Notebookcheck Logo

BlackBerry DTEK60 智能手机简短评测

也许是黑莓的救生艇? 黑莓带来了一台配置出色的Android智能手机DTEK60,同时有着公司以安全著称的良好声誉。但这是否足够拯救黑莓呢?
Android ARM Security Smartphone
BlackBerry DTEK60 (Blackberry Series)
Processor
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 534 PPI, 电容触摸屏, AMOLED, 抗划玻璃 抗油涂层, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.1 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD 最大2TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计, 磁力传感器, 陀螺仪, 距离传感器, 霍尔效应传感器
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B19/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41); Bandwidth (download/​upload): 300Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE); SAR-Value: 1,275 W/kg (Head), 1,988 W/kg , LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7 x 153.9 x 75.4
Battery
13.2 Wh, 3000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 26 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 336 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 21 MPix f2.0, 双LED闪光灯, 4K@30 fps录像
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 84 ˚ 广角, 1080p HD@30 fps录像
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 充电器, USB 线缆, 耳机, BlackBerry Hub, BlackBerry Calendar, BlackBerry Contacts, BlackBerry Notes, BlackBerry Tasks, BlackBerry Camera, BBM®, DTEK™ by BlackBerry®, BlackBerry Device Search, BlackBerry Launcher, BlackBerry Services, BlackBerry Support, BlackBerry Pass, 24 Months Warranty, QuickCharge 3.0, fanless
Weight
165 g, Power Supply: 49 g
Price
579 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

158.2 mm 77.9 mm 7.3 mm 188 g154.7 mm 75.7 mm 8.5 mm 168 g153.9 mm 75.4 mm 7 mm 165 g152.7 mm 74.7 mm 7.35 mm 161 g152.3 mm 75.3 mm 6.98 mm 162 g150.9 mm 72.6 mm 7.7 mm 157 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
435 MBit/s +140%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s +85%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
323 MBit/s +78%
BlackBerry DTEK60
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
181 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
515 MBit/s +69%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
320 MBit/s +5%
BlackBerry DTEK60
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s -8%
GPS BlackBerry DTEK60 – Overview
GPS BlackBerry DTEK60 – Overview
GPS BlackBerry DTEK60 – Intersection
GPS BlackBerry DTEK60 – Intersection
GPS BlackBerry DTEK60 – Bridge
GPS BlackBerry DTEK60 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Intersection
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Intersection
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
577
cd/m²
594
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
598
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
655
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 655 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 608.1 cd/m² Minimum: 6.73 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 590 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 1.88
BlackBerry DTEK60
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50
Google Pixel XL 2016
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Huawei P9 Plus
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50
Screen
4%
2%
37%
-9%
34%
Brightness middle
590
402
-32%
419
-29%
557
-6%
361
-39%
554
-6%
Brightness
608
408
-33%
431
-29%
553
-9%
366
-40%
552
-9%
Brightness Distribution
88
85
-3%
84
-5%
97
10%
87
-1%
96
9%
Black Level *
0.35
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.6
4
39%
4.1
38%
1.4
79%
5.1
23%
1.59
76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
14.3
10.1
29%
12
16%
3.1
78%
10
30%
2.56
82%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.3
3.2
26%
3.3
23%
1.3
70%
5.5
-28%
2.01
53%
Gamma
1.88 117%
2.19 100%
2.1 105%
2.21 100%
2.24 98%
2.01 109%
CCT
6966 93%
7037 92%
6550 99%
6667 97%
7388 88%
6321 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.38
63.1
82.12
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99.83
99.98
Contrast
1591

