联想 C2 智能手机简短评测

Name: Lenovo C2
Brand: Lenovo

价格合理的电池巨擘。联想C2是一个入门级智能手机，将会吸引那些喜欢大容量可拆卸电池、高清显示屏和双卡的低预算客户。由于屏幕，摄像头和电池续航都相当不错，这很合理。但是，它是否也存在不足之处呢？

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 02/19/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Smartphone ARM Android

Test device courtesy of Lenovo Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo C2 (Vibe Series)

Processor

Mediatek MT6735 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Memory

1024 MB

Display

5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容式触控屏, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB

, 5.46 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 毫米耳机插口, Card Reader: microSD 高达32 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计，接近传感器

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40/B41); Bandwidth (Download/Upload): 150Mbps/50Mbps (LTE); SAR value: 0.59 W/kg (head), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 143 x 71.4

Battery

10.5 Wh, 2750 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix AF, LED flash, videos @720p
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 后置扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 电源适配器, USB电缆, McAfee Security, Navigate, SYNCit, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

139 g, Power Supply: 47 g

Price

129 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	313 MBit/s +487%
Lenovo C2 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	53.3 MBit/s
Alcatel Shine Lite Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	42.3 MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AX12
OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	257 MBit/s +409%
Lenovo C2 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	50.5 MBit/s
Alcatel Shine Lite Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46.5 MBit/s -8%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

click to load images


453 cd/m²	438 cd/m²	433 cd/m²
459 cd/m²	458 cd/m²	431 cd/m²
470 cd/m²	461 cd/m²	434 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 470 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 448.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13.51 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 458 cd/m²
Contrast: 1309:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.15

	Lenovo C2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.00	Huawei Y5 II IPS, 1280x720, 5.00	Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 SAMOLED, 800x480, 4.50	Wiko Lenny 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5.00	LG K7 IPS, 854x480, 5.00
Screen		-33%	10%	-13%	-44%
Brightness middle	458	465 2%	301 -34%	374 -18%	308 -33%
Brightness	449	443 -1%	303 -33%	343 -24%	300 -33%
Brightness Distribution	92	90 -2%	91 -1%	85 -8%	93 1%
Black Level *	0.35	0.84 -140%		0.47 -34%	0.26 26%
Contrast	1309	554 -58%		796 -39%	1185 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.5	7.8 -20%	4.9 25%	6 8%	12 -85%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.7	15.7 -34%	7.6 35%	11.9 -2%	25.3 -116%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.7	8.4 -9%	2.5 68%	6.7 13%	15.3 -99%
Gamma	2.15 ^102%	2.07 ^106%	2.02 ^109%	2.19 ^100%	2.15 ^102%
CCT	8518 ^76%	8438 ^77%	6314 ^103%	8073 ^81%	22440 ^29%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 26 ms rise
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	23825 Points
Huawei Y5 II	23795 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	19253 Points -19%
Wiko Lenny 3	25237 Points +6%
LG K7	23997 Points +1%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	424 Points
Huawei Y5 II	561 Points +32%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	1192 Points
Huawei Y5 II	1573 Points +32%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	8.5 fps
Huawei Y5 II	15 fps +76%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	15 fps +76%
Wiko Lenny 3	8 fps -6%
LG K7	10 fps +18%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	5 fps
Huawei Y5 II	8.4 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	5.5 fps +10%
Wiko Lenny 3	4.4 fps -12%
LG K7	4.3 fps -14%

GFXBench 3.0 - on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	3.7 fps
Huawei Y5 II	6.1 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	7.9 fps +114%
Wiko Lenny 3	fps -100%
LG K7	fps -100%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	2.7 fps
Huawei Y5 II	fps -100%
Wiko Lenny 3	fps -100%
LG K7	fps -100%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	1.2 fps
Huawei Y5 II	fps -100%
Wiko Lenny 3	fps -100%
LG K7	fps -100%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	1908 Points
Huawei Y5 II	3237 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	3241 Points +70%
Wiko Lenny 3	2832 Points +48%
LG K7	2553 Points +34%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	147 Points
Huawei Y5 II	183 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	494 Points +236%
Wiko Lenny 3	399 Points +171%
LG K7	350 Points +138%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	826 Points
Huawei Y5 II	1094 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	1019 Points +23%
Wiko Lenny 3	988 Points +20%
LG K7	1011 Points +22%
Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	332 Points
Huawei Y5 II	375 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	546 Points +64%
Wiko Lenny 3	293 Points -12%
LG K7	189 Points -43%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	177 Points
Huawei Y5 II	283 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	199 Points +12%
Wiko Lenny 3	138 Points -22%
LG K7	145 Points -18%
Web (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	9 Points
Huawei Y5 II	10 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	539 Points +5889%
Wiko Lenny 3	632 Points +6922%
LG K7	541 Points +5911%

Legend

Lenovo C2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Y5 II Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 Samsung Exynos 3475 Quad, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Wiko Lenny 3 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

