Notebookcheck Logo

惠普 15-ay116ng Notebook Review

惊喜。 惠普15-ay116ng售价500欧元(约3692人民币),对于一台简单办公笔记本电脑来说并不算低。不过这台设备也带来了很多:一颗Kaby Lake处理器,一块全高清屏幕和一块固态硬盘。除此之外还有非常优秀的电池续航时间和低运行噪音。
Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows
HP 15-ay116ng (15 dw000 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 620, Core: 1000 MHz, 单通道, 21.20.16.4542
Memory
4 GB 
, DDR4-2134, 单通道
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics, TN LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, 256 GB 
, 190 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC282 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0
Networking
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8101/2/3 Family Fast Ethernet NIC (10/100MBit/s), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0
Optical drive
HP DVDRW GUD1N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 24.3 x 384.3 x 254.6
Battery
41 Wh Lithium-Ion, removeable
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, Cyberlink Power Media Player 14, Cyberlink PowerDirector 14, McAfee LiveSafe (试用版), MS Office (试用版), 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.04 kg, Power Supply: 295 g
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
 
155.7 MB/s +601%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
 
23.7 MB/s +7%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
 
22.7 MB/s +2%
Dell Latitude 15-3570
 
22.24 MB/s 0%
HP 15-ay116ng
 
22.2 MB/s
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
 
15.35 MB/s -31%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414
 
234 MB/s +757%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
 
27.7 MB/s +1%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
 
27.5 MB/s +1%
HP 15-ay116ng
 
27.3 MB/s
Dell Latitude 15-3570
 
24.15 MB/s -12%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
125 MBit/s +172%
HP 15-ay116ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (jseb)
46 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
274 MBit/s +417%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
89 MBit/s +68%
HP 15-ay116ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (jseb)
53 MBit/s
229
cd/m²
235
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
231
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
222
cd/m²
243
cd/m²
224
cd/m²
240
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 249 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 233.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 241 cd/m²
Contrast: 566:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.71 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 13.13 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.34% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.57
HP 15-ay116ng
TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
TN, 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60
Dell Latitude 15-3570
TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60
Display
-2%
9%
0%
9%
Display P3 Coverage
37.34
36.51
-2%
40.71
9%
37.24
0%
40.61
9%
sRGB Coverage
56.2
55
-2%
61.1
9%
56
0%
61.1
9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
38.58
37.72
-2%
42.07
9%
38.48
0%
41.96
9%
Response Times
2%
-33%
-31%
-27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 ?(20, 20, Plateau)
40 ?(20, 20)
-0%
52 ?(28, 24)
-30%
58 ?(27, 31)
-45%
37 ?(13, 24)
7%
Response Time Black / White *
23 ?(7, 16, Plateau)
22 ?(6, 16)
4%
31 ?(14, 17)
-35%
27 ?(10, 17)
-17%
37 ?(20, 17)
-61%
PWM Frequency
1000
Screen
-4%
-0%
-7%
-11%
Brightness middle
249
219
-12%
211
-15%
204
-18%
202
-19%
Brightness
234
222
-5%
200
-15%
198
-15%
211
-10%
Brightness Distribution
89
85
-4%
83
-7%
85
-4%
88
-1%
Black Level *
0.44
0.39
11%
0.43
2%
0.48
-9%
0.62
-41%
Contrast
566
562
-1%
491
-13%
425
-25%
326
-42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
11.71
12.67
-8%
10.53
10%
11.62
1%
12.35
-5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
19.51
20.99
-8%
17.79
9%
19.97
-2%
19.9
-2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
13.13
13.82
-5%
11.85
10%
12.3
6%
13.46
-3%
Gamma
2.57 86%
2.63 84%
2.25 98%
2.22 99%
2.44 90%
CCT
15273 43%
15633 42%
13758 47%
13244 49%
15217 43%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36
35
-3%
39
8%
36
0%
39
8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
56
55
-2%
61
9%
56
0%
61
9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / -3%
-8% / -3%
-13% / -9%
-10% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7753
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11342
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4991
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
30.18 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.67 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.44 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
34.93 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
325 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
122 Points
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP 15-ay116ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
122 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points -5%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points -5%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
87 Points -29%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
82 Points -33%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
74 Points -39%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
52 Points -57%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP 15-ay116ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
325 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel Core i5-6200U
290 Points -11%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
288 Points -11%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
261 Points -20%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
208 Points -36%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
195 Points -40%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
174 Points -46%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP 15-ay116ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
11342 Points
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
9080 Points -20%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
6927 Points -39%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
6385 Points -44%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