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238.1 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
134232 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
138641 Points +3%
OnePlus 3
142090 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points +23%
Huawei P9 Plus
98413 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points -4%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
1513 Points
OnePlus 3
1754 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3476 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1840 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
4167 Points
OnePlus 3
4097 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
5630 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
5503 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
29651 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
27766 Points -6%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
37746 Points +27%
Huawei P9 Plus
19936 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
33037 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
32652 Points -1%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
63386 Points +92%
Huawei P9 Plus
21807 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
21822 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
18222 Points -16%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
15626 Points -28%
Huawei P9 Plus
15331 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
2666 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
3180 Points +19%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points +28%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3034 Points +14%
Huawei P9 Plus
1188 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (2421min) Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
4466 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
3935 Points -12%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
4235 Points -5%
Huawei P9 Plus
1042 Points -77%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (2895min) Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
1106 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
1902 Points +72%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points +62%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1522 Points +38%
Huawei P9 Plus
2336 Points +111%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (1539min) Points +81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
2265 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
2560 Points +13%
OnePlus 3
2571 Points +14%
Huawei P9 Plus
952 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (1923min) Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
2837 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
2820 Points -1%
OnePlus 3
2864 Points +1%
Huawei P9 Plus
807 Points -72%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (2043min) Points -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
1328 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
1935 Points +46%
OnePlus 3
1892 Points +42%
Huawei P9 Plus
2547 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (1594min) Points +60%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
4589 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
4739 Points +3%
OnePlus 3
7101 Points +55%
Huawei P9 Plus
7159 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points +2%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
2141 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
2378 Points +11%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points +17%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points +45%
Huawei P9 Plus
2019 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points -3%
System (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
2897 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
3889 Points +34%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points +22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points +127%
Huawei P9 Plus
3932 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points +41%
Memory (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
1642 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
1677 Points +2%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points +25%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points -20%
Huawei P9 Plus
2667 Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points +26%
Graphics (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
4763 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
5017 Points +5%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points +44%
Huawei P9 Plus
1512 Points -68%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points -54%
Web (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
927 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
977 Points +5%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points +20%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points +66%
Huawei P9 Plus
1049 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points +7%

Legend

 
BlackBerry DTEK60 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
9473 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
8690 Points -8%
OnePlus 3
9155 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
26053 Points +175%
Huawei P9 Plus
12058 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13191 Points +39%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
2880 ms *
Google Pixel XL 2016
2654 ms * +8%
OnePlus 3
2921 ms * -1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1103 ms * +62%
Huawei P9 Plus
2792 ms * +3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2564 ms * +11%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
119 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
126 Points +6%
OnePlus 3
122 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
204 Points +71%
Huawei P9 Plus
130 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
163 Points +37%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
55.2 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
55.4 Points 0%
OnePlus 3
54.4 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
168.1 Points +205%
Huawei P9 Plus
70 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
75.1 Points +36%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
257.4 MB/s
Google Pixel XL 2016
258.2 MB/s 0%
OnePlus 3
408.7 MB/s +59%
Huawei P9 Plus
284.3 MB/s +10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
487.3 MB/s +89%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
79 MB/s
Google Pixel XL 2016
83.4 MB/s +6%
OnePlus 3
153.3 MB/s +94%
Huawei P9 Plus
140.4 MB/s +78%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
145.1 MB/s +84%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
43.1 MB/s
Google Pixel XL 2016
87.7 MB/s +103%
OnePlus 3
137.6 MB/s +219%
Huawei P9 Plus
39.33 MB/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
86.7 MB/s +101%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
15.1 MB/s
Google Pixel XL 2016
14.56 MB/s -4%
OnePlus 3
18.23 MB/s +21%
Huawei P9 Plus
51.2 MB/s +239%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15.79 MB/s +5%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
78.8 MB/s
Huawei P9 Plus
62.5 MB/s -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
76.4 MB/s -3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
BlackBerry DTEK60
58.5 MB/s
Huawei P9 Plus
24.95 MB/s -57%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
50.4 MB/s -14%
Max. Load
 42.1 °C42.6 °C36.9 °C 
 40.9 °C41.9 °C36.3 °C 
 39.9 °C40.1 °C36.1 °C 
Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 39.6 °C
35.2 °C40.6 °C42.4 °C
34.3 °C37.8 °C42.5 °C
34.6 °C38 °C39 °C
Maximum: 42.5 °C
Average: 38.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.638.52525.434.33125.330.44032.937.25033.644.76331.637.58028.431.21002733.312520.838.5160224420021.346.225020.850.331521.256.340019.459.250019.561.863017.766.280017.969.5100017.873.8125017.375.1160017.472.8200016.771.6250017.272.9315018.273.7400017.972.8500017.673.3630017.774.8800017.871.11000017.962.21250018.153.61600018.255SPL3084.4N1.360median 17.9median 66.2Delta1.49.840.136.832.440.1382731.33834.330.631.734.334.529.72634.544.138.139.444.140.529.736.240.53331.428.63326.827.625.426.826.924.421.326.93724.823.33745.529.522.545.551.636.222.451.657.341.721.357.359.746.618.459.766.452.517.566.468.45217.568.469.952.517.269.971.853.816.871.872.554.817.372.575.256.917.475.278.459.716.678.477.659.717.377.678.260.817.678.281.363.817.681.378.561.817.778.575.958.817.475.976.259.417.776.274.357.517.974.370.354.818.170.354.437.618.154.488.671.129.888.67325.81.373median 71.8median 53.8median 17.7median 71.810.910.71.710.926.428.426.42826.72825.828.725.829.133.229.126.12626.123.925.523.927.724.727.733.426.933.441.53741.540.320.240.343.720.243.745.521.845.547224752.822.252.860.121.860.166.517.266.569.217.869.271.619.871.669.919.169.96815.46869.515.669.56614.96671.514.771.571.214.271.272.21472.271.213.971.26713.86758.913.958.952.413.952.454.713.754.781.529.581.549.91.349.9median 66median 17.2median 6610.13.810.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBlackBerry DTEK60OnePlus 3Apple iPhone 7 Plus
BlackBerry DTEK60 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.24 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.13 / 1.2 Watt
Load midlight 6.52 / 9.75 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
BlackBerry DTEK60
3000 mAh
Google Pixel XL 2016
3450 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Power Consumption
17%
-1%
-28%
7%
5%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.53
24%
0.57
19%
0.77
-10%
0.87
-24%
0.63
10%
Idle Average *
1.13
1.07
5%
1.24
-10%
2.04
-81%
1.2
-6%
1.1
3%
Idle Maximum *
1.2
1.12
7%
1.36
-13%
2.24
-87%
1.27
-6%
1.56
-30%
Load Average *
6.52
5.53
15%
5.92
9%
4.69
28%
4.69
28%
5.95
9%
Load Maximum *
9.75
6.26
36%
10.53
-8%
8.66
11%
5.63
42%
6.7
31%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
22h 36min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 38min
BlackBerry DTEK60
3000 mAh
Google Pixel XL 2016
3450 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-17%
9%
3%
-2%
28%
Reader / Idle
1356
1333
-2%
1338
-1%
1835
35%
1446
7%
1663
23%
H.264
809
505
-38%
847
5%
813
0%
776
-4%
914
13%
WiFi v1.3
779
505
-35%
840
8%
587
-25%
530
-32%
732
-6%
Load
218
230
6%
268
23%
225
3%
263
21%
392
80%