LG K7 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | JetStream 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	2159 Points
Huawei Y5 II	2707 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	2323 Points +8%
Wiko Lenny 3	2133 Points -1%
LG K7	2280 Points +6%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	16585 ms *
Huawei Y5 II	12505 ms * +25%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	16486 ms * +1%
Wiko Lenny 3	14863 ms * +10%
LG K7	14579 ms * +12%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	13.5 Points
Huawei Y5 II	18.47 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	15 Points +11%
Wiko Lenny 3	14.07 Points +4%
LG K7	14.37 Points +6%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	120.7 MB/s
Huawei Y5 II	173.3 MB/s +44%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	164.1 MB/s +36%
Wiko Lenny 3	132.5 MB/s +10%
LG K7	128.2 MB/s +6%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	8 MB/s
Huawei Y5 II	21.6 MB/s +170%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	40.91 MB/s +411%
Wiko Lenny 3	11.6 MB/s +45%
LG K7	8.2 MB/s +3%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	14.5 MB/s
Huawei Y5 II	27.3 MB/s +88%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	17.27 MB/s +19%
Wiko Lenny 3	15.1 MB/s +4%
LG K7	15.63 MB/s +8%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	4.7 MB/s
Huawei Y5 II	6 MB/s +28%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	9.92 MB/s +111%
Wiko Lenny 3	6.2 MB/s +32%
LG K7	5.33 MB/s +13%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	24.2 MB/s
Huawei Y5 II	29.47 MB/s +22%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	64.4 MB/s +166%
Wiko Lenny 3	40.59 MB/s +68%
LG K7	37.84 MB/s +56%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo C2	16.1 MB/s
Huawei Y5 II	18.03 MB/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016	43.56 MB/s +171%
Wiko Lenny 3	19.59 MB/s +22%
LG K7	19.27 MB/s +20%

Max. Load

Idle


33.2 °C	32.6 °C	33.2 °C
34.2 °C	32.8 °C	34.2 °C
34.3 °C	32.7 °C	32.9 °C

Maximum: 34.3 °C
Average: 33.3 °C


32.7 °C	32.7 °C	34.4 °C
32.9 °C	33.5 °C	35 °C
32.2 °C	34.4 °C	36.2 °C

Maximum: 36.2 °C
Average: 33.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.8 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Lenovo C2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Y5 II audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.23 / 0.35 Watt
Idle	0.71 / 1.62 / 1.64 Watt
Load	3.24 / 3.36 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Lenovo C2 2750 mAh	Huawei Y5 II 2200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 2050 mAh	Wiko Lenny 3 2000 mAh	LG K7 2125 mAh
Power Consumption		-4%	28%	-37%	9%
Idle Minimum *	0.71	0.54 24%	0.44 38%	0.76 -7%	0.61 14%
Idle Average *	1.62	1.58 2%	1.1 32%	2.16 -33%	1.36 16%
Idle Maximum *	1.64	1.7 -4%	1.17 29%	2.35 -43%	1.38 16%
Load Average *	3.24	2.98 8%	2.31 29%	4.65 -44%	3.11 4%
Load Maximum *	3.36	4.98 -48%	3.04 10%	5.35 -59%	3.59 -7%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		11h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 47min

	Lenovo C2 2750 mAh	Huawei Y5 II 2200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 2050 mAh	Wiko Lenny 3 2000 mAh	LG K7 2125 mAh
Battery Runtime		-18%	13%	-32%	-14%
WiFi v1.3	662	503 -24%	535 -19%	549 -17%	453 -32%
Load	287	253 -12%	415 45%	155 -46%	299 4%
Reader / Idle		1102	1242	944	1000
H.264			738		311

Pros

+ 体面，坚实的机身

+ 可拆卸电池

+ 电池续航长

+ 明亮的显示效果

+ 良好的灰度和对比度

+ 低发热

+ 双卡和SD卡

+ 准确的触摸屏

+ 优秀的后置摄像头

Cons

- 使用免提时的有杂音

- 薄弱的麦克风质量

- 平庸的视频录制质量

- 屏幕有明显的蓝色光...

- ...和高色偏差

- 系统性能略低于平均水平

In review: Lenovo C2. Review unit provided by Lenovo Germany.

联想的C2不仅是一个电池巨擘：它还提供了一个稳固的机身，能拍摄相当清晰照片的主摄像头与绚丽明亮的屏幕。此外，扬声器不会太差，发热有限，并且电池续航良好。电池也是可拆卸的，所以联想C2可以说是拥有持续作战能力的“猛兽”。所有这些，在某些情况下，可以在网上以不到100欧元（约106美元）的价格获得。

这个智能手机是联想一个真正值得庆贺的成就，虽然存在缺陷，但是它们大多是细节上的：使用免提功能时有可察觉的背景噪声，主摄像头录视频能力远远不如拍照片的能力。在这个价格范围内，SoC比起其他智能手机的功能，有点不够那么强大，而且一些游戏只能在较低的图像质量设置下运行。但总的来说，联想C2可以在速度上跟上与其价格相似的智能手机。只不过存储访问真的很慢...

C2，联想为市场带来了的拥有优秀性价比的智能手机：在摄像，显示和电池续航方面，它远超同类竞争对手。性能的局限使它无法与其他价格更昂贵的设备竞争。

非常好的性价比，使联想C2值得推荐给任何正在寻找续航时间长的入门级智能手机的用户。联想C2目前是这个价格范围内最好的设备之一，前提是你愿意牺牲一点系统性能。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Lenovo C2 - 2017-02-02 02/02/2017 v6^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis

86%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

90%

Connectivity

33 / 60 → 55%

Weight

93%

Battery

94%

Display

84%

Games Performance

6 / 63 → 10%

Application Performance

18 / 70 → 25%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

56 / 91 → 61%

Camera

69%

Average

68%

80%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 C2 智能手机简短评测

Florian Wimmer, 2017-02-19 (Update: 2017-02-27)