荣耀 5X 智能手机简短评测

Name: Honor 5X
Brand: Honor

直销金属。 华为的直销品牌荣耀一直在性价比上十分出色。这次进入我们实验室的是采用金属机身和高品质相机的荣耀5X。让我们看看这台智能手机的细节是不是也可以让人满意。

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 03/15/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Honor Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor 5X (5 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 8 x 1.7 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 405

Memory

2048 MB

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, 电容式, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 9.67 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频插口, Card Reader: micro-SD 读卡器最大支持 128 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 运动传感器，近距传感器，光线传感器，指南针，指纹识别器

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 151.3 x 76.3

Battery

11 Wh, 3000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Android 5.1 Lollipop

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix 自动对焦, LED闪光灯, 视频拍摄@1080p/30FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 扬声器位于底部边缘, Keyboard: 触控键盘, 电源适配器，USB数据线, HonorClub, HiCare, 电话管理器, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

158 g, Power Supply: 51 g

Price

229 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Honor 5X Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Samsung Galaxy J5 OnePlus X DIN A6 ❌

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


475 cd/m²	499 cd/m²	538 cd/m²
500 cd/m²	535 cd/m²	554 cd/m²
509 cd/m²	522 cd/m²	559 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 559 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 521.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.84 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 535 cd/m²
Contrast: 1244:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.26

	Honor 5X Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Screen		-32%	20%	-4%	-8%
Brightness middle	535	312 -42%	467 -13%	418 -22%	349 -35%
Brightness	521	314 -40%	460 -12%	407 -22%	353 -32%
Brightness Distribution	85	91 7%	95 12%	95 12%	93 9%
Black Level *	0.43		0.3 30%	0.49 -14%
Contrast	1244		1557 25%	853 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.88	6.28 -29%	3.28 33%	3.92 20%	5.22 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.66
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.2	8.24 -58%	1.89 64%	3.81 27%	3.96 24%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.12 ^104%	2.21 ^100%	2.27 ^97%	2.08 ^106%
CCT	7766 ^84%	8145 ^80%	6734 ^97%	7361 ^88%	7308 ^89%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17909 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	698 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	464 Points -34%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	526 Points -25%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	3047 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	1403 Points -54%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	1561 Points -49%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	37152 Points
OnePlus X	52463 Points +41%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 5X	5.9 fps
OnePlus X	10 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3.8 fps -36%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	3.8 fps -36%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3.7 fps -37%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5X	5.4 fps
OnePlus X	8.6 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy J5	1.8 fps -67%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	1.8 fps -67%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	1.7 fps -69%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5X	14 fps
OnePlus X	23 fps +64%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	9.2 fps -34%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	9.5 fps -32%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5X	14 fps
OnePlus X	21 fps +50%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	5.2 fps -63%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	5.3 fps -62%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 5X	129 Points
OnePlus X	710 Points +450%
Samsung Galaxy J5	53 Points -59%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	52 Points -60%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	49 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	103 Points
OnePlus X	643 Points +524%
Samsung Galaxy J5	42 Points -59%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	41 Points -60%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	39 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	1089 Points
OnePlus X	1117 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy J5	734 Points -33%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	733 Points -33%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	758 Points -30%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	9609 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	5227 Points -46%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	5298 Points -45%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	10045 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	4692 Points -53%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	4712 Points -53%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	8343 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	8697 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	9385 Points +12%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	5551 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	2631 Points -53%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	2580 Points -54%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	5056 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	2193 Points -57%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	2135 Points -58%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	8445 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5	8732 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	9544 Points +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	7852 Points
OnePlus X	15051 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy J5	4345 Points -45%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	4402 Points -44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	7764 Points
OnePlus X	14541 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3782 Points -51%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3789 Points -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	8174 Points
OnePlus X	17156 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy J5	9079 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	10148 Points +24%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 5X	297 Points
OnePlus X	1252 Points +322%
Samsung Galaxy J5	534 Points +80%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	646 Points +118%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	515 Points +73%
System (sort by value)
Honor 5X	1378 Points
OnePlus X	2225 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy J5	1058 Points -23%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	1077 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	1166 Points -15%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 5X	787 Points
OnePlus X	662 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy J5	399 Points -49%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	797 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	394 Points -50%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5X	763 Points
OnePlus X	1975 Points +159%
Samsung Galaxy J5	314 Points -59%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	316 Points -59%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	315 Points -59%
Web (sort by value)
Honor 5X	9 Points
OnePlus X	843 Points +9267%
Samsung Galaxy J5	615 Points +6733%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	643 Points +7044%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	484 Points +5278%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	3794 Points
OnePlus X	4450 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3966 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3701 Points -2%

