惠普 EliteBook 1030 G1 亚笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA
Brand: HP

没有fan也快乐。 尽管搭配了被动散热的酷睿m处理器，EliteBook 1030 G1依然能够提供出色的应用程序性能，同时搭配了出色的输入设备和明亮的IPS屏幕。惠普在亚笔记本电脑中创立了一个新的里程碑吗？

Till Schönborn, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 08/30/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Laptop / Notebook Skylake Touchscreen Ultrabook Windows

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA

Processor

Intel Core m7-6Y75 2 x 1.2 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 515, Core: 1000 MHz, 20.19.15.4331

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR3-1866, 双通道，板载

Display

13.30 inch 16:9, 3200 x 1800 pixel 276 PPI, 电容式, Sharp SHP1465, IPS, LED-背光, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH

Storage

Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006, 512 GB

Soundcard

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 15.7 x 310 x 210

Battery

40 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 芯, 不可拆卸

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: Bang & Olufsen (立体声), Keyboard: 孤岛式, 45瓦电源适配器, 36 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

1.16 kg, Power Supply: 230 g

Price

2000 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA Dell Latitude 13 7370 HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA DIN A4 ❌

Left side: Kensington lock, HDMI, USB 3.0, USB 3.0 Type-C

Right side: headset jack, USB 3.0, docking port, AC power

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	570 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	397 MBit/s


342 cd/m²	364 cd/m²	355 cd/m²
366 cd/m²	401 cd/m²	395 cd/m²
358 cd/m²	368 cd/m²	375 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Sharp SHP1465 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 401 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 369.3 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 399 cd/m²
Contrast: 1146:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.13 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94.64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

	HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA Sharp SHP1465, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.30	Dell Latitude 13 7370 Sharp LQ133M1, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA AUO226D, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.50	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 TOS508F, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE VVX14T058J00, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00
Display		-21%	-33%	1%	-1%
Display P3 Coverage	67.6	52.2 -23%	44.45 -34%	67.9 0%	66.7 -1%
sRGB Coverage	94.7	78.3 -17%	65.2 -31%	98 3%	94.7 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69	53.9 -22%	45.96 -33%	69.8 1%	68.4 -1%
Response Times		-25%	16%	-4%	1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42.4 ?(17.2, 25.2)	50.4 ?(20.4, 30) -19%	32 ?(14.8, 17.2) 25%	42 ?(18, 24) 1%	44 ?(17, 27) -4%
Response Time Black / White *	25.6 ?(11.6, 14)	33.6 ?(13.2, 20.4) -31%	24 ?(12.4, 11.6) 6%	28 ?(7, 21) -9%	24 ?(5.2, 18.8) 6%
PWM Frequency				217 ?(40)	220 ?(90)
Screen		-20%	-19%	-19%	-2%
Brightness middle	401	261 -35%	289 -28%	300 -25%	272 -32%
Brightness	369	241 -35%	298 -19%	280 -24%	268 -27%
Brightness Distribution	85	85 0%	87 2%	87 2%	95 12%
Black Level *	0.35	0.26 26%	0.27 23%	0.31 11%	0.32 9%
Contrast	1146	1004 -12%	1070 -7%	968 -16%	850 -26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.5	4.3 -23%	4.82 -38%	4.9 -40%	2.61 25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.33	8.66 -37%	10.73 -70%	8.91 -41%	6.43 -2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.13	5.82 -41%	3.84 7%	6.69 -62%	3.31 20%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	2.44 ^90%	2.41 ^91%	2.33 ^94%	2.35 ^94%
CCT	6508 ^100%	6771 ^96%	6492 ^100%	6487 ^100%	6360 ^102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	61.56	49.18 -20%	42.03 -32%	63 2%	63 2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	94.64	77.84 -18%	64.8 -32%	98 4%	95 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-22% / -20%	-12% / -17%	-7% / -13%	-1% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.6 ms rise
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.2 ms rise
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | X264 HD Benchmark 4.0

