Notebookcheck Logo

微星 CX72-7QLi581 笔记本电脑简短评测

全方位。 CX72是一台注定会一直坐在家里或办公室桌面上的17.3寸笔记本电脑。它的发热和噪音都控制在了很低的程度，它搭配强劲的Kaby Lake处理器，但屏幕表现不尽人意。请阅读我们的详尽评测了解更多。
Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows
MSI CX72-7QLi581 (CX72 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1176 MHz, Memory: 1001 MHz, DDR3, 64 位界面, ForceWare 375.95, Optimus
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR4 2400, 单通道, 两个内存槽 (一个已占用)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1600 x 900 pixel 106 PPI, LG Philips LP173WD1-TLF1, TN LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Storage
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, 1024 GB 
, 5400 rpm, 874 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC892 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 麦克风接口，耳机接口, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0
Networking
Qualcomm Atheros AR8171/8175 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Optical drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 37 x 420 x 287
Battery
41 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Additional features
Speakers: 4个扬声器, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, Cyberlink PowerDVD 12, Magix Music Maker Silver, Magix Photo Manager 15, McAfee LiveSafe (试用版), MS Office 365 (试用版), Winzip (试用版), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.8 kg, Power Supply: 362 g
Price
799 Euro
Links
MSI homepage
MSI notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)
331 MBit/s +57%
MSI CX72-7QLi581
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)
211 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)
327 MBit/s 0%
MSI CX72-7QLi581
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (jseb)
326 MBit/s
231
cd/m²		252
cd/m²		286
cd/m²
239
cd/m²		268
cd/m²		301
cd/m²
234
cd/m²		253
cd/m²		296
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LP173WD1-TLF1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 301 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 262.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 77 %
Center on Battery: 268 cd/m²
Contrast: 273:1 (Black: 0.98 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 12.45 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
71% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
46% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
52% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
53% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.03
MSI CX72-7QLi581
TN LED, 1600x900, 17.30		Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.30		Asus F756UX-T7013T
TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.30		Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2
TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.30		Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
TN LED, 1600x900, 17.30
Display
34%
26%
29%
3%
Display P3 Coverage
53
72.3
36%
63.9
21%
68.8
30%
52.4
-1%
sRGB Coverage
70.8
94.8
34%
93.7
32%
90.6
28%
76.1
7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
52
69.3
33%
64.6
24%
66.3
28%
54.2
4%
Response Times
637%
639%
638%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43 ?(22, 21)
43 ?(23, 20)
-0%
42 ?(20, 22)
2%
41 ?(21, 20)
5%
42 ?(22, 30)
2%
Response Time Black / White *
25 ?(7, 18)
22 ?(5, 17)
12%
21 ?(6, 15)
16%
23 ?(6, 17)
8%
24 ?(7, 17)
4%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(50)
1000 ?(90)
1900%
1000 ?(90)
1900%
1000 ?(90)
1900%
Screen
46%
73%
35%
12%
Brightness middle
268
320
19%
268
0%
362
35%
205
-24%
Brightness
262
302
15%
255
-3%
344
31%
182
-31%
Brightness Distribution
77
86
12%
83
8%
84
9%
77
0%
Black Level *
0.98
0.4
59%
0.17
83%
0.57
42%
0.43
56%
Contrast
273
800
193%
1576
477%
635
133%
477
75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
11.26
7.78
31%
7.18
36%
9.54
15%
9.75
13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
17.88
12.74
29%
11.67
35%
16.11
10%
16.02
10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
12.45
8.87
29%
7.97
36%
10.39
17%
12.09
3%
Gamma
2.03 108%
2.27 97%
2.34 94%
2.55 86%
2.62 84%
CCT
12273 53%
8979 72%
8541 76%
11093 59%
12875 50%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
46
62
35%
59
28%
59
28%
49
7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
71
95
34%
94
32%
90
27%
76
7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
239% / 154%
246% / 170%
234% / 147%
6% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 50 Hz ≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5011
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11481
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6732
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
129 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
332 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
67.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
Cinebench R15 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | JetStream 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
131 Points +2%
Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points +1%
MSI CX72-7QLi581
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
118 Points -9%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI CX72-7QLi581
Intel Core i5-7200U
332 Points
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
330 Points -1%
Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2
Intel Core i7-6500U
329 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
292 Points -12%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
Intel Core i5-6200U
289 Points -13%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
3266 Points +11%
MSI CX72-7QLi581
Intel Core i5-7200U
2941 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
2396 Points -19%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
6847 Points +5%
MSI CX72-7QLi581
Intel Core i5-7200U
6537 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
5569 Points -15%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI CX72-7QLi581
Intel Core i5-7200U
3678 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI CX72-7QLi581
Intel Core i5-7200U
7012 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
216.8 Points +2%
MSI CX72-7QLi581
Intel Core i5-7200U
213 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
192.6 Points -10%
Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2
Intel Core i7-6500U
190.9 Points -10%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3586 points
Help
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3734 Points +4%
MSI CX72-7QLi581
GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3586 Points
Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2
GeForce 940M, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3502 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Radeon R5 M330, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3184 Points -11%
Asus F756UX-T7013T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
3162 Points -12%
HD Tune
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
hddimg
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
Transfer Rate Minimum: 44.5 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 119 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 87.6 MB/s
Access Time: 16.6 ms
Burst Rate: 219.7 MB/s
CPU Usage: 2.2 %
MSI CX72-7QLi581
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0		Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Lite-On CV1-8B256		Asus F756UX-T7013T
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680		Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2
Lite-On CV1-8B256		Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
9146%
-6%
7900%
-17%
Read Seq
102.8
520
406%
105.8
3%
473
360%
100.6
-2%
Write Seq
100.2
332.8
232%
105
5%
366.3
266%
96.3
-4%
Read 512
34.83
382.8
999%
33.33
-4%
329.4
846%
28.15
-19%
Write 512
46.87
357.7
663%
39.12
-17%
357.3
662%
43.34
-8%
Read 4k
0.422
32.31
7556%
0.413
-2%
30.83
7206%
0.312
-26%
Write 4k
1.063
85.1
7906%
0.947
-11%
74.8
6937%
0.792
-25%
Read 4k QD32
0.918
277.7
30151%
0.812
-12%
245.1
26599%
0.708
-23%
Write 4k QD32
1.064
269.8
25257%
0.968
-9%
217.3
20323%
0.764
-28%
3DMark 11 Performance
2508 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus F756UX-T7013T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
4083 Points +71%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
2813 Points +18%
MSI CX72-7QLi581
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2387 Points
Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, Intel Core i7-6500U
2376 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U
1518 Points -36%
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 99.9 53.8 45
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) 37.6 34.4 17.8
Dishonored 2 (2016) 18 14.7

