富士通 Celsius H760 工作站简短评测

Name: Fujitsu Celsius H760
Brand: Fujitsu

大成功。 富士通Celsius H760是经典工作站设备的一个成功范例。性能，灵活性，品质和人体工程学设计都是它们不可或缺的特质。我们将在接下来的深入评测中为你分析这台测试机的实际表现。

Tobias Winkler, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 10/28/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows Workstation

Test device courtesy of http://shop.fujitsu.com/de/notebooks/mobile-workstations

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Fujitsu Celsius H760 (Celsius H Series)

Processor

Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 4 x 2.8 - 3.7 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M - 4 GB VRAM, 10.18.13.5459 - nVIDIA ForceWare 354.59, Nvidia Optimus mit Nvidia Quadro M2000M und Intel P530

Memory

16 GB

, 三星 DDR4 2x 8 GB, SO DIMM 2133 MHz / PC4-17000 ECC (M474A1G43EB1-CPB), 2 空余插槽

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD046F LP156WF6-SPP1, IPS LED, 88 % sRGB, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel CM236 (Skylake PCH-H)

Storage

Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e, 512 GB

, + 1 TB HDD Seagate ST1000LM 014-1EJ164

Soundcard

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Skylake PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 分开的输入和输出接口（3.5寸麦克风／立体声耳机接口）, Card Reader: Realtek PCIe SD读卡器, SDHC, SDXC, 1 SmartCard, 0 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: PalmSecure指纹感应器, TPM 2.0

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, Sierra Wireless Airprime EM7305 (LTE/ HSPA+), GPS

Optical drive

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 32 x 380 x 257

Battery

72 Wh, 6400 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 10.8V

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 200万像素

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

2.98 kg

Price

3700 Euro

Links

Fujitsu homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) Fujitsu Celsius H760 HP ZBook 15 G3 T6M54EA Dell Precision 5510 DIN A4 ❌

Left: AC power, LAN, VGA; DisplayPort, Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB 3.0, SmartCard reader, card reader, audio in/out

Right: Optical drive, USB 2.0, slot for a Kensington Lock

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Fujitsu Celsius H760	84 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Fujitsu Celsius H760	171 MB/s

Networking
WiFi Speed Client 1m
WiFi Speed Server 1m


306 cd/m²	335 cd/m²	328 cd/m²
302 cd/m²	341 cd/m²	320 cd/m²
283 cd/m²	294 cd/m²	281 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LGD046F LP156WF6-SPP1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 341 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 310 cd/m² Minimum: 17.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 342 cd/m²
Contrast: 1003:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
88% sRGB (Calman 2D)
82.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Fujitsu Celsius H760 LGD046F LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.60	HP ZBook 15 G3 Samsung SDC5344, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo ThinkPad P50 LP156WF6-SPK1, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) Sharp LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.60
Display		12%	-34%	40%
Display P3 Coverage	63.9	66.8 5%	39.13 -39%	86.2 35%
sRGB Coverage	82.4	95.5 16%	58.5 -29%	99.7 21%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	60.3	69 14%	40.45 -33%	99 64%
Response Times		-40%	-11%	-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	38 ?(15, 23)	54 ?(24.4, 29.6) -42%	46 ?(17, 29) -21%	40.4 ?(19.6, 20.8) -6%
Response Time Black / White *	26 ?(7, 19)	35.6 ?(11.6, 24) -37%	26 ?(9, 17) -0%	27.6 ?(6.8, 20.8) -6%
PWM Frequency		198 ?(95)		198.4 ?(29)
Screen		-29%	-18%	4%
Brightness middle	341	306 -10%	263 -23%	279.2 -18%
Brightness	310	289 -7%	236 -24%	271 -13%
Brightness Distribution	82	85 4%	78 -5%	83 1%
Black Level *	0.34	0.34 -0%	0.34 -0%	0.266 22%
Contrast	1003	900 -10%	774 -23%	1050 5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.8	5.1 -34%	2.35 38%	4.14 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.8	9.9 8%		6.56 39%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	7.4 -270%	3.33 -67%	3.26 -63%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.37 ^93%	2.38 ^92%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	6581 ^99%	7263 ^89%	6917 ^94%	6375 ^102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	54	63 17%	37 -31%	85.68 59%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	82.2	95 16%	58 -29%	99.72 21%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-19% / -22%	-21% / -20%	13% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	158 Points 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H760 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	158 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P50 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	157 Points -1%
HP ZBook Studio G3 Intel Core i7-6820HQ	149 Points -6%
Dell Precision 3510 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	144 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P50 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	729 Points +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H760 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	710 Points
HP ZBook Studio G3 Intel Core i7-6820HQ	706 Points -1%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	674 Points -5%
Dell Precision 3510 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	601 Points -15%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Fujitsu Celsius H760 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	1.79 Points
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	1.78 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	1.78 Points -1%
HP ZBook Studio G3 Intel Core i7-6820HQ	1.74 Points -3%
Dell Precision 3510 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.69 Points -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P50 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	7.99 Points +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H760 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	7.73 Points
HP ZBook Studio G3 Intel Core i7-6820HQ	7.7 Points 0%
MSI WS60-6QJE316H11 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	7.42 Points -4%
Dell Precision 3510 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	6.79 Points -12%

