何工具轻松打开。而后续机型EliteBook 725 G3的底盖则使用了螺丝固定。说实话，只需一个螺丝刀用户可以很容易打开它的底盖，不过这仍然是一种退步。

它的电池续航也不算出色。这台12.5寸笔记本电脑需要有更长的续航时间，在这方面它落后于EliteBook 820 G3和联想 ThinkPad X260。它的屏幕在这个价位上显得十分简陋。它亮度较低，对比度和可视角度都不理想，同时只有高清分辨率。

EliteBook 725 G3将会在惠普的商务产品线中举步维艰。它的硬件、定价都不足以成为亮点。

整体上，我们很难找到理由向用户推荐EliteBook 725 G3。即使它的价位有所下降，它的电池续航无论如何很难满足此类产品的标准。另外，用户还有EliteBook 820 G3 (T9X40ET)可供选择，它搭配酷睿 i5-6200U且相比我们的测试机更加便宜。这款机型的其他功能都和这台测试机725 G3相似。我们的测试机售价1000欧元（约7479人民币），比820 G3贵出了近80欧元（约598人民币）。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP EliteBook 725 G3-P4T48EA - 2016-08-11 08/11/2016 v5.1^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

91 / 98 → 93%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

57 / 80 → 71%

Weight

72 / 35-78 → 86%

Battery

77%

Display

77%

Games Performance

50 / 68 → 73%

Application Performance

60 / 87 → 69%

Temperature

86 / 91 → 94%

Noise

76%

Audio

59 / 91 → 65%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Average

71%

82%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 EliteBook 725 G3 亚笔记本电脑简短评测

Sascha Mölck, 2016-08-30 (Update: 2016-09- 1)