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points +14%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 T8X20EA Intel Core i5-6200U	117 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA Intel Core m7-6Y75	114 Points
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Core m5-6Y54	111 Points -3%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel Core m5-6Y57	101 Points -11%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	91 Points -20%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	90 Points -21%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	88 Points -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Intel Core i7-6500U	325 Points +15%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 T8X20EA Intel Core i5-6200U	292 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA Intel Core m7-6Y75	283 Points
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel Core m5-6Y54	250 Points -12%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	218 Points -23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	206 Points -27%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel Core m5-6Y57	180 Points -36%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA Intel Core m7-6Y75	1.37 Points
HP EliteBook 820 G3 T8X20EA Intel Core i5-6200U	1.34 Points -2%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel Core m5-6Y57	1.16 Points -15%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	1 Points -27%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	0.95 Points -31%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	0.98 Points -28%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA Intel Core m7-6Y75	3.25 Points
HP EliteBook 820 G3 T8X20EA Intel Core i5-6200U	3.23 Points -1%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.35 Points -28%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.29 Points -30%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.27 Points -30%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel Core m5-6Y57	2.03 Points -38%

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA Intel Core m7-6Y75	108.7 fps
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Intel Core i7-6500U	104 fps -4%
HP EliteBook 820 G3 T8X20EA Intel Core i5-6200U	100 fps -8%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel Core m5-6Y57	92.6 fps -15%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	76.8 fps -29%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	69 (61.3^min - 76.8^max) fps -37%
Pass 2
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-125 Intel Core i7-6500U	21 fps +10%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA Intel Core m7-6Y75	19.13 fps
HP EliteBook 820 G3 T8X20EA Intel Core i5-6200U	19 fps -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	14.15 fps -26%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel Core m3-6Y30	13 (11.7^min - 14.2^max) fps -32%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel Core m5-6Y57	11.72 fps -39%

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.37 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.25 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

28.99 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

283 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

114 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

33.92 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Help

... in comparison

	HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006	Dell Latitude 13 7370 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ512G8NY
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		154%	173%	53%	11%
Read Seq	387.5	1354 249%	1482 282%	754 95%	518 34%
Write Seq	348.7	1132 225%	1232 253%	638 83%	423.3 21%
Read 512	239.9	1140 375%	1191 396%	616 157%	414.8 73%
Write 512	335.3	1020 204%	1220 264%	678 102%	379.9 13%
Read 4k	30.34	42.13 39%	46.96 55%	14.6 -52%	21.17 -30%
Write 4k	75.9	105.8 39%	100.7 33%	20.5 -73%	86.3 14%
Read 4k QD32	311.3	400.5 29%	464 49%	464 49%	227.3 -27%
Write 4k QD32	192.8	328.4 70%	292.1 52%	315 63%	174.7 -9%

PCMark 8 | PCMark 7

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	3385 Points +19%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ512G8NY	3271 Points +15%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	3048 Points +7%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	3037 Points +7%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006	2838 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	2550 Points -10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	2426 Points -15%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	4342 Points +15%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	4238 Points +12%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	4146 Points +10%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006	3784 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	3550 Points -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	3186 Points -16%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	4150 Points +17%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006	3555 Points
Dell Latitude 13 7370 HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	3528 Points -1%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	3430 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	2968 Points -17%

PCMark 7 - Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	5350 Points +9%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006	4917 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	4274 Points -13%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 HD Graphics 515, 6Y57, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	4165 Points -15%

PCMark 7 Score		4917 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2838 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3555 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3784 points
Help

Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006

Transfer Rate Minimum: 86.1 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 403.6 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 373.8 MB/s

Access Time: 0.1 ms

Burst Rate: 49.6 MB/s

CPU Usage: 3.5 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1386 Points +22%
Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1377 Points +22%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	1254 Points +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	1206 Points +7%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	1186 Points +5%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75	1132 Points
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y57	992 Points -12%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	7516 Points +12%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	7035 Points +5%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75	6684 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	6597 Points -1%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	6078 Points -9%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y57	4658 Points -30%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	959 Points +8%
HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75	892 Points
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54	844 Points -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	810 Points -9%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30	735 Points -18%
Dell Latitude 13 7370 Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y57	565 Points -37%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		7197 points
3DMark 11 Performance		1219 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		43571 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5242 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		774 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	44.6	19.5	16.7	5.1
Metro: Last Light (2013)	21.5	18	12.5
Dirt Rally (2015)	67.2	15.8	12.5

Max. Load

Idle


34.7 °C	37.6 °C	43.4 °C
34.5 °C	35.7 °C	41.9 °C
33.4 °C	33.1 °C	38.7 °C

Maximum: 43.4 °C
Average: 37 °C


44.5 °C	42.9 °C	35.4 °C
41.9 °C	38.8 °C	33.6 °C
37.5 °C	34.3 °C	32.7 °C

Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 38 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45.5 °C | Room Temperature 24.1 °C | Fluke 62 Max

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.7 °C / 101.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-10.4 °C / -18.8 F).