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

94.5 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.73 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.79 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

114 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

710 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

158 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Fujitsu Celsius H760	4028 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	4023 Points 0%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)	4020 Points 0%
HP ZBook 15 G3	3959 Points -2%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)	5537 Points +27%
HP ZBook 15 G3	4392 Points +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	4345 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	4291 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Fujitsu Celsius H760	5301 Points
HP ZBook 15 G3	5221 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	4372 Points -18%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)	4246 Points -20%

Legend

Fujitsu Celsius H760 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e

HP ZBook 15 G3 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e

Lenovo ThinkPad P50 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e

Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)

	Fujitsu Celsius H760 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e	Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)	Lenovo ThinkPad P50 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	HP ZBook Studio G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Dell Precision 5510 SK hynix SC920 512 GB	MSI WS60 6QJ-535VPL 2x Plextor PX512M6GV-2280 (RAID 0)
AS SSD		3%	-69%	-10%	-515%	-48%
Copy Game MB/s	978	1045 7%	206.7 -79%	1104 13%	349 -64%
Copy Program MB/s	571	480.1 -16%	171.3 -70%	593 4%	221 -61%
Copy ISO MB/s	1325	1391 5%	269.3 -80%	1280 -3%	387 -71%
Access Time Read *	0.036	0.036 -0%	0.058 -61%	0.046 -28%	0.111 -208%	0.054 -50%
Access Time Write *	0.018	0.025 -39%	0.038 -111%	0.025 -39%	0.74 -4011%	0.041 -128%
4K-64 Read	801	1067 33%	381.2 -52%	1050 31%	327 -59%	437.1 -45%
4K-64 Write	285	375.7 32%	258.3 -9%	230.6 -19%	257 -10%	375.8 32%
Seq Read	1916	1953 2%	515 -73%	1713 -11%	474 -75%	880 -54%
Seq Write	1492	1484 -1%	272.8 -82%	947 -37%	389 -74%	821 -45%

* ... smaller is better

AS SSD

Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e

Sequential Read: 1916MB/s

Sequential Write: 1492MB/s

4K Read: 34MB/s

4K Write: 188MB/s

4K-64 Read: 801MB/s

4K-64 Write: 285MB/s

Access Time Read: 0.036ms

Access Time Write: 0.018ms

Copy ISO: 1325MB/s

Copy Program: 571MB/s

Copy Game: 978MB/s

Score Read: 1048Points

Score Write: 623Points

Score Total: 2201Points

SPECviewperf 12 | SPECviewperf 11

SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	84.8 fps +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	74.7 fps +2%
Dell Precision 7710	73 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	73 fps
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)	68.7 fps -6%
HP ZBook 15 G3	66 fps -10%
Dell Precision 3510	32 fps -56%
HP ZBook 15u G3	31.41 fps -57%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	65.8 fps +96%
Dell Precision 7710	63 fps +88%
HP ZBook 15 G3	35.87 fps +7%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	33.6 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	32.86 fps -2%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)	32.41 fps -4%
Dell Precision 3510	26 fps -23%
HP ZBook 15u G3	19.89 fps -41%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	43.81 fps +95%
Dell Precision 7710	37 fps +64%
HP ZBook 15 G3	23.86 fps +6%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	22.5 fps
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)	21.15 fps -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	20.58 fps -9%
Dell Precision 3510	14 fps -38%
HP ZBook 15u G3	4.98 fps -78%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Dell Precision 7710	27 fps +84%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	22.34 fps +52%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)	18.19 fps +24%
HP ZBook 15 G3	15.03 fps +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	14.7 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	14.43 fps -2%
HP ZBook 15u G3	6.09 fps -59%
Dell Precision 3510	5.9 fps -60%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	50.4 fps +42%
Dell Precision 7710	46 fps +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	37.15 fps +5%
HP ZBook 15 G3	35.94 fps +1%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)	35.55 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	35.5 fps
Dell Precision 3510	22 fps -38%
HP ZBook 15u G3	16.38 fps -54%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	4.85 fps +52%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)	3.98 fps +25%
HP ZBook 15 G3	3.29 fps +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	3.19 fps
Dell Precision 7710	3.17 fps -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	3.13 fps -2%
HP ZBook 15u G3	0.41 fps -87%
Dell Precision 3510	0.38 fps -88%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	64.8 fps +62%
Dell Precision 7710	50 fps +25%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)	45 fps +13%
HP ZBook 15 G3	40.61 fps +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	40 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	39.39 fps -2%
Dell Precision 3510	20 fps -50%
HP ZBook 15u G3	16.87 fps -58%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	77.9 fps +66%
Dell Precision 7710	58 fps +23%
HP ZBook 15 G3	47.08 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	47 fps
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO)	45.28 fps -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	44.98 fps -4%
Dell Precision 3510	23 fps -51%
HP ZBook 15u G3	18.62 fps -60%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)
Fujitsu Celsius H760	40 fps