4428 Points -61%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP 15-ay116ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
4991 Points
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
3505 Points -30%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
3133 Points -37%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
2325 Points -53%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
1642 Points -67%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
HP 15-ay116ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
2907 Points
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
2228 Points -23%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
1944 Points -33%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
1928 Points -34%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP 15-ay116ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6488 Points
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
5144 Points -21%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
4550 Points -30%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
4075 Points -37%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP 15-ay116ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
3672 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP 15-ay116ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6825 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP 15-ay116ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
221.5 Points
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
160.6 Points -27%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
151.9 Points -31%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
132.7 Points -40%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
109.9 Points -50%
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE
AMD A8-7410
71.2 Points -68%
Octane V2 - Total Score
HP 15-ay116ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
32838 Points
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
19299 Points -41%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
15801 Points -52%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
14188 Points -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
2390 ms * -106%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ
AMD A10-8700P
2267 ms * -96%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel Core i3-5005U
1832 ms * -58%
HP 15-ay116ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
1159 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
4977 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3315 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4338 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4587 points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 15-3570
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
3337 Points +1%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3317 Points 0%
HP 15-ay116ng
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
3315 Points
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
HD Graphics 5500, 5005U, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)
2980 Points -10%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
2834 Points -15%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP 15-ay116ng
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
4587 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
4477 Points -2%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
4343 Points -5%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
HD Graphics 5500, 5005U, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)
3923 Points -14%
Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
Sequential Read: 501 MB/s
Sequential Write: 483.9 MB/s
512K Read: 413.8 MB/s
512K Write: 294.9 MB/s
4K Read: 34.91 MB/s
4K Write: 95.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 370.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 243.6 MB/s
HP 15-ay116ng
Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Toshiba MQ01ABF050
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-21%
-92%
-92%
-56%
Read Seq
501
509
2%
104.7
-79%
102.5
-80%
453.2
-10%
Write Seq
483.9
322.1
-33%
95.7
-80%
90.7
-81%
137.7
-72%
Read 512
413.8
321.2
-22%
33
-92%
32.58
-92%
308.5
-25%
Write 512
294.9
289.4
-2%
38.3
-87%
35.65
-88%
134.1
-55%
Read 4k
34.91
20.99
-40%
0.375
-99%
0.426
-99%
19.06
-45%
Write 4k
95.7
88
-8%
0.782
-99%
0.64
-99%
21.31
-78%
Read 4k QD32
370.9
141.3
-62%
0.675
-100%
0.987
-100%
93.5
-75%
Write 4k QD32
243.6
228.5
-6%
0.769
-100%
0.645
-100%
23.3
-90%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
8012 points
3DMark 11 Performance
1511 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
49743 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5542 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
744 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P
2210 Points +59%
HP ProBook 470 G3
AMD Radeon R7 M340, Intel Core i7-6500U
2151 Points +54%
HP 15-ay116ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1394 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1273 Points -9%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1257 Points -10%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1162 Points -17%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i3-5005U
968 Points -31%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP 15-ay116ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6876 Points
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
6314 Points -8%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P
6127 Points -11%
HP ProBook 470 G3
AMD Radeon R7 M340, Intel Core i7-6500U
6125 Points -11%
Dell Latitude 15-3570
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
5909 Points -14%
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i3-5005U
5097 Points -26%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP ProBook 470 G3
AMD Radeon R7 M340, Intel Core i7-6500U
1212 Points +51%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, AMD A10-9600P
1205 Points +50%
HP 15-ay116ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
802 Points
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i3-5005U
578 Points -28%
low med. high ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 67.6 33.9 19.5 9.6
BioShock Infinite (2013) 45.3 25.3 20.9 6.5
Battlefield 4 (2013) 31.1 24.9 16.4 5