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.23 / 0.32 Watt
Idle	4 / 8 / 8.6 Watt
Load	26.5 / 34.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-512G-1006, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.30	Dell Latitude 13 7370 6Y57, HD Graphics 515, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.50	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ512G8NY, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00
Power Consumption		11%	13%	-8%	-3%
Idle Minimum *	4	5 -25%	4.3 -8%	3.2 20%	3.8 5%
Idle Average *	8	7.5 6%	6 25%	7.8 2%	7.1 11%
Idle Maximum *	8.6	8 7%	6.4 26%	8.7 -1%	7.7 10%
Load Average *	26.5	15.3 42%	22.7 14%	42.2 -59%	30.2 -14%
Load Maximum *	34.8	26.8 23%	31.2 10%	35.7 -3%	44.7 -28%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		10h 18min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		6h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 24min

	HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 40 Wh	Dell Latitude 13 7370 6Y57, HD Graphics 515, 34 Wh	HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh	Toshiba Portege Z30-C-138 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 52 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 52 Wh	Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh
Battery Runtime		10%	4%	13%	27%	53%
Reader / Idle	618	588 -5%	526 -15%		942 52%
H.264	377	391 4%	413 10%		510 35%	512 36%
WiFi v1.3	305	367 20%	355 16%	345 13%	429 41%	501 64%
Load	144	176 22%	152 6%		115 -20%	231 60%

Pros

+ 高品质机身

+ 出色的输入设备

+ 出色的QHD+屏幕

+ 应用程序性能高

+ 快速无线网络

+ USB C型接口

+ 无风扇

Cons

- 有限的升级空间

- 一般的电池续航

- DisplayPort只能通过底座获得

In review: HP EliteBook 1030 G1. Test model courtesy of HP Germany.

对于被动冷却的商务笔记本电脑大家可能有不同的看法：如果你在夏天也要使用需求较高的计算软件，需要尽量强的性能的话，那么可能经典的酷睿i系列处理器更适合你。对于简单的办公应用，比如上网浏览或者视频会议，并不需要很强的性能——而其他的方面如输入设备，重量或噪音控制则显得更加重要。

惠普从这个角度设计了一款几乎完美的设备EliteBook 1030 G1。这台笔记本电脑在工艺品质，键盘和屏幕方面都表现特别优秀。它的应用程序性能也特别优秀，尽管有以上提到过的限制，但惠普在性能和发热量间找到了一个巧妙的平衡，这要归功于它聪明的功率温度控制。

只有相对短的电池续航时间无法满足完美超极本的定义——即将上市的全高清机型可能会提供更长的续航，如果你能够放弃它极致瑞丽的QHD+屏幕的话。

整体上，我们认为1030 G1值得推荐，不过1500到2000欧元（约11219人民币到14912人民币）的较高零售价可能会让一些潜在消费者止步不前。不过，水平相当的竞争机型也同样价格不菲。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA - 2016-07-11 07/11/2016 v5.1^(old)
Till Schönborn

Chassis

91 / 98 → 93%

Keyboard

92%

Pointing Device

90%

Connectivity

52 / 80 → 65%

Weight

73 / 35-78 → 88%

Battery

85%

Display

86%

Games Performance

54 / 68 → 80%

Application Performance

80 / 87 → 92%

Temperature

89 / 91 → 98%

Noise

100%

Audio

75 / 91 → 82%

Camera

47 / 85 → 56%

Average

78%

88%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1612 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 EliteBook 1030 G1 亚笔记本电脑简短评测

Till Schönborn, 2016-08-30 (Update: 2016-09- 2)