SPECviewperf 11
1920x1080 Siemens NX
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	49.91 fps +16%
Dell Precision 7710	49 fps +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	43.29 fps +1%
HP ZBook 15 G3	43.17 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	43 fps
Dell Precision 3510	30 fps -30%
1920x1080 Tcvis
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	56.3 fps +28%
HP ZBook 15 G3	44.89 fps +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	44 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	43.79 fps 0%
Dell Precision 7710	36 fps -18%
Dell Precision 3510	8 fps -82%
1920x1080 SolidWorks
Dell Precision 7710	74 fps +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	53 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	53 fps
HP ZBook 15 G3	48.13 fps -9%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	48.01 fps -9%
Dell Precision 3510	30 fps -43%
1920x1080 Pro/ENGINEER
Fujitsu Celsius H760	23 fps
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	22.46 fps -2%
HP ZBook 15 G3	21.57 fps -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	21.27 fps -8%
Dell Precision 7710	11.7 fps -49%
Dell Precision 3510	4.3 fps -81%
1920x1080 Maya
Dell Precision 7710	106 fps +83%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	58 fps
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	57.8 fps 0%
HP ZBook 15 G3	57.7 fps -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	57.3 fps -1%
Dell Precision 3510	21 fps -64%
1920x1080 Lightwave
Dell Precision 7710	84 fps +53%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	56.4 fps +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	55 fps
HP ZBook 15 G3	52 fps -5%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	51.9 fps -6%
Dell Precision 3510	36 fps -35%
1920x1080 Ensight
Dell Precision 7710	70 fps +52%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	59.1 fps +28%
HP ZBook 15 G3	46.68 fps +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	46 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	45.8 fps 0%
Dell Precision 3510	24 fps -48%
1920x1080 Catia
Dell Precision 7710	61 fps +9%
Fujitsu Celsius H760	56 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P50	54.1 fps -3%
HP ZBook 15 G3	53.5 fps -4%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	53.4 fps -5%
Dell Precision 3510	13 fps -77%

Legend

Fujitsu Celsius H760 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e

Lenovo ThinkPad P50 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e

Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)

HP ZBook 15 G3 Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e

Dell Precision 3510 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, AMD FirePro W5130M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e

HP ZBook 15u G3 Intel Core i7-6600U, AMD FirePro W4190M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e

HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e

Dell Precision 7710 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5, AMD FirePro W7170M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e

3DMark | LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | Cinebench R11.5

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad P50 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Core i7-6820HQ	30495 Points +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H760 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	30255 Points
HP ZBook 15 G3 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	30236 Points 0%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	26869 Points -11%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	4193 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Core i7-6820HQ	4126 Points +2%
HP ZBook 15 G3 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	4091 Points +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H760 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	4053 Points

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Sala GPUs-only
HP ZBook 15 G3 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	1556 Samples/s +62%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Core i7-6820HQ	1426 Samples/s +48%
Fujitsu Celsius H760 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	961 Samples/s
Room GPUs-only
HP ZBook 15 G3 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	930 Samples/s +49%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Core i7-6820HQ	791 Samples/s +26%
Fujitsu Celsius H760 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	626 Samples/s

Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit
Fujitsu Celsius H760 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	94.5 fps
HP ZBook 15 G3 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	94 fps -1%
Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	93.5 fps -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P50 NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, Intel Core i7-6820HQ	43.32 fps -54%

3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		90607 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		18192 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3794 points
Help

	low	med.	high	ultra
Metro: Last Light (2013)	118.9	94.8	55.3	29.5
Dirt Rally (2015)	272	136	76	33
The Witcher 3 (2015)	68	49	22	15

Noise Level

Idle		29 / 29 / 29 dB(A)
HDD		29 dB(A)
Load		43.1 / 49.2 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


25.3 °C	30.1 °C	38.5 °C
26.8 °C	32.5 °C	35.1 °C
23.7 °C	26.2 °C	24.6 °C

Maximum: 38.5 °C
Average: 29.2 °C


29.3 °C	42.8 °C	27.1 °C
36.9 °C	35.4 °C	25.7 °C
25.3 °C	31.4 °C	24.2 °C

Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 30.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45.9 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fennel FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.1 °C / 89.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-4.3 °C / -7.8 F).