Noise Level

Idle
31.3 / 31.3 / 31.3 dB(A)
DVD
38.4 / dB(A)
Load
35.6 / 36.15 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
HP 15-ay116ng
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
6200U, HD Graphics 520
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
5005U, HD Graphics 5500
Dell Latitude 15-3570
6200U, HD Graphics 520
Noise
-8%
-1%
-1%
2%
off / environment *
30.5
31.6
-4%
31.2
-2%
31.2
-2%
31
-2%
Idle Minimum *
31.3
34.5
-10%
31.5
-1%
32.5
-4%
31
1%
Idle Average *
31.3
34.5
-10%
31.9
-2%
32.5
-4%
31
1%
Idle Maximum *
31.3
34.5
-10%
31.9
-2%
32.7
-4%
31
1%
Load Average *
35.6
39
-10%
34.2
4%
34.2
4%
34.2
4%
Load Maximum *
36.15
38.3
-6%
36.8
-2%
34.6
4%
34.3
5%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 32.5 °C33.8 °C23.6 °C 
 31.2 °C33 °C23.5 °C 
 29 °C31.9 °C24.4 °C 
Maximum: 33.8 °C
Average: 29.2 °C
22.9 °C33.8 °C36.6 °C
23.3 °C31 °C36.4 °C
22.5 °C32.8 °C29.9 °C
Maximum: 36.6 °C
Average: 29.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.4 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-4.2 °C / -7.5 F).
HP 15-ay116ng
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
6200U, HD Graphics 520
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
5005U, HD Graphics 5500
Dell Latitude 15-3570
6200U, HD Graphics 520
Heat
7%
-14%
-5%
-27%
Maximum Upper Side *
33.8
31.1
8%
33.2
2%
34.6
-2%
36.1
-7%
Maximum Bottom *
36.6
31.8
13%
37.3
-2%
35.6
3%
47
-28%
Idle Upper Side *
23.6
22.9
3%
28.7
-22%
26.7
-13%
31.7
-34%
Idle Bottom *
23.8
22.6
5%
32
-34%
26
-9%
32.9
-38%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.634.635.6253939.6393145.439.945.44037.135.237.15035.332.335.36329.628.229.68028262810028.92628.912532.225.432.216027.723.327.720028.723.828.725047.322.747.33156021.66040061.820.261.850057.419.657.463060.818.660.880066.518.666.5100065.11865.1125064.717.464.7160064.817.964.820006917.569250070.217.870.2315070.117.970.1400075.21875.2500073.318.373.3630068.318.468.3800071.418.471.41000072.718.472.71250071.118.271.11600063.818.463.8SPL82.130.582.1N50.61.450.6median 64.8median 18.4median 64.8Delta10.11.110.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP 15-ay116ngApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HP 15-ay116ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.34 / 0.35 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.2 / 6.3 / 7.4 Watt
Load midlight 24 / 29 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP 15-ay116ng
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
6200U, HD Graphics 520
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
5005U, HD Graphics 5500
Dell Latitude 15-3570
6200U, HD Graphics 520
Power Consumption
0%
-54%
-20%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
3.2
3.6
-13%
5.8
-81%
5.5
-72%
4.9
-53%
Idle Average *
6.3
6
5%
12.6
-100%
7.6
-21%
7.2
-14%
Idle Maximum *
7.4
6.4
14%
12.8
-73%
8.5
-15%
7.5
-1%
Load Average *
24
26
-8%
27.6
-15%
24.5
-2%
25.4
-6%
Load Maximum *
29
28.1
3%
30
-3%
25.4
12%
28
3%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
14h 29min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)
6h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 10min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 27min
HP 15-ay116ng
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE
5005U, HD Graphics 5500, 32 Wh
Dell Latitude 15-3570
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-24%
-28%
43%
Reader / Idle
869
634
-27%
1024
18%
H.264
430
313
-27%
WiFi v1.3
412
347
-16%
315
-24%
295
-28%
542
32%
Load
87
109
25%
157
80%

Pros

+ 磨砂屏幕
+ 全高清屏幕
+ 高速固态硬盘
+ 优秀电池续航

Cons

- 仅高速以太网卡
- 仅一年质保
- 不支持USB-C
- 无维护底盖
- 不支持无线AC标准
- 无线网络模组数据传输率低
In review: HP 15-ay116ng. Test model provided by Cyberport.de
In review: HP 15-ay116ng. Test model provided by Cyberport.de

惠普的这台15.6寸笔记本电脑给我们带来了十分优秀的整体印象。由于搭配了Kaby Lake处理器,它可以适合大部分常见用途的需要——不管是现在还是数年之后。用户也可以更换固态硬盘,不过这需要打开机身才可以实现。它搭配的硬盘可以满足日常使用的需要。同时它也提供了十分优秀的电池续航。磨砂屏幕具备全高清分辨率,不过亮度较低且对比度十分不足。另外它的可视角度也不太稳定。不过,考虑到价位,这块屏幕也不算是无法接受。

15-ay116ng是惠普为产品线增加的一台全功能型办公笔记本电脑,它提供了十分优秀的性价比。

这台笔记本电脑的价签为500欧元(约3592人民币)。大部分的成本都用在了处理器,屏幕和固态硬盘上。这意味着其他部分它都节省了预算:这台笔记本电脑只有一年的质保,就算是在实惠型设备中,两年质保也是近年来的标准。另外,它仅搭配了高速以太网接口。如果千兆以太网对你来说不可或缺的话,就需要另外看看别的设备了。这台设备的无线网卡也不支持高速AC标准。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

HP 15-ay116ng - 11/25/2016 v5.1(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
76 / 98 → 77%
Keyboard
75%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
38 / 80 → 47%
Weight
63 / 20-67 → 91%
Battery
89%
Display
76%
Games Performance
55 / 68 → 80%
Application Performance
85 / 92 → 92%
Temperature
95%
Noise
91%
Audio
53%
Camera
35 / 85 → 42%
Average
70%
78%
Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普 15-ay116ng Notebook Review
Sascha Mölck, 2016-12- 6 (Update: 2016-12- 7)