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Honor 5X	144 MB/s
OnePlus X	235.5 MB/s +64%
Samsung Galaxy J5	145.5 MB/s +1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	131.4 MB/s -9%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Honor 5X	78 MB/s
OnePlus X	49.31 MB/s -37%
Samsung Galaxy J5	39.4 MB/s -49%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	22.33 MB/s -71%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Honor 5X	17 MB/s
OnePlus X	16.31 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy J5	19.25 MB/s +13%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	22.79 MB/s +34%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Honor 5X	10 MB/s
OnePlus X	14.22 MB/s +42%
Samsung Galaxy J5	7.2 MB/s -28%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	5.11 MB/s -49%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Honor 5X	12510 ms *
OnePlus X	7264 ms * +42%
Samsung Galaxy J5	14074 ms * -13%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	14680 ms * -17%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	11843 ms * +5%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	3595 Points
OnePlus X	4810 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy J5	3038 Points -15%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL	3012 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	3296 Points -8%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X	21.92 Points
OnePlus X	28 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy J5	18.42 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	20.83 Points -5%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Honor 5X	65 Points
OnePlus X	85 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy J5	52 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541	52 Points -20%

Legend

Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	21 fps
	very low	35 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	32 fps

Max. Load

Idle


41.2 °C	38.4 °C	38.4 °C
41.6 °C	38.1 °C	35.8 °C
39.7 °C	37.3 °C	37.5 °C

Maximum: 41.6 °C
Average: 38.7 °C


35.6 °C	37.3 °C	37.5 °C
35.6 °C	37.1 °C	37 °C
35.3 °C	36.9 °C	36.3 °C

Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 36.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 35.9 °C | Room Temperature 22.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.13 / 0.3 Watt
Idle	0.87 / 2.08 / 2.22 Watt
Load	5.26 / 6.34 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		17h 33min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 24min

	Honor 5X Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime		24%	38%	27%	-58%
Reader / Idle	1053	968 -8%	1292 23%	1364 30%
H.264	602	514 -15%	657 9%	677 12%
WiFi v1.3	643	549 -15%	495 -23%	526 -18%	267 -58%
Load	144	339 135%	350 143%	264 83%

Pros

+ 高品质金属机身

+ 高性价比

+ 无线上网测试中的电池续航长

+ 发热量低

+ 屏幕明亮

+ 新颖的软件系统

+ 不错的相机

+ 双SIM卡

+ 指纹识别器

Cons

- 一般的GPS信号接收

- 通话品质低

- 扬声器品质低

- 负载下功耗高

- 负载下续航短

In review: Honor 5X. Test model courtesy of Honor Germany.

华为设计了一款十分不错的设备。它经典的机身中搭载了高性能的组件，售价却毫不夸张。它的软件系统也新颖兼顾实用，相机可以拍摄不错的照片，同时有24个月的保修。

荣耀5X售价如此低当然也难以避免有不少缺点：通话质量差，扬声器一般，GPS信号不稳定。不过它的优质机身和明亮屏幕可以弥补这些缺憾。

荣耀5X的另外一个弱点是负载下的电池续航，让我们对它有些动摇。另一方面，这款智能手机的很多地方都让我们十分着迷：首先当然是售价。另外，如果消费者愿意多划出一些预算，避免荣耀5X的弱点的话也可以选择去年的机型，它的性能甚至更高。

对售价敏感的用户可以参考荣耀5X，它在这个价位上提供了很多独特的功能（屏幕尺寸，性能，机身品质）。可以接受更高价位机型的用户可以找到更多值得考虑的设备。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Honor 5X - 2016-03-07 03/07/2016 v5^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis

83%

Keyboard

70 / 75 → 93%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

42 / 60 → 70%

Weight

92%

Battery

92%

Display

86%

Games Performance

13 / 63 → 20%

Application Performance

30 / 70 → 43%

Temperature

87%

Noise

100%

Audio

53 / 91 → 58%

Camera

75%

Average

70%

84%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Read about the changes in the new rating version 5

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 荣耀 5X 智能手机简短评测

Florian Wimmer, 2016-03-15 (Update: 2016-03-19)