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.3 / 0.4 Watt
Idle	7.7 / 11.8 / 12.9 Watt
Load	90.2 / 130.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Fujitsu Celsius H760 E3-1505M v5, Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512 m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60	Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) E3-1535M v5, Quadro M2000M, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512), IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60	HP ZBook 15 G3 E3-1505M v5, Quadro M2000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e, UWVA-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo ThinkPad P50 6820HQ, Quadro M2000M, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Dell Precision 3510 6700HQ, FirePro W5130M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60
Power Consumption		-103%	5%	21%	36%
Idle Minimum *	7.7	23.9 -210%	5.7 26%	5.6 27%	4.2 45%
Idle Average *	11.8	28.9 -145%	12.2 -3%	8.6 27%	6.5 45%
Idle Maximum *	12.9	30 -133%	12.6 2%	9.3 28%	7.1 45%
Load Average *	90.2	95.2 -6%	83.1 8%	89.5 1%	74.6 17%
Load Maximum *	130.8	157.1 -20%	138.2 -6%	105 20%	92.2 30%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		9h 17min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		4h 33min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 46min

	Fujitsu Celsius H760 E3-1505M v5, Quadro M2000M, 72 Wh	Dell Precision 7510 (4K IGZO) E3-1535M v5, Quadro M2000M, 91 Wh	HP ZBook 15 G3 E3-1505M v5, Quadro M2000M, 90 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad P50 6820HQ, Quadro M2000M, 90 Wh	Dell Precision 3510 6700HQ, FirePro W5130M, 84 Wh
Battery Runtime		-38%	33%	52%	79%
Reader / Idle	557	268 -52%	822 48%	860 54%	1168 110%
H.264	273		449 64%	533 95%	605 122%
WiFi v1.3	333	239 -28%	386 16%	498 50%	591 77%
Load	106	70 -34%	110 4%	113 7%	111 5%

Pros

+ 机身稳定性

+ 工艺品质

+ 处理器性能

+ 显卡性能

+ 系统性能

+ 负载下的性能稳定性

+ 接口配备

+ 可定制性

+ 模块插槽

+ 多种质保和支持选项

+ 多种配件可供选择

+ 发热噪音低

Cons

- 使用电池时性能有所下降

- 屏幕的色域和色彩准确度

- 摄像头和扬声器

- 最高负载下的系统噪音

富士通Celsius H760是前代机型Celsius H740的改进版，它在各个方面都表现优秀。他的机身坚固优质，设计也看起来不差。

在实用性上，我们很喜欢它更新后的接口配备，丰富的配置组合和合理的性能水平。

在工作站这类产品中，用户当然不希望为强劲性能而放弃常见的商务特性。它搭载了完备的安全功能，优秀的输入设备和可选质保和服务，这都让它更加全面。

一项不显眼但十分重要的功能是内置的模块插槽。搭配不同的可选模块，它有了更高的灵活性，也可以与其他竞争对手有所区别。

它的摄像头表现中规中矩，噪音在最高负载下较高，使用电池时性能会有所下降，这些你可能能勉强接受，但它最大的问题是全高清屏幕面板。尽管这是一块不错的宽视角IPS屏幕，但它很难达到这个价位的平均水平。它不够优秀的色域覆盖和色彩准确性，以及可见的像素网格都在一定程度上影响了优秀性能所带来的良好印象，也会影响需要准确色彩的一些专业用途。

整体上，富士通的Celsius H760移动工作站相比同类产品不乏独特之处，根据配置不同，它的定价也十分合理。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Fujitsu Celsius H760 - 2016-10-12 10/12/2016 v5.1^(old)
Tobias Winkler

Chassis

93 / 98 → 95%

Keyboard

97%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

76 / 81 → 94%

Weight

57 / 10-66 → 84%

Battery

81%

Display

87%

Games Performance

86%

Application Performance

93%

Temperature

90 / 95 → 94%

Noise

83 / 90 → 92%

Audio

63%

Camera

21 / 85 → 25%

Average

78%

86%

Workstation - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1614 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 富士通 Celsius H760 工作站简短评测

Tobias Winkler, 2016-10-28 (Update: 2016-10-29)