Noise Level

Idle
30.9 / 30.9 / 30.9 dB(A)
HDD
31.4 dB(A)
DVD
36.3 / dB(A)
Load
34 / 34.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
Max. Load
 34.8 °C40.1 °C26.8 °C 
 32.7 °C39 °C26.5 °C 
 28.2 °C31.7 °C23.4 °C 
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 31.5 °C
23.6 °C25.1 °C36.6 °C
23 °C24.5 °C30.4 °C
22.8 °C23.4 °C30.2 °C
Maximum: 36.6 °C
Average: 26.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  59.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.7 °C / 89.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.9 °C / -5.3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.335.12532.931.83131.8324036.535.15032.428.9633328.98036.328.810048.32712561.52716052.924.820060.92425062.822.731563.32240069.521.250067.82163074.82080075.919.4100072.718.912507117.7160070.117.820006917.6250071.817.6315068.117.6400071.417.6500073.717.6630070.417.5800071.617.61000071.617.61250069.617.41600059.717.5SPL83.630.6N62.51.5median 69.6median 17.8Delta4.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.5 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.6 / 11 / 11.6 Watt
Load midlight 54 / 61 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)
4h 38min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
6200U, Radeon R5 M330, 41 Wh
406 min +46%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
6500U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
322 min +16%
Acer TravelMate P278-MG-76L2
6500U, GeForce 940M, 37 Wh
297 min +7%
MSI CX72-7QLi581
i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
278 min
Asus F756UX-T7013T
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 38 Wh
217 min -22%

Pros

+ 磨砂屏幕
+ 大量存储空间
+ 可用M.2插槽
+ USB-C

Cons

- 屏幕亮度和对比度均较低
In review: MSI CX72-7QLi581. Test model provided by Notebook.de.
In review: MSI CX72-7QLi581. Test model provided by Notebook.de.

微星CX72-7QLi581是一台为家庭办公用途设计的笔记本电脑。它提供了足以应对日常用途和简单游戏的性能，在运行中也十分安静，不会变得很烫。另外，这台笔记本电脑搭配了1TB硬盘，并可以通过M.2 2280插槽增加一块固态硬盘。由于底盖上设计有维护窗口，升级所需的操作也十分简单。它的键盘可以出色地满足家庭使用需要，电池续航也还不错。我们不太满意的是它的HD+屏幕，它的亮度和对比度都较低。

微星CX72-7QLi581是一台优秀的17.3寸全能型家用设备。这台机型没有突出的优势，但也没有重大的缺陷。

我们最近测试的宏碁 Aspire E5-774G也是一个不错的备选方案。E5-774G-553R机型售价800欧元（约5873人民币），搭配1TB机械硬盘和一块固态硬盘。它提供了更优秀的全高清屏幕以及更强劲的GDDR5版本GeForce 940MX显卡。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。 

MSI CX72-7QLi581 - 11/26/2016 v5.1(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
75 / 98 → 76%
Keyboard
75%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
55 / 81 → 68%
Weight
58 / 20-67 → 81%
Battery
79%
Display
74%
Games Performance
64 / 85 → 76%
Application Performance
78 / 92 → 85%
Temperature
93%
Noise
92 / 95 → 97%
Audio
56%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Average
71%
77%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 微星 CX72-7QLi581 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2016-12- 3 (Update: 2016-12- 3)