Pros

+ 高亮度屏幕
+ 广色域
+ 出色的相机
+ 高音量扬声器
+ 附加安全功能
+ 长电池续航
+ 高可靠性配置
+ USB-OTG 功能
+ 准确触控
+ 印象深刻的系统性能
+ 低发热

Cons

- 相对较低的Wi-Fi速速
- 有点不准确的GPS
- 平均水平的色彩准确度
- 低储存访问速度
- 部分应用无法启动或崩溃
- 高负载下高耗能
Review: BlackBerry DTEK60. Test device provided by
Review: BlackBerry DTEK60. Test device provided by

黑莓从最近的失败中得到了经验,推出了新手机DTEK60,它在一个合理的价位上有着超出平均水平的表现。在一个抵抗网络攻击不论对个人或是公司都至关重要的时代,DTEK60增强了的安全保护毫无疑问成为了它的闪光点。

黑莓已经转向Android而不是自有的系统,这可能会让一些铁杆粉丝失望,但在品牌的市场占有率急剧下降的情况下,的确是合情合理的举动。黑莓对于原生系统只做出了很少的修改,包括提供了一些预装应用一集很少但是很好的系统增强。

手机本身毫无疑问有着出色的性能表现,坚固且吸引人的外壳设计,以及令人印象深刻的高音量扬声器。此外,电池续航能力足够支撑一整天的使用,成像效果出色。其高亮度及显著的高色域AMOLED屏幕可以说是一个真正的亮点。

但在另一方面,存储访问速度以及Wi-Fi速度偏慢,但这仅仅是一个小缺陷。更大的问题出现在应用程序的使用上。由于增强的安全措施倾向于限制应用程序的权限,导致一些应用崩溃。

考虑到DTEK60出色的配置,合理的价格,以及众多的出彩点,它的确有成为黑莓的救生艇的潜力。

除了企业市场之外,DTEK60也可以吸引到个人用户,特别是那些追求出色的多媒体表现以及安全性的用户。在经过几年不太成功的产品之后,DTEK60肯定能够为黑莓带来一些改观,但能否在销量上得到改善还有待观察。

 

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

BlackBerry DTEK60 - 12/05/2016 v5.1(old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
70 / 75 → 94%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
47 / 60 → 79%
Weight
91%
Battery
95%
Display
83%
Games Performance
67 / 63 → 100%
Application Performance
56 / 70 → 80%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
74%
Average
78%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > BlackBerry DTEK60 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2017-01- 7 (Update: 2017